Friday, February 10, 2012Cloudy -2°C
Environment

Green Roof Bylaw Set to Take Effect in Toronto

Posted by Derek Flack / January 27, 2010

Green Roof TorontoThings are about to get a lot greener around Toronto -- well, at least when looking down from above. On January 31st, two environmental initiatives designed to foster a more sustainable urban landscape will take effect: a new Green Roof Bylaw and a tougher version of the Toronto Green Standard (TGS).

Both the Green Roof Bylaw and the updated TGS are key elements of the City's Climate Change Action Plan, which aims to reduce Toronto's greenhouse gas emissions by 80 per cent by 2050.

As of the end of this month, all applications for residential and commercial/institutional buildings above 2,000 square metres of gross floor area will require a green roof (the bylaw will take effect for industrial buildings a year later). The coverage of the greenery will range from 20-60 per cent depending on the size of the building.

The upper end of that range (60 per cent) applies to buildings with an excess of 20,000 square metres of gross floor area. To give you an idea of how big that is, the Hudson Bay Centre at Yonge and Bloor has a floor area in the neighbourhood of 160,000 square metres.

What constitutes a green roof? The green area needs to include vegetation, a growing medium, filter and root resistance layers, and a waterproof membrane. Some notable buildings that already feature green roofs are Mountain Equipment Co-Op, Ryerson's Engineering Building, and the YMCA on Grosvenor Ave.

Needless to say, not all developers are happy about the bylaw. "I don't think anybody is warm and fuzzy about having a green roof bylaw impressed on them as a prescriptive method," Stephen Upton, a vice president for development at Tridel Corp., commented when it was first announced that the City would be proceeding with the initiative in June 2009.

But both the City and environmental activists point out that extensive green roof implementation can reduce storm-water run off, filter carbon dioxide out of the air, and reduce the urban heat island effect by lowering ambient temperatures by as much as two degrees Celsius.

Also taking effect on January 31 is a reworked version of the TGS. Adopted by City Council in 2006, the TGS was a set of environmental performance initiatives originally only binding for City-owned facilities. Private development could voluntarily choose to adopt the initiatives, but adherence was not mandated.

That's set to change with the implementation of a new two-tiered system. The formerly voluntary tier 1 requirements will now be compulsory with the addition of a more stringent set of tier 2 guidelines. These tier 2 guidelines will now be voluntary, but those developers willing to meet them may be eligible for a development charge refund of 20 per cent. More details can be found here.

Toronto is the first city in North America to mandate the inclusion of green roofs as part of new development. What do you think? Are they worth the potential increase in building costs? Will they really make much of a difference? Is Toronto doing enough to address climate change?

Photo by smuncky, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

22 Comments

Amanda / January 27, 2010 at 04:12 pm
user-pic
I'm psyched--I think this is awesome news. As an ecology student who studies the changes that are happening and will happen to our planet I'm really glad we're moving in the right direction. Aside from that green roofs are economically friendly; reducing air conditioning costs and so forth.
B / January 27, 2010 at 04:23 pm
user-pic
It's a good start... just don't stop at that!
nick d / January 27, 2010 at 04:53 pm
user-pic
Great intention, poor execution.

I assume the goal was to reduce the heat-island effect vast expanses of roofs have on the urban core- so why not make *that* the law?

Why impose the expense and potential liability on the owner when there are a number of ways to achieve the same objective?

I know it may be hard for some of you to come to terms with, but green roofs are NOT ALWAYS the right answer.

Keep tryin' Toronto... you're gettin' there.
Ruth / January 27, 2010 at 06:12 pm
user-pic
Not to forget, these roofs can been extremely picturesque. They really add another dimension to the built environment.
Peter K / January 27, 2010 at 08:10 pm
user-pic
Despite being the reactionary conservative Satan, I think this is a pretty good idea. At the very worst no harm can come from it. At best it's a simple way to enhance both the beauty and environment of the city.
westsidedweller replying to a comment from nick d / January 27, 2010 at 08:15 pm
user-pic
ok, i agree with you that green roofs aren't always the right answer - are you talking about right to light(?), snow load(?), program design(?), when(?) - but the same thing can be said about most things. if you are going to try to discredit something, why not provide some suggestions on 'a number of ways to achieve the same objective' rather than just throw around complaints and insults. if people are wrong why not let them in on some facts/ideas so they can form educated opinions?
jack / January 27, 2010 at 08:30 pm
user-pic
wow, this is so stupid.. we only have 8 weeks of summer in toronto if we are lucky.. what a waste of condo fees
Jo / January 27, 2010 at 09:13 pm
user-pic

Bravo...Glad to see this very interesting subject getting some exposure again! There are all sorts of options that can be considered here, not just the most pricey and risky investments in standard GreenRoof technologies...Whether imposed by law or not.

I've started listing the most obvious ones (including Green Roofs), and will be branching out into some of the more daring or obscure solutions in the very near Future...

http://environauts.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/creeping-green/

Have your say about where you see the Future going!
Cya There
Jo
Khristopher / January 28, 2010 at 03:53 am
user-pic
I think it's a terrible idea. There are other ways to be more green. I think green roofs look horrible most of the time as well.
Mattalexander replying to a comment from Khristopher / January 28, 2010 at 07:51 am
user-pic
The reason they LOOK horrible most of the time is that roofs are really inhospitable so the plants on a green roof need to be drought resistant.
KBorg replying to a comment from jack / January 28, 2010 at 09:48 am
user-pic
I was pretty stoked about the idea, but you raise an extremely good point...
Christopher / January 28, 2010 at 10:44 am
user-pic
Personally, I feel it's a great idea.
Downtown Toronto is becoming rather bland to look at with all of these new buildings going up on an almost daily basis. Take a good look at what was once College park as a fitting example.
My only question is to wonder whether my TCHC run building, which is 26 stories tall, could be one of those buildings? It would be interesting to see if a community garden could be established up there.
Liam O'Brien / January 28, 2010 at 11:59 am
user-pic
Roofs represent a huge opportunity for solar energy collection. It's good that this is being partially acknowledged, but the bi-law seems very strict and closed to alternative ideas. I would like to see how the benefit of these green roofs compared to PV or small-scale agriculture (where a useful product is being produced).
gadfly / January 28, 2010 at 12:09 pm
user-pic
Well, as a property manager, all I can say is, "hold on to your wallets, folks." It's not enough the HST is going to hike up most condo fees by 5-6% this year (that is what ACMO's research is recommending), but now condos are going to be saddled with 'green roofs?" LOL
As was pointed out above, we have maybe 4 months of decent weather. The extra cost of watering and maintaining these roofs wipe out any potential cost savings. Certainly, green roofs look good on paper, and may even be pretty, but snow and ice damage to roofs are a big deal in Canada: imagine the cost of having to tear up the turf and plants to get at water leaks.
I wouldn't buy a condo in a building with a green roof.
Sam replying to a comment from gadfly / January 28, 2010 at 12:20 pm
user-pic
There is no need to water native species of plants as they have adapted to this climate over the past thousands of years. As for water leaks, if you look at the layering involved in the construction of green roofs, the are designed to not only filter and absorb water, but also to direct any excess storm water for appropriate collection. Failing that, there are layers of impermeable materials to prevent water damage from occurring.
I can't disagree with the few summer months in Toronto, but in the winter, green roofs provide an extra layer of insulation, thus they save on both heating and cooling costs.
Invest in a green roof and I will happily "hold on to your wallet".
nick d replying to a comment from westsidedweller / January 28, 2010 at 02:27 pm
user-pic
"if you are going to try to discredit something, why not provide some suggestions on 'a number of ways to achieve the same objective' rather than just throw around complaints and insults."

Was my comment insulting in some way? My statement was CRITICAL, and not a complaint. If you do no QUESTION things, they will never IMPROVE. You should steel yourself; constructive criticism can be biting at times. Especially when you're used to hearing "Good Job!" and "This is soooooo smart!!!!!!" all the time. Suck it up, buttercup.

"If people are wrong why not let them in on some facts/ideas so they can form educated opinions?"

Instead of wasting my time on a COMMENT POST listing various facts that can be ACCESSED FOR FREE IN ANY LIBRARY, or even.... ON THE INTERNET (what a concept!) I thought they could inform themselves. But if I must, I shall enumerate:

As Liam O'Brien mentioned:
"Roofs represent a huge opportunity for solar energy collection."

Roofing Option B) SOLAR COLLECTION.
PV panels are coming down in price. The benefit is, you can offset the heating and cooling loads of your building with the FREE ENERGY collected. (note: not a vegetated roof)

Roofing Option C)WHITE (light coloured) ROOFS.
Reflective EnergySTAR compliant roofing materials can be applied to reduce the ammount of heat gained from solar exposure. Granted, this solution will not solve stormwater run-off, or provide extra insulation in the winter time, but as with everything, if applied in tandem with other technologies, it can greatly reduce the heat-island effect.

I stand by my conviction. There are alternatives to green roofs to achieve the same goal, and I really think the city should have made THAT the law- to achieve a quantifiable result- not just advocate green roofs "cuz they look purdy".
jameson / January 28, 2010 at 04:06 pm
user-pic
Greenroofs are inevitible, it's a technology that isn't going away. Unfortunate that Toronto itself is enforcing this bylaw and not any other municipalities, considering that the fastest growing municipality in the Golden Horseshoe is Brampton, this bylaw is only going to push development into the fringe even further.

This bylaw needs provincial legislation to have an effect, then a market for green roofs could develope, drive costs down, and become standard.
kenchikuka / January 28, 2010 at 09:59 pm
user-pic
The industry is driven by evolving demands and this was to be expected. It's only a matter of time when designer formulate a design that everyone can like. Hopefully, developer don't just slap some earth and a bunch of vegetation on their building just to pass the new requirement.

Another thought...
Why do I get the feeling that this isn't just about environmental consciousness. This will definitely be an opportunity for anyone who are in the carbon trading market... just a thought
gadfly replying to a comment from kenchikuka / January 29, 2010 at 12:33 pm
user-pic
Ha ha - the carbon trading market! Apparently you haven't been following all the scandals out of East Anglia. Finally, Australia and other governments are waking up to the scam of 'global warming,' er, 'global change,' er, oh, never mind!
Like 'green roofs,' this is just another recent Ryerson grad's fad that will die away when the next generation of urban planners decide what we should think...
Kenchikuka replying to a comment from gadfly / January 29, 2010 at 04:25 pm
user-pic
My post was very impartial and I merely stated that it will be an opportunity for carbon trader. I myself see the carbon trading market as a joke which is taking advantage of environmental paranoia rather than directly helping the environment. I mention it as a thought... A thought that maybe this whole green roof by-law may be lobbied by carbon traders. If I did mention it likewise I would sound like a conspiracy theorist which is the last thing I want.

I believe that this is more than a fad. I see future for this design because not everyone like to see a concrete landscape.
davidbaer / February 3, 2010 at 02:42 am
user-pic
Often we forget the little guy, the SMB, in our discussions of the comings and goings of the Internet marketing industry. Sure there are times like this when a report surfaces talking about their issues and concerns but, for the most part, we like to talk about big brands and how they do the Internet marketing thing well or not so well.

www.onlineuniversalwork.com

Jame / August 28, 2011 at 11:40 pm
user-pic
I am looking for the best green roofs in the downtown core. can someone email me photos? or point me in the right direction?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal