Saturday, May 18, 2013Mostly Cloudy 12°C
City

Corporate Fraud is the New Black

Posted by Sameer / December 10, 2007

Conrad Black by highwaygirl67
It is timely — perhaps almost too coincidental — that on the same day that Conrad Black is about to be sentenced to six to eight years of prison for corporate fraud, the Toronto Police are hosting the 2007 International Fraud Investigators Conference at the Sheraton Hotel downtown. After all, Black did go to school up the street at Upper Canada College, and has a storied history in the Toronto business community.

While Toronto may not be known as a hotbed for corporate fraud, the Toronto Police Fraud Squad is gaining prominence as one of the premiere fraud eradication agencies in North America. But why is fraud on everyone's mind these days?

I went to high school near a minimum security prison that mainly housed white-collar offenders. Back then, we weren't enthralled (or even threatened) by the fact that the guys next door had embezzled millions of dollars. Corporate fraud just wasn't "cool" back then.

These days, however, it seems as though fraud is the media's darling: for months, the nightly news has led with stories about the sponsorship scandal or the Airbus affair. The Conrad Black trial is getting more coverage than OJ's trial did thirteen years ago.

Which leads me to the question: why and how has corporate fraud become the glamorized crime in media today? The Enron scandal has already led to blockbuster movie deals, the BBC has a highly-rated show that tracks organizational crime (soon to be televised on the CBC, if I'm not mistaken), and names like Jeff Skilling and Karlheinz Schreiber are already as recognizable as some famous musicians.

What's next? A CSI-style police drama on HBO modeled after the Toronto Fraud Squad? As much as I think that the exposure for our excellent police would be welcome, that still doesn't answer the one question that still bothers me: when did corporate fraud all of a sudden become sexy? And why?

I can't offer any answers to these questions, because to be honest I don't know much about the field at all, but I thought I'd ask some of you for your insights: after all, if Toronto is going to host an international fraud prevention conference, it only makes sense that Torontonians know a thing or two about fraud.

(Photo: Conrad Black by highwaygirl67)

Discussion

12 Comments

Danielle / December 10, 2007 at 03:36 pm
user-pic
Just in, 78 months in jail, $125,000 fine, and oh, returning that $6.1 mill.
http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2007/12/10/conradsentence.html
sookie / December 10, 2007 at 04:26 pm
user-pic
If I were a fraud artist I'd definitely be checking out that conference for tips.
goleafsgo / December 10, 2007 at 04:49 pm
user-pic
I haven't fully formed an opinion so I'm just wondering what y'all think. Conrad gets the 6 1/2 years in low-security prison, $125,000 fine and the return of $6.1 million... Michael Vick gets 23 months in, I'm assuming Federal prison for his role in Bad Newz Kennels...

In comparison, I kinda think 6 1/2 is a little hefty in comparison, albeit low-security...
Sameer Vasta / December 10, 2007 at 05:42 pm
user-pic
I wonder if that hefty 6.5 year sentence is indicative of just how much we love to see corporate con artists fall: maybe it makes us feel good to see that even the big guys can fall hard?
retorts / December 10, 2007 at 10:06 pm
user-pic
I think the scale of the impudence that everyone saw in the Enron/Worldcom scandals was a bit of a shock. The attention and the awareness of the scale of it all might be related to that.

I wanted to say that courts have responded with harsher penalties, but I read that the judge used sentencing guidelines from 2000 - so before Enron - to sentence Black. There are tougher guidelines in place now, though. In the states at least.
Jerrold / December 10, 2007 at 11:15 pm
user-pic
You forgot the biggest fraud yet - the Harper government's "environmental policies".
Sameer Vasta / December 11, 2007 at 01:43 am
user-pic
<b>Retorts</b>, I wonder if Canada's laws and guidelines have changed since the Enron debacle...

...and <b>Jerrold</b>, you forgot to add a word after your remark: "zing!"
Tabish Bhimani / December 11, 2007 at 02:15 pm
user-pic
its funny how u called it "the field," almost signifying a new breed of business. Another thought: I want to see that Enron film. Last thought: I'm sure the stronger Canadian Dollar has nothing to do with this. I guess it is the role of the media to sell, to be profitable. It isn't as true in Canada as it is other places in the world however, but conformity to the majority is something everyone, whether as individual entities or as crown corporations...well...conform to: It sells, people want it, so show it to them. More ratings perhaps? Perhaps I'm just rambling.
Sameer Vasta / December 11, 2007 at 04:44 pm
user-pic
Ramble on, Tabish. Good thoughts in there...
Disparishun / December 11, 2007 at 05:29 pm
user-pic
<i> Corporate fraud just wasn't "cool" back then. These days, however, it seems as though fraud is the media's darling....
Which leads me to the question: why and how has corporate fraud become the glamorized crime in media today?</i>

Is that really true? Is multi-tens-of-million (erm, multi-crore?) embezzlement really something that the media do cover now, but did not cover in the past?

For instance, is there anyone in the past who was on trial for something of an Enron, Worldcom, or Black magnitude, where the trial was <i>not</i> covered as front page news?

If so -- and I would be surprised if that were the case, to be honest -- then I would assume that the increase in the number of people who trade stocks is by far the biggest factor. Once day trading, The Motley Fool, online discount brokers, and the rest of the investing-for-dummies trend became part of the media landscape, the activities of the CEOs of the firms all these people were talking about became part of the media landscape, too.
Sameer Vasta / December 11, 2007 at 06:20 pm
user-pic
I'm sure that there were highly publicized embezzlement trials in the past; it's just that these days, it seems as though the perpetrators of these crimes are pseudo-celebrities instead of just criminals. Then again, I could just be watching the wrong kind of TV...

I do think your comments regarding day trading and the ability for any Joe Schmoe to be in the "big money" world now do have something to do with it.
Investblogger / February 26, 2008 at 11:00 pm
user-pic
Ladies and Gentlemen,
My name is Earl and this is my first
post. I didn't find relevant
thread to post this, and my
apologies, if I posted inappropriately,
moderators, please move this post accordingly.
Not so long ago, I stumbled upon information about
investment funds, that are not readily available to the public. The earnings, which participants could
receive by joining in such
programs, seemed
extremely high at
first, but as I searched more about them, I started to
invest. Today, I consider
myself to become the successful
investor. To
share my findings, I
set up the blog, which
provides detailed information
about investment
programs. You can see it, <a href=HTTP://WWW.ALL-HYIPS.COM>;follow this URL</a>. I would be happy to receive
user's feedbacks.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal