Tuesday, February 14, 2012Cloudy -1°C
City

Toronto's Forgotten Landmarks: Charles Street Mansions

Posted by Jonathan Castellino / December 26, 2008

charles street mansionUntil only a few months ago, a mere block south and west of Bloor and Bay street lay home to the old derelict Charles Street Victoria College mansions. Since 2002, these 2 blocks of abandomnments have been slowly vanishing, making room for new hotel and condominium developments.

Since my alma mater, St. Michael's College, lies just adjacent to the property, I have spent (wasted?) much time salivating over these beautiful, and absolutely impenetrable late 19th century buildings. It was not until fairly recently that I was able to finally gain entry, and at that, in quite unique a manner.

Charles Street MansionsQuite unlike the Richardson Romanesque architecture of Victoria College's main building, these old houses had traces of neo-gothic as well as Victorian work; the college itself was only incorporated into the coalition of colleges comprising UofT (along with Emmanuel College) in 1890, having been originally founded in 1836.

Charles Street MansionsModern residences were erected West of the abandoned lots, which sat vacant for decades, finally succumbing to their inevitable entropy. Much of their finer detail work (both inside and out) was wood, which did not weather well.

Charles Street MansionsFinally, in May of 1999, an application was made to redesign the proposed hotel plans for the area closer to Bay street (where the beautiful modern faux-art deco building currently sits), so that the facades of the final quartet of historical mansions could be incorporated into what was to be a "low density mixed commercial residential area". The group, Cityplan, overstepped rules set in place by the Ontario Historical Society, and called for site-specific bi-laws to be created for the unique location.

Charles Street MansionsAs the battle waged on between the city, Victoria College, and the independent planning groups, the buildings continued to age, until finally one day, the final fencing went up - this would be my last chance to visit this space as it existed in my imagination.

With only the last aging duet remaining, me and my girlfriend walked right around the slightly more modern abandoned buildings just north and around, until we came upon a scene which seemed like something out of a Cronenberg film - the literally ripped-open rear-ends of the place. This looked incredibly dangerous, but I had wanted this for far too long to back-out. As we gingerly picked our way over the rubble and carefully made our way into what appeared to be the remains of a washroom, a young couple on bikes motioned for our attention at a nearby fence. Nervous that they were warning us of something terrible, I crept over to the fence. They wanted to come in with us.

Charles Street MansionsWe had a brief chat inside (it turned out the gentleman had gone to school with my girlfriend), but soon the pair had to leave; I recall distinctly the feeling of waving goodbye as he walked down the stairs - a very uneventful-seeming scenario - a goodbye at the end of a visit, but then I turned around. It was as if I was walking inside a post-apocalyptic movie set, the 4th wall open-air. What a sight.

Charles Street MansionsI want to learn more about these buildings, now past, but it seems that more and more often these days, getting historical information on smaller buildings such as these is either pulling teeth, or trampling red tape. I feel it most important to take a look at the macro history of the buildings which we dwell in and near, as it is a part of Toronto's past which an ordinary view tends to overlook. I am not upset that these buildings finally came down, but rather that in decades past they were not revitalized. 'Demolition by neglect' seems to be the word of the day, often times with well-intentions on one side, and bureaucracy on the other.

For a place to be forgotten entails it once having been known; to get to know, in these cases, often involves a tangential etiquette which involves a great deal of side-stepping. From an aesthetic point of view, we must recall the Hegelian logic of synthesis: every new structure contains within itself the seeds of its own negation. We must, therefore, synthesize this truth and fact of the mortality of buildings with the inevitability of innovation. Fusion, therefore, and not forgetfulness.

Below is the rest of the photo set from this recently departed space:

Discussion

11 Comments

Eric / December 26, 2008 at 01:46 pm
user-pic
What a beautiful building coming to it's end. You just don't get this kind of craftsmanship anymore with new houses and complexes!

I wonder if Victoria College (and subsequently UofT) had any plans or ideas to renovate or restore these buildings, rather than demolishing them due to derelict conditions.

It also makes you wonder if these houses ever had squatters and how it would have played out if the squatters (if any) obtained the rights to the house.
Rob / December 26, 2008 at 01:53 pm
user-pic
What I hate just one step less then the demoloition of such buildings is that they do not even try to save some of the features.. there is a place i Coburg that I go to and they saell old doors, banisters, stairs, balconies and even the oak flooring from building such as this for huge money.. they will tear a building down for free to be able to keep the salvage.. yet in toronto (where most of these architectural peices end up) they just bulldoze these builings down...
Rose / December 26, 2008 at 02:19 pm
user-pic
I'm a Victoria College Student and lived directly across the street in a Vic College residence building. I loved looking out my window to see the beautiful old houses that lined Charles St. It's a real shame that these buildings are now gone to make way for another condominium. I mean, Charles St. is the home of Vic, I consider it my home, and now that home is being demolished and taken over by rich yuppies who can afford to live in the new condominiums. These condos pose a threat to the community at Victoria College. It would have been wonderful if the buildings had been restored and used to provide affordable student housing for the 80% plus commuter students at the University of Toronto.
Jenn / December 27, 2008 at 12:57 pm
user-pic
Awesome pictures. Less awesome text to go with it. I found this dense and overly written. I don't care who went to school with your girlfriend, how about some specifics about those site-specific bylaws ("bi-laws")?
Lindsay / December 27, 2008 at 01:19 pm
user-pic
What beautiful photographs, although sad. I have to agree with Robs comment, I too wondered if they had any thoughts on salvaging some of the beautiful architectual details in the home - I noticed the beautiful banister spindles. In an age where we're becoming more aware of using 2nd hand materials, I'm surprised that salvaging (if not the house itself) but the contents inside were not addressed. I'm assuming that it's cheaper to bulldoze than to fix, or even to try to find some treasures to save. I have to also agree with Jenn - I found myself skipping through the text - sometimes less, is more.
Bonnie / January 2, 2009 at 10:51 am
user-pic
I once lived on Charles and Bay Streets (in the Bay Charles Towers or, as I preferred to call them, the Ray Charles Towers). On my way home from whereever, I would stand in front of these houses and just admire the architecture. (I never had the guts to look inside.) I would then wish for a huge lottery windfall so I could snap these homes up and restore them to their original beauty. A pox on the city for letting these buildings rot away.

Thanks for the photos; wish I was there to explore with you.
Ugh / January 7, 2009 at 03:30 pm
user-pic
That 4th shot would have been brilliant -- had Mr. Photog kept his focus and not obliquely incorporated said indie-civics-vintage-hip looking girlfriend in the shot for falsely reflective/ironic/whatever value. What an obvious mistake.
Me / January 7, 2009 at 03:36 pm
user-pic
"I'm a Victoria College Student and lived directly across the street in a Vic College residence building ... I consider it my home ... now that home is being demolished and taken over by rich yuppies who can afford to live in the new condominiums."

As opposed to freshly-minted rich yuppies that graduate from Victoria College? LOL ... nice, Rose. Damn, wish I could have afforded U of T. Charles St. is what, a block from Yorkville? If that's your spiritual "home", you'd best make peace with yuppiedom soon.
Jonathan / January 7, 2009 at 03:54 pm
user-pic
You know, I was actually beginning to miss your commentary/criticism ; P

I have the shot sans GF as well - it is quite a striking angle; I can e-mail it to you in RAW format, if you'd like?

drop me a line at jonathan@blogto.com

Hope your new year is lookin' good!

Adieu,

Jonathan.

ps. for our readers' benefit, the prev. 2 comments are from the same person/IP
Jonathan / January 7, 2009 at 03:56 pm
user-pic
whoops! It's www.blogto.ca, not .com

Jonathan.
Renee Ryan / April 17, 2010 at 04:36 pm
user-pic
I grew up @ 100 Charles St w. (the house right at the corner of Charles and St Thomas) my family lived there from aprox. 1966 - 1980, and it breaks my heart to see what became of such a grand old house. I remember helping my Dad paint the ceilings and we had to stand on ladders as the ceiling was so high. The house was full of wonderful stain glass windows which I hope someone removed before the house fell apart. It will always be home to me, at least in memory, and although I have a ton of pictures of the inside of the house and backyard I cannot find any of the front of the house during the years I lived there, so if anyone has any please let me know, I would love to see.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal