Saturday, May 26, 2012Mostly Cloudy 24°C
Fashion & Style

Lettuce See Skin

Posted by Guest Contributor / September 17, 2009

Lettuce BikiniA bikini made of lettuce? I'm game for vegan fashion so I brought my curiousity along to the PETA fundraiser at Tryst on a cold Tuesday night. The invite asked attendees to keep their leather and fur at home and while I made sure to wear a fur free outfit (I don't own any fur) I decided to take a risk and wear my leather oxfords since I was unable to find another pair of shoes to match my outfit.

Lettuce BikiniUpon arrival, I see the Smashbox Cosmetics trailer parked outside, providing free make-up touch ups all night. Inside, jungle like lighting and loud techno music. If it weren't for the cold weather I'd feel as if I was playing the lead role in the commercial for the next Ministry of Sound release.

Lettuce BikiniI walk around, passing the vegan hors d'oeuvres, courtesy of Free Times Cafe, and pick up a few handy PETA guides from the tables including a "where to shop cruelty free" guide.

Lettuce BikiniI head backstage for a peak and see the models getting the last minute details right in barely there bikinis made of lettuce. The tables are filled with pieces of lettuce. The bikinis, I'm told, are designed by various make-up artists from Smashbox cosmetics in Los Angeles, Canadian designer Joeffer Caoc and Maha, a charming stylist to various Canadian artists such as Massari.
Lettuce BikiniMaha tell me...."as a vegan, it's difficult to be conscientious in fashion because you need to take into account that all the pieces must be cruelty free. Organic tops and skirts are easy to find but non-leather shoes and various accessories are difficult."
Lettuce BikiniI head back and the crowd starts to gather around as TV personality Sarah Taylor, a vegan-vegetarian (she's alternated) for the past decade, is on the runway getting everyone ready. As the models strut their stuff on the runway, the crowd starts dancing and the men are gawking as remixes of songs like "Calabria", "The Way I Are" and "When I grow up" blare from the speakers.

Lettuce BikiniPETA sticks true to its controversial reputation with the outfits: some lettuce tops covered more than others, some, barely covered anything at all. There were models in long skirts, and others in shorter skirts. But one thing was certain - there was a lot of skin, skin that was branded with PETA logos painted all over the bodies of the models, including one model with an infamous tramp stamp.

Lettuce BikiniThe colours and bikinis had obvious mermaid inspiration (influenced by Ariel's seashell bikini perhaps?) and organic and forest type colours were also dominant. For the finale, PETA, continuing to push the "I'd rather be naked than wear fur" campaign had two models at the front walk on stage with one hand covering a breast while the other was covered with a "Fur is dead" sticker.

Lettuce BikiniLettuce BikiniLettuce BikiniLettuce BikiniLettuce Bikini

Writing by Danah Abdulla. Photos by Paul Flynn

Discussion

46 Comments

goosh / September 17, 2009 at 10:51 am
user-pic
PETA: the useless third tit of the animal rights movement.

I'd tap that girl in the third pic though.
Aston / September 17, 2009 at 10:57 am
user-pic
DO NOT WANT. I have seen better meat at Brass Rail.

...what are femenists doing about Peta?
jess / September 17, 2009 at 10:58 am
user-pic
hmm looks like peta is really into boob jobs. and, being a vegan i get what they mean BUT, there really wasn't anything that looked that good. maybe it was the pics but the fashion sucked.
Crankypants / September 17, 2009 at 10:58 am
user-pic
Hi, harvesting plants kills them. FYI.
Jamie / September 17, 2009 at 11:29 am
user-pic
Plastics kill animals and destroy the earths environment. What the hell are they doing wearing plastics? I think those plastic stickers on the boobs should come off ;)

Moreover, I should hope the paint used to write peta on and all that makeup on the girls are organic as well.

As a habitant of the earth, I get down right pissed when veganers support plastics and inorganic's instead natural/biodegradable products (such as leather) and promote the earths destruction.
Amie / September 17, 2009 at 11:39 am
user-pic
Peta should really consider using organic, free range models next time. Don't get me wrong, these women are lovely, but the fake boobs and bleached hair are just creating mixed messages.
jen / September 17, 2009 at 11:52 am
user-pic
They actually called this a fashion show? How about real, wearable cruelty-free clothing rather than stereotypically hot models with lettuce taped to their bodies? All these "outfits" look like bad Halloween costumes thrown together at the last minute. Pathetic.
Mr. Hate / September 17, 2009 at 11:58 am
user-pic
PETA are stupid.

This show was stupid.

The end.
ddt / September 17, 2009 at 12:02 pm
user-pic
stupid stupid stupid....looked at the pics 10 times and still think it's stupid
that guy replying to a comment from Aston / September 17, 2009 at 12:21 pm
user-pic
I hope they are doing nothing.

Last i checked women are not part of an entity that is represented by feminists. Feminists represent feminists. Women represent themselves.
little kid / September 17, 2009 at 12:27 pm
user-pic
this event has convinced me to slaughter 10 bunnies and wear their fur this winter. thx peta!
gnille replying to a comment from goosh / September 17, 2009 at 12:33 pm
user-pic
@ goosh: Stay classy, goosh, you give Blog TO the rep it has.
goosh replying to a comment from gnille / September 17, 2009 at 01:44 pm
user-pic
@gnille: You mean as the one of the most read and frequently enjoyed blogs on the city? I'm sure they're very pleased you think so.

Also, here's a lesson to you as someone who is obviously new to the interweb and blog platform (welcome!): the virtue of blogs is that commentors like me can express my view without actually being representative of the blog or blog contributors in question. I am not a formal contributor, and thus have no effect on BlogTO's "rep." For example, if I had substituted my previous comment with "I want to smack gnille's mother around in the face," would you deduce then, that BlogTO would also want to slap your mom around in the face? No, of course not. That would be silly.
Amy / September 17, 2009 at 02:08 pm
user-pic
That looks like an unreal party. Congrats to whoever put that together. I'm sure it was a lot of work but totally worth it!
You rock!!
choppery replying to a comment from goosh / September 17, 2009 at 02:08 pm
user-pic
You know how part of Youtube's reputation is the stupidity of its commenters? Yeah. It's like that. We may not be affiliated with BlogTo formally, but we're part of its content, and a major element in the BlogTo experience. That's why I try to be as inane and raving as possible; I wanna drag this mother down.

Just kidding, BlogTo.

Ha. Ha.
Gloria replying to a comment from that guy / September 17, 2009 at 02:13 pm
user-pic
Thumbs-up to that.
jamesmallon / September 17, 2009 at 02:43 pm
user-pic
I've nailed a vegan. Nothing more tedious than her 'ideas' (well, not hers really). She was the type to write to Dan Savage and ask if vegans can swallow.
that guy replying to a comment from Gloria / September 17, 2009 at 03:08 pm
user-pic
Glad someone appreciates that.

I'm just for personal freedoms. And don't like it when a few individuals of any kind take it upon themselves to represent a larger group. Especially when the link is something a weak as gender, ethnicity or religious beliefs.

I i want someone to speak for me, I make it clear.

Jonathan replying to a comment from jamesmallon / September 17, 2009 at 03:17 pm
user-pic
Can they?
Jen replying to a comment from Jamie / September 17, 2009 at 03:58 pm
user-pic
Haha, leather is "natural"?! You may want to check your facts and see how environmentally friendly it really is. Plus, although vinyl and other synthetics may also be not so great, at least no animals had to die. ;)
Alogon replying to a comment from Jonathan / September 17, 2009 at 04:21 pm
user-pic
Only if it hasn't been used on animals first.
that guy replying to a comment from Jen / September 17, 2009 at 04:25 pm
user-pic
Leather is awesome. Meat will be easten for a long time, may as well sue every part of the cow if you will use it. I find commercial farming pretty terrible, but meat eating itself seems rather natural to me. I was veg. for a while, explored my views. I'll eat meat, i just wish it was produced in a better environment.

GMO me a meat tree and i'll be all for it.
saltspring replying to a comment from Jen / September 17, 2009 at 04:47 pm
user-pic
Hey Jen, guess what? Animals and all living things die (except Keith Richards). Might as well put their hides to good use, and his face would make one hell of a wineskin.

There's more synthetics inside those PETA models' cannons than in your average wardrobe.

she said / September 17, 2009 at 05:05 pm
user-pic
I have been a vegetarian for the past 15 years. I applaud Peta for trying to bring awareness around animal rights to the mainstream culture, but did this event really do anything? As far as I can see, this party was geared toward heterosexual men, and didn't really bring a lot of attention to environmental implications of meat eating/ wearing. Not to the typical vegan or vegetarian person, or person considering it. Believe me, I worked as a bartender for 8 long years, and rarely met another vegetarian in the club scene.

It seems odd to me to have a Peta party at a club-- clubs are notorious for being un-green. They waste tons of energy on lighting and soundsystems, tons of waste is created in the form of empty bottles from alcohol (yes, i know they are recycled, but recycling still requires energy), and most people who attend clubs are very much a part of the consumer lifestyle. And the event hosted by a Much Music Vj, who I personally would not take very seriously when it comes to environmental issues.

This party seemed wasteful, and while it was trying to promote not eating meat, it also helped to promote being excessive, superficiality, and fake boobs all at the same time.

Makes me want to eat a hamburger.

dcooper / September 17, 2009 at 06:18 pm
user-pic
Those girls could each use a burger or two (alright, maybe just one, but make it a double).
Pita / September 17, 2009 at 06:30 pm
user-pic
Last I checked PETA doesn't really care too much about the environment, just the "ethical" treatment of animals. They also use insane tactics and try to bully companies and people into their views...sounds like a few overzealous religious people to me....wouldn't you say?
Nemo / September 17, 2009 at 07:44 pm
user-pic
I don't want to sound superficial but I found the whole thing very moving. I've seen all of the videos of newborn chicks being ground up but I never felt anything (guess I don't like propaganda).

It was that one outfit with the lettuce that made me realize I'm not going to eat meat any more. She is a hero to me. They're all heroes. You're a hero for reading this and spreading the message.
a human / September 17, 2009 at 08:13 pm
user-pic
we live in a country that started out being heavily dependent on the hudson's bay company...fur trade. imagine if peta existed back then...all frozen to death and starving in the winter. ha ha
chenyip / September 18, 2009 at 12:11 am
user-pic
The models made me never want to eat vegetables again.

Here's to being carnivorous.
Jennai / September 18, 2009 at 01:44 am
user-pic
Once again PETA thinks attention = respect, when it most certainly does not. The whole "shock the audience into listening to your message" tactic does not hold water. What does a woman wrapped provocatively in lettuce do for animals that are being exploited or are suffering at the hands of the current system? I would bet not a lot. What this does is give everyone who wants to a pretty valid reason to ignore this position full license to do so. Why? because it's stupid, wasteful, tired, uncreative, cookie-cutter, bimbo, bullshit. I am a big supporter of animal rights issues, but this is embarrassing for vegetarians and vegans everywhere.
Ryan L. replying to a comment from Pita / September 18, 2009 at 06:07 am
user-pic
That's my biggest issue with PETA: putting so much emphasis on 'animal rights' while completely ignoring environmental issues and human (and women's) rights. They do not seem to understand that sometimes they are all interconnected and if your ignore one then you only end up hurting the one thing you're trying to protect. (Destroy the environment and you destroy the creatures that live in that environment...duh)

Take agriculture for example. We have two systems available to us:
1)Industrial: Take away meat production and this system is capable of supporting a vegan lifestyle...but at a cost to both the environment and human health. As nutrients in the soil get depleted in this system they get replaced with artificial ones and at inadequate levels. The soil soon will contain just enough of the basic nutrients the plant needs to grow (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) but will be severely lacking in vitamins, minerals and who knows what else that is required to keep the people who feed off of it healthy. I don't think I really need to describe how this system is bad for the environment.

2) Organic, sustainable agriculture. This system -requires- the use of animals to work. They are an incredibly important factor in the circle of life and by using animals on a -sustainable- farm you create healthier food that is better for the environment.

Look at the big picture (and not just at whatever is right in front of your face like PETA does) and you have two choices: Slowly destroy the environment and thereby destroy everything in the environment (animals and humans alike) or use a system that mimics how nature actually works, but use animals to do so.*

*I'm not saying you have to EAT the animals, but that's generally how the current sustainable, organic system works. Perhaps there is a way of doing it without the animals becoming part of our food chain, but we haven't really figured that out yet.
conscious / September 18, 2009 at 09:13 am
user-pic
I'm surprised it hasn't been brought up yet: PETA's euthanization rate for animals in their care is regularly over 90%.

PETA is little more than an organization that puts on fashion shows.
that guy replying to a comment from Ryan L. / September 18, 2009 at 09:57 am
user-pic
Well put. Best and most coherent argument against peta.

The only arguments are i see are idiots saying how they want to kill bunnies.
HornyVegan / September 18, 2009 at 10:07 am
user-pic
I'll give em my cucumber and they can toss my salad any day!
tdotlib / September 18, 2009 at 11:25 am
user-pic
It's kind of ironic really - think of all the kittens will be killed at the sight of those hot hot hot pics!
Laura / September 18, 2009 at 12:59 pm
user-pic
I've been vegetarian and then more recently vegan for 17 years. PETA's latest campaigns have been incredibly insulting to women (their Save the Whales billboards) and this party just confirms their how offensive and ridiculous they are with their cheap shot tactics.


Ryan L. replying to a comment from Ryan L. / September 18, 2009 at 01:12 pm
user-pic
I need to stop posting before I fully awake in the morning.

"Take away meat production and this system is capable of supporting a vegan lifestyle...but at a cost to both the environment and human health."

Sounds like I'm suggesting that a vegan diet based on the industrial model is -worse- than an ominvoire diet based on the industrial model. That of course isn't the case. I just meant that it isn't harmless and not as good for the environment as an organic (and I mean -real-, sustainable organic) omnivoire system.

I think the hierarchy would go something like this:
Industrial Omnivoire < Industrial Vegetarian < Industrial Vegan < Organic Vegan < Organic Vegetarian < Organic Ominvoire

This is assuming that one eats everything in moderation in all of these systems. It's not really fair to compare a vegetarian who is concerned about their diet to an omnivoire who doesn't give a crap.

It's kind of like those studies that often show that the average vegan is healthier (in regards to certain health problems, such as heart disease) then the <b>average</b> non-vegan. This is comparing apples and oranges for the aforementioned reason. (I don't blame the research. They generally will make a point of noting this in their papers, but when the media rereports it they of course always leave this out) There have been more in depth studies though that have taken this into account and it has been shown that when people put careful consideration into their diet ominvoires turn out to be healthier than vegans or vegetarians (vegans being the least healthy).

Toast / September 18, 2009 at 01:22 pm
user-pic
Looking good ladies!
miley / September 18, 2009 at 01:39 pm
user-pic
i love smashbox and peta! you go girls. :)
Ryan L. replying to a comment from Ryan L. / September 18, 2009 at 04:26 pm
user-pic
"I think the hierarchy would go something like this:
Industrial Omnivoire "

Comment system didn't like my greater than signs

"Industrial Omnivoire - Industrial Vegetarian - Industrial Vegan - Organic Vegan - Organic Vegetarian - Organic Omnivoire"
thatguy replying to a comment from Ryan L. / September 18, 2009 at 06:19 pm
user-pic
These all sound like Band Names
I'd give Industrial Omnivore a listen.
Stasi replying to a comment from Amie / September 26, 2009 at 07:05 pm
user-pic
Free range, organic models!? Hilarious! That's a good one! I thought the same thing- using such fake, plastic, sleazy models really perpetuates a mentality that is equally as harmful to this planet than consuming/using animal products!
Stasi replying to a comment from Amie / September 26, 2009 at 07:05 pm
user-pic
edit:
Free range, organic models!? Hilarious! That's a good one! I thought the same thing- using such fake, plastic, sleazy models really perpetuates a mentality that is equally as harmful to this planet as consuming/using animal products!

As not THAN.
JorgioSays replying to a comment from goosh / October 16, 2009 at 12:40 pm
user-pic
I could't agree more. sad when you NEED to use sex to get your word out. nobody really cares they're just there to see boobies, hell thats why i went` what a trainwreck.
Madeleine / October 19, 2009 at 10:23 pm
user-pic
Why are meat-eaters so defensive? Calm down, by not eating animals I'm not trying to personally insult you.
FAIL / February 19, 2010 at 01:36 am
user-pic
Plastic surgery
+ Fake tans
+ Dress lining pinned to make "skirts"
+ Wasted lettuce
+ Lack of imagination and preparation

= Minimal impact, Impractical use of resources

Fail for Peta and the Venue

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal