Tuesday, February 14, 2012Cloudy 1°C
City

The Condo Market Gets Another History Lesson

Posted by Brady Yauch / January 14, 2009

Church LoftsAnother beautiful and historical work of architecture in Toronto is set to join the swelling ranks of the condo market. The Toronto City Council plans to make the Victoria-Royce Presbyterian Church located at 152 Annette Street, in the Junction, an Ontario Heritage Site. History buffs are likely to be disappointed, as the building is scheduled to be transformed into lofts.

The building dates back to 1892 when it was constructed by architects Wilm Knox and John Elliot to house the congregation of the West Toronto Junction Presbyterian Church. After the construction of the church, it was renamed the Victoria Presbyterian Church in honour of Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee in 1897. The church was closed in June 2006.

The church is one of a number of heritage sites/churches housed in the neighbourhood. Among the group, three are also included in the city's heritage inventory - including Keele Street Church of Christ (1890) at 99 Annette, Annette Street Baptist Church (1888) at 200 Annette, and High Park-Alhambra United Church (1908) at 260 High Park Avenue.

But sadly, the 'condofication' of the Victoria-Royce Presbyterian Church is becoming a common story. The Centenniel United Church - just south of Bloor on Dovercourt Road--is also being flipped into condos. It's the same story for the Abbey lofts, formerly the Howard Park Methodist Church, in the Roncesvalles/High Park neighbourhood.

Churches aren't alone in suffering the fate of condo developers, as an increasing number of sites across the city are being taken over by the real estate sector. Just take a walk through the Distillery District and you'll see a number of new condos. Or head south to Liberty Village and visit the Toy Factory Lofts, made from a building constructed around the turn of the century.

Some enthusiasts call it progress, claiming that turning a heritage or historical site into a condo can actually preserve the character of the building and its neighbourhood. But I don't buy it. I'd rather see the buildings refitted for community centers and neighbourhood museums. This would both preserve the character of the neighbourhood, while allowing members of the public to take in a bit of the city's history.

Photo by rfmcdpei on Flickr

Discussion

41 Comments

Cynthia / January 14, 2009 at 09:02 am
user-pic
Not the first time something religiously-related is converted. Loretto College in th Annex was converted a while ago :-(

jamesmallon / January 14, 2009 at 09:13 am
user-pic
Living space is a better use of a church.
protogenes / January 14, 2009 at 09:34 am
user-pic
As the comments here will no doubt will show, the population of Toronto seems to want their city transformed in Tocondo.
doublespeak / January 14, 2009 at 09:48 am
user-pic
And who gets to pay to run these community centres and neighborhood museums?
Anon / January 14, 2009 at 09:49 am
user-pic
Point of interest; both Bruce McDonald's Pontypool and the pilot for JJ Abrams' Fringe were filmed in this building.

=]
protogenes replying to a comment from doublespeak / January 14, 2009 at 09:53 am
user-pic
"And who gets to pay to run these community centres and neighborhood museums?"

No, we wouldn't want any community building efforts here in Tocondo, now would we? At least, none not owned by a corporation...
Loozrboy / January 14, 2009 at 10:23 am
user-pic
Could be worse... they could be bulldozed, like the two side-by-side churches that once stood on Roncesvalles where the sadly generic "High Park Lofts" building is now.
Bradley Wentworth / January 14, 2009 at 10:25 am
user-pic
I assume those who use the term Tocondo do so disparagingly. Yet all the great cities I sometimes wish Toronto were more like (London, Tokyo, Paris, New York - smaller cities too like Oslo and Portland) have densities that can only be achieved by building "condos". Is it a language thing? Does a "flat" in Picadilly, or an "apartment" in Soho somehow make the world less evil than a "condo" in St. Lawrence Market? You can't stop people moving into the GTA, and the alternative 905 sprawl is not something I'd like to see more of.

I do wish they would build more No-Frills, mixed-market-social-housing buildings a la One Cole; but even then TO real estate prices are reasonable compared to other big cities.
Ryan L. / January 14, 2009 at 10:30 am
user-pic
While a community centre may be a better use for a historic building than a condo, a condo is certainly better than tearing the building down or letting it fall apart.

If there isn't money for the city to turn the building into a (well maintained) community centre and there are no private corporations willing to spend the money to do it, should we complain when a condo developer steps in?

And as lovely as a community centre would be, they aren't known for their upkeep. Being transformed into a condo will ensure the building stays standing for many more years and kept in the best possible shape (even if the historic aspect is limited to just a facade).

What the city can do:

Since they can't afford to be opening community centres everywhere, they need to encourage businesses to invest in properties by providing tax incentives, low rent, etc

BUT, they have to ensure the building is well kept, and be a benefit to the neighbourhood. They might have to be flexible, ie, allowing some retail or condo space in addition to the public space.

If that doesn't pan out, the least the city can do is ensure companies keep as much of the original structure/style intact in the event it gets turned into condos/etc. Simply saving the facade doesn't cut it.
Mr. Constant Negativity / January 14, 2009 at 10:35 am
user-pic
What do you care what goes on in this building?

Just another reason to get your back up. Oh my good its happening again!!! Tocondo!
Did you ever use this building? Probably not. Whatever happens to it you probably won't use it either, so its a completely useless building to you. Let those that want to do something with it do something with it, "The church was closed in June 2006".
LMIH / January 14, 2009 at 10:41 am
user-pic
Turning a church into a beautiful place to live is a great idea in my opinion, have you seen how gorgeous the Abbey lofts are?
Stephanie / January 14, 2009 at 10:45 am
user-pic
Neighbourhood museums? Just how many places have successful neighbourhood museums -- and I judge that by actual attendance? Sometimes these lovely ideas are nothing but pipe dreams. And are the community centres we have all over the city now turning people away?

Reuse is good. But the idea that building neighbourhoods happens only through non-commercial buildings that everyone's allowed to go into is as silly as the idea that making Yonge Street pedestrian-only will suddenly turn it into a destination (because, obviously, nobody goes there now - not counting shoppers, tourists, and kids who feel like hanging out downtown).

Neighbourhoods happen when people live there and have local shops they can go to for their everyday needs, schools and childcare for their kids, and a park with a playground and a dog run. People will live in the converted church. Sounds like neighbourhood-building to me.
Mark / January 14, 2009 at 10:49 am
user-pic
This post fails to mention the size of this particular "condofication". It's not going to be some massive tower. I think they're putting in somehwere around 30 units and parking will be underground (if I remember correctly). The building itself is fairly big so I don't think any additions or alterations would be to wild. The city also approved the application for alterations of a heritage property.

As for the community centre suggestion, that might work in other areas, but the article doesn't mention the fact that the Victoria-Royce church is directly across the street from a public library and is a 5-10 minute walk from the Annette Rec Centre (or if you catch the Dupont bus that runs on Annette, probably about 2 minutes).
Parkdalian replying to a comment from Loozrboy / January 14, 2009 at 11:08 am
user-pic
Loozrboy's got it right. This is better than bulldozing. ANd those High Park Lofts are such an eye sore they make my retina's burn! But then again, people will live in just about any place right(*look at Missi-car-ssauga)

Turning it into a community ctr. would be great also, but there is one already down the street.
Talkin Minutes / January 14, 2009 at 11:10 am
user-pic
The Condo Market Gets Another History Lesson?????

HIstory Buffs get schooled in addition, subtraction and condofication 101.
Parkdalian / January 14, 2009 at 11:20 am
user-pic
And to add.. turning all heritage buildings into museums or Rec. Ctr.'s isn't a solution. Not every building in every area deserves to be made into a museum. One museum per neighbourhood is sufficient, right?

Also, turning these into lofts is much better than seeing things deteriorate and bulldozered. Just look at some Rep. Cinema's around town for evidence, which some have been turned into cruddy "variety stores"!! How's that for heritage.

Again, there's no money from both the city or private investors. Now excuse me i'm going out to buy a lotto ticket..
Patrick / January 14, 2009 at 11:31 am
user-pic
I have to agree with Parkdalian (and others). The building could either sit, rot, and face razing, or it could be given new life. Granted it's probably not the use that many people would envision for such an old structure, but at least it'll stay standing and be maintained (i.e. it has a chance to be restored to its original function in the future).

http://torontocitylife.com/
Ryan L. / January 14, 2009 at 11:32 am
user-pic
I'd personally be weirded out by living in a church. But on the bright side, when the vampire apocolypse comes those who bought the condos will be laughing at the rest of us.
Rick / January 14, 2009 at 11:43 am
user-pic
I'd rather see a historical building turned into a condo instead of it being torn down or allowed to fall apart due to neglect.
The problem is that museums and community centres don't make money and every old building can't become a museum or a community centre.
I'd rather see it stay a church, but if that's not possible it's better to turn it into something that will turn a profit, since that gives the building a chance to survive.
o_O / January 14, 2009 at 12:38 pm
user-pic
I think churches are property tax exempt so at least this means that plot of land will now generate some revenue to help enhance service to the community (I assume those enhancements were planned for through the loft's development applicaton; that's what usuall happens anyways).
Loozrboy replying to a comment from Parkdalian / January 14, 2009 at 12:50 pm
user-pic
Although, not to argue with what many including myself have said, it would be nice if somebody had the budget and/or vision to turn some of these disused churches into something <i>other</i> than a condo. Something where the grand interior spaces could be preserved and at lest somewhat open to the public. I mean, there's nothing wrong with a little wistful dreaming, right?

There is / was a big old abandoned church at College and Palmerston or so; when I first saw it was for sale I had this crazy fantasy that someone should put a restaurant in there... a colossal dining room with soaring ceilings, stained glass windows, wood beams, iron chandeliers... although it wouldn't have a chance of being profitable after fickle Little Italy diners tired of the Hogwarts vibe. I haven't been by lately, but I'm sure it will have a "condos coming soon" sign on it soon if it doesn't already.
Parkdalian replying to a comment from Loozrboy / January 14, 2009 at 01:07 pm
user-pic
I defenitely agree that we all could come up with something a little more imaginative(then a condo) and preserve both this church's exterior and interior. But when are people(*usually with money) going to step up and do this? It does sound a little dream-like but i agree it doesn't hurt to dream and think bigger(*not as in size, but as in smarts)



Sean / January 14, 2009 at 01:36 pm
user-pic
Better than a parking lot.
bradG / January 14, 2009 at 01:39 pm
user-pic
Heritage Schmeritage. Just cause they put a plak on a building everyone cares so much about it, with out ever learning its real heritage. You should care so much about all buildings and one day they will all be heritage. I have to agree with myself on this one, I'm all for this amalgamation preservation of church and condo!! The city wins with this one.
badbhoy replying to a comment from Loozrboy / January 14, 2009 at 02:33 pm
user-pic
I was in Glasgow last year and went to a nightclub that was previously a church. They also had a couple of restaurants in the building and it was used for weddings and the like. The place was great.

So it can be done successfully.

http://www.oran-mor.co.uk/images.php
Ryan L. replying to a comment from Loozrboy / January 14, 2009 at 02:45 pm
user-pic
I suppose I could start a cult.
Colin / January 14, 2009 at 03:46 pm
user-pic
This is right down the street from where I live. I hope the building remains relatively in tact, at least from the outside. I'm glad it's not being torn down.
Todd / January 14, 2009 at 04:13 pm
user-pic
Yes its good its not being torn down. People seem to raise more of a stink for churches but when a factory, or warehouse gets redeveloped not many people speak up, I believe this has nothing to do with acutal religion, but the church is still viewed as more sacred
Yay something useful... / January 14, 2009 at 10:44 pm
user-pic
If people cant be bothered to support their precious church then the church must be sold.
If it's sold to developers who will make good use of the building and not tear it down, then great. That's a million times better than the building getting leveled and some bullshit ugly tower getting put up in its place.

" I'd rather see the buildings refitted for community centers and neighbourhood museums."
Righhhht. And who the fuck is supposed to pay for this?

Anti-condo people need to get over themselves.

jack / January 15, 2009 at 12:57 am
user-pic
they should turn the church into a chinese temple.. more money to be made. the chinese temple can probably afford to pay tax.. but not the church
eugene / January 15, 2009 at 09:44 am
user-pic
best use for a church... ...a skatepark!

seriously, tell me when you where a young boy that you did not think of better places to be than in church on a sunday morning! like riding your bike, or skateboarding, or playing in the dirt...

now you can skate... ...in church tada

did you cry as well when the runnymede theatre got turned into chapters?
Jimmy / January 15, 2009 at 09:57 am
user-pic
@Eugene

Great idea. Get all the skaters cash to together buy the place,start the business, open for business, and see how long you survive...
jen / January 15, 2009 at 10:31 am
user-pic
From what I've seen of church conversions, they're beautiful...many hallmarks of the church are kept intact - stone walls, large doors, stained glass, etc. In fact, if I could live in one, I probably would...they're very unique living spaces. I don't see the problem with more of these.

I grew up in the neighbourhood of this particular conversion. There are already lots of other functioning churches in the area, as well as community amenities. I could not see a neighbourhood museum being a success as museums need tourists as well...because how often would you go to this theoretical museum if you lived in the area? From what I can tell, the area wouldn't attract enough outside people for such a project to survive. It would have to be something really great (read: $$$) to do so.

Bottom line is, the city or a different kind of developer/entrepreneur didn't step in. No point whining about it.
nav replying to a comment from protogenes / January 15, 2009 at 11:13 am
user-pic
thats true..and funny at the same time
Kirby @ Re/Max / January 15, 2009 at 01:02 pm
user-pic
Developers think with their @ss, where their pocketbooks are. If turning the Church into Condos makes them the most money, that's what they'll do. I'm not complaining because that means more units for me to sell. Another thing to think about is the location. It's not a great location for anything commercial. A community centre certainly not needed with 2 community centres and 3 indoor pools within a 1KM radius. Tearing this beautiful church down would be a pity so I'm glad it's going to be put to good use and converted into condos. Change is good for survival even for buildings.
From around the way / January 16, 2009 at 11:53 am
user-pic
Just wanted to mention that I believe the photo is wrong in this article. The photo is not of the Annette/Keele church conversion but of the Dovercourt/Bloor church conversion. I used to live in the area so I'd pass by that church everyday on my way home.

Its difficult to tell as the spire is not included in the photo which is a stark difference between the two.
Anon replying to a comment from From around the way / January 16, 2009 at 04:52 pm
user-pic
This is the Annette church. Spent a month and a bit working on the grounds this summer.
From around the way replying to a comment from Anon / March 2, 2009 at 06:29 pm
user-pic
If you're correct Anon, then that banner that's in the photo is advertising the wrong church conversion..

Check the website http://www.thechurchlofts.com
MrLOFTca / April 3, 2009 at 10:49 pm
user-pic
Toronto has enough under funded community centers, i think It's just not practical nor feasible to turn many of these semi-historical buildings into any but lofts.
THECONDOBAR.com / December 19, 2009 at 11:32 pm
user-pic
The city is constantly changing and growing with new construction. Local landmarks such as this one have served their purpose within the community, but times have changed and it would probably serve the community better if converted to residential. I believe projects such as this are important to Toronto; preserving the street-scape while providing best-use of existing structures.
Larry replying to a comment from Anon / January 11, 2011 at 10:39 pm
user-pic
No, it's the one on Dovercourt. Check Google Streetview and you'll see it mid-conversion.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal