Arts
Istvan Kantor makes art out of smashing cars
Walking into the clearing across from the abandoned WWII munitions factory at 163 Sterling Road on Saturday afternoon, it was a surprise that the Toronto police hadn't been called. A crowd of 40 stood in a semi-circle around a broken down red Pontiac as the beginnings of a faux riot commenced. Most of the audience was armed with heavy-duty cameras, but some were people who simply came to see what SMASHING, the performance art piece involving a live, hour-long car destruction, was all about.
Sponsored by vintage shop Smash, Saturday's performance art gala was the work of renowned Hungarian-Canadian artist Istvan Kantor, a man with silver teeth and bleach blond spiked hair who spent the event switching roles between electric guitar player and master destructor.
Joined by Estonian performance art group Non Grata, who have been growing in popularity in the New York art scene for several years now, Kantor's fête of ruin was to take place over the course of the day in two venues, beginning with the demolition of a vehicle on Sterling Road.
The hour-long "smash" involved performances by the characters of Non Grata, such as a young dark-haired girl in a flowing white dress, who began the afternoon by lighting the car on fire with a flaming stick.
Another anonymous member of Non Grata walked the grounds in a black balaclava with two small balloons attached to the head--a criminal Mickey Mouse--with a sign that read, "Smash it, baby, smash it" while a second girl in a long black lace gown casually presented observers with weapons such as sledgehammers, mallets, hammers and a pickaxe, inviting them to destroy the car.
Miraculously, no one caught a pickaxe in the eye as the group stood for an hour, taking turns at shattering glass, stabbing rubber and, eventually, flipping the car on its hood. At one point, I overheard someone say, "This is so fucked up." It's not, really, when you take into account that it was a pre-arranged art piece. Add in a desensitized crowd, and it was almost funny.
The fucked up part came later in the night.
At the end of the hour, once the car had been flipped and destroyed, Silver Teeth (as Kantor could be dubbed) had dropped the electric guitar. He hopped on top of the belly-up car with his red flag, smiled and rebel yelled. Anarchists win, his gesture seemed to say, with consumerism (as embodied by the car) having been effectively smashed. The revolution had begun (for the day).
The two-part event continued three hours later at The Theatre Centre Pop-Up (1095 Queen Street West) with local performance and video artists such as Wesley Rickert and Jubal Brown playing music and mash-ups as accompaniment to violent video components that flashed on the southern wall of the venue. The same anonymous Non Grata characters from earlier had also returned to close out the night with the pièce de résistance that they have become famous for--a performance piece known as STORM GENERATION.
Non Grata has performed the piece worldwide, relying on their "floating" membership which allows artists to drift in and out of the group depending on their location. The group's motive to recreate real art is realized by allowing artists to experience complete immersion in their roles through anonymity. STORM GENERATION takes that anonymity to a new level, calling for the breakdown of capitalism through a controversial cult-like initiation ceremony that involves human branding. Yes, branding.
With Kantor back on electric guitar, Non Grata's Mickey Mouse Balaclava man stood in the center of the room, shouting in heavily accented English through a megaphone, "We are the Storm Generation. Do you love the Storm Generation?" The woman in the white dress from earlier circled the room repeatedly with a blowtorch, heating up an S-shaped rod of iron, a staple of the piece. A member of the troupe was pulled from the crowd--the young girl in the black lace gown.
"Oh God, are they going to brand her?" I whispered to my friend, as the blowtorch and the iron rod made its way back to the centre of the room. It's important to note that at each of Non Grata's performances of STORM GENERATION, participants are willing; occasionally, even people who are unaffiliated with the group volunteer.
I covered my eyes and could only hear the electric guitar. When I looked back up, the girl proudly smiled an unsettling smile, the symbol of Non Grata's Storm Generation on her arm.
And with that, Non Grata had left their mark, and a strong message, on Toronto.
Photos by Christian Bobak. Top photo by Andrew Williamson.


Discussion
39 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
and if they get one, can I have one too?
Yawn.
Signed,
Everyone
Part 2 looks a bit more interesting.
Sheesh! Finally, ppl have woken up.
PS-Taxpayers also supported Kantor's shtick about vials of blood in his anus. Great use of my money. Thanks, Gov't of Canada!
Can't help but think that this was more practice than an exhibition.
Istvan is actually Karl Lagerfeld's less-succesful younger brother, who couldn't make it in Europe so has colonized the soporific and gullible Toronto "arts" scene...
"Let's destroy capitalism, but please don't destroy my designer shades...."
Counterculture movements and manifestos focus on what they are against and it's time they get a facelift. It has traditionally been a young artist's game to say 'f*ck the man', but it takes a more insightful and less self-focused person to suggest a better way of being.
This event illustrates how anyone can make a weapon out of a tool, like a hammer or an axe, and dent up an object considered an icon of consumerism. It takes far more effort, skill and imagination to use these tools to make something beautiful. I would have liked to have seen teams of people systematically dismantle a car and make sculptures from their parts. This would have been something worthy of the SMASH brand and funding.
Many activities at this event emulate the counterculture movement from the early 80s. To cavalierly relive punk glory days and teach the same ridiculous disenchanted battle cry to echoboomers shows less concern for making a political or artistic statement and more interest in hyping up a reputation for a group of individuals. It's wasn't about "what does this act say?" It was about "How cool will I look if I organize this event?". This 'spectacle as art' and marketing as art form is classic irony likely missed by many busy documenting it.
Watch SUBURBIA (1983)to see where a lot of this stuff was ripped off from. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DAhIHu7mYE
Pshaw.
For the love of god, please dont report on garbage like this.
This crap adds absolutly nothing to the make-up of Toronto, but takes away from the real artists.
I wonder how the air smelled after this dumb bit*h allowed some meth'd out losers to brand her with some worthless design. Another pathetic display of Torontonian's with too much time on their hands.
I have five things to say about your drive-by post:
1) What defines a 'real' artist and, by those criteria, name twelve Toronto artist who, in your opinion, are real. Then tell me what credentials you have to determine who is and is not a real artist.
2)Do you know the person who was branded? Do you know the person who branded her? Do you know she's a meth head? If you don't you shouldn't make public statements like that. It's Libel and there are laws against that in Canada. http://www.cba.org/bc/public_media/rights/240.aspx
3)Using a gender pejorative does nothing to reinforce your argument and adds nothing to the conversation. Ironic given your comment about the "event adding nothing to the make-up of Toronto."
4)There are a lot of Torontoians creating amazing arts and culture initiatives locally, nationally and internationally. Many of these people still make time to volunteer for organizations which help others. Making sweeping generalizations about 'Torontonians with too much time on their hands' is fighting words. Don't pick that fight. You will lose.
5) God has nothing to do with it.
Also, calling someone a meth'd out loser is not libel, and calling it that makes you seem really dumb.
Sincerely,
"A Real Aritist"
Wow, ppl smashed a car with sledgehammers. Wow, someone now has a branded S on her arm. Were the fancy finger food trays & flutes of crap bubbly passed around before or after?
C'mon, Mr Know-what-a-real-artist-&-what's-libel-gender-perjorative-sweeping-generlizations, defend 'Silver Teeth'(gag) and his 'art' (bigger gag). I dare you.
After a pathetic 'event' like that, is it any wonder to anyone why the majority of art lovers worldwide don't place Toronto on their places to visit map when thinking about art?
Not my job to defend this art piece. I think there are ritual elements to it that are still very much used in a lot of art making, particularly in performance art. Unless I'm on someones payroll I don't have to write anything. If you read an earlier comment in this thread, I think I said a fair bit about what I think about car smashing art parties.
Some people think it's okay to do a drive by shooting in comment sections and use internet anonymity as cover and that's what my comment was about. It was addressing a behavior, not a personal attack. If you have an opinion, you better be able to put your name on it. If I want this kind of flame war I could sit back in the early 90's in IRC chat rooms where everyone has a nickname.
No, I feel no need to defend myself at all. I was making comment on the quality of the critique someone was offering and thought it was quite flip.
Smashing a car doesn't make it art, but neither does passing food and drink around at an opening.
Earlier in this thread you'll see I made a few comments about what I thought about the work including the dated messaging that often drives these sort of art events.
Let me guess - you wear thick black frames, and a douchy touque/beenie in the middle of summer, and buy obscure clothing from value village because you thinks it's cool to do so. You define the term hipster with your defence of such utter garbage this "art" is.
I'm pretty sure you were coddled as a child/teen and when you discovered an interest in "counter culture arts" you ran with it, as you found acceptance with other losers of the same ilk.
Your arguments are weak, hold absolutely no ground anywhere - to threaten someone on a message board shows what kind of loser you are. Keep trying and living the lifestyle you live, and defend this crap.
I'll most likly see you in the future when you change the oil in my car, or pump my gas, or when I roll up my window to you when you ask me for change.
Life is harsh bud, get your head straight.
what a bunch of lame-ass whiney haters!
I didn't much care for the work above either and I said as much before your drive-by comments. Did you read the part where I said:
"To cavalierly relive punk glory days and teach the same ridiculous disenchanted battle cry to echoboomers shows less concern for making a political or artistic statement and more interest in hyping up a reputation for a group of individuals."
Your assumptions about me are wrong. You don't know me.
I never said arts and culture were bad for anything or anyone. My disgust stems from the brain dead "artist(s)" in this post that call destroying a car and branding a delusional chick in some weird counter-culture, hippie/voodoo, cult-like way.
Before you claim big economic revenue numbers derived from the arts - I would like to see which kind or arts bring in the real dough your claims are based on - Are you talking about the art that ends up in the AGO, or Toronto's Movie/film industry, ballet/theater production, money generated from music artists big and small touring through Toronto or even government funded culture initiatives???
You cannot compare some trashy, classless, neo-whatever, “performance” in the same league as the aforementioned other forms of art which bring home the bacon to the numbers you speak about.
Sigh. Another misguided under 30 year old, who is a lost soul in a world of realists. Perhaps you should be branded on your hands or face to always remind you of your devotion to this type of crap.
Too much time in mamma's basement, the douchery is strong in this one.
Since it is winter, do you not wear a douchy touque which you reserve for a hot summer day? Let me guess, it's douchy scarf season?
Whom ever you are I can gaurentee you that I have much more education and influenece than you. Your world is in my hands.
Your welfare/art grant is in the mail.
Best
Kantor