Saturday, May 26, 2012Partly Cloudy 21°C
City

Election Primer 010: How to NOT Vote

Posted by St Dan / January 17, 2006

Believe it or not, not all Torontonians will vote January 23rdA quick and easy guide for the perplexed

While we here at blogTO certainly encourage everybody to vote on or before January 23rd, we also recognize that some people - be it out of lethargy, complacence, or political protest will choose not to vote. This is an examination of how to do that.

Method 1: Avoid the polling stations.
This is the non-voting method prefered by many Canadians for its ease and simplicity. There are thousands of things to do in Toronto, even in the winter, so go out and do them instead of walking the 200m to the ballot box. The Simpsons is probably on TV somewhere for most of the 12 hours that voting is on. Or you could go skating al fresco in Mel Lastman Square. Alternative, you could use the three hours your employer is obligated to give you to take a nice long bath.

While this method has the advantage of being easy, it suffers by sending mixed messages. While you may be not-voting as a protest, avoiding the polling stations just sends the message that you're lazy.

Method 2: Spoil your ballot.
In theory, it's exceptionally easy to spoil a ballot. In practice, it's only really easy. According to law, a ballot must be marked with an 'X' and only an 'X'. Anything else; a stray pencil marking, a checkmark rather than an 'X', two 'X's, anything will invalidate it. In practice though, a ballot will only be ruled spoiled if either voting intention is not clear, more than one box was checked, or it could be easy to identify who filled out the ballot. So yes, writing 'All of you losers are corrupt!!!!' counts.

While spoiling your ballot has the advantage of proving that you have the energy to walk (or be driven) the 200m to the polling station, all spoiled ballots are lumped together in the counting - regardless of if they were intentional or accidental. The politicians will have no way of telling your protest vote apart from the ballot of Bobby McStupid of Stupidville, SK, who thought you had to scribble out every politician you didn't like.

Method 3: Refuse your ballot.
This is the method that Elections Canada doesn't want you to know about (although I'd suspect if it was more publicised, voting percentages would go up significantly) because it sends a clear message that you're not happy - too many of these, and the burocracy might realise that people want change. To refuse your ballot, go up and register just like you would if you were voting, and then once they give you your ballot: hand it back. They don't get many of these (a handful each election each poll) so expect to be stared at blankly for a moment, but that will subside. When you're handing back your ballot, tell them that you're choosing to refuse your ballot - you can make a grand speech about it if you want, but it doesn't get recorded.

Refused ballots are recorded seperately from all other ballots, and send a direct message to the government that you're not just apathetic or uninformed, you're not happy with the electoral system as it stands. The main disadvantage is that nobody, minus a handful of politics geeks, knows about the availability of this method. But now you do.

Method 4: How not to not vote.
There are plenty of other ways to not vote; you could eat your ballot, burn down the polling station, or refuse to give your ballot back, to name but three. However, all of these are illegal and could land you in jail, so I wouldn't recommend them.

Discussion

14 Comments

Christina / January 17, 2006 at 12:30 pm
user-pic
I like how eating your ballot is specifically illegal...
Bubbles / January 17, 2006 at 05:32 pm
user-pic
Hello,</br>
</br>
Actually, Method 3 is only valid for provincial elections. There is no provision for refusing a ballot in a federal election (ie it's not part of federal election law), which is why you'll get funny looks if you try it.</br>
</br>
The reason you've heard of this is that Elections Canada has asked for the law to be changed, to allow Canadians to do it in federal elections. It's currently only part of provincial law in a few provinces.</br>
</br>
See here:</br>
<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2004/200406/20040628.html";>http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2004/200406/20040628.html<;/a>
</br>
</br>
Bub
Thane / January 17, 2006 at 11:00 pm
user-pic
I've scrutinized in a federal election before, and we had seperate catagories for refused and spoiled ballots.
matt / January 18, 2006 at 05:28 am
user-pic
Refuse your ballot. - this is interesting (giving it back).

We here in Poland maybe will go (probably) to vote after only 6 months since last elections, which makes everyone quite furious (we've just got 3 voting days - 1 parliamentary and 2 for president, so we're quite fed up with this democratic procedure).

The most important is that politicians will (but will they ever?) understand people are fed up with them...
St Dan / January 18, 2006 at 09:36 am
user-pic
Matt:

That's the tough bit - making politicians know that we're not happy while still using our vote to influence the decisions. Many people here in Canada do that by voting for fourth parties - those who are on the ballot, but who don't stand a chance of winning.
Clide Rockwell / January 18, 2006 at 04:50 pm
user-pic
Voting should be made mandatory, especially for young people.
Jennn / January 19, 2006 at 04:13 pm
user-pic
"Bobby McStupid of Stupidville, SK"
hehehehehe.. that's awesome..

I think every ballot should just have the option to X saying "I would like to vote but do not approve of any candidate".
St Dan / January 22, 2006 at 04:36 pm
user-pic
Clide: I agree that voting should be mandatory, but first they need to include an explicit 'none of the above' option.

Jennn: Thanks, I just hope the McStupids don't catch wind of me using them as a punchline. I doubt they will though.
Cloquewerk / January 23, 2006 at 03:50 pm
user-pic
<p>I just reviewed the <i><a href="http://www.elections.ca/content.asp?section=loi&;dir=leg/fel/cea&document=index&lang=e&textonly=false">Canada Elections Act</a></i>, and there's nothing about refusals. They count the number of votes for each candidate and the rejected votes, which includes votes spoiled for any reason (too many Xs, no X, etc.).</p>

<p>Whether or not some polls do count refusals or anything I don't know, but there's no specific provision for it in the law. Too bad.</p>

<p>Oh, and sadly it seems impossible to get actual numbers of spoiled votes for previous elections... neither the Elections Canada nor Parliament websites present them, at least that I could find.</p>
St Dan / January 23, 2006 at 05:35 pm
user-pic
if you go to http://www.elections.ca/scripts/OVR2004/default.html you can find the number of rejected ballots in each polling station.
Cloquewerk / January 23, 2006 at 08:32 pm
user-pic
Aha, okay, thanks. They don't make it easy to find, do they... still, while a large number of non-voters could be (and would be) attributed to just laziness, it would be really hard to attribute a large number of spoiled ballots to stupidity, especially since we seem to always use the same (or at least very similar) ballots. I would hope so, anyway, although media spin is an impressive (and depressive) thing to watch.
St Dan / January 24, 2006 at 04:21 am
user-pic
It's absolutely true that a spoiled ballot does send more of a message than just staying home. The only problem is that it doesn't send an indisputable message, is all.
Jen Orenstein / January 24, 2006 at 02:32 pm
user-pic
hello.
i have been very confused about the ballot refusal concept because over the past 3 days the story keeps changing.
after reading the cbc link posted above, i decided that it was still worth trying to refuse the ballot. so i went to the polls and did so. they were a bit unsure but i said clearly "i am refusing, not spoiling, this ballot" they checked it out and said it would be counted seperately than a spoiled ballot.
then today, i looked at the elections canada results and saw that there is no comlumn for refused ballots and that at my poll it said there were 0 rejected!
i know that i did not dream that i put a blank ballot in the box, it happened.
so i just got off the phone with elections canada who informed me that
a) the rejected vote tallies are not final as of yet (so, the votes aren't all counted even though we have our results????)
and b) there is NO SUCH THING as a protest vote or refused ballot in the federal election system of canada.
so the people at my poll had no idea what they were saying.
basically all i've got to work with now (within the system anyway)
is the address of the committee on procedure. i'm going to write a letter demanding a change in the voting system. where is the freedom in not having the option of being heard outside of a few names on a page? not everyon fits on a fucking ballot.
so here's the address (although i am cynical that writing a letter will do fuck all)
Standing Committee on Procedure and House of Commons
Room 617
180 Wellington
Ottawa, ONtario
k1a 0a6
peace
jen
St Dan / January 24, 2006 at 08:40 pm
user-pic
Wow Jen. Thanks for that, and goodluck!

Please, keep me updated (stdan@blogTO.com) about your progress.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal