Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 18°C
City

Joy Oil Station Move Brings No Joy Yet

Posted by Jerrold Litwinenko / April 15, 2007

Joy Oil Station Moved.jpgWest-enders (and smart commuters that choose Lakeshore over the Gardiner on their way into the city) will notice a slight change to the landscape at Windermere the next time they pass by.

Back in September 2006, the city approved the very expensive and very short distance move of the decaying heritage landmark "Joy Oil Station" - a relocating and stabilizing project that required a whopping $400,000 in city funding (still no word on how much more it will cost to restore it).

This weekend, heavy equipment was brought in to hoist up part of the building and drop it just across the street, in Sir Casimir Gzowski Park of the Western Beaches.

20070415_joyoil02.jpgFormerly on the north side of Lakeshore Blvd, the castle-like, plastic-covered, rotting remains of what represents the last standing relic of an American chain of gas stations built in the 1930's in Toronto, is now sitting in a very sad state on the south side of Lakshore Blvd (within a stone's throw from a playground).

According to a community newspaper, the grounds where the station originally sat were intended for use by developers to build affordable housing, but site surveys found that the grounds are so badly contaminated that the housing project is unfeasable.

The building was declared a historic site in 1989 by the City of Toronto under the Ontario Heritage Act, and the land was acquired in 1995. The whole while, the city essentially let it sit there rotting. Now they plan to spend plenty of more money (in addition to the $0.4million it cost to relocate it) to pretty it up.

While I'm all for the preservation and reassignment of historical buildings in Toronto, this restoration project really bothers me. Sure, the building embodies architectural oddities and historical significance (arguably), but the approach is deplorable. Why did it take 18 years to do something about the building's decaying state? Why are we only now willing to salvage, at a high cost, what ultimately represents an icon of early American oil imperialism in "one of the greenest and most creative cities in North America"?

Update (April 17, 2007):
The Star is reporting that once restored, it'll become a concession stand and a tourist info center.

20070415_joyoil03.jpg

Discussion

13 Comments

bart / April 15, 2007 at 12:57 pm
user-pic
So what are they planning on doing with that structure if it ever gets restored? I can't imagine it having much use.
Jerrold / April 15, 2007 at 01:06 pm
user-pic
I've heard that it might be made into a concession stand

Ultimately, what it becomes may hinge on the results of the <a href="http://www.toronto.ca/waterfront/wwmp.htm";>Western Waterfront Master Plan</a>.
Christine / April 15, 2007 at 02:06 pm
user-pic
Wow. With all the stuff Toronto has sacrificed... I'm a little surprised, though not unhappy, that this is being preserved. There used to be this great example of an early gas station on Fleet Street, across from where Molson's Brewery (is, or was, haven't visited in awhile). I was sad when that disappeared.
Hamish Grant / April 15, 2007 at 02:28 pm
user-pic
They plopped it down right next to the ice cream stand there... so maybe they'll reno it to replace that? That'd be cool, actually.
Jerrold / April 15, 2007 at 02:37 pm
user-pic
How cool? Like $4million cool? $10million?
Andrae Griffith / April 15, 2007 at 03:02 pm
user-pic
"Why are we only now willing to salvage, at a high cost, what ultimately represents an icon of early American oil imperialism in "one of the greenest and most creative cities in North America"?"

One could argue that if we preserve it as a monument to the tragedies of the past, we are encouraged never to let them happen again. Or am I just reaching?
Adam Sobolak / April 15, 2007 at 06:33 pm
user-pic
First, Joy wasn't an American chain--it was, truly, a homegrown phenomenon; the stations were unique to Toronto.

Secondly, to seriously entertain the "icon of early American oil imperialism in one of the greenest and most creative cities in North America" argument against its retention (or even the "monument to the tragedies of the past" counter-argument for its retention) is naively adolescent at best. If we're indeed "most creative", such reasoning is more the philistine-in-spite-of-itself stuff of tinpot zealots. (That is, unless one sees *all* preservation as a "monument to the tragedies of the past". In which case, in a more abstract philosophical sense, it may be genuinely creative.)

And hey, for political balance, here's an opposite version of such nitwit-heritage-philistine logic against Big Evil Gas Companies...
http://iamscotto.blogspot.com/2006/09/go-go-citgo.html
Ian / April 15, 2007 at 06:37 pm
user-pic
Is it a 100% guarantee that the city is paying for the relocation AND restoration? Because I think the costs of moving it are worth the preservation; architecturally, culturally, and historically, this building tells a story about Toronto's past, and that's an increasing rarity here.

Maybe it'll be sold to a private developer who'll spruce it up and re-use it? 18 years is a while, but nothing moves very fast in this city, ESPECIALLY in heritage issues. Let's just be glad it's still there to preserve.
Jerrold / April 15, 2007 at 07:00 pm
user-pic
Adam,

You may want to call <a href="http://wx.toronto.ca/inter/it/newsrel.nsf/7017df2f20edbe2885256619004e428e/4b851a85d4dfa8e8852572bc00691869?OpenDocument";>The City of Toronto</a> and tell them that the info in their <a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2007/13/c5064.html";>press release</a> is wrong. *rolls eyes*

"As one of the gas stations built in the 1930s for the Joy Oil Company Ltd., a Detroit and Cleveland based firm, the Joy Oil Station has established itself as a recognizable image for an era when automotive travel was expanding."
Adam Sobolak / April 15, 2007 at 07:57 pm
user-pic
Thanks for the clarification; I was going a bit by old legend. (Though I'd be interested, for argument's sake, in knowing whatever "Joyness" still might exist outside of Toronto--in any event, it's been *treated* as an indigenous phenomenon through the years.)
sookie / April 15, 2007 at 11:10 pm
user-pic
Thank goodness Sunnyside was saved, but I wish more of the former amusement park buildings and our piers could've been too.
Jerrold / April 17, 2007 at 08:01 am
user-pic
<a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/article/203780";>The Star</a> is reporting that it'll become a concession stand and a tourist info center.
Sam Brown / April 18, 2007 at 10:57 pm
user-pic
I really don't see the point of doing this now after almost two decades.

Photo of the remaining part of this structure:
http://www.swansea.ca/gallery_Community_230.htm

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal