City Beautiful?

  • Posted by Staff
  • Filed in City
  • February 21, 2005

Feb21Lars.jpg
Free speech or free ad?

That's the crux of the matter between some free speech advocates and city councillors who want to ban posters on hydro poles in Toronto.

Two years ago, the Toronto Public Space Committee (TPSC) won the fight to keep hydro poles covered with ads promoting everything from (insert unsigned garage band here) to (insert sex & violence cartoon festival here.) City councillors had it wrong. These often torn up and crudely taped lifelines of culture were not the work of opportunistic vandals as some of them suggested. They were expressions of freedom.

Click next and today we have the same debate at city council. And once again the TPSC has stepped up, opposing what it calls an attack on culture, multiculturalism, and freedom of expression.

To be denied a voice is undoubtedly an unjust imposition. We've all felt the weight of being silenced through unwanted discipline or our acquiescence to the intimidation brought on by others. But we are kidding ourselves if we think that by banning advertisements (and that's what they really are) from the public's utility poles that we are denying ourselves an outlet for meaningful expression or attacking culture. There are countless ways to express one's self other than at the expense of a public that has to foot the bill year round for cleaning the sticky mess people leave encrusted on a pole intended to light up streets.

To would be flamers: Please inform me how a missing sign for Fluffy the cat or guitar lessons from Dave can pass for culture any more than the sensory explosion of would-be consumer bliss turning Dundas Square into a 24 hour a day fireworks display. In Fluffy's case, its owners are trying to recruit you to find the cat that they lost. And Dave has to pay the rent so those lessons aren't free.

How many of these expressions of freedom that you see are just that? I'm not being rhetorical. There are some poignant and provocative prints out there and a local mag called Spacing makes a good if not too forgiving case for keeping paper on poles.

But rallying against the by-law to ban posters on hydro poles may not be the freedom loving revolutionary cause it's made out to be. As Dylan Reid points out at spacing it's already illegal to post signs on telephone booths and public parking meters. That hasn't deterred people from scattering what Reid calls a kind of postering archaeology of fragments and layers of past announcements.

Taken in an urban and architectural context, his argument for art and past preservation makes sense. Viewed another way, these signs are an offence to a public's freedom from information. Whether you were sold on a screening of the Rocky Horror Picture Show from a poster stuck to a public lamp post or taking the tykes to see Sponge Bob Square Pants because of a billboard facing Times Square North, both are trying to sell you on something, and the Toronto Public Space Committee does its cause a disservice by not acknowledging this fact.

Have your say at city hall. Check out the council schedule or comment here at blogTO.

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

I've got to disagree with you on this one Lars. There's a big difference between corporate billboards and neon lights at Yonge and Dundas and your common street poster. Namely, most artists, promoters and other citizens can't afford the former.

The fact is that entrepreneurs, artists and promoters need an outlet to let people know about their shows/events/music etc. Mainstream media is stretched too thin and doesn't have the interest to give coverage to a range of local talent.

You should check out Chris Hutsul's story in the Sunday Star. An interesting read on this very topic.

Also in the Star (they did a bang-up job this past weekend), is a write-up on TO's own City Beautification Ensemble.

Posted by: tim [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 21, 2005 7:36 PM

Hehehe. It's a lot more complicated of a world than many people would think.

Make sure to pick up a copy of the next Scenester Magazine (Issue 3, March). I have a detailed article called "Flyer Wars" about what goes on behind the scenes of those posters you see layering our poles. ;)

Posted by: Jennn at February 22, 2005 3:04 AM

i have mixed feelings on this one. it's too bad people can't restrain themselves a little. i don't mind posters on poles, but i really think our city is starting to look dirty and disgusting now that we have posters all over mailboxes and street signs.

Posted by: zydeco fish at February 22, 2005 9:55 AM

while some may say they detract from our city's beauty i certainly see the glass as being "half-full"... i see them as a baromoter of life and underground movement in this city. i enjoy seeing what's up and going on around me. maybe a set of reasonable guidelines need to be enforced to keep really offensive postering/flyering in check? not sure. something to think about. toronto...it's alive, IT'S ALIVE!!

Posted by: dvs at March 2, 2005 1:23 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'City Beautiful?' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.