Friday, May 24, 2013Cloudy 4°C
City

Morning Brew: November 16th, 2007

Posted by Ryan C / November 16, 2007

I'm jealous, invite me to come next time!
Photo: "Light at the end" by BlogTO Flickr pooler inventor_77

Your last morning news roundup, before Jerrold returns, for Friday November 16th, 2007:

The CNE is gonna cost a total of at least 47 million dollars for remodeling and junk. Can you guess who's gonna foot a chunk of the bill?

McGuinty has wussed out of banning cell phone use while driving, saying he "Wouldn't know where to draw the line." The answer is simple you twit; don't let people use their phones in any way while driving a motor vehicle. No, there won't be any lenience for using a frickin' iPhone, Adam Schwabe.

A variation of the common cold virus killed 10 US citizens over 18 months. Should we really be all that concerned of it hitting us when influenza is directly related to 36,000 deaths a year, and is questionable in another 470,000 worldwide? Get your damn flu shots people and save some old people, people.

That stupid Bloor condo that had students getting paid to sit in for real estate agents hasn't even been cleared by the city yet.

Wanna know who's to blame for recent Mississauga lake oil spills? YOU ARE.

The weather's gonna suck a lot harder a lot sooner.

Get your Darth Maul on tonight! BlogTOers will be there, in force (Psst! See what I did there!?) and will be sure to kick your dark-side wandering asses.

Even though I really don't give a hoot about hockey or Bryan McCabe, I do enjoy making fun of him. It seems like I'm not the only one, as www.McCabeSucks.com is a living, breathing intertube site. Rejoice friends, for Jerrold returns from a questionable trip to Thailand on Monday.

Discussion

10 Comments

Bloorman / November 16, 2007 at 09:01 am
user-pic
Not only that, but word on the street is that Bloor 1 is sold out, including the unadvertised, $18 million penthouse.
Chris / November 16, 2007 at 09:02 am
user-pic
Ugh McGuinty is such a moron. "We can't ban cellphones cause so many other things distract drivers, we'd have to ban those too!" Good logic there, buddy.
Matt / November 16, 2007 at 09:43 am
user-pic
I think we can safely ban cell phones, applying makeup, drinking coffee and eating while driving in one fell swoop. And those whild-driving sexual favours have got to STOP.
Mark Dowling / November 16, 2007 at 10:21 am
user-pic
Bloorman - TCHC bought that one. They don't mind owning high value properties.
Brian / November 16, 2007 at 11:34 am
user-pic
Anyone who would argue that applying makeup, reading, shaving, eating, is less dangerorus then using a cell phone is just got a hard on for hating cell phones. They're all horrible things to do while driving.

At the same time, bannning cell phones would just encourage the use of Bluetooth headsets, but people would still technically be using cell phones. Even though studies have shown using a headset/handsfree reduces the danger compapred to using a cell sans handsfree, its still not safer then a conversation with other people in the car (in fact less so), but is still safer then trying to apply makeup, open that Tims cup, or any of the other inane things people try to do while driving.

It'd probably be better to just implement a kind of minor dangerous or careless driving charge that can be used in situations where people are obviously using phones, applying makeup, shaving, reading, etc. Shouldn't be as serious as a careless driving where someone is driving on the shoulder or going 170, but its still putting people at risk (or at the very least affecting traffic flow).
Maria / November 16, 2007 at 11:48 am
user-pic
Pheew, I can still read the newspaper while driving. Good!
Jonathan / November 16, 2007 at 01:59 pm
user-pic
"Bloorman - TCHC bought that one. They don't mind owning high value properties."

Hey maybe you're onto something there.
Perhaps a condition of approval is that the developer has to sell 1 (or more) units in each development to TCHC.
Then the TCHC can sell them at market after construction or it can actually use them, depending on the development.

I know investing in real-estate is outside the TCHC mandate and carries some risk, but more likely than not, it would be a cash cow!
Joe LaFortune / November 17, 2007 at 04:34 pm
user-pic
I find it curious that there has been all this call for specific legislation regarding cell-phone use in cars and controversy now that McGuinty can't tell where to draw the line. None of it is necessary. Existing laws already cover the wide multitude of scenarios McGuinty cited: eating, putting on makeup, etc. It's called 'failure to have care and control of your vehicle.' The police can stop you and cite you just for having only one hand on the wheel. The courts and the police need to get together on that legislation and back one another up. It doesn't matter that a motorists can claim they had full control of their vehicle while holding a phone up to their ear, as soon as their hand left the wheel, they were no longer capable of executing some maneuvers effectively or properly. Charge them and convict them.
A.R. / November 17, 2007 at 10:45 pm
user-pic
Hey, at least we can listen to the radio without controversy.
Rebecca Johnson / November 27, 2007 at 05:14 am
user-pic
It all comes down to money and politics. I'd assume the cell phone companies are lobbing Mr McGinty quite hard for him to not ban cell phone use. They would lose money.. the economy will suffer and it will be bad news for shareholders!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal