Maybe He's Born with it...

Lovely to see some spirited criticism of our new PM.

It might even have legs if Paul Martin didn't look 18 months removed from gastric bypass surgery with his wobbly chin and Jack Layton didn't look like a reformed porn star from the early 70's.

Nice idea though.

i don't get this intense focus on "the looks" of our leaders. when did it start to matter how the make up was applied? multiple people have told me they wouldn't vote for so-and-so because "they didn't like they way he looked". who cares? bring the ideas, the resolve and the commitment to the job. leave it to hollywood north to find a suitable ass-double and make up artist for you when they make your bio pic.

To give his wobblyness a break, Paul Martin is also about 20 years older than our creepy current PM.

As for Layton.. i LOVE the stache, heh.

If you ever read the book "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell you would realize that the "look" of our leader is terrifically important to his or her public perception.

Society forces us to have predilection for the type of individual we're inclined to support. That is fact.

More importantly, I would never EVER vote for someone who doesn't look physically fit. Anyone who can't tend to their own physical and mental health through healthy and active living shouldn't be allowed to run for any type of office. At all.

Paul Martin - 20 years older or not - looks like he spent the 70's and 80's partying with John Candy.

Layton's Mustachio is spectacular. Never said it wasn't.

the make up can't be worse than brokeback mountain

LOL, Jack.

Make-up, of course, is not a physical trait. I wouldn't dare to go too far in that direction lest I lay down a comment about how disturbing the eyes of Mr. H are.

You can be fit, fat, wobbly or worn out, but hardcore eyeliner is not the route to taken in order to distract people from your terrible helmet hair nor the fact that your chin is doubling.

Whoops.

"blink" -- that book was okay. gladwell gets points for giving kenna an entire chapter of literary love. but as he puts forth his theory of quick thinking he does also caution against an over abuse of instinct. indeed, he gives you a big long chapter on white cops filling an innocent black guy with hot lead because they acted on instinct. we're voting for more than the man here. it's a party, a platform, a set of ideals. if you were signing a contract with harper specifically, or asking him out on a date, sure let your instincts guide you. it's between you and him. but if you're voting for a party -- a non-physical entity really -- you need to look past the frontman and at what the propose to do with your money and country.

seriously, he should have hired the person who did Arnold's make up, here is the proof:

http://www.youtube.com/?v=vEIA0ec44bk

I'm not hear to break the news of Stephen Harper's victory.

hear hear!
Here?

DAMNIT! How did I miss that? Thanks, Paige.

(As the blogTO editor tiptoes away in shame... to fix her typo)

hello! http://www.dirare.com/Sweden/ online directory. MY yellowpages, SMART Yellow Pages, About DIRare. From online directory .