Morning Brew: July 30th, 2007

20070730_mb.jpg
Photo: "graffiti" by blogTO Flickr pooler karlofun.

Your bullet-ridden morning news roundup for Monday July 30th, 2007:

What a weekend! The city was buzzing with Wakestock, Just for Laughs, Rogers Picnic, and Jazz. But while the city was reaching its peak of summer fun, it also seemed to challenge last weekend's "of the gun".

A woman was critically injured killed after police being shot in the head. The SIU is investigating, and police won't say who fired the shot (yet).

Police also shot and killed two pit bulls in an apartment after the dogs were ordered by their owners to attack entering officers.

A 25-year old was gunned down execution style in his car.

A highway police chase resulted in the suspects shooting back at police and the QEW shut down for the ensuing investigation. Watch out for a 2002 burgundy Cadillac Escalade with plates AKRZ 595.

UofT will be shutting down their popular 88-year old shooting range, and its 400 members aren't happy.

Not all is gun news, however. A 70-year old man is being hailed a hero after rescuing a 7-year old drowning victim in Lake Huron.

Today's Crossroad Puzzle after the jump...

200707230_crp068.jpg
Recognize this part of the city? Post your answer in the comments, and check for the answer in tomorrow's blogTO Morning Brew.

Friday's answer: College Park

Scroll down for today's comments...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

Bizarre. Maybe U of T ought to close down their archery club as well, as painful reminders of the Hundred Years' War. Hey, some people are still hurting!

Posted by: Gloria at July 30, 2007 8:40 AM

400 & Steeles Ave

Posted by: Stephen at July 30, 2007 8:43 AM

Boy, a right ray of sunshine you are on this Monday morning.

And by "you" I guess I mean "gun-toting citizens of Toronto", as it hardly seems sensible to blame Jerrold.

Posted by: Matt at July 30, 2007 8:54 AM

Maybe the Bad Brains dude was smart to be wearing that bulletproof vest afterall!

Posted by: Carrie at July 30, 2007 8:58 AM

Shooting remains a sanctioned event at international university competitions, said Ms. Chao, who sees Mr. Bryant's call for a handgun ban as a knee-jerk, political response that will punish responsible shooters, but have little impact on a social problem as nuanced as gang culture. Crime, she pointed out, has also been banned, but gang members apparently "didn't get the memo."

Got a point there - although break-ins to properties holding guns remain an issue for legal owners.

Posted by: Mark Dowling at July 30, 2007 10:09 AM
Shooting remains a sanctioned event at international university competitions, said Ms. Chao, who sees Mr. Bryant's call for a handgun ban as a knee-jerk, political response that will punish responsible shooters, but have little impact on a social problem as nuanced as gang culture. Crime, she pointed out, has also been banned, but gang members apparently "didn't get the memo."
But why would you want to support the gun companies that are at least partially responsible?  I'm all for boycotting.
Posted by: Ben at July 30, 2007 11:38 AM

They should close down Chess Club as I have very painful memories from childhood

: - ), just wanted to lighten things up, but jeesh, what's goin' on up there?

Posted by: Steve at July 30, 2007 11:48 AM

Rifles and bows, while can be used against other humans, are primarily hunting weapons.  Gloria, you don't hunt with a hand gun.  They exist for one reason only.  To shoot people.  Someone didn't invent them with the grand idea of gun ranges or gun collectors. Unless you support the idea of killing other human beings, a hand gun has no reason to exist.

Posted by: Ryan at July 30, 2007 12:31 PM

According to the Star article the police did not shoot the woman in the head, but in fact it appeared that the gun shot wound was self-inflicted.  In the future please read the article before making a statement

Posted by: Rob at July 30, 2007 12:39 PM

Rob: I read the Star article. And others.

Where in the article does it say that she shot herself?!  While that is entirely possible, the article is vague because we don't know that as fact yet.  That's why the SIU is involved.

680 news is reporting that police will not yet say who fired the gun:

http://www.680news.com/news/local/article.jsp?content=20070730_090442_3944 

I may have misinterpreted the story, and have updated the post.

Posted by: Jerrold at July 30, 2007 12:53 PM

We can't hunt with swords either (well, you can, but it'd be difficult). They are weapons, expressly manufactured to wound and kill other human beings. Should fencing be banned?

Ryan, you defend rifles. My point was just that. It seems a bit over the top to associate sporting rifles -- the sort seen in Olympic events -- with handguns used for crime and murder. Long rifles are not weapons commonly seen on the street, just like the bow and the sword (unless you've got your occasional medieval enthusiast). Yet the article says the ban is for the rifle as well as the hand pistol.

But then again, rifles aren't entirely benign either. Ever heard of a sniper?

Posted by: Gloria at July 30, 2007 1:44 PM

It seems we both read the same story but different versions of it.  The version that you posted a link for seems to be an earlier report.  Check out http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/241303 for additional information.  Sorry if the comment came off a little harsh.  I think I was channeling my frustration with Canadian media (like Global News and City TV) taking on a more American style of sensationalist statements and biased newscasts.  I always enjoy the "Morning Brew" and look forward to more in the future.

Posted by: Rob at July 30, 2007 3:47 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Morning Brew: July 30th, 2007' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.