City
Your Rights as a Photographer in Toronto

There's certainly no shortage of photobloggers in Toronto. With an ever increasing amount of people picking up a camera for the first time and putting on their 'citizen journalist' hats (whether you like the expression or not), many are facing increased scrutiny and roadblocks from the police and rent-a-cops alike.
Having recently picked up a DSLR myself, I've already had many encounters with security and other officials telling me where I can and for the greater part, cannot take pictures. It got me thinking; What are the laws that bind photographers in the city? Specifically, when is someone actually justified in telling you that you cannot take a photo?
There's not a whole lot of legal resources on what your rights are as a photographer in Toronto (or provincially/federally), so determining these are a matter of interpreting the Criminal Code, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and so forth.
There's a couple examples in recent memory where I've been taking photos that where I've been told not to.
The first was at the Toronto Dominion Bank plaza, where, while adjusting the settings on my camera, I pointed my camera skyward and snapped a photo of one of the towers.
As I fiddled with the aperture, I caught glimpse of a security guard walking briskly towards me from across the plaza. I knew immediately what she was about to tell me, "Can you tell me what you're doing?," she asked. When I replied that I was taking a photo of a building, she said, "You can't take pictures of the bank buildings."
Being in a space with benches and plenty of greenery (an illusion of public space, really), I felt affronted and began to protest, but she didn't budge. I left the plaza, a little disgruntled.
In another case, I was inside a performance theatre, and during the intermission of the show, I thought I'd capture some of the architecture of the building. An usher spotted me, walked up the aisle, and asked, "Can you please delete those photos you just took?" Shocked, and worried about getting kicked out entirely, I complied and trashed the photos as the usher observed over my shoulder.
So what should or could I have done in either of these situations? I came across this wonderfully put together piece by Tyler Hutcheon on his personal blog called Photography Laws. Hutcheon notes that while he isn't a lawyer, this is just his interpretation of the laws, but I think it's a pretty concise run-through.
Some important points to take away:
- You can take photos of anything, but if in taking the photo you break other laws, such as trespassing, then you're in trouble.
- You can't violate others' privacy by taking photos of them in places where it's reasonable for them to expect privacy (i.e. a bathroom).
- You can't trespass on someone's property to take a photo if either indicated by a sign, or being told directly by the owner. Disobeying this means a trespassing charge. There are certain exceptions to this in the Trespass to Property Act.
- You can take photos of any building, provided you're not on private property, or invading someone's privacy (like pointing a telephoto lens in someone's home). Even on TTC property, they have their own set of private rules that prohibits commercial photography, and they could technically tell you to not take pictures there.
- Nobody can threaten to destroy your camera, photos, or force you delete photos taken as this would be considered assault and/or criminal mischief.
As for my two past problems mentioned above? I couldn't have done a whole heck of a lot, as it turns out, but I could have done some things differently.
In the case of the TD Plaza, I believe I was on private property, but no signs were posted prohibiting photography, and I had no way of knowing this since I just walked into the plaza from the sidewalk. However, if I had continued taking photos after being told by the guard to stop, she could have called the police and I may have been faced with a trespassing or mischief charge.
In the theatre, however, the usher had no right to force me to delete the photos, but had I not complied, I likely would have been asked to leave the building immediately and again, possibly been charged.
The laws in place leave a lot open to interpretation, but there's something to be said for common sense. When in doubt, play it on the safe side on private property and don't get sassy. I have to stress that all of the above info is just an interpretation of the law, and a judge might look differently on the situation at hand. (Don't blame me if you get locked up!)
Feel free to post about any grey-area photographic encounters with police/security, and how you handled it in the comments.
Photos by blogTO Flickr group contributors Metrix X (top), my own (right top), and spotmaticfanatic (right bottom).


Discussion
62 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
That might be the motivation, but you don't actually have a legal right to *make* someone do that. Even looking at them would require a warrant.
That being said, I still find Toronto is a relatively photographer-friendly city and as long as you look harmless you don't get too many challenges. I'm actually amazed at how many people will stop and wait for you to get your shot before crossing your path when you're shooting in the street.
Thanks for all the good info and the different perspectives on this issue.
The simple rule is if you can see it from public property then you can shoot it. (In the red herring cases of a person in their home there is an exception as there may be as well in a car). The tricky part really is what you plan to do with the picture or footage after and thats where it gets complicated; and becomes a another whole thread of talk.
Other posters are correct that 9/11 created a whole paranoia about filming and picture taking (but Google Earth is Ok !) that has also been exploited by commercial interests to create rights that they do not have.
Importantly though, one area that I always use caution with is children. There are creepy types out there as well as a very large over reaction to the possibility of creepy types being out there. If somebody says stop shooting pictures of children, you should explian who you are, offer your card, and move on. You cant win this one and it can lead to a bad scene very fast. I was taking pictures on a public street once of trucks when a woman started yelling that I was a taking pictures of kids. (I didnt have single image of any body); despite offering my press card etc she could not be convinced (I actually started to become mildly scared of her). A crowd gathered and I could tell who they were going to believe so I put my rights away and retreated.
I won't name the building in question (yet), as I have contacted their building, property, and security managers via e-mail challenging my experience last week. Depending on the response I get (or don't get), I'll provide more details.
The bottom line is, the law is on OUR side. Stand your ground (using a little common sense), and take the photos you want to (and are legally allowed to).
In my October 6th post, I refrained from mentioning the Toronto building in question to give them a fair chance to respond to an e-mail inquiry I sent their general, building, and security managers. Well, I've given Scotia Plaza almost 4 weeks to reply, and so far they haven't. Feel free to read more about it at http://blogintrigue.com/?p=18.
So, if you're in Toronto with a camera handy, please take a moment to snap a shot or two of Scotia Plaza (just be sure to do it from public property).
Surely there must be something more official somewhere saying whether or not it's legal to take pictures of buildings from the street - I'd like to make sure that I'm in the right before I get too indignant.
Actually, if I had more energy, I'd like to organize a group of say, 100 photographers who'd converge on the site simultaneously.
Allam - Not to be rude, but you're full of shit. Here's why:
"Copyright laws prohibit you from taking ANY pictures anywhere around a live theatre (as the copyright for the production covers the whole facility)" - Nothing in the Copyright Act says that; in fact s.32.2 suggests otherwise.
"Live ent vs Marc Bouden. He took pictures of the national arts centre with the Phantom sign on the side and was charged for duplicating copyright material and basically lost his home in the lawsuit from live ent" - No reference to such a case on either Google or Canlii. By the way, it's Livent, not Live ent.
"There are also a slew of federal and provincial security laws that cover banks..." - such as?
"...because people tend to take pictures before robbing them." - Bullshit.
"It is the same with police, military etc. These laws are covered under civil defence, Military law, etc." - Huh?
"as a Lighting designer if anyone takes my picture, I am covered under ACTRA and IATSE" - ACTRA is a performers' organization - since when do lighting designers belong to them?
"and I can demand a release or any photographer is in a restriction of trade situation" - Precisely how does a photographer prevent you from doing business as a lighting designer? And by what right can you "demand a release"? Oh wait, it doesn't and you can't.
"(I sued the star and they settle out of court)." - Hear that? It's the sound of my bullshit detector going off again.
"As far as a public space, the Ottawa Sun was charged and sued for having two woman pictured in the background of a photo of a PETA protest on the canal." - There it goes again!
"Do your research on military and copyright laws" - I've done plenty of it, thanks. As have most people, it's not that difficult.
Photography out-of-doors for commercial purposes. Legal? Potato chip advert photographed at corner of Yonge & Queen. Is it considered public property?
thanks!
I don't think you could be charged for refusing to delete the pictures, as you said, you can't be forced to delete photos. That's like someone putting a gun to your head and saying you can do what you want, but if you do this, I'll shoot you. You don't have to delete the pics, that's your legal right, but if you don't I'll have you arrested, doesn't make much sense logically.
She was soooooooooooooo unbelievably rude, and I didn't know what to do at that point. I generally know my rights in Toronto and with the photos I take, and I was sure this law didn't make sense. She basically said any photo, any device you need a permit. I honestly just wanted to be very rude to her but I'm not like that... and then we decided to walk through the park anyway and saw a lot of other people taking photos, and as we left we saw people walking in with DSLR's ..
What do I do? I had a shoot coming up (again, for fun) that I wanted to use the garden for, but I am worried there is something I am missing?
I checked their website and it said that commercial photos need a permit and so do wedding photos, which I knew. Now what!~?
The Toronto Botanical Garden is a not for profit organization and is not in anyway linked to the City of Toronto.
There are strict photography rules that are now in place that prohibit photos taken without a permit.
This includes Wedding, Prom, Family portrait shots, group photos (including religious or celebratory - communion, bar/bah mitzvahs, confirmations, graduation etc).
Should you wish to take casual family photos with a regular non professional camera, there will not be a photo permit charge. However, if you are carrying a professional looking camera/equipment we ask that you take a moment and ask in the main building if you need a permit or not. Taking photos of the flowers, gardens or anything on the property to post and make money off of requires a permit and anyone violating this will be dealt with accordingly.
Photography information is on the website:
www.torontobotanicalgarden.ca and you can always call or email for further information.
Again, please note - the TBG is not paid for by Toronto Tax Payers! It is a not for profit and we use the revenue generated from this and other programs to keep the gardens beautiful.
Another reason that we now have permits is so that a photo coordinator can walk you through the areas where photos are permitted and where they are not. The TBG has had extensive damage done to their gardens by careless photographers taking "casual and formal shots" and trespass and damage plants, trees and shrubs.
Please respect the policies so that others can enjoy the gardens.
One last note - a separate permit for Edwards Gardens is necessary should you want to take photos there. Please look on the City of Toronto website for further information.
I have been having a lot of issues with photogaphy permits like in parks. I am just 18, doing photography as my hobby and I like to dress up my models and do fun fashion shoots. I do not publish them anywhere I just post them on my website/ portfolio.
I was at Guildwood Park one day doing one of these photoshoots and one of the people who maintain the park came up to me and told me I need a permit. However while I was reading on the Toronto website about photography permits it says it is only for weddings and it said nothing about fashion photography... I have shot there many times before and this is the first time it actually happened to me. I mean it is just a park and there were many other people doing portrait shots with an SLR. They just did not have dressed up models like I did..
but it is still not fair...
If you photograph someone in a public place and they ask you to stop and you don't because you feel legally entitled, sorry but that makes you a jerk.