Can't We Just Flush the Great Lakes Clean?

deadfish.jpg
If only it were that easy. We've got the world's greatest amount of fresh water surrounding us, and, according to a recent report, we insist on treating them like giant porcelain bowls waiting for the number ones and number twos of society.

Environmental rights group Environmental Defence has just just revealed that alarming levels of cancer-causing mercury, PCBs, pesticides, dioxins and furans have rendered some of our Great Lake fish inedible. The report, aptly named Up to the Gills: Pollution in Great Lakes Fish, examined the advisories for four species of fish in 13 locations across Lake Ontario, Lake Erie, Lake Superior and Lake Huron.

Photo by blogTO Flickrite viviloob.

Lake Ontario's report card was one of the least desirable. The study found that eight categories of fish have an increased occurrence of contamination since 2005, while only one has improved. Near Toronto, fish like Rainbow Trout and Carp were tested, and the results found that these fish should no longer be consumed. The eatability scale involves rating the fish according to meals/month that can be safely consumed.

The entire report is available for viewing from the Environmental Defence website, and it's worth the read. It details the methodology of the study, summarizes the findings, teaches about the different toxic chemicals found in our lakes, and offers recommendations. Measures like education, prevention and enhancing response to threats are necessary in order to make our lake fish safe to eat again.

"To reduce threats to human and ecological health, we must insist on aggressive measures to prevent the movement of toxic chemicals into fish and equally aggressive measures to revitalize the Great Lakes basin ecosystem," says Dr. Gail Krantzberg, director of the Dofasco Centre for Engineering and Public Policy, and a professor at McMaster University. She specializes in Great Lakes protection and remediation.

So, next time you go to buy that fresh Lake Ontario trout, try to remember if you scooped your dog's poop, or used pesticides on your lawn, and then think again.

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

looking at that fish makes me wish I wasn't a vegetarian. Mmmmm.

Posted by: Ben at July 6, 2007 12:25 PM

I walked along a short stretch of the Han River a month or two back and, in the span of about 15 minutes, saw about 5 dead fish, a dead eel, a dead turtle, a dead mouse, and wbhat might have been a mole or shrew or something. My point is that *all* fresh water bodies are treated like toilets and always have been. The real issue is proper treatment of sewage and nailing industrial polluters and commercial dumpers.

Posted by: rek at July 6, 2007 12:52 PM

What is wrong with you Toronto-heads and the environment. Lake Ontario is a great example.


You wont swim in it, won't eat the fish and are constantly moaning about cancer.


But you happily drink it and eat food grown in it.


And the most bally-hooed environmental action you can take is piously taking a transit system that runs mainly on tritium-leaking nukes and mercury spewing coal-plants that are the major source of a deadly neurotoxin in Great Lakes water.


In November, you'll piously re-elect a provincial government whose entire 2007 Great Lakes budget item was not more than the cost of a few TTC streetcars. I also note that you've got an environment minister and husband that appear to be addicted to gas guzzlers at a time when even Arnie knows that it's bad PR. You are all so pious and polite about it. Toronto is such a great city. Cough, hack, gurgle.

Posted by: Northerner at July 7, 2007 3:14 PM

hey Northerner
You dumb turd. Toronto isn't the only city on the Great Lakes.

Posted by: alfred at July 8, 2007 12:46 AM

I wonder if we go on and carelessly polluted our fresh water lakes, and doing this long enough, will the fishes in lakes eventually evolve and becoming uneatable fishes (poisonous fish). Probably not. Evolving must take the course of million of years I suppose.

I am hoping fishes evolve faster, maybe in the course of years instead of million years. Then the human like us will see the consequence much faster, and maybe then we will treasure our natural resources much and much more.

Posted by: BLOGMYWAY.org at July 8, 2007 12:59 AM

Environmentalists and scientists know what they are talking about with research into the effects of toxic substances.

If stupid, greedy people weren't so extreme in their stupidity or greed then they would have listened to environmentalists rather than heaping scorn and derision on them.

Here is the news. It's too late anyway.

Posted by: HAAHAAHAAHAAHAA at July 8, 2007 1:25 AM

Have you tasted Toronto's water in the recent years? It tastes like a mix between chlorine, sulfur and eggs. It's disgusting, it's rivalling Buffalo or Boston's water.

Posted by: Online TV at July 8, 2007 1:32 AM

CANDU nuclear reactor spills have all been deuterium. Deuterium is a stable isotope of hydrogen that naturally occurs in water. It is non-toxic, non-radioactive, and is biologically indistinguishable from a normal hydrogen isotope of water.

Tritium has nothing to do with any pollution in any of the great lakes. Nuclear power plants, however, do reduce the number of coal burning power plants required to power Central and North-East America (referring to the continent). No other mature technology yet compares to the amount of electricity produced in anything near the scale and price required. Nuclear, therefore, as an atmospherically neutral source of energy, as an environmentally beneficial technology comparative other toxic generation possibilities (including PV solar cells, which produce a large amount of toxic waste that must be disposed of), is again environmentally friendly. Only radiologically does nuclear compare unfavorably to some technologies (coal it beats by far), and this testing has nothing to do with radiolgical contamination.

Trying to introduce the nuclear bogey man into this discussion is an off topic troll, especially on the Candian side in reference to the CANDU reactors and resorting to ignorance or deception to try to make your point (tritium instead of deuterium in the great lakes). Especially when nuclear is the only viable alternative source of containable clean energy in the present day and for the foreseeable future.

As an aside, see that granite that comprises a large % of the bedrock stone of the great lakes? Yep, radioactive. Gives off far more radiation to someone standing on top of natural granite rock than someone working in a nuclear reactor near the containment vessle (in actuality, a nuclear plant typically has far lower total environmental amounts of radiation than even environmental causes). So please, keep the ignorance or deception out of your posts, especially because it harms everything around you (especially by perpetuating a deceptive nuclear bogey man).

Posted by: John at July 8, 2007 1:38 AM

Water is a huge problem for everyone, in Australia we are currently experiencing one of the largest dry spells on record, only having slightly eased lately with some spots of rain.

A novelty site has been put up to help people realise that a small change in habit can have a massive effect on the environment and it's more about changing peoples attitudes than actual daily procedures.

http://www.savewaterpissinthegarden.com

Posted by: Sean at July 8, 2007 4:14 AM

Yay for Lake Michigan! Cleanest sewage dump of them all!

Posted by: joshuasbones at July 8, 2007 10:35 AM

joshuasbones, that's because in Chicago, we send all our #1 and #2 down the Illinois to the Mississippi.

Take that, Gulf of Mexico!

Posted by: matt at July 8, 2007 10:49 AM

I couldn't agree more..

Posted by: MC at July 9, 2007 5:03 AM

cheap@levitra.com

Posted by: cheap levitra at July 19, 2007 2:52 PM

Post a comment

   
Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Can't We Just Flush the Great Lakes Clean?' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.