Offers Come In on Royal and Revue

  • Posted by Tim
  • Filed in Film
  • June 9, 2006

jun806_revue.jpg
Last night in the teacher's lounge at Howard Public School, more than 30 members of the Roncesvalles community including councillor Sylvia Watson gathered to discuss the plight of their local cinema in a meeting that was billed as "Save the Revue".

Owner Chris McQuillan spoke at length and filled the crowd in on the latest developments. Here's what I learned:

* There have been a number of bids on the Royal Cinema. Offers close today and apparently at least some of the interested parties intend to keep the Royal operating as either a cinema or a live theatre venue.

* The owners were essentially forced to sell the Royal to pay off debts accumulated from operating the Festival Cinemas over the years.

* There has been one unsolicited offer to buy the Revue, even though the owners have no intention of selling. The owners are in discussion with two other parties to lease the property; one a former employee and the other an operator of another Rep cinema who a year earlier had offered to buy the Revue outright.

* On June 22nd, there will be a public meeting to discuss whether the Revue will be designated a Heritage property. The owners expressed disappointment in this turn of events, as heritage status would significantly de-value the property.

Given that offers are coming in, the role of the community members who gathered last night is unclear. There was talk about pursuing charitable status; but this seems unrealistic. There was perhaps not enough talk about re-structuring the operations. It seems both the majority of community members and the current owners are victims of in-the box thinking and holding onto the romantic idea of maintaining the Revue as a community cinema with tickets for $4.25.

What I was hoping to hear was more discussion on alternatives how to turn this business around including some of the suggestions previously made in this comment thread.

My two cents:

* Increase prices threefold to be on par with the multiplexes. The Revue shouldn't be seen as a discount theatre; but instead as a premium film-going experience.

* Re-think the concession stands. Popcorn and Pepsi is so passe. Instead, offer healthier snacks at reasonable prices.

* Don't compete with DVDs. Forget about offering older art-house films, classics and second run films that are available on DVD. Think niche. Documentary, independent and Bollywood films are all under-represented in the marketplace.

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

I hope they find a viable way to keep the theatres operating - with any luck they'll read and consider your opinions.

Increasing the ticket prices is reasonable, I'd rather give twelve dollars to an independent than Paramount - but will it cover costs if they do switch from classics to niche market films?

Posted by: Katherine at June 9, 2006 10:39 AM

If we're expected to pay 3x the price to see a film, shouldn't we expect 3x the experience? I saw Charlie and the Chocolate Factory at the Revue a few months back and found the lyrics of the various songs muddy and unintelligible due to the sound system. I didn't feel gipped though, as my cost for entry was low.


It could have been the film print perhaps that was of poor quality, but still, if you want to charge the same as the multi-plexes, shouldn't the quality of the image and sound at least be up to par?


And I'm not sure if going niche is really the answer. As mentioned previously, Cinematheque kind of has that covered, and it gets support from the government to keep it going.

Posted by: Shagz at June 9, 2006 10:41 AM

i love the Revue, but 3x the price for poor projection and crackling sound? (it's not the prints!)And one of the reasons many of us go to the festivals is, in fact, because it's cheaper.

Then, you're suggesting pricier snacks be made available at cheap prices..?

Posted by: noel at June 9, 2006 11:17 AM

Until I read this post, i hadn't considered the historical designation a hinderance to finding a new owner. I suppose the designaton would make it difficult for new owner to modernize the interior in terms of a new screen or overall aesthetics. Hopefully the new owner keeps the facade and cleans it all up (and keeps showing movies). Is the Eglinton cinema that became an event theatre a few years back a historical landmark?

Posted by: Jason Carlin at June 9, 2006 12:54 PM

Jason:

Historic designation won't stop a new owner from modernizing the interior or putting in a new screen - historic designation is designed to protect buildings, not force them to decay.

The reason that historic designation will reduce the building value (and make it more difficult to find an owner) is because with it historically desginated, you need to keep the facade, and can't just tear down the place to build a condo. Believe it or not, there are lots of more valuable things to do with a large lot on College St than show films. ;)

Posted by: St Dan at June 9, 2006 4:28 PM

If you get the right Manager or Owner to run the Revue its going to stay afloat. You just have to be a little more varied with your programming. The problem with the festival cinemas was that they all kinda played the same stuff, they just rotated the prints between the screens. Open your options, get a video projector so you can have more local smaller festivals, make sure the presentaion is top notch. Really mix up the programming, the owner's need to go to film festivals and find out whats going to work at their cinema. Play KID stuff on the weekends, they bring in the most money. Its not tickets that make these theatres money its popcorn, pop and candy!!! remember that. Arty folks don't eat junk food.

Posted by: Paul G. at June 12, 2006 4:41 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Offers Come In on Royal and Revue' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.