Tech
Rogers lowers download limits after Netflix announcement
Two days after Netflix, the U.S.-based on-demand online video service, announced it will be entering the Canadian market in the fall, Rogers lowered the cap on many of its service plans in Ontario.
Hands up if you're surprised.
Customers who signed up after July 21 will be allowed 80GB under the "Extreme" service versus 95GB previously, and 15GB versus 25GB before under the "Lite" service. Rogers did, however, bump the speed of the Extreme plan to 15 megabits per second from 10 (the Lite plan didn't change).
According to CBC News, Rogers did not explain the changes, nor did a spokesperson provide comment.
In the U.S., Netflix allows customers to watch an unlimited number of movies and shows for $9.99 per month. With an average of 3GB being used for every two-hour HD Netflix movie, Lite subscribers could watch 10 hours of HD video a month (and not use their internet for anything else) before reaching their cap.
Let the overage charges begin.


Discussion
49 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I hope Canadians wake up and start pressuring rogers to stop being such douche bags
They routinely lie about what services are available in which areas and then when pressed they refuse to admit the truth.
I would love to see either a) reforms or b) a significant/credible competitor offer comparable (or better) services for less.
Teksavvy, Acanac, to name prominent ones that are well reviewed.
Yak offeres a host of services as well.
They now offer cable services which use the same lines as Rogers. Same speeds...
UNLIMITED downloads as-well. The switch over is a no-brainer.
Cancel all your Rogers systems, use the internet to watch tv shows, use netflix for movies and older seasons of shows, use a digital antennae to get all local programming.
i cut all rogers thing from my life years ago!!
i hope ted rogers is burning in hell
Obscene!
TekSavvy for internet, WIND for phone and OTA.
Just a word of caution to those changing to Teksavvy... (been reading up reviews on them) Bell and Rogers will give you hell for switching. Since Teksavvy uses cable lines, a Rogers technician has to go out and do the change and they may prolong the process. So usually you have to confront Rogers for slacking off.
remember when bill gates bought out homer's computer company on the simpson's....same thing. lol
As always, new customers have a wide range of plans to select from depending on their usage habits and speed needs. For example, new customers in Ontario signing up for Rogers new Extreme Hi Speed Internet service will benefit from a speed boost - now available with download speeds of 15Mbps up from 10Mbps.
Existing Rogers Hi Speed Internet customers are not affected by changes made to Ontario Lite and Extreme tier plans.
We constantly review our Internet offers to ensure they meet the needs of new and existing customers while remaining competitive. These changes to the Light and Extreme tier plans are unrelated to the Netflix announcement made earlier this week.
With that said, i warn against anyone looking to sign a contract with Rogers - they will charge you an exorbitant fee if you break it for any reason; even if you are only breaking the contract to upscale to a plan that offers more.
Yup, Rogers will charge you for the privilege of paying them more per month!
"We constantly review our Internet offers to ensure they meet the needs of new and existing customers while remaining competitive."
This should read: "We constantly review our profit margin and decided what will increase it regardless of customer needs and demands."
No matter how you sugarcoat this, Rogers sees the Netflix system as compeition to their own outdated on-demand system. Rather than putting forth a proper effort to compete with them, they have decided to tax their users for going with the competitor.
Rogers is TAXING their users for going with a better competitor while.
I called Rogers today and effectively canceled ALL of my services. I've already set myself up with Wind for telephone, and Anatech is coming next week to setup my internet. This was the final straw.
i get my tv over an HD antenna.
totally rogers and bell free and loving it 100%.
THIS is how you show rogers/bell that you think they don't serve your needs. do not patronize their business.
Have been with teksavvy ever since and have been delighted with the service.
I left Bell because of the terrible service and the traffic shaping they would do, and now it looks like Rogers is going down that road. Where is the CRTC in all of this?
The truth is Rogers and Bell are for-profit corps. They are responsible for making the most profit for their shareholders within the legal bounds. If you or me are their CEO, we'd probably do the same thing.
They would only care about their customers if they need to compete in a well functioning free markets. But ensuring a well functioning free market is CRTC's job, not Rogers' or Bell's.
True, Rogers' and Bell's practices are terrible. But no amount of complaints to them will change much. The root cause of those behaviour is CRTC. Put the pressure to CRTC.
Make sure you factor that into your whining when you consider our cost structures. Back in the day when Ma Bell and Nortell had a monopoly, the only reason Canada enjoyed the best phone service in the world (and was a pioneer in microwave technology, among other marvels at the time) was because of this monopoly. We'd like to whine about 'choice' and price gouging, but consider that there are only 3 dense markets in the entire country: the rest is virtual tundra.
But, of course, like most bitching around here, it's the downtown Toronto whiners who will say f$#k those who live in Kapuskasing or Brandon, 'we want cheaper prices' and it's our entitled 'right' to have the same deals as [insert your favorite out of context comparison geographical region that has 10 times the population.]
Seriously, what's the point in issuing this PR nonsense? It's yet another ripoff and continuous decline in Internet service by the duopoly in this part of the country. "Pay more for less", that should be your motto. Pathetic.
Link to the firmware is here http://fixppp.org/index.php?p=about
I have the 200 gig plan and never come close to hitting the limit, for heavy downloaders there is also an unlimited plan.
As others have mentioned, they now offer cable internet but I find their DSL services with MLPPP activated are quick enough for me.
They also fight for net neutrality so your monthly bill actually goes to a good cause.
Remember Rogers invented 'negative option billing". I've talked to people who worked in these big corporate companies and they're greedy power hungry corporate climbers proud of every sleazy scheme to squeeze a few extra bucks out of you.
Rogers can suck my left nut and make the right one jelous.
I'm going to WIND for phone and TEKSAVVY for internet.
Absolutely. I had the same experience. We moved into a new building that didn't install analog phone lines at all--they made a deal with Rogers so we would all have to go with Rogers, or pay for Bell to come in and drag wires 7 floors to the basement. Then I found out that TekSavvy is reselling Rogers cable. It took three weeks to get Rogers to come and hook it up, although my understanding is that TekSavvy's cable service is so new that there's been a learning curve in dealing with Rogers. My expectation is that they will get better at this. And they were always upfront about the status of their communications with the Rogers techs. Now that we're on TekSavvy cable, we have no complaints whatsoever.
Verdict: TekSavvy was still worth the wait.
why should customers willing to pay to same amount for lowered download limit.
Anyone interested in the saga can read the long thread about it at DSL Reports; I entered the url as my 'website' for this comment.
Or apparently not? Here's the link.
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r24221081-I-moved-into-a-Rogers-only-building-but-dont-want-Rogers
Heard of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatr">Chatr</a>? Rogers discount <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighter_Brand">fighting brand</a> of wireless service, backed by Rogers' <i>entire network</i>, but <b>only available to ppl in the same cities as Wind, PM, etc</b>; the new entrants.
What a crock of shit.
@Derek: I also blame the CRTC, for completely selling out. Every recent decision of theirs in the ISP domain favours the telecoms at the expense of the consumer (UBB, network throttling).