Tech
Is The Dragons' Den a Farce?
The Dragons' Den has been one of the CBC's most successful original shows in recent memory. In January, it will begin its fifth season and earlier this year ABC started to notice and launched a similarly formatted show called Shark Tank, bringing two of Dragon Dens' VCs, Kevin O'Leary and Robert Herjavec, along for the ride.
But while The Dragons' Den might seem like a way for budding entrepreneurs to raise quick funds (while at the same time gaining national exposure for their brand or product on the show), the reality is that not all the deals that get made on-air come to fruition. Take for example the case of GrubCanada, a Toronto start-up that helps restaurants find take-out customers via the web. They appeared on The Dragons' Den a number of months ago and, as the clip embedded above might have us believe, they secured $200,000 in funding for 50% of their company. Or did they? Last week I connected with GrubCanada founder Ross Lipson who filled me in on his business and what actually transpired when the cameras weren't rolling.
You're from Detroit. What brought you to Toronto?
With the colder climate and the wide variety of restaurants, I felt there would be demand for GrubCanada.com in Toronto.
So you came here specifically to start the business?
Yes.
What was it about Detroit or the US market that you felt wasn't going to work?
Actually, I ran a similar website in the States; we sold the business and saw the demand for it in Canada. I was a first year university student that LOVED ordering delivery, like all university students do. I had a stack of delivery menus on my table.
It was a hassle sorting through the menus, and I hated calling. The busy signals, and the mis-communication was very frustrating, so I thought to myself: there must be a solution. So I started the company. (Note: Lipson asked that I not include the company name in this post.)
So did you have a non-compete clause in the U.S. that prohibited you from launching a similar site or expanding in the U.S.?
Yes.
When did Grubcanada.com launch?
GrubCanada launched in September 2008 in London, Ontario. We have expanded to eight cities across Ontario - Toronto, London, Guelph, St. Catharines, Waterloo, Hamilton, Kingston and Ottawa. We now offer online ordering for over 200 restaurants in Toronto and we are actively signing more.
From which restaurant are you getting the most orders from?
A few restaurants that we have noticed do extremely well, including Spring Rolls, B.B.Ques, Mykonos Mediterranean Grill, Sizzlers Panzerotto Pizza, and Dominos.
You charge a 9% commission per order. Are there any restaurants that have declined to come on board that you really wish you had as customers?
We have received great feedback from all of our restaurants. GrubCanada lists restaurants on the website for free! We post menu information and allow customers to order directly online. We only charge the restaurant for results. The only reason people come to our website is because they are hungry and ready to place an order. They are qualified customers. We give restaurants the opportunity to put their menu in front of these potential customers and take the order.
We bring restaurants additional orders - incremental revenue - and only charge a small percentage, making it a direct return. The first order they receive, they have seen an ROI.
Fair enough. But on the episode of Dragons' Den, one of the chief criticisms laid against you was that restaurants would balk because 9% commissions would cut into their margins. Is it not safe to say that many restaurants have declined to be listed, even for free?
No. We have not had restaurants deny the charge. What aired on the show, was not exactly what took place when taping.
So you're able to sign up every restaurant you approach?
I don't want to say every restaurant, but restaurants love the concept. And we have great feedback from them.
Who do you consider your main competition?
Just-Eat.ca. They just recently launched in Toronto. They have a very similar business model.
Are there any ways you're different (or better) than them?
We work out exclusive specials with our restaurants so we can offer menu items at a discounted price. The idea is that you save money when ordering online at grubcanada.com. We have focused on making our website extremely user-friendly. We also have a larger selection of restaurants! GrubCanada is known to give out free food! We frequently send out emails with free food coupons to our customers!
On Dragons' Den you initially asked for $200,000 for 20% of the company. Why did you choose to take the offer for $200,000 + 1% commission for 50%?
We valued the experience and knowledge Brett Wilson brought to the table; however, the deal fell though after the show. We did not end up partnering.
Why did the deal fall through?
We respectfully declined. After meeting with our partners and advisers, we felt the deal undervalued GrubCanada.
So saying yes on-air wasn't intended to be a binding decision in any way?
No. It goes to a due-diligence period where both parties have the right to back out.
Did Brett back out or did you?
We did.
So you didn't get your funding. How would you rate your overall experience with Dragons' Den?
It was an awesome experience. It was fun! I love talking about GrubCanada, especially with experienced and knowledgeable people.
Have you maintained contact with any Dragons from the show?
Unfortunately not.
How did you feel when Jim Treliving declined to participate in the offer. His decision seemed to sway the rest of the Dragons. Do you think he understood your business?
Yes, he wanted to speak post-show, and see if it may be a conflict of interest.
What do you mean?
He wasn't sure if our system would work with Boston Pizza (Jim is the chairman and owner of Boston Pizza International Inc.).
So he chose not to invest simply because he didn't think your web site would integrate with Boston Pizza's ordering process?
He wasn't sure. He doesn't know much about online food ordering. He wanted to speak with his team. So he stated he could not make the deal at the time of taping; however, he wanted to revisit the opportunity after speaking with his team.
What did you mean when you said the clip that aired wasn't really how it went?
Well, of course what aired happened. However, they taped for 90 minutes and cut the clip down to 7 minutes.
So what did we miss in the other 83 minutes?
There was a lot of talk in between that was not aired. The Dragons loved the concept. The Dragons explained to [Treliving] how it is incremental revenue; they are additional orders and that he would be naive to say he didn't want a piece of the cake. The Dragons had more of a conversation and were on our side when speaking with [Treliving]. He simply didn't know if it would be a conflict of interest, so he stated he could not move forward at this time. But he thought it was a great idea. We went more in-detail with our numbers and revenues. That was not shown as well.
So why didn't more of the Dragons make an offer? Or a better offer?
I'm not sure. Arlene was the only one that said why, and that was because she thought someone else can do the same thing.
She thought there weren't any competitive barriers to entry?
Exactly.
Is she right?
We have very strong relationships with our restaurants and clients. They listen to us. Although you can run a similar operation, it may be difficult to start. A lot of our clients would not be opposed to signing exclusive contracts.
Are most off your relationships exclusive? Or can the same restaurant sign up with another site?
Yes they can sign with another site. We do not have exclusive contracts.
What advice would you give to other entrepreneurs considering appearing on the Dragon's Den?
Do it. It's fun, exciting, and very rare to have the opportunity to speak to such intelligent individuals about your business.
What's next for GrubCanada?
GrubCanada is actively signing more restaurants across Ontario. We hope to have over 300 restaurants in Toronto within the next few months. We will be continuously running aggressive discounts on the website, and giving away FREE FOOD to our customers! We have plans to expand out west in 2010.
How do customers get free food?
Simply sign up and order! We send our customers emails with coupons quite often. Also if you would like, I just made a coupon code: BLOGTO for 10% off any order at any restaurant. It expires January 1st.


Discussion
59 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Very misleading headline!
The long and short - and I can speak to this with some authority, since my company was filmed for Dragon's Den this season - is that just like business, there's an artificial factor to TV that can't be avoided. Everything stated above isn't hidden from the public, but in terms of public consumption they certainly aren't going to go over the legalities of a 'yes deal' with each episode.
Arlene was refreshingly candid about the editing process of the show, and spoke to the entertainment value that the CBC producers are obviously trying to instill. Anyone who has actually worked on a business pitch or proposal on a grand scale would understand how fabricated this type of pitch process really is... especially given that some businesses are clearly selected for their 'wow' or 'it' factor, vs. their profit potential.
I was really glad that the Dragons spent over 1.5 hours actually probing our company... knowing full well that we'd be cut to <10 min of airtime. I love Ross' attitude here... can see why his business has persevered! Congrats :)
I just took a quick look at his website and the competition. I found four restaurants available on both websites. I do prefer grubcanada's layout though. Less jarring to the eyes.
Is dragon's den a farce, followed by an article that really had nothing to do with whether or not dragon's den is a farce. They don't hide the fact that all deals are only finalized after lots of due diligance, which only makes sense. And the fact that they cut most of the conversation is simply typical of 100% of so-called reality or non-scripted shows. Do you think they should have a 2 hour episode for each deal? Even the person you interviewed is still pro-dragon.
Seems to me that someone doesn't like dragon's den, and set out to prove that it's a farce, and even when their interview offered no proof of said farce, refused to change the title, because hopefully enough people will just read the title and then tune out.
Is this article a farce? Yes.
SHAME SHAME SHAME!!!!
That said it makes perfect sense once you actually read the article, like the show the headline was crafted to convey a certain amount of drama where there really isn't any.
Anyone naive enough to believe that business is concluded completely on camera should probably leave the house a bit more. The "Dragons" didn't garner the reputations they have, or the capital to invest in in other people's businesses without performing their due diligence, something that arguably wouldn't make for riveting television. Unless for some reason the thought of watching a group of lawyers and accountants in a windowless room on Bay Street debating the veracity of column x on page 27 of a financial statement keeps you pinned to the couch, in which case I stand corrected.
Between this article and yesterdays regarding the Roncesvalles construction it's been a banner couple of days for misleading headline writing on BlogTO. I can only hope that tomorrow we get something titled "BLAMO!" or "HEARSAY AND CONJECTURE!" but hey I guess it worked because I read both articles, like a sucker. Caveat, I'd also read articles entitled "BLAMO!" and/or "HEARSAY AND CONJECTURE!"
Or, if you realy want click-throughs, the next time you do a profile on somone, title it "is (insert name here) Tiger's latest lover to come forward?" And then in the article, briefly mentin that they've never met Tiger.
I'm gald the guys are doing well with their business but it's hardly original or exclusive. They just need to do it better than the competition.
If you just tell me what the guy said I'll take your word for it, I don't need a direct quote and I'd really prefer to read a STORY, not a conversation.
I don't think anyone has a problem with the content of your story, but it's simply a misleading headline that you chose.
Something like "The real deal on a Dragon's Den deal" would be more appropriate...
also, i would say that due diligence ends a lot of deals, and from watching the show, i would hope the viewers do not presume that handshake means the deal is final. in real life things do not happen so easy. the show also had an entire episode dedicated to deals that do not go through.
"The Dragons' Den has been one of the CBC's most successful original shows in recent memory."
Is it a CBC property and the BBC show is a British version, or was it a BBC property originally?
I feel like I read somewhere that it was originally a BBC production.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dragonsden/
Is Dragons' Den originally a British show?
Dragons' Den originated in Japan and versions of it have emerged in Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, The Netherlands, Finland, in the Middle East and of course our own here in Canada. More information can be found on Wikipedia.
Is the flu shot safe?
Is Obama a socialist?
Are the Liberals jew haters?
Did the moon landing really happen?
Agreed the title is misleading and the with opening blurb implies the entrepreneurs get the shafted in the end.
It should not surprise anyone they still have time to mull over the deal with their (legal) on either side.
I'd be suspicious of the author trying to discredit the show but I can't imagine why. Other than that it indeed is a note worthy article.
re: the title & the article.
Anyone who's a fan of the show (they even mention this in many episodes)knows that the deals made on the show aren't necessary seen all the way through. The dragons are rich by making smart clever investments, not throwing money away. The acceptance of a the deal aired shows the basis of the agreement, but the process of due diligence is necessary in business to make sure both parties are protected.
re: GrubCanada.com
Immediately after watching the episode, I went to browse the site to see what they have to offer. Perhaps it was the Dragon's Den effect, but the site slowed slowy and it didn't work like a "good website" should work. Their concept is great and I wish them success, but the flaws pointed out by the Dragons are very valid, and my first experience with that site did not have me wanting more.
re: Ms. Lube
The person that was going to sue them for bajillions was Jim Treliving. He owns Mr. Lube. You can see why he was a little upset at the whole brand and trademark issue. Sure Kevin, Jim or other dragons can come off as dicks, but I'm sure they play it up for TV. You wouldn't watch a show if all they do is unenthusiastically say "I'm Out"
Anyone who watches the show knows that business DUE DILIGENCE is on the forefront of any deal brokered on Dragon's Den. We know that despite a handshake on air, doesn't necessarily mean it's a done deal behind the scenes.
As one commentor stated, special episodes were aired that showed many deals that fell through cuzza due diligence, and it wasn't always the Dragons that did it.
And here I thought the article was about the crazies that show up once in a while... y'know the ones with the really whacked out ideas that are so out there, they have to be actors... like that one guy on the last ep who was pitching that 1 billion dollar phallic hotel thing. He can't be a real businessman.
http://www.startupnorth.ca/2007/10/01/tonight-is-the-night-dragons-den-season-2-episode-1/
They are pretty bearish about DD being less of a valid incubator for startups for some of the reasons implied in this article and others. A good read for anyone interested in bringing their startup to DD.
Do all of the people who win prizes on the Price is Right take the prize home??? Not unless they can pay they taxes on it.
Like all business deals there's a handshake of interest to start it off. If it still looks good after all of the meetings the deal is still on, if not the deal is off...
That headline.
as a writer you look very foolish with that misleading and just plain dumb headline. and that it appears that you don't get that is the real farce.
I can hardly buy that this story about this crappy CBC show is more comment-worthy than the article from a few days ago about Igor Kenk only getting 2 years for stealing 5,000 bikes.
Seriously. I'm curious, what site linked to this story? I don't buy that this many people care about Dragons Den.
That said, clearly we shouldn't underestimate the popularity of cbc apparently :)
For the record, I came up with the title after I finished the post. First off, I like BlogTO and I'm merely asking if the blog is a farce - not necessarily suggesting it is. Second, the blog is about two things: (a) Toronto in general and (b) their experience with Toronto. Poor writing and editing often leave you with the feeling that you are reading a random torontonians poorly formed opinion.
BlogTO may or may not be a farce, but nowhere in my post do I say the answer to my question is "yes". But given the evidence I certainly think asking the question is not out of line.
The part about this sordid tale that angers me the most is that this guy is not even a Canadian citizen. He's here as a guest, more or less, and this is how he treats our country? Apparently, he won't be deported, but he damn well should be.
that title needs to go... embarrassing frankly very misleading.
re: The headline: it's fine. It asks a question you, the reader, are expected to answer for yourself by reading the article. It's blunt and is black and white in the sense that there are on-air happenings and off-air happenings. Just because it didn't end up being a 'farce' and your whetted appetites for a juicy expose didn't exactly come to pass, doesn't mean you were misled. Think for yourselves ya big babies.
After an on-air "deal" is made, both parties must enter into a period of due diligence. All knowable facts can not be presented on the show, and things can change. Any investor or entrepreneur has the right to ask more questions and do their own investigations before signing a deal. The TV pitch is just the first step in a process which may or may not reach fruition. Regardless of how much we don't see, the few minutes we do see is very entertaining.