Environment
Green Roof Bylaw Set to Take Effect in Toronto
Things are about to get a lot greener around Toronto -- well, at least when looking down from above. On January 31st, two environmental initiatives designed to foster a more sustainable urban landscape will take effect: a new Green Roof Bylaw and a tougher version of the Toronto Green Standard (TGS).
Both the Green Roof Bylaw and the updated TGS are key elements of the City's Climate Change Action Plan, which aims to reduce Toronto's greenhouse gas emissions by 80 per cent by 2050.
As of the end of this month, all applications for residential and commercial/institutional buildings above 2,000 square metres of gross floor area will require a green roof (the bylaw will take effect for industrial buildings a year later). The coverage of the greenery will range from 20-60 per cent depending on the size of the building.
The upper end of that range (60 per cent) applies to buildings with an excess of 20,000 square metres of gross floor area. To give you an idea of how big that is, the Hudson Bay Centre at Yonge and Bloor has a floor area in the neighbourhood of 160,000 square metres.
What constitutes a green roof? The green area needs to include vegetation, a growing medium, filter and root resistance layers, and a waterproof membrane. Some notable buildings that already feature green roofs are Mountain Equipment Co-Op, Ryerson's Engineering Building, and the YMCA on Grosvenor Ave.
Needless to say, not all developers are happy about the bylaw. "I don't think anybody is warm and fuzzy about having a green roof bylaw impressed on them as a prescriptive method," Stephen Upton, a vice president for development at Tridel Corp., commented when it was first announced that the City would be proceeding with the initiative in June 2009.
But both the City and environmental activists point out that extensive green roof implementation can reduce storm-water run off, filter carbon dioxide out of the air, and reduce the urban heat island effect by lowering ambient temperatures by as much as two degrees Celsius.
Also taking effect on January 31 is a reworked version of the TGS. Adopted by City Council in 2006, the TGS was a set of environmental performance initiatives originally only binding for City-owned facilities. Private development could voluntarily choose to adopt the initiatives, but adherence was not mandated.
That's set to change with the implementation of a new two-tiered system. The formerly voluntary tier 1 requirements will now be compulsory with the addition of a more stringent set of tier 2 guidelines. These tier 2 guidelines will now be voluntary, but those developers willing to meet them may be eligible for a development charge refund of 20 per cent. More details can be found here.
Toronto is the first city in North America to mandate the inclusion of green roofs as part of new development. What do you think? Are they worth the potential increase in building costs? Will they really make much of a difference? Is Toronto doing enough to address climate change?
Photo by smuncky, member of the blogTO Flickr pool.


Discussion
22 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I assume the goal was to reduce the heat-island effect vast expanses of roofs have on the urban core- so why not make *that* the law?
Why impose the expense and potential liability on the owner when there are a number of ways to achieve the same objective?
I know it may be hard for some of you to come to terms with, but green roofs are NOT ALWAYS the right answer.
Keep tryin' Toronto... you're gettin' there.
Bravo...Glad to see this very interesting subject getting some exposure again! There are all sorts of options that can be considered here, not just the most pricey and risky investments in standard GreenRoof technologies...Whether imposed by law or not.
I've started listing the most obvious ones (including Green Roofs), and will be branching out into some of the more daring or obscure solutions in the very near Future...
http://environauts.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/creeping-green/
Have your say about where you see the Future going!
Cya There
Jo
Downtown Toronto is becoming rather bland to look at with all of these new buildings going up on an almost daily basis. Take a good look at what was once College park as a fitting example.
My only question is to wonder whether my TCHC run building, which is 26 stories tall, could be one of those buildings? It would be interesting to see if a community garden could be established up there.
As was pointed out above, we have maybe 4 months of decent weather. The extra cost of watering and maintaining these roofs wipe out any potential cost savings. Certainly, green roofs look good on paper, and may even be pretty, but snow and ice damage to roofs are a big deal in Canada: imagine the cost of having to tear up the turf and plants to get at water leaks.
I wouldn't buy a condo in a building with a green roof.
I can't disagree with the few summer months in Toronto, but in the winter, green roofs provide an extra layer of insulation, thus they save on both heating and cooling costs.
Invest in a green roof and I will happily "hold on to your wallet".
Was my comment insulting in some way? My statement was CRITICAL, and not a complaint. If you do no QUESTION things, they will never IMPROVE. You should steel yourself; constructive criticism can be biting at times. Especially when you're used to hearing "Good Job!" and "This is soooooo smart!!!!!!" all the time. Suck it up, buttercup.
"If people are wrong why not let them in on some facts/ideas so they can form educated opinions?"
Instead of wasting my time on a COMMENT POST listing various facts that can be ACCESSED FOR FREE IN ANY LIBRARY, or even.... ON THE INTERNET (what a concept!) I thought they could inform themselves. But if I must, I shall enumerate:
As Liam O'Brien mentioned:
"Roofs represent a huge opportunity for solar energy collection."
Roofing Option B) SOLAR COLLECTION.
PV panels are coming down in price. The benefit is, you can offset the heating and cooling loads of your building with the FREE ENERGY collected. (note: not a vegetated roof)
Roofing Option C)WHITE (light coloured) ROOFS.
Reflective EnergySTAR compliant roofing materials can be applied to reduce the ammount of heat gained from solar exposure. Granted, this solution will not solve stormwater run-off, or provide extra insulation in the winter time, but as with everything, if applied in tandem with other technologies, it can greatly reduce the heat-island effect.
I stand by my conviction. There are alternatives to green roofs to achieve the same goal, and I really think the city should have made THAT the law- to achieve a quantifiable result- not just advocate green roofs "cuz they look purdy".
This bylaw needs provincial legislation to have an effect, then a market for green roofs could develope, drive costs down, and become standard.
Another thought...
Why do I get the feeling that this isn't just about environmental consciousness. This will definitely be an opportunity for anyone who are in the carbon trading market... just a thought
Like 'green roofs,' this is just another recent Ryerson grad's fad that will die away when the next generation of urban planners decide what we should think...
I believe that this is more than a fad. I see future for this design because not everyone like to see a concrete landscape.
www.onlineuniversalwork.com