City
A CN Tower-less Toronto
The CN Tower - it's Toronto's most iconic and unavoidable building. Ever since its completion in 1976, the Tower has not only dominated the city's skyline, but at just over 553 metres, it's been a ubiquitous presence in general. And with this in mind, I've often wondered what the city might look like without it.
In fact, it was a tragedy that got me dwelling on this hypothetical scenario. After a 2002 visit to the former World Trade Center site in New York City, I couldn't help but imagine what the loss of the CN Tower would mean to my city's physical and psychological landscape.
With a brief exception when the so-called Toronto 18 were alleged to have plotted to take down the Tower, these ominous thoughts eventually faded from mind. And yet, every time I would take a photograph that included the CN Tower, it would again spark a curiosity about what the city would look like in its absence.
So, after becoming relatively proficient with the digital manipulation of photographs, I decided to go ahead and remove the Tower from a few. Liking what I saw, I proceeded to do a more extended series, of which these are some of my favourites. All of the photographs here depict a scene of the city in which the Tower is included in so-called real life.
I once heard that the 19th century French writer Guy de Maupassant hated the Eiffel Tower so much that he ate his lunch there everyday so as not to have to see it. Personally I've always been ambivalent about Toronto's most famous landmark. Sometimes I think it's quite cool, and at others, I think its vaguely 'futuristic' appearance is annoying to have to look at everyday.
Perhaps more than anything, these images were a way of asking a question about my photographic relationship to the city. I've often felt limited when continually shooting Toronto, thinking there's little left for me to contribute to the wealth of images others have shot. And, to a great extent, these images were originally quite clichéd and even touristy.
But, post-manipulation, they depict an imaginary Toronto that is surprisingly unfamiliar to me. Indeed, I've even returned to a few of them long after the removal process to find that I can't exactly place where the Tower was located. One of the reasons for this is that I've done my best to capture the city from a variety of perspectives and angles, which seems to make it more difficult to 're-place' the Tower.
A CN Tower-less Toronto is strange and a far more anonymous place. Take, for instance the image of the construction of condos southeast of Bathurst and Front: I often think this one makes the city look like one of the many Asian cities undergoing rapid expansion. But, of course, after a longer look the other landmarks give it away.
There is much debate about the manipulation of photographs. Just last week a photo essay in the New York Times Magazine by Edgar Martins was cause for great controversy when it was discovered that his photos featured a number of alterations. Well, this isn't that. I make no bones about the presence of the manipulations and have little doubt that a really trained eye could see evidence of my tinkering. But the wonderful thing about new photo technology is that, in a case like this, it can allow for the imagination of strange and compelling scenarios, which make no claim to be 'real.'
At a minimum, the depiction of this simulated Toronto has enabled me to look at my city with a fresh set of eyes.
For a look at the photos prior to the removal of the CN Tower, check out my Flickr slideshow.


Discussion
74 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
That's how I often help tourists around the city - if it's below you that's where the water is.
I enjoyed this piece.
But I rather like it. As a kid adventuring around the city I rarely got lost as I could always find the Tower and know that was south. Older now, I like how when I stop to look at the built environment, the Tower is often peaking through.
Instead of digitally removing the Tower, how about some images of the city with the Gardiner removed?
Bite your tongue!
Also, it would be interesting to see a digital manipulated toronto with many CN Towers (as if they were the norm for businesses and condos). Then we'd have a unique, albiet ridiculous, city.
Also, it would be interesting to see a digital manipulated toronto with many CN Towers (as if they were the norm for businesses and condos). Then we'd have a unique, albiet ridiculous, city.
I couldn't imagine the city without it. Thanks for the essay, this was fascinating!
are you trying to tempt fate or something?
it would be so sad to go back to the old (no) lighting concept of the CN Tower, how boring...Toronto definitely needs more innovative lighting of buildings. I'm happy to see the CN tower lead the way - it's a sight to see and great for city pride and tourism!
But you know, without the CN Tower we'd have the Scotiatower or Bank of Montreal in its place. If we'd grown up without it it'd be fine.
Heh, now imagine living in Toronto before the CN Tower, you move away and live somewhere else for a few years, a decade or two. With no internet and toronto not being too exciting, you don't hear much about home. You come back and BAM! What the hell is that?! Amazing!
I have lived in Toronto my entire life and yet I still make sure to visit the observation deck once a year.
The funny thing I noticed about your altered photos is that when you remove the CN tower, the Toronto skyline appears to be bigger to me than usual. I think the BMO building, Scotia tower and all other buildings in the city for that matter look smaller than they really are sometimes because of how ridiculously tall the CN Tower is.
airplanes landing or taking off at its north-east corner.
Luciano Galasso
Great concept and good job manipulating the photos!
Now this could be because the CN Tower becomes the focal point of so many Toronto skyline photographs. In the photos at the end that don't have the CN Tower erased, the tower often acts as such a strong compositional element; even if it's only at the edge of the frame it is really anchoring the image. It could be that the city seems so bland in these pictures because the pictures were composed with the CN Tower in them; they fall down without it acting as a crutch.
It could also be that all the rest of the architecture of Toronto uses the CN Tower as that same crutch...
Funny story, my mother in law from northern Alberta kept asking why all the buildings in town had a spire coming out of the top. She kept seeing the top of the CN tower behind buildings and thought it was part of the building, she also claimed the Calgary tower was taller.
The CN Tower is 553.33 metres (1815 feet) tall. The Calgary tower is 191 metres or 626 feet. So doing your math, it will depend is you include the ground elevation or not.
He had 3 pairs of ray-bans on, which is how you knew he was from the future.
I still remember that. WISH someone from city would dig in the archives and find that. That would make my year.
So if something happened to the CN Tower, I'd think, "Maybe it's me."
Until I moved in Toronto in 2007 I'd never lived anywhere really where a significant landmark was visible from virtually everywhere in the downtown core. The closest was in Montreal where the cross on the mountain is visible from most places east of downtown, but it never held the same significance for me. I like the CN Tower - I like that a touristy thing still has a real presence in the lives of those of us who live here. I can't imagine our city without it, really.
In brief, yeah it would be a terrible tragedy if we lost the CN Tower, but we shouldn't rely on it as being our only distinctive tall building...lest we become some generic booming Asian city!
It makes me wonder if you could do a companion project where you took the removed CN towers from those photos and inserted them into photos of other cities - would they then look like Toronto? What would happen if you showed those photos to people on the street and asked people to tell you where they were taken from? Hm... I might do that myself actually.
Jonathan Castellino, you bum, you could learn a thing or two from Derek.