Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 18°C
City

No Yuppies in Leslieville Makes First Strike?

Posted by Tim / November 10, 2008

No Yuppies in LeslievilleDid Studio We just become the first victim of Anti-Yuppy sentiment in Leslieville? Over the weekend, the clothing boutique not far from the now infamous Duke of York had one of its windows smashed. Area businesses fear that it could be related to the recent No yuppies in Leslieville postering campaign.

Personally, I have my doubts. While the posters did call for the smashing of windows at high-end stores in the area, I've seen far too much broken glass on Queen Street over the years to definitively make a connection here.

But that's not to say that area residents and businesses aren't worried, many of which have been talking up the issue on the Leslieville Facebook group. One local business owner wrote blogTO expressing concern, adding "we need more police presence for the shops".

Discussion

30 Comments

Elle Driver / November 10, 2008 at 12:00 pm
user-pic
I usually associate the term "yuppie" with the 80's. Either this person is 20-years behind in their colloquial terms, or I am.
Davedavedave / November 10, 2008 at 12:45 pm
user-pic
YEAH! Dann those yuppies with their jobs and upgrading their homes! I mean, how DARE they? Leslieville is just fine without 'those' kind of people. More locals like that nice fella who shot up the Duke of York are what is needed.
Anna / November 10, 2008 at 12:47 pm
user-pic
Maybe they smashed the window to grab one of the fabulous jackets.
Keven / November 10, 2008 at 12:55 pm
user-pic
Since when did blogTO get into fear mongering?

It's bad enough that the papers created fear over a 'satirical' piece posted around the neighbourhood.

Only those completely out of touch with Leslieville would think it's anything less then vandalism motivated by nothing.

Worst article I've read on this site to date.

We need more police presence for the shops?

lol. If Walmart asked for the same concession, we'd be crying foul, foaming at the mouth about corporate police protection.
Ryan L. / November 10, 2008 at 12:55 pm
user-pic
They're only using 'yuppie' because it is a derogatory term. This clique-y behaviour is pathetic, especially considering the groups that it usually comes from.
Tim / November 10, 2008 at 01:00 pm
user-pic
@Keven - I'm not sure fear mongering is what's going on here....A window got smashed and a local business owner emailed us with his concern and called for more police presence. We're not making this stuff up.
Keven / November 10, 2008 at 01:07 pm
user-pic
I'm not saying that you guys are making it up. But, why facilitate one's paranoia though? Does he actually have PROOF that this wasn't just some stupid idiot, stumbling home from the Duke?

Vandalism is pre-ttyyyyyy common in Leslieville.
Dawn / November 10, 2008 at 01:13 pm
user-pic
Oh give me a break.
I noticed these posters over a month ago, so why has nothing happened since than? ONLY when the media gave it coverage it became a problem and lo & behold, something happens. People wouldn't go smashing in windows because a poster told them too, it was probably someone that left the Duke all drunk one night...again. People will believe anything.
Darlene / November 10, 2008 at 01:31 pm
user-pic
I've got to agree with Keven.

Windows get smashed ALL OVER the city for a plethora of reasons, with or without malicious intent. So, when it happens in Leslieville, it's automatically because the locals are scheming?

Give me a break. This isn't news.
Ratpick / November 10, 2008 at 01:38 pm
user-pic
I'm gonna start a "No Yuppies in Centreville" postering campaign. Who's with me?
Adam / November 10, 2008 at 01:38 pm
user-pic
I don't know all the facts, but the nature and location of the break doesn't look the result of a direct assault on the store - more consistent with someone being pushed into the window.
Ryan L. / November 10, 2008 at 01:46 pm
user-pic
Indeed. You'd think if someone wanted to break the window they'd aim for the central part of the window and not the part near the frame.
Ben / November 10, 2008 at 01:46 pm
user-pic
The two choices for who broke the window seem to be:
1. a drunk person
2. anti-yuppie vigilantes

People worried about #2 are why the Americans have the Patriot Act.
Dawn / November 10, 2008 at 02:01 pm
user-pic
Thinking about this story some more, I'm a bit pissy with this comment:

"One local business owner wrote blogTO expressing concern, adding "we need more police presence for the shops"."

So with all the crime that happens on a regular basis, that doesn't warrant more police presence but because someone got pushed into a store window that does? As someone who lives in this area and has been for over 6 years that doesn't sit well with me. Does this store owner even live in Leslieville??
thom / November 10, 2008 at 02:21 pm
user-pic
If it is not your personal belief the window being broken is related to the posters, why on earth would you right an article about it?

Is blogto hoping for city to pickup stories now?
Tim / November 10, 2008 at 02:24 pm
user-pic
@thom - because my opinion isn't the only one that matters. I thought others might have something to say on the subject
thom / November 10, 2008 at 02:58 pm
user-pic
Your opinion and judgment surely should matter utmost when you are writing a "news" posting. Especially when it is linking two weak non-news worth events.

Had there been a brick thrown through a window with a poster taped to it, perhaps maybe then you'd have something to write about.
Neil / November 10, 2008 at 03:00 pm
user-pic
Count me amongst the "much ado about nothing" voices. This 'vandalism' smacks of a simple accident or a drunken brain-fart, rather than a targeted attack against the store.

Besides, if there's really an "anti-yuppie" uprising in Leslieville, you'd think those behind it would at least be smart enough to realize Studio We is a privately-owned boutique, set amongst a wide array of other privately-owned boutiques in the neighbourhood. And I don't think the concerned shop owner need fret - if any sort of targeted vandalism campaign does start in Leslieville, the cops will be on it before you even realize. The City knows that areas like this need more successful businesses and renovated properties, not more slackers with no ambition.
Slava / November 10, 2008 at 04:03 pm
user-pic
Heh, this is what first comes to mind when I hear about stuff like this: http://www.theonion.com/content/news/shitty_neighborhood_rallies

Although anyone who seriously worries about anti-yuppie vigilantes is pretty paranoid.
JimmyJames / November 10, 2008 at 04:18 pm
user-pic
I don't understandpeopel that claim and area like its thier own. It's an evolving area, city, world. If the people before you fought against such change you wouldn't even be there NOR would the DUKE nor would the Loblaws or the 7-eleven, Jimmie Simpson recreation centre.

Alot of change and evolution occurs in an area before you arrive. You may be there of the moment BUT don't be so greedily selfish that your going to hold back the progession of the area for future generations. IF you can't get along with others you should go buy a commune out in the country somewhere that you can have full control over.

The city and downtown is growing east and west. The same discussion is happening on both sides. Unfortunately this isn't a communist country, so let the entrepeneur and the mighty dollar go where it can survive.

I'm gonna make signs. "Don't stop the progress"
Ryan L. / November 10, 2008 at 05:05 pm
user-pic
Jimmy, the real tragic irony is that the people making these complaints are those who try to put forth the image of inclusion.

They go around and try to show people how wordly they are by eating at the newest Ethiopian restaurant and wearing the latest Arabian scarf without fully understanding or appreciating the 'wordly' things they partake in.

They pick and choose which things are acceptable and which are not (which generally seems to be decided by whichever happens to be popular within their sub culture at the time).

All the while they are immensely critical of those who aren't like them (ie, anybody not belonging to a sub culture). In a group that thrives on being 'ironic', it is almost pathetic that this huge irony is lost on them.
oterry / November 10, 2008 at 05:38 pm
user-pic
I'm gonna say it's a random thing. Eventhough many people don't like to see neighbourhoods change as fast as Leslieville has (myself included, to some degree) and eventhough some of the change won't be for the better I can't believe that this kind of store would be on any one's hit list. But whatever the truth behind this unfortunate act,if I was the owner I suppose I could be excused for being somewhat paranoid.

I live at Eglinton and Dufferin and would love to see some of the change that has happened in Leslieville happen in my neighbourhood. But it ain't broke so I guess we don't need to fix it.

That Onion article was a gas, btw.
sajane / November 10, 2008 at 08:31 pm
user-pic
This Suck cartoon is an oldie, but a goodie, describing exactly this phenomenon...

http://www.suck.com/daily/99/07/07/
Laura / November 11, 2008 at 02:59 am
user-pic
"People wouldn't go smashing in windows because a poster told them to."

You don't get out much, do you...it's mindblowing the things people do because they saw it on some form of media.
santa / November 11, 2008 at 10:30 am
user-pic
If you love Leslieville set it free, if it comes back to you it was meant to be.

Don't stop the progress!!!
Pam / November 11, 2008 at 12:53 pm
user-pic
Leslieville looks like a dive. I can't wait for the neighborhood to gentrify.
davy / November 11, 2008 at 01:14 pm
user-pic
The people making these signs and threating to cause damage obviously have too much time on thier hands AND need some cause or something, anything to speak out against. Thier lost
bigWill / November 11, 2008 at 02:10 pm
user-pic
Leslieville? Whatever? Its the Beaches West. Upper Swamp.
Tim Hewetson / November 12, 2008 at 09:32 am
user-pic
It's sad to witness this kind of diabolical behavior. Leslieville's majority of well kept homes and great shopping stores are a far cry from the run down rooming houses and dingy stores that seemed to be in the majority 10-15 years ago. The neighbourhood is finally emerging as a desirable place to live and shop in Toronto and it's disappointing that a small minority are making feeble attempts to regress the progress that has been made.

I'm attributing these kinds of events to growing pains. Other neighbourhoods (Queen West) experienced similar situations.
keven / November 13, 2008 at 07:32 am
user-pic
> The neighbourhood is finally emerging as a desirable place to live

Desirable to who? I've lived in the area when it was 'apparently' run down with rooming houses (I must have missed that, save for a few pockets here and there). Shopping in the area has always been decent. If not, you've got the Beach 5 min one way and downtown 10 minutes the other way.

Hell, I had a 1000/sq/ft studio - 35ft ceilings/1100/month
Had to leave that space (as did most of the tenants who are mostly made up of tradepeople and artists) when the starbucks opened as rent shot to 1500/month, even though there was absolutely no improvements made. Then again, the crowd changed. Artists in the building were replaced by professionals looking to be hip and cool in a 'loft space'.

I spose that's progress though right?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal