City
Habitats: Charles Pachter's House
For some people, Charles Pachter is as notable a real estate speculator as he is an artist. The 68-year-old painter and sculptor has owned a series of downtown buildings, with an eye for location that's inevitably been one step ahead of real estate trends. He explains that it was accidental - it was easier to make money as a landlord than an artist back then, but he sold his last income property years ago, and has settled into his striking home/studio/gallery near the Art Gallery of Ontario with an undisguised zeal for staying there for the long haul.
Since architect Steven Teeple's renovation of the space was finished four years ago, adding Pachter House to the Moose Factory studio and gallery, the notoriously gregarious Pachter has thrown the space open for countless events, and last night he hosted the kick-off event for artsScene's Art Of Living architecture series, showcasing distinctive houses around Toronto.
Pachter bought the original building in 1997, a dilapidated warehouse and factory at the back of a lot behind a broken down garage. He demolished the garage, and turned the old building - once a Jewish funeral home - into his gallery and studio, while maintaining a home in the neighbourhood. He finally approached Teeple to build a home there, and recalls that the architect showed up with a bottle of single malt scotch to talk about Pachter's ambitious plans for the site. After helping the artist finish off the bottle, Teeple considered the project and told him that "I think if you can do it anywhere, you can do it in Chinatown."
Teeple designed a trio of long boxes that interlock and thrust out into the street, each devoted to one of the functions of Pachter's building. The bedrooms that Pachter had built into the original Moose Factory as potential home in a downsized future are now packed with older canvases, while more recent work fills the main floor galleries, and a tiny elevator rises from the studio on the lower level to the artist's living space on the top floor. Pachter admits that the lift was a late addition, shoehorned into the building when he contemplated a time when he might not be as happy or able to climb so many sets of stairs.
"I knew I only had one shot to do it right," Pachter told the crowd at the artsScene event, a social mixer organized under the auspices of Business For The Arts, a local volunteer-staffed organization meant to build bridges between the city's businesspeople and the bohemian community. Pachter describes getting up in the middle of the night with an idea for a painting, and descending slowly to the studio, perched on a chair in his dressing gown, in full view of the street in his glass-walled elevator.
While his firm has designed much bigger projects, such as the Graduate Student Residence at U of T, with its cantilevered "O" hovering above Harbord Street, Teeple says that nothing has gotten as much publicity as Pachter's house, thanks mostly to his client's flair for self-promotion. The pair describe their nervousness before a committee of adjustment hearing at City Hall, but no one in the neighbourhood had any objections to the audacious house - in Chinatown, at least right now, anything goes.
Pachter says he has a great relationship with his neighbours, which includes the mahjong club next door. He went to the president of the club with the plans for his new house, expecting some opposition, but he was just told that he was a "yuppie" who was going to make their house prices go up, and that they had no problem with that. "The neighbourhood has come of age," says Pachter. "It's as close to Greenwich Village as we'll ever get."









Discussion
23 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I always wondered about this house; thought it was gorgeous. Love the little garden.
An amazingly young and innovative 68-year-old :) Thankfully, there's no NIMBY-ism in Chinatown!
Beautiful abode
I've never liked the look of modern homes like that. Personal preference. But the water garden looks very nice.
Spectacular house.
I wish there were more of them and less ugly crap designed via Home Depot.
An interesting look into his home!
I love the painting of the Queen giving the thumbs-up to the grinning moose!
And it's a very beautiful house (I love looking at artist's working spaces, and his is quite impressive and enviable.)
always thought this art deco nightmare should have statues of monkeys at the base marveling at its monolithic imposition ala 2001: a space odyssey... my tune's changed now that i've come to learn that someone really cool lives inside with tons of interesting works/stuff, and not just some rich dude who told the construction company to tetris his house onto street where every house looks identical but his.
Art deco? I think the style's a few decades after that.
Art deco?
You clearly don't have clue what art deco is.
Maybe you should go back to your Markham cookie cutter suburb.
i think he picked up the chinese warrior thingy from Pacific Mall.. standing in front of the washrooms
oh my gosh...
this place looks AMAZING!!!!
he lives in my dream home.. *sigh*
and i envy his art skills!!!!!
i'm motivated to get back to the brush!
oh my gosh...
this place looks AMAZING!!!!
he lives in my dream home.. *sigh*
and i envy his art skills!!!!!
i'm motivated to get back to the brush!
yeah yeah gotcha, bandwagon jumper. the rest still stands including the GOOD things said.
So much better than the McMansions made out of off-the-shelf crap from Home Depot.
True enough, Jeremy, but to be frank, very few people can afford this sort of house, and whatever might be a bit insipid about off-she-shelf materials, they at least maintain resale value, unromantic as that might be.
I think I like the exterior better than the inside
talented local architect + quality art work with a sense of humour + home owner with an artistic eye + money = one in a million combo
As much as I like and appreciate the building, in and out, the concept (un-subtly) integrating it into the surrounding urban fabric, living nearby my concern is its effect on gentrification. It's not like gentrification hasn't already started, or that it wouldn't continue without this addition, but the uncritical sentiment that often follows progressive architectures (ie. the redevelopment of CAMH) ends up legitimizing the process; it leaves those negatively affected (ie unable to keep up with rising property taxes) with less power to oppose the process. I only hope that the strong sense of community that already exists in the Grange Park neighbourhood will allow this project to blend rather than overpower.
Maybe the mahjong club isn't representative of the neighbourhood, but the article clearly states that Pachter went to them and asked *their* opinion of his house. It's not clear how much input he would have welcomed, but still, there you go.
"He went to the president of the club with the plans for his new house, expecting some opposition, but he was just told that he was a 'yuppie' who was going to make their house prices go up, and that they had no problem with that."
It's possible the MC isn't representative of broader acceptance, but the hope of property owners generally is that value increase. Of course this opens another discussion of how much one's home should be a speculative investment vs. a 'place to live', the former arguably a major component of the subprime mortgage failure (alongside racism, bank deregulation, and technologies of risk).
The real concern for the broader community is to what degree this architectural achievement signals that the area is ready for mainstream middle-class suburban-values redevelopment. The fallout then for residents who can't keep up financially is displacement from their homes and social networks.
I'm not sure Gloria if this relates to your comment, and apologies if I went off track trying to clarify my concerns. I think members of any community experiencing gentrification should be aware of how the benefits of rising property values don't necessarily outweigh the social disinvestment that has historically and geographically followed.
If there's anyone interested in a clearer presentation of this topic, this is an interesting article:
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/16028/
ps. sorry for the block of text, that wasn't how it was initially formatted.
Charles! You are a Renaissance man. Congratulations.