Saturday, February 11, 2012Partly Cloudy -10°C
Arts

King Tut at the AGO

Posted by Guest Contributor / November 21, 2009

King Tut AGOKing Tut has returned to the AGO.

30 years ago, when I was eight, my parents attended the Treasures of Tutankhamun exhibit at the Art Gallery of Ontario without me, figuring I was too young and that their evening tickets to the very popular show were past my bedtime. Thankfully they brought home a copy of the catalog, which I read and re-read, again and again. How awesome then, to learn of another chance to see the Tut in person!

Three years in the making, this new show is twice the size of the 1979 one with over 100 antiquities on display. The AGO stop is the only Canadian visit for the tour. I attended a preview of the show on Friday morning and was simply blown away.

King Tut AGOThe tour is being mounted by the Egyptian government, quite blatantly to raise money for the creation of a new museum of antiquities, as well as to fund the preservation of finds from the over 1,000 archaeological digs throughout Egypt. Dr. Mohammed Abdel Maksoud, head of the Central Department of Lower Egyptian Antiquities, added that for him, the show is "a message of peace from Egypt to the World."

King Tut AGOThere was some debate in Egypt's parliament over whether to "send the pharaohs out for gold," but the detractors were outnumbered. Egypt is clearly very concerned about the show's public relations potential, with Cairo having suffered terrorist attacks in recent years which dealt a heavy blow to tourism. Things have settled down a bit, and Egypt is eager for the return of sweaty Westerners to rediscover that very, very old country.

King Tut AGOEgypt is also rightly concerned about the security of its treasures -- the Egyptian government has promised that this is the last time they will allow Tut's treasures to travel beyond their borders. Never say never of course, but for the time being it's a good marketing hook, and I'm not willing to wait another 30 years!

King Tut AGOWhile the original exhibit featured the actual gold sarcophagus and funeral mask in which Tut was laid to rest, this time around we get to see a miniature version of the coffin, minutely detailed and inscribed with hieroglyphs inside, meant to hold one of his internal organs. A different death mask is on display, as well as gold slippers and finger and toe covers that were found on Tut's body. My previous experience of Tut was almost entirely based on the photos from the 1979 show, so it is a real treat to see a wider variety of pharaonic goodies.

King Tut AGOThere's nothing quite like witnessing over 3,000 years of history right before your eyes (staring back at you, in fact). Many of the objects are statues and masks, each intricately carved and decorated to represent the visage of either the boy king Tutankhamun or one of several other ancient Egyptian rulers or their gods. The exhibit is laid out in a series of themed rooms, some inspired by the arrangement of items in Tutankhamun's tomb as it was discovered in 1923, others devoted to the variety of lesser-known pharaohs as well as stunning jewelry and other art pieces.

King Tut AGOMake no mistake, however, this is not the show that I missed as a boy. Only three items from the original show are included in this one; the rest are all here for the first and, quite possibly, last time. I'll be attending the show again in a couple of weeks, with my parents and my own son and daughter.

Ling Tut AGO

King Tut AGO

King Tut AGO

The show runs Nov. 24 to April 18, 2010.

Admission is $16.50-$32.50, depending on one's age and the time of visit.

Writing and photography by Hamish Grant. To see more photos of the exhibit, check out the slide show below.


Discussion

36 Comments

Guest commentor / November 21, 2009 at 10:42 am
user-pic
Who is this guest contributor? Martin, is that you?
Robert / November 21, 2009 at 11:05 am
user-pic
My wife and I attended the show in 1979, and were both blown away by everything about it. The only down side being, and I'm not complaining, ticket sales were through the roof, the lines were enormous, and visitors were prodded by over zealous staff to hurry on to the next display. I would have liked to have spent another couple of minutes at each exhibit to absorb the enormity of it. We'll most definitely be attending this one and looking forward to it.
Martin / November 21, 2009 at 12:31 pm
user-pic
I find it confusing that the AGO is hosting this and the ROM hosting a photographic exhibit, seems backwards to me.
Nolan / November 21, 2009 at 02:39 pm
user-pic
Does anyone know if this show is free to OCAD students like most of their special exhibits are?
AllanM88 / November 21, 2009 at 05:31 pm
user-pic
I agree with you Martin...it does seem backwards to me. This hsould be at the ROM and the Vanity Fair exhibit should be at the AGO.
Kelly / November 22, 2009 at 05:16 pm
user-pic
I asked a friend of mine who works at the ROM why they arent hosting this. The answer is because the AGO hosted to first exhibit and so already had ties in place with the Egyptian Government. Also, with the ROM hosting the Dead Sea Scrolls right now there just isn't room for the King Tut exhibit too.

Either way, consider yourself lucky to be able to attend both the Tut and DSS exibits Im out of the country until next year and am sad to miss both completely.
283 salem replying to a comment from Nolan / November 22, 2009 at 11:40 pm
user-pic
No The show is not free for OCAD students, members of the AGO etc. THe King TUT exhibition is a touring exhibition that is separate from the AGO.
As far as I know once you pay to get into the exhibition there is certain time slots of viewing!

IF you are interested in viewing a create blog with postings about art culture locally and internationally
DIG the 283 Salen Blog.
Mike replying to a comment from 283 salem / November 23, 2009 at 12:42 am
user-pic
AGO members can get free tickets online, but I don't think this applies to students. I went earlier today and it was brilliant, except for the crowds.

Check out the following link to see if you qualify for free tickets:

http://www.ago.net/kingtut-members-tickets
Chester Pape / November 23, 2009 at 08:57 am
user-pic
I saw the members preview on Sunday, I didn't get to see the 1979 show so I don't have a basis for comparison. I'm of mixed feelings, it is a really excellent collection of quality materials and they've done a very good job of explaining the context and the ancient Egyptian religion. If it had been described as an exhibit of the Egyptian middle kingdom I would have been blown away, especially by the more recent materials from Dr, Hawas's discoveries. But as it is supposed to be specifically about Tut I was a little let down that there isn't more specifically from his tomb, in particular from the actual burial chamber none of the sarcophagi from the mummy appear for example, the sarcophagus in all the ads is one of 4 that contained the preserved organs, it's beautiful and intricate but it's only about 18 inches tall. I guess if you want to see the big stuff one has to make the trek to the museum in Cairo.
HODG / November 23, 2009 at 10:32 am
user-pic
Just wondering if your allowed cameras in there?
HODG / November 23, 2009 at 10:33 am
user-pic
just wondering if your allowed cameras in there?
Gloria replying to a comment from Martin / November 23, 2009 at 12:49 pm
user-pic
I don't find it confusing. Photographs are in their own right historical artefacts, not to mention documents, which have places at the ROM. AGO doesn't only display 2D works -- paintings and photos -- but archaeological artefacts that are also works of art in their own right. Works for me.
Mike replying to a comment from HODG / November 24, 2009 at 01:23 am
user-pic
No cameras allowed, if you believe the signs.
ii / November 29, 2009 at 06:02 pm
user-pic
free wednesday evenings AGO include King Tut?
Sajid / December 22, 2009 at 10:04 pm
user-pic
Went there and was thoroughly disappointed. It is a money making sales show without the main items.

Why do they show or advertise with the sarcophagus and the gold statute with hand crossed when they are not even in the exhibit since they are NOT allowed to leave Egypt?

What was on display was a tiny fraction. Because i had been fortunate to have spent time in Cairo and been to Cairo Museum. The fees is outrageous to say the least.

I pointed out to one of the exhibitors that this was truly false advertisement.
Hamish Grant replying to a comment from Sajid / December 30, 2009 at 07:08 pm
user-pic
The sarcophagus in the ads is in fact in the exhibit - it is one of the miniature coffins used to enclose Tut's internal organs. You can see my photo(s) of it above.
Russ Spencer / January 11, 2010 at 02:34 am
user-pic
Did you attend the show in 1979? I did.

>>> It was amazing!!!

This time around - well it's very educational, if you listen to the tape tour and read all the description cards - but by the time you reach the end of this lengthy and 98% not about Tut exhibit, you will be exhausted and probably a touch bored.

This time around - NOT AMAZING. It barely merits the description impressive. It's interesting, not much more.

Yeah, but what about that fantastic gold mask pictured in the blog article above. NOT TUTANKHAMUN (18th Dynasty 1333 BC to 1323 BC). It's the pharaoh Psusennes 1 (21st Dynasty 1047 BC to 1001 BC). Created almost 300 years after Tut died and most certainly not found in his tomb. How many school children have seen this artifact and gone home to tell their friends that they saw King Tut's famous gold mask? How may adults look at this and think to themselves "Wow, that covered King Tut's face in his multi coffined burial tomb!"?

OK, so what about that beautiful Gold Mask of Tut (also shown above) with the crossed scepters? It's a gold canopic jar people. It's 15 inches high. Beautiful and marvelously detailed - but hardly impressive. And this is the image the AGO is using to promote this show!

I'm afraid that I have to agree with the comments above that suggest that the public is fraudulently being sold a bill of goods. It's interesting. It's educational. Some of the items on display are gorgeous and a very few are, in fact, solid gold (i.e. the last photograph above of a solid gold breast-plate - one of the few items on show which were in fact found in Tut's tomb).

OK - maybe the AGO did not intend to defraud anyone, they just wanted to induce people to attend the show and create big line-ups. After all "It's for their own good to see something like this".

Thanks but I'd rather know what I'm getting when I buy something.

R.S
p.s. I'm writing this comment because a young friend of mine went to see the show yesterday and came home bragging that he saw something at the show that was really amazing, Tut's gold burial mask. Humpf!
Angela / January 21, 2010 at 08:29 pm
user-pic
Absolutely gorgeous. After seeing the beautiful slideshow I have an excuse not to brave the cold and the crowd in order to see the exhibit. But I think I will!!
Phill / January 23, 2010 at 04:08 pm
user-pic
Thoroughly disappointed! I pre purchased the tickets online for a specific time slot thinking that we would not be queued in a long line-up. When we got there we had to wait an hour in a huge line and then when we got in we were herded like cattle. What was the purpose of the pre purchase?

I found the show had very little to do with King Tut as there were very few of the kings artefacts.


Emily / February 24, 2010 at 12:11 pm
user-pic
The objects were fascinating, but the massive amounts of people that were allowed in at once ruined the exhibit, especially for the ticket price! I, too, am confused as to why there were timed pre purchase tickets when people were continuously being let in outside of the time slots.
Janie / March 7, 2010 at 01:25 am
user-pic
Attended the exhibit today and felt ripped off- too many people at once-where was the one thing about King Tut that everyone knows HIS sarcophagus and death mask. Totally a bull sh rip off. Felt like asking for my money back. The whole family went and were very disappointed and from listening to others coming out they were too. Don't waste your money with this skimpy exhibit. Took about less than 40 minutes to see, even with all those useless people who stand listening to the recording.
G Rose / March 22, 2010 at 10:09 am
user-pic
We traveled to Toronto's AGO to see "KING TUT: THE GOLDEN KING AND THE GREAT PHARAOHS". Touted in Toronto’s city guide as "His first stop in Canada in 30 years, King Tut will be bringing 130 artefacts from his tomb and surrounding archaeological sites along with him." Also included in the advertising are numerous references to his presence in the AGO. The presentation is very well done and laid out to pump through as many as possible per hour. My wife commented that it should have been a Disney style ride. Some big watch outs. It will be packed, you will have to weeble your way through the exhibit shoulder to shoulder. If you are in a wheelchair you can just about forget seeing anything. Do NOT bring young kids into an hour long sweatbox shuffle where all they will see is belts and pockets. It is in the AGO for a number of reasons. It was there 30 years ago. The ROM had or has the dead sea scrolls so there was not enough room. It could not be in a federal museum as there is no French anywhere and they used the death head mask to advertise. In federal museums that is false advertising. Tut IS NOT THERE. The only part of Tut that is there is his stomach coffinette that was possibly appropriated from an earlier pharaoh. Some research reveals what is really going on. It is a great exhibit but it is a double grab. AGO wants to boost it's numbers for publicity and funding. The Egyptian government cannot raise enough money to build a museum of their own to house all that they have so they send out teaser treasure to raise money. Most of their treasures were originally dug up by excursions funded by the British in a race to find what may be there before the locals dug it all up and flogged it to the highest bidder or melted it down.
Pity Tut did not make it to his own funeral (in Canada). At least his stomach, or where his stomach and some other Pharaohs stomach was in, casket did..... Not as bling as death head mask and sarcophagus.
T / March 29, 2010 at 04:54 pm
user-pic
Well the long awaited day arrived we were forutnate to get VIP Passes skipped the long lines and got shuttled to the Museum walked throuh ok got to the burial chambers and turned a corner and "WHAT A HUGE LET DOWN NO sarcofigus"
So anti-climatic I felt ripped off?
Barb / April 3, 2010 at 09:55 am
user-pic
I saw the exhibit when it passed through L.A. several years ago. I, too, felt totally ripped off. While the items on display were interesting (when you could actually get through the crowd to read the discriptions), but it certainly wasn't anything like the hype had us expecting. I kept hoping that the NEXT room would contain the "WOW" relics, but like "T" stated, it was totally anti-climactic.

False advertising at its worst. Should have saved my time and money.

Barb / April 3, 2010 at 10:05 am
user-pic
Another thing that I forgot to mention above - was anyone else surprised at how little gold there actually was? All those big pieces that we were taught or led to believe or assumed were solid gold were actually WOOD painted with gold. Talk about a let-down. Maybe it was naive of me to think they were really solid gold, I don't know.
Brian / April 3, 2010 at 09:14 pm
user-pic
Just came back from the great AGO Pull the Wool Over Your Eyes King Tut Extravaganza. The posters, murals and billboards all show a big golden head. In the minds of 95% of the population that big gold head means that they are going to see a big gold head when they come to the show. What we got was a 2" head. Perhaps the advertising could have mentioned that.
Now I am reading that this exhibit has been travelling North America for a few years and these bait and switch tactics have been used at each stop along the way. And the AGO has the gall to act surprised when folks complain. Shame on them.
I raved about the AGO when I first visited last year. This betrayal of trust will have me railing against it for years to come.
rusty / April 8, 2010 at 10:50 am
user-pic
Bought tickets for my daughter and myself... KerCHING!

Sauntered toward the entrance finally into the exhibit an hour later than our "admission time" because of the crowds...KerCHING! KerCHING! KerCHING!

Hired the "audio guide" KerCHING!

Exited the exhibit directly into the shop where, amongst other merchandise, I almost knocked over a display of "Authentic Tut Fridge Magnets"... KerCHING! KerCHING! KerCHING!

Had to forgo the "3D Tut" (KerCHING!) as our time had been spent admiring the building's interior, shuffling in line for an hour before entering the exhibit.

My opinion... KerCHING! KerCHING! KerCHING! KerCHING! How much are YOU willing to pay for it?
Bob / April 13, 2010 at 10:25 am
user-pic
I was mad.And very dissapointed.This exibit was dumb.
I didnt like anything in it.I shouldnt have been exited.
JOE / April 13, 2010 at 10:25 am
user-pic
exibit sucked so much
toronto / April 13, 2010 at 10:33 am
user-pic
awsome photos mr cheese hey do you know how many pharohs it takes to screw in a light balb ????

none because everyone will do it for them
toronto / April 13, 2010 at 10:34 am
user-pic
went to see the exibit last tuesday and it was crouded
Taylor & Mackenzie / April 13, 2010 at 10:41 am
user-pic
When my classmates and i went to the King Tut exhibit it was wonderful when we went to see the 3-D movie about King Tut it was like we were whatching the movie on persone it termendouse and i loved it i hope i get to visit it again. One thing though i wish they could have shown the body of King Tut in his coffin!
toronto / April 17, 2010 at 09:47 pm
user-pic
My daughter and I went to see King Tut today- what a total disappointment. This is false advertising at it's best. From the adverts you are led to believe you will actually see the gold sarcophagus, not an 18 inch canopic jar that housed his stomach. Having purchased tickets for a set time, one would think that you would not need to still wait in line after line to get into the exhibit, only to be cattle herded through the whole thing. Only about half of the exhibit is dedicated to Tut, the other half to other pharaohs. Yes, some of the artifacts were quite beautiful, but if you want to see and learn more about Tut, catch him on Discovery channel, as they are running specials about him all week. Total money grab- shame on you AGO.
toronto / April 17, 2010 at 10:11 pm
user-pic
Totally disappointed in the exhibit today as not seeing the sarcophagus was a real let down. The advertisements were very misleading to say the least. Perhaps I am naive to think that the sarcophagus or one of the many layers he was buried in would have been on site, as I am sure many others thought the same as I.
Kevin / April 24, 2010 at 10:39 am
user-pic
disappointed. way too short. very few items, though what was there was neat, nice to be upclose to ancient artifacts...but hardly worth the enormous lines and VERY crowded environment. expensive for whats available.

meh. another toronto disappointment.
Sandy / November 7, 2010 at 04:42 pm
user-pic
As an Egyptian and an art graduate student, I have never been more disappointed with an exhibition or the AGO. This was obviously a blockbuster exhibit to attract crowds and make up for the financial deficit of the Gehry renovation.
Why is Harrison Ford the narrator and what's with the mystical music? nice touch with the emphasis on the Howard Carter discovery... another display of colonization.
Museums and art galleries are supposed to be places of knowledge and meaningful interactions with art. Although its nice to look at the treasures of Ancient Egypt, Egypt is not a giant treasure chest, and there is more to it than the pharaohs ...
It is exhibitions like this that reiterate stereotypes about oriental cultures and the very reason why as a child my schoolmates thought I lived in a pyramid and rode a camel.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal