City
Jan Gehl Inspires Toronto
Danish urban planner extraordinaire, Jan Gehl, was at the Design Exchange on Wednesday, talking about public spaces for the 21st century.
Gehl is the powerhouse behind Melbourne's successful urban design strategy and he recently worked with New York City's radical Commissioner of Transportation Janette Sadik-Khan for the PlaNYC Initiative, including the new pedestrianization of Times Square. If you want clearly-stated, clearly-do-able urban design, Gehl is the man to listen to. And the city of Toronto is listening.
The old Toronto Stock Exchange was standing-room-only for Gehl's lecture. "I am a bit surprised that at 3 o'clock on an ordinary Wednesday, we can have half of Toronto at the Design Exchange," Gehl marvelled, getting to the podium.
Founder of Gehl Architects, and a retired Urban Design professor at Copenhagen's School of Architecture (at the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts), Gehl is an incredibly charming, articulate, and exuberant proponent of the walkable city. Starting out with praise for Jane Jacobs, Gehl has his audience wrapped around his practical fingers within seconds.
He credits his vision of the livable city to his wife - he claims that when he married, years ago, his psychiatrist wife demanded, "Why are architects not interested in people?"
So Gehl became interested in people. "Being sweet to people is really sweet to the economy," he says. (Hear that, Toronto City Council?) But how to be "sweet" to a city's inhabitants? According to Gehl, a sweet city is lively, attractive, safe, sustainable, and healthy. And we already know how to do this: limit cars, encourage bicycling, and create better outdoor public spaces so that people can walk on the streets of our city.

Gehl believes firmly in the built-a-better-mousetrap theory: if we make a city's core amazing, people will want to live there, and the city will thrive - economically, culturally, and architecturally. "Make the space good and they will come. I have not a single example of anywhere in the world where this is not true. When we provide places of good quality, people will come. Because there is nothing more interesting in the city than the people."
And he's not talking out of his hat: Gehl has been involved not only in making Copenhagen the amazingly walkable city that it is today, he's also been changing cities across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Mexico, the U.S., China, and Saudi Arabia.
So how can we apply these ideas to Toronto? Unfortunately, in a city hampered by the ward system, where City Council seems unable to get out from its car wars, I just don't know how Toronto is going to put this into action. Our mega-city means suburban councillors all-too-often dictate downtown decisions.
Gehl stays away from directly criticizing our City plans. Instead, he focuses on success in other countries; his work in Melbourne seems particularly relevant to Toronto - our cities have similar built histories, sprawl problems, and public issues. But after a radical shift in outlook in 1994, Melbourne now has the most extensive tram system in the world and has "Copenhagen-ized" its downtown, making it pedestrian and bike friendly. It's also considered one of the best places to live on the planet.
"It's a matter of invitation," Gehl says. "Ever since the car rolled in, it is as if we've forgotten why it is we had cities... It is arbitrary, the level of traffic in each city. It is silly to add more roads, you'll only get more traffic." But the same equation means a city that gives more lanes to bikes and pedestrians will increase bikes and pedestrians. And increase quality of life. That's exactly the route New York has decided to go, with Gehl's help. "And New York, if you can do it there, you can do it anywhere," he half-sings.
But getting our city to budget for a big idea seems like a long pedal uphill. In a city where the tiny change of a bike lane on Jarvis causes City Council to erupt with charges of car hatred, I wonder how we're ever going to get to a 21st century approach to solving our problems. I wish Gehl could wave his practical Danish hand and get us a miracle.
UPDATE (June 23rd, 2009):
Jan Gehl's presentation has been archived on video and is now available for viewing on the Design Exchange web site.
Biking Broadway photo courtesy of Gehl Architects.
Photo of cyclists in Toronto by Leanne Eisen.


Discussion
20 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
too bad the transit system is unbearable, there isn't even air conditioning on the spadina streetcar, and if anyone knows, the spadina streetcar in 30 degree weather is the absolute pits.
My father lives in the beaches and bikes downtown to work at least 3 days a week during the warm months; as did I when I lived there. The Martin Goodman Trail/Lakeshore path is a fine way to bike downtown from the Beaches, and Dundas isn't bad either.
Forest Hill seems like it would be just as possible, though I've never tried it. Perhaps this is a good idea for a bike trip.
Area [1][2]TOronto
- City 630 km2 (243.2 sq mi)
- Urban 1,749 km2 (675.3 sq mi)
- Metro 7,125 km2 (2,751 sq mi)
Area [2]Copenhagen
- Urban 455.61 km2 (175.9 sq mi)
Wikipedia the facts, copenhagen has less people living in the city - about half a million, whereas toronto has almost 3 million people in the downtown urban area ALONE. You cannot even compare the two when the situations are completely different. It's not like we're dealing with some tiny area, its a HUGE area with more people. How about instead of using tax dollars to benefit a small number of people who ride bikes to work for whatever reasons- incomes, environment, speed, etc. and put that money elsewhere where it benefits more people, i don't know like back in public schools, or helping at risk kids or homeless on the street. It just doesn't make sense what Miller is trying to make Toronto, besides crumbling at the seams. There's a reason why drivers hate cyclists because you guys dont believe the rules apply to you. So many times have a seen a biker ride through red lights, and do plenty of things that a driver would get charged for. I only hope if cyclists get their dream land, you get the same rules as drivers.
So while "for anyone in Etobicoke, Forest Hill, North York, and the Beaches, biking will never be a viable means of transport to the office" is largely true, if you shift your focus to a quick hop to the local subway or GO station, it suddenly becomes very possible. . .
Last time I checked the 2006 Census from statscan, Toronto (city) only has 2.5 million residents; and that's from Steeles to the lake, Hwy 427 to the Rouge.
Another thing, cyclists are bound by the Highway Traffic Act already; the only problem is that it's not strictly enforced or widely known. There are law-abiding cyclists and drivers, just as there are violators on both sides. Let's not point fingers too quickly and shift blame around.
Statistics Canada reported that in 2006 most people in the Toronto CMA (which includes far-flung suburbs like Oakville and Markham) live less than 10km away from their usual place of work; admittedly any commute will be longer than the "as the crow flies" distance. Still, these trips are or can be possible by bike.
My point is an argument of space: cars take up more of it. If a lot more people cycled, there would be a lot less traffic gridlock. I agree that cyclists need to stop breaking the laws; once cycling has reached a critical mass, make sensible laws to govern them, install bicycle signals at EVERY intersection (as Paris has done), and then crack down.
One last point: parking. Bike rings take away sidewalk and hence pedestrian space. Once a cyclist gets to her destination, she disappears out of the car-world. Next time you're driving, To Bub, count up all the bikes you see and imagine the number of extra parking spots necessary if they had driven instead.
I studied with Jan Gehl (forty years ago) and then brought him to Kingston, Ontario to review a waterfront development scheme. So .... the problem isn't the ward system in Toronto (etc. etc. etc.) The problem with Toronto is simple.
Not one traffic engineer, not one urban planner, not one landscape architect, not one architect in Toronto (and the rest Canada) has the required skill sets needed to redesign the inner core of City of Toronto.
Moreover, not one politician on Toronto's Council has the required skill sets to make decisions on the redesigning the inner core of the City of Toronto.
There is only one person who has the required skill sets; his name is Jan Gehl! That's why he has been hired to redo the inner city cores of London, UK, New York, NY and a long list of cities around the world. It's really that simple, Gehl has to be hired by Mayor Miller. After all Gehl is the Gretzky of city design.
At the same time there appears to be a mis-understnding by many of what outcomes Gehl is after when he PEDESTRIANIZES any city. Most people think (including landscape architects, “urban planners” and politicians) that PEDESTRIANIZATION is all about people walking - going from point A to point B, to go to work , to go shopping or to go to visit. But anyone who thinks that’s the case is missing the entire point of PEDESTRIANIZATION. Although every Italian teenager understands PEDESTRIANIZATION (they call it PASSEGGIATA).
PEDESTRIANIZATION is all about NOT GOING: but to STAYING! Translation, it’s all about loitering, hanging out, and going nowhere. That’s the mark of a great livable city; having lots of space for people to loiter, hang out, and go nowhere! Those spaces are; sidewalks, squares, promenades, and esplanades. The latter are example of PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. Another term that many mis-understand.
Some Toronto artists and writers think that the ballroom at the Gladstone Hotel is a GREAT example of PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (I don’t know whether to laugh or cry!)
Gehl has 40 years of research to show that it is easy to destroy what little PUBLIC OPEN SPACE is available in most cities. Toronto is a prime example of the latter; both in having very little PUBLIC OPEN SPACE to begin with, and then destroying what little PUBLIC OPEN SPACE there is.
i like his ideas. im a town planning undergraduate student. his ideas are more helpful me.