Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 18°C
City

Whatever Happened to Old Toronto?

Posted by Ian / March 13, 2007

20070313_torontobefore.jpgThere is a vast part of this city with mouths buried in it. Mouths capable of speaking to us. But we stop them up with concrete and build over them and whatever it is they wanted to say gets whispered down empty alleys and turns into wind. People need to be given a reason to listen.

- From Michael Redhill's Consolation.

In the short time I've been actively reading Toronto literature, one of my favourite books has been Michael Redhill's Consolation. The book, which weaves between mid-nineteenth and late-twentieth century Toronto, is about many things, but to me the most important is its discussion of the way the city engages with (i.e. erases) its past.

It should go without saying, then, that I'm excited to have this Thursday, March 15 booked off for a lecture on the very subject. I hope it's packed, because with Toronto as embattled in heritage issues as it ever has been (48 Abell, the half-round Riverdale Hospital, Walnut Hall...), it's a subject everyone who cares about Toronto should be concerned about. We are being given a reason to listen.

20070313_skyline.jpgBeginning at 7pm in the East Common Room of the University of Toronto's Hart House, urban affairs writer John Lorinc, Toronto writers Sally Gibson and Barry Callaghan, and the aforementioned Michael Redhill will be discussing "how space design, human behaviour and culture interact and foster new relationships between people and their environments" as part of the University's Grand Design series.

With the subject being "Whatever Happened to Old Toronto?" there should be some interesting discussion on Toronto's past, present, and, maybe most importantly, its future.

Images by alad1n, the blogger behind Toronto Before: A Step into the Past.

Discussion

6 Comments

Chris / March 13, 2007 at 12:11 pm
user-pic
I can appreciate both the nostalgia and the drive to preserve the past for historical purposes, but really I find myself on the other end of this... I love seeing the city transform as I grow up, and I like very much that it's changing from buildings and forms and spaces that I can't relate to into ones which I can.
Ian / March 13, 2007 at 01:08 pm
user-pic
Chris: Thanks for your comment. I like watching the city grow up, too, and I don't think every single thing needs to be preserved. Having said that, if you've ever taken a look through archived photos you'll know that Toronto had some simply beautiful architecture, buildings with character that were demolished and replaced by sterile masses of concrete.

How can we find an identity in a place constantly erasing its past for the future? I hope people in the city care about its past more than that.
Andrew / March 13, 2007 at 04:51 pm
user-pic
One thing to remember is that Toronto had a huge fire in 1904 which destroyed much of the downtown core as we know it.

For some great pics, check out http://www.archives.gov.on.ca/english/exhibits/fire/index.html

But I do definitely lean more towards the preservation side of the spectrum when it comes to old buildings. The building I live in is actually 100 years old and was converted into condos about 3 years ago. Both sides of the spectrum can live together.
Brian / March 13, 2007 at 09:06 pm
user-pic
Along the same lines take a read of Terry Murray's Faces on Places: A Grotesque Tour of Toronto.
crystal / March 13, 2007 at 10:30 pm
user-pic
Tell me if this is inappropriate because it's not T.O-based, but on a similar note I was saddened to hear that the Stardust Casino in Las Vegas was blown up... to build a bigger casino. It's the STARDUST casino! The Rat Pack played there! Where's the sense of history?
P22M / July 26, 2007 at 07:47 pm
user-pic
In the original plans for the Eaton's Centre they wer going to tear down Old City Hall and just leave the tower. What a shame that would have been.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal