Airplane Crashes at Pearson

  • Posted by Tim
  • Filed in City
  • August 2, 2005

aug0205_torontoplanecrash.jpg
[Update]The plane crash today at Pearson airport was shocking and surreal. It's been a long time since a large jet has burst into flames in the GTA and early signs pointed to a grim outcome. But miraculously, all 309 passengers and crew of the Air France AF358 walked away from the burning wreckage.

Reports now indicate the plane came in too high and landed too far down the runway, causing it to skid off the end and crash into a ravine where it broke apart and, later, burst into flames. Bad weather certainly played a factor.

Seeing news reports come in from across the web as the situation unfolded was pretty unreal, but ultimately uplifting. Here's some screenshots from earlier today:

Reports from the Star.

aug0205_torontoplanecrashst.jpg

The Star an hour later, trying to put a figure on the number of passengers.

aug0205_torontocrashstar2.jpg

Homepage of CNN earlier this afternoon.

aug0205_torontoplanecrashcn.jpg

Toronto was the number one search term on blog search engine Technorati.

aug0205_technorati.jpg

See below for archived content of this post as the news was breaking:

This is just hitting the wire. Stay tuned for updates here as news unfolds.

* Globe link

Update 1: The Star is reporting this is an Air France Jet arriving from Paris to Toronto.

Update 2: The National Post has more.

A passenger jet has skidded off the runway at Toronto's Pearson International Airport and crashed into a ditch. The flight is apparently Air France flight AF358, an Airbus A340, and the airliner is now nose-down in a ditch and billowing thick black smoke

Smoke billowed from a wooded area near Highway 401, Canada's busiest highway.

Peel police say the craft was an Air France passenger jet that was attempting to land when it ran into trouble.

Sgt. Glyn Griffiths said passengers saw flames from the window but couldn't say whether they had been removed from the plane.

Emergency crews were enroute to the scene.

Update 3: Wikipedia has info about previous crashes at Pearson.

Update 4: From the Globe on casualties: "A pilot has gone to hospital and they were picked up on the 401 and a number of other passengers were wandering around the area so we're trying to head them off. I haven't got any information on casualties at all."

Update 5: 680 news is reporting that 2 busloads of passengers have been moved away from the area. Also mentioned two large explosions. 401 closed.

Update 6: 680 news reporting that "most" of the 200 passengers were able to get out of the plane before it burst into flames. Live streaming of their coverage online.

planecrashpic2.jpgUpdate 7: Air France states 252 passengers were on board.

Update 8: CNN reporting that plane touched runway before crashing. Globe has list of previous incidents involving the A340.

Update 9: Audio from 680 news and CNN. Listen to the MP3.

Update 10: NY Times has live video.

Update 11: All flights canceled in and out of Pearson.

planecrashpic3.jpgUpdate 12: From the CBC: The incident happened as most operations at the airport were grounded because of severe thunderstorms in the area. At mid-afternoon Tuesday, a spokesperson with the Greater Toronto Airports Authority said lightning was causing technical problems with the airport's lightning-detection system. All aircraft were grounded for safety reasons as a result, largely to protect crews working on the ground.

Update 13: From 680 News/CTV. Passenger says there were no evacuation instructions when plane crashed. Everyone was panicked. There was no warning from captain/crew that landing would be difficult. But power went out in plane just before landing. Thought it was because of the rain/lighting. Was very scared.

Update 14: 680 news reporting that all passengers escaped. Some injuries but no report of fatalities.

planecrashpic4.jpgUpdate 15: CBC confirming all passengers survived the crash.

Update 16: Audio coverage from the GTAA news conference. Listen to the MP3

Update 17: 297 passengers. 12 crew. 14 injuries. no fatalities. Source: GTAA

Update 18: Audio interview with passenger. From CNN.

Update 19: Another passenger interview from CNN. Listen to the MP3.

planecrashpic5.jpgUpdate 20: From CNN. Passenger Roel Bramar told CBC-TV that he was in the last seat of the full flight when it landed and failed to stop before the runway ended. "There was some real roller-coasting going on," as the plane drove into the ravine, he said. "This plane came off the runway. It slid off the runway and into this gully," said Toronto radio reporter Leah Walker, who witnessed the crash. "It's come off with probably a great amount of force into trees and the creek." She said a fireball engulfed the plane.

Another witness, Corey Marx, said, "Everything looked good, sounded good. It hit the runway nice, then all of a sudden we heard the engines backing up." Marx said he initially didn't think anything was wrong. But then, "The guy I was with piped up, 'You know, he's getting pretty close to the end.' Immediately afterward, right off he went." The plane fell into a valley at the end of the runway and cracked in half, Marx said.

Update 21: Another interview with a passenger by CNN's Wolf Blitzer. Listen to the MP3.

Update 22: Globe has list of notable plane crashes in Canada.

Update 23: From the Globe/CBC Newsworld. "All I did was run like crazy," passenger Roel Bramar told CBC Newsworld. "I was the second one off the plane and everyone was running like crazy. It was full. Totally full. I saw lightning. Just as we landed, the lights turned off and that's unusual. The captain wanted to lower the plane as quickly as possible. We had come to a complete stop. It's not like you think anything else is about to happen. I got off the plane on a chute. I don't know what happened to everyone else because I was the second one off the plane. I'm standing here in a blanket and I just want to go home because I'm feeling pretty shaky," Mr. Bramar said.

Update 24: Audio coverage of the second GTAA press conference. Listen to the MP3.

Breaking news seems to be winding down on today's plane crash at Toronto's Pearson airport. No doubt can get a full recap on the evening news and tomorrow's papers.

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

This is excellent for my confidence, as I am flying out tomorrow morning.

Posted by: Paul at August 2, 2005 6:02 PM

Just because it's exciting and happening in Toronto does not make it appropriate material for this site. Especially in the form of a peacemeal news bulletin "Cuz you don't live in Relevance City or EditorialCohesive Town."

Posted by: gR at August 2, 2005 6:56 PM

i heard the internet is a pretty big place. nobody's forcing you to read blogTO.

Posted by: Tim Author Profile Page at August 2, 2005 7:00 PM

"i heard the internet is a pretty big place. nobody's forcing you to read blogTO."

It's an open forum. You list yourself as the publisher. If someone were giving you strokes for this you'd gladly take them but instead you're taking your ball and going home. If you want to run a site which often publishes critical opinions you should expect critical feedback.


Posted by: gR at August 2, 2005 7:28 PM

i welcome the feedback. but this is a two way dialogue so i'm simply responding to your feedback.

Posted by: Tim Author Profile Page at August 2, 2005 7:29 PM

perhaps you can explain why you don't feel it's relevant? aside from having issues with our sarcastic taglines, why shouldn't we cover this?

Posted by: Tim Author Profile Page at August 2, 2005 7:33 PM

You created an entire report from cut and paste jobs from a half dozen other news sources. You did it because you wanted to catch a hold of something that was exciting but that you had absolutely no insight into.

Posted by: gR at August 2, 2005 7:44 PM

first off, not covering this would have been a major oversight. this was big news in toronto today and none of us knew at the outset how it would unfold.

next, just in case you didn't know alot of news organizations (and i don't see why blogs should be excluded) use third party reports when they aren't in position to provide first hand coverage. ever read the local paper and see all those articles from a/p, reuters or the ny times? same thing.

third, for everyone whose only access to news coverage of this incident today was via the web, what site should they have turned to? in times of breaking news, i think there is value in linking to various sources to give readers a more complete view. those who didn't find it useful i'm sure had no problem surfing over to cnn, cbc or some other source.

Posted by: Tim Author Profile Page at August 2, 2005 8:10 PM

Does that make every other sensational news story that you didn't cover in the last few months a major oversight? For example, doesn't half a dozen people being shot to death in the last week on the streets of Toronto qualify as news? Couldn't you find anything good on the wires? Or did you think it already got enough coverage on AP, Reuters, CP and the other wires?

Or was it just not to your taste?

Compared to the rest of the content of your site I can't see how covering the plane crash story in the way that you did makes any sense.


Posted by: gR at August 2, 2005 11:07 PM

great

Posted by: kolp at August 2, 2005 11:23 PM

gr what's your real beef - did blogto scoop you or something.. faster linking fingers to the trigger. I don't see anything truly critical about any of your remarks - you say it doesn't make sense - exactly how does it not make sense? Makes perfect sense to me. This is the site of blogto, they can publish whatever they see fit, relevant, etc. in whatever way they choose. Do you have to have direct insight on an issue to have an opinion about it, post a reaction, or otherwise link to sites that might have more direct information? Smelling as how this accident affected the entire city - nice new toxic pollution odour - nothing like burning jet fuel to get your evening humming, if you're in the t.dot I think it's eminently bloggable in whatever fashion you wish...

Posted by: ann at August 2, 2005 11:30 PM

arguing on the internet is like...

Posted by: Amelie Poulin at August 3, 2005 12:00 AM

gR, what kind of posts do you like? Do you enjoy this site at all?

Criticism is fine but ultimately unhelpful to those wishing to make this space more relevant.

How should we have covered this? Or does this story simply not belong on blogTO in your opinion?

This is a blog about Toronto afterall, and international news taking place in our city, I feel, is worthy of mention.

Posted by: Zach at August 3, 2005 3:05 AM

Sensational? A plane with 300 people crashes, breaks, and bursts into flames while nearly ending up on one of the biggest highways we know -- and not one person is killed. More like INCREDIBLE.

You could smell the blaze from km's away in the the west end... that's as T.O. as it gets.

Also Tim, nice run down on how our media + world media went about covering the story... i like the angle. I heard about the story through my mum who was actually watching 2 Cdn news channels + CNN and an italian news station 'cause she 'loved' to see how it was being interpreted and reported differently.

Posted by: Tanja at August 3, 2005 3:14 AM

FWIW, the coverage is very appreciated and, I think, is pretty good considering the information was coming in from a variety of scattered sources.

Posted by: Craig at August 3, 2005 9:12 AM

I can't believe you guys are arguing about whether or not BlogTO should cover this sort of thing or not. If it happened or is happening in Toronto, I say it makes sense for BlogTO to cover it or not.



Every major newspaper has an editor that chooses to run stories on things happening locally and internationally. Some of those stories fall through the cracks, are discarded in favour of other stories, and thats totally at the editors discretion. Likewise, BlogTO chose to cover this, and not other stories.



I'm scratching my head that anyone actually has beef with this. That's what makes no sense.

Posted by: brokenengine at August 3, 2005 11:18 AM

all this hostility makes my head hurt. i still think you guys are doing a great job. keep it up.

Posted by: Sameer Vasta Author Profile Page at August 3, 2005 1:31 PM

gR, you have so much time to attack blogto, maybe you should focus on telling CNN to provide news that is less biased and US centric,constantly looking for ways to bash Canada.

Posted by: jackatM2 at August 3, 2005 2:38 PM

Wow there's some "cheeky banter", as the Brits would say!

Apparently GM really ENJOYS our original insights and it appears that late-breaking, timely news isn't what brings him here. It's almost as if we've disappointed him... a real large scale wounding of his expectations!

Interesting...

Posted by: Jennn at August 3, 2005 4:03 PM

In case anyone's interested, Gothamist covered the plane crash, too.

Posted by: Camille at August 3, 2005 4:15 PM

Post a comment

Email This Entry

Email 'Airplane Crashes at Pearson' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.