Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 18°C
City

Canada isn't a Sinking Ship Yet

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / December 8, 2008

20081208_flag.jpg"Why are you flying our flag like that? It's disgraceful!" says a man as he leaves the Rally for Canada event at Queen's Park in Toronto, to which the flag bearer responds "If you knew anything about politics, you'd know what it means!"

Heated confrontations with pro-coalition protesters were coupled with fighting amongst anti-coalition protesters - at least when rally attendees crossed paths with a fellow protestor flying an inverted Canada flag.

I haven't seen a Canadian flag displayed upside-down since the accident in 1992. It made me wonder what the official rules are.

If Canada were a ship at high seas and it struck an iceberg, was taking on water, with radio communications out, and no flares left to signal for help... then flying the flag upside-down would be appropriate - it's an internationally recognized symbol for distress at sea (don't ask what happens if it's a Japanese or Swiss boat).

Is flying the flag upside-down this the protestor's way of likening our Canada, currently in parliamentary crisis, to a sinking ship? If so, I think it's a little premature to be calling for outside help.

Officially in the US, their Flag Code explicitly states: "The flag should never be displayed with union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property."

Here in Canada, our Rules for Flag Flying state rather specifically the correct ways to display our flag (none of which allow for the maple leaf to be inverted), but don't go as far as saying that flying it upside-down is illegal, or disrespectful. Nor does it states that it's acceptable when aboard a boat in distress.

Apparently this hasn't stopped others in Toronto from making waves by flying our National flag upside-down as a form of protest. Let's hope this doesn't gain steam and become widely accepted.

Discussion

11 Comments

Malcolm Bastien / December 8, 2008 at 05:30 pm
user-pic
Dugg for [more or less] Spanish styled exclamation marks, and Chinese protest sign.
AND for stubby, short & angry old man at the front.
AND for discreet you-know-what salute by guy at the back by the statue.
AND for moron using an umbrella during snow fall on the right.
Eric / December 8, 2008 at 06:22 pm
user-pic
The man with the salute was probably caught at a bad moment trying to flag a person down. Let's not jump to conclusions here with one picture.

Also, using umbrellas during a snow fall isn't uncommon for Oriental Asians, fyi. You might want to stop and think before calling other people a moron.
George / December 8, 2008 at 06:52 pm
user-pic
Besides the obvious stupidity of the 3x No signs... we dont elect "Leaders" in our electoral system, we elect a local representative from a party (this has been pointed out enough)... and the fact that all those 3 were elected in their own ridings, so yes they were given all actually given a "yes"... But it still seems to miss out on the fact that by their logic than...

Gilles = 10% yes
Jack = 18 % yes
Stephane = 26% yes

... and of course Stephan = 37% yes

so really they all were given yes by some percentage of Canadians...
Feldwebel Wolfenstool / December 9, 2008 at 09:15 am
user-pic
Good thing that the old dude left his hat on, during the protest. Otherwise, the Pigs would make T.O. MSM say that there was a SKINHEAD element involved....
Ben on on on / December 9, 2008 at 12:02 pm
user-pic
The anti-coalition folks should be more positive. It seems like they can only rag on the coalition parties; what they should be doing is asking the conservatives to be less dogmatic in their application of their ideology in parliament. In doing so, they'd find that their party would have more support than they do while demonizing the other parties in the house.

There times call for a supple government.
MER1978 / December 9, 2008 at 01:02 pm
user-pic
A facebook friend of mine changed his profile pic to a half ripped Canadian flag when the whole situation in Ottawa started... I guess I shouldn't be surprised... when you have a ruling party that labels everyone that opposes them as traitors... I guess visual rhetoric to match is to be expected... sad as it may be.
rek / December 9, 2008 at 01:15 pm
user-pic
IIRC when the Philippine flag is flown upside down it means the country is at war.
Diane / December 9, 2008 at 01:50 pm
user-pic
This is Canada. We have rules for everything:

http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/etiquette/2_e.cfm
Jerrold replying to a comment from Diane / December 9, 2008 at 01:52 pm
user-pic
Pssst. I linked that in the article, Diane :)
Diane / December 9, 2008 at 01:52 pm
user-pic
Whoops, I should have read the "Continue reading" half of the post before commenting. Apoligies.
Bill Bishop / December 13, 2008 at 04:17 am
user-pic
Bill Bishop said... Sir J.G. Bourinot wrote in "How Canada is Governed(1895) under "Executive Power" with regards to the Dominion Government and the National flag, Quote" The Dominion of Canada has also authority to display on all public occasions a national flag; viz., the Red or Blue Ensign...The Red Ensign is displayed at the opening and closing of parliament, and on national occasions. The Blue Ensign is a distinguishing flag of the government vessels of Canada; the mercantile marine of the Dominion has a right to use the Red Ensign."Sir John George Bourinot,(1837-1902)Canadian historian and political scientist. He is remembered as an authority on the Canadian constitution and government his "Local Government in Canada (1887), Manuel of the Constitutional History of Canada (1888,rev.ed.1901), How Canada Is Governed (1895, rev.ed. 1918)," and other books are still authoritative... Just want to make sure everyone has some information "Heritage Canada" pretends never existed and will not recognize. That's Heritage Canada located in the "Nation of Quebec". Press two for English.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal