Saturday, May 26, 2012Clear 20°C
City

New Eucan Bins Can't Even Fake It

Posted by Tanja / August 9, 2005

august0905_bigbins.jpgOver the past few months I've read much press concerning the new giant Eucan garbage bins/billboards the city is looking to install. I easily emerged on the side of scrapping the plan, but now, after finally coming face to face with one, I'm in awe.

I'm in simple awe at how city council is trying to pull a fast one on the citizens of this city -- and doing a sloppy job of it too.

Initial models of the new contraption have been placed in various around the GTA. Considering how badly the mayor seems to want to win over the public on this (or at least shut us up), one would think that an effort would have been made to place the bins well and in some form of pleasing -- let along logical -- manner. Apparently, nobody at Eucan was thinking.

Take a look at the photo above. I'll try to be brief.

Problem #1: You heard it was a big box, and it's true. This binzilla towers over the average human being. Whether at a distance or right next to it, it's seriously cutting off your sightline of the road and the sidewalk.

The shot above, taken from a few metres back shows off how the bin, from most perspectives, stands taller than the bus that's turning the corner.

And I'm only standing metres back because when I was closer to it, I kept being startled by people appearing from the other side, or cars whizzing at close proximity, as I hadn't seen them coming.

If you're a driver, prepare yourself for random pedestrians popping out from behind the bins in their attempts to cross the street. There is no way in hell you are going to see them. So remember, brake hard.

Problem #2: There are six slots for different types of materials -- 3 on each narrow side. Currently, a full-size poster outlines what goes where. Once that poster is replaced by a half-naked underage American Apparel model pouting away, does anyone honestly think people will circle the length of this bin or refer to the diagram to figure out where their trash goes? First hole you see -- in it goes.

Current bins have 3 holes all nicely in a row and we still screw that up from time to time.

Problem #3: Despite just telling you that there are six trash slots in the bin, I'm revising to state that really, there are only 3 safe ones.

Quickly examining the photo above, you''ll notice that the right side is pretty much on the curb. In order to trash your "cigarettes, recycling, and litter" (the big 3) located on that side, you are risking being clipped by a bike, car, vespa or swift moving downtown rickshaw.

Genius.

Thank you City Council for giving us material proof of what a pathetic idea these bins are. Now please, take them off our public sidewalks.

--

If you want to voice your opinion or find out more, visit PublicSpace.ca. There you'll find info on where the bins are located, fill out a response survey for City Hall and get info on how to reach your local councillor.

Discussion

21 Comments

Alpha / August 9, 2005 at 02:15 am
user-pic
That is the most idiotic - and frankly, INSANE - garbage bin I have ever seen. I mean, I thought the OMG metal bins were bad (hey we'll offer tiny slots so people can get their hands dirty), but this is just atrocious. Let's not roll over about this one.
Adam / August 9, 2005 at 09:39 am
user-pic
I just saw one of these yesterday and man are they big and ugly.

I also had to stop and think about which slot to put my trash in, most rubbish bins are self-explanitory. These ugly ad-boxes need to go.
Dave / August 9, 2005 at 11:21 am
user-pic
I haven't seen one up close yet, but I tend to agree with what I've read so far.

On the lighter side, at least they'll block you from the bullets!

Dave
Tanja / August 9, 2005 at 11:29 am
user-pic
Ouch.
blamb / August 9, 2005 at 11:50 am
user-pic
Clearly, these things are billboards first and garbage bins second.
irc / August 9, 2005 at 12:26 pm
user-pic
if you want to tell the mayor and the city councillors what you think about this plan you should contact your local councillors office: <a href="http://app.toronto.ca/im/council/councillors.jsp";>http://app.toronto.ca/im/council/councillors.jsp<;/a>

the more you tell them how silly an idea this is, the more likely they are to bring it up in council meetings.

i'm interested to see if any of them would respond directly to this post...i've sent some invites...
Doug / August 9, 2005 at 12:52 pm
user-pic
vandals...you have our permission...
Dave / August 9, 2005 at 01:22 pm
user-pic
Ok. Sorry, bad bullet joke :-)
In all seriousness though, I could see these being dangerous at night.

Picture being a single person, waiting for a bus or streetcar at the wee hours. You won't see who's creeping around from behind the thing.

They do appear to be WAY too big.

Dave
smc / August 9, 2005 at 02:55 pm
user-pic
I do not live in Toronto, but do visit from time-to-time, and to be honest I think I'd scream as loud as that lady does on the KFC commercial when she sees that Autumn is coming if I saw one of these things...it could swallow you it's so BIG!

Toronto is a great city and this just messes with that.
brokenengine / August 9, 2005 at 05:12 pm
user-pic
I saw one at Christie / Bloor last night, and had the same thoughts about the different holes.<br>
However, your article makes it sound like your <b>real</b> problem with these things are their proximity to the street. Just a thought.<br>
Wasn't there a rumour awhile back about these things being equipped as Wi-Fi hotspots? Anyone know if there's any truth to that?

Alpha / August 9, 2005 at 05:31 pm
user-pic
No mention of wireless capabilities on megabin.ca
Tanja / August 9, 2005 at 07:00 pm
user-pic
I heard that rumour as well. I'm sure there is that potential in the future, but I'm also sure that Rogers or whoever buys up the rights to the WIFI will charge you big to use it.
Mike / August 9, 2005 at 09:27 pm
user-pic
Yuckkk
irc / August 9, 2005 at 09:50 pm
user-pic
whoa! did you catch their estimated yearly revenue from that eucan site?!?! wtf? 0.9 million dollars! that's it? that's less than 0.1% of the city's yearly operating budget (~$7 billion this year).

i like how their marketing/pr team said, "say 'million' when you qote the dollar figure because people will round up in their heads!" to their web team. i'm seeing a puny nine hundred thousand in revenue for a city that operates on <em>billions</em> of dollars a year.

how stupid are these people we put in city council? how can they even say that amount is <em>revenue</em> for the city? i don't think that'd even cover the catering budget for their council meetings for the year.
brokenengine / August 9, 2005 at 11:59 pm
user-pic
Actually, I work for Rogers, in the data device department. Blackberries, etc. Gonna be doing Wi-Fi soon. We don't own any wi-fi, nor do we charge anything for it. We just tell you how to access it with your blackberry/treo/whatev. I doubt we'll be doing it ourselves. I guess we'll see, I could be wrong, but I've heard nothing.
Tanja / August 10, 2005 at 12:11 am
user-pic
Was only using Rogers as an example (no idea who would offer it), seeing as they've got the 2nd Cup WiFi circuit hooked up, but you have to pay for access now that the 'trial' period is over and done with.
JackatM2 / August 11, 2005 at 03:56 pm
user-pic
i want to see these big boxes in downtown Vancouver, they desparately need this advertising medium there
armchair / August 16, 2005 at 12:08 am
user-pic
Yeah well...

They're up for 3 months. It's a pilot. They'll remain installed after the 3 month pilot until the public feedback and operational feedback can be assessed and written into a staff report. That will go to committee and then to Council.

15 wards opted to not participate in the pilot study and will most likely vote to not allow Eucan to use the bins in the city. The remaining wards will vote once they've considered the recomendations in the staff report.

Given the feedback here, in the press, and generally from the vox pops, one could assume they won't be around for too long.
hanzy / June 28, 2006 at 02:38 pm
user-pic
Everytime I see one of these boxes on the Danforth I cringe. Garbage is overflowing the inadequately small garbage can given the size of the enclosure and is piled wherever it fits. Whoever designed these should be fired. If city council goes ahead with these new cans then we know they really do not have Toronto's interests at the top of their list. The old OMG bins were bad but at least they were functional and had a good ratio of useable volume for garbage and recycling. These new can seem to be mostly advertising space with little usable volume for garbage and recycling. I for one hope they are gone off our streets soon.
Tanja / June 28, 2006 at 09:10 pm
user-pic
You'll be happy to see this then, Hanzy:

http://www.blogto.com/city/2006/06/megabins_get_stuffed/
Mary Box / August 18, 2006 at 11:47 pm
user-pic
You can't be 56452 serious?!?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal