Fashion & Style
Lettuce See Skin
A bikini made of lettuce? I'm game for vegan fashion so I brought my curiousity along to the PETA fundraiser at Tryst on a cold Tuesday night. The invite asked attendees to keep their leather and fur at home and while I made sure to wear a fur free outfit (I don't own any fur) I decided to take a risk and wear my leather oxfords since I was unable to find another pair of shoes to match my outfit.
Upon arrival, I see the Smashbox Cosmetics trailer parked outside, providing free make-up touch ups all night. Inside, jungle like lighting and loud techno music. If it weren't for the cold weather I'd feel as if I was playing the lead role in the commercial for the next Ministry of Sound release.
I walk around, passing the vegan hors d'oeuvres, courtesy of Free Times Cafe, and pick up a few handy PETA guides from the tables including a "where to shop cruelty free" guide.
I head backstage for a peak and see the models getting the last minute details right in barely there bikinis made of lettuce. The tables are filled with pieces of lettuce. The bikinis, I'm told, are designed by various make-up artists from Smashbox cosmetics in Los Angeles, Canadian designer Joeffer Caoc and Maha, a charming stylist to various Canadian artists such as Massari.
Maha tell me...."as a vegan, it's difficult to be conscientious in fashion because you need to take into account that all the pieces must be cruelty free. Organic tops and skirts are easy to find but non-leather shoes and various accessories are difficult."
I head back and the crowd starts to gather around as TV personality Sarah Taylor, a vegan-vegetarian (she's alternated) for the past decade, is on the runway getting everyone ready. As the models strut their stuff on the runway, the crowd starts dancing and the men are gawking as remixes of songs like "Calabria", "The Way I Are" and "When I grow up" blare from the speakers.
PETA sticks true to its controversial reputation with the outfits: some lettuce tops covered more than others, some, barely covered anything at all. There were models in long skirts, and others in shorter skirts. But one thing was certain - there was a lot of skin, skin that was branded with PETA logos painted all over the bodies of the models, including one model with an infamous tramp stamp.
The colours and bikinis had obvious mermaid inspiration (influenced by Ariel's seashell bikini perhaps?) and organic and forest type colours were also dominant. For the finale, PETA, continuing to push the "I'd rather be naked than wear fur" campaign had two models at the front walk on stage with one hand covering a breast while the other was covered with a "Fur is dead" sticker.





Writing by Danah Abdulla. Photos by Paul Flynn


Discussion
46 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I'd tap that girl in the third pic though.
...what are femenists doing about Peta?
Moreover, I should hope the paint used to write peta on and all that makeup on the girls are organic as well.
As a habitant of the earth, I get down right pissed when veganers support plastics and inorganic's instead natural/biodegradable products (such as leather) and promote the earths destruction.
This show was stupid.
The end.
Last i checked women are not part of an entity that is represented by feminists. Feminists represent feminists. Women represent themselves.
Also, here's a lesson to you as someone who is obviously new to the interweb and blog platform (welcome!): the virtue of blogs is that commentors like me can express my view without actually being representative of the blog or blog contributors in question. I am not a formal contributor, and thus have no effect on BlogTO's "rep." For example, if I had substituted my previous comment with "I want to smack gnille's mother around in the face," would you deduce then, that BlogTO would also want to slap your mom around in the face? No, of course not. That would be silly.
You rock!!
Just kidding, BlogTo.
Ha. Ha.
I'm just for personal freedoms. And don't like it when a few individuals of any kind take it upon themselves to represent a larger group. Especially when the link is something a weak as gender, ethnicity or religious beliefs.
I i want someone to speak for me, I make it clear.
GMO me a meat tree and i'll be all for it.
There's more synthetics inside those PETA models' cannons than in your average wardrobe.
It seems odd to me to have a Peta party at a club-- clubs are notorious for being un-green. They waste tons of energy on lighting and soundsystems, tons of waste is created in the form of empty bottles from alcohol (yes, i know they are recycled, but recycling still requires energy), and most people who attend clubs are very much a part of the consumer lifestyle. And the event hosted by a Much Music Vj, who I personally would not take very seriously when it comes to environmental issues.
This party seemed wasteful, and while it was trying to promote not eating meat, it also helped to promote being excessive, superficiality, and fake boobs all at the same time.
Makes me want to eat a hamburger.
It was that one outfit with the lettuce that made me realize I'm not going to eat meat any more. She is a hero to me. They're all heroes. You're a hero for reading this and spreading the message.
Here's to being carnivorous.
Take agriculture for example. We have two systems available to us:
1)Industrial: Take away meat production and this system is capable of supporting a vegan lifestyle...but at a cost to both the environment and human health. As nutrients in the soil get depleted in this system they get replaced with artificial ones and at inadequate levels. The soil soon will contain just enough of the basic nutrients the plant needs to grow (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) but will be severely lacking in vitamins, minerals and who knows what else that is required to keep the people who feed off of it healthy. I don't think I really need to describe how this system is bad for the environment.
2) Organic, sustainable agriculture. This system -requires- the use of animals to work. They are an incredibly important factor in the circle of life and by using animals on a -sustainable- farm you create healthier food that is better for the environment.
Look at the big picture (and not just at whatever is right in front of your face like PETA does) and you have two choices: Slowly destroy the environment and thereby destroy everything in the environment (animals and humans alike) or use a system that mimics how nature actually works, but use animals to do so.*
*I'm not saying you have to EAT the animals, but that's generally how the current sustainable, organic system works. Perhaps there is a way of doing it without the animals becoming part of our food chain, but we haven't really figured that out yet.
PETA is little more than an organization that puts on fashion shows.
The only arguments are i see are idiots saying how they want to kill bunnies.
"Take away meat production and this system is capable of supporting a vegan lifestyle...but at a cost to both the environment and human health."
Sounds like I'm suggesting that a vegan diet based on the industrial model is -worse- than an ominvoire diet based on the industrial model. That of course isn't the case. I just meant that it isn't harmless and not as good for the environment as an organic (and I mean -real-, sustainable organic) omnivoire system.
I think the hierarchy would go something like this:
Industrial Omnivoire < Industrial Vegetarian < Industrial Vegan < Organic Vegan < Organic Vegetarian < Organic Ominvoire
This is assuming that one eats everything in moderation in all of these systems. It's not really fair to compare a vegetarian who is concerned about their diet to an omnivoire who doesn't give a crap.
It's kind of like those studies that often show that the average vegan is healthier (in regards to certain health problems, such as heart disease) then the <b>average</b> non-vegan. This is comparing apples and oranges for the aforementioned reason. (I don't blame the research. They generally will make a point of noting this in their papers, but when the media rereports it they of course always leave this out) There have been more in depth studies though that have taken this into account and it has been shown that when people put careful consideration into their diet ominvoires turn out to be healthier than vegans or vegetarians (vegans being the least healthy).
Industrial Omnivoire "
Comment system didn't like my greater than signs
"Industrial Omnivoire - Industrial Vegetarian - Industrial Vegan - Organic Vegan - Organic Vegetarian - Organic Omnivoire"
I'd give Industrial Omnivore a listen.
Free range, organic models!? Hilarious! That's a good one! I thought the same thing- using such fake, plastic, sleazy models really perpetuates a mentality that is equally as harmful to this planet as consuming/using animal products!
As not THAN.
+ Fake tans
+ Dress lining pinned to make "skirts"
+ Wasted lettuce
+ Lack of imagination and preparation
= Minimal impact, Impractical use of resources
Fail for Peta and the Venue