Sunday, February 12, 2012Mostly Cloudy -6°C
Toronto Film Festival 2008

At Midnight: Martyrs

Posted by Matt / September 11, 2008

Scream for your life
There is an escalating game of one-upsmanship that Midnight Madness plays with itself every year. Renowned for bringing the nasty back to Toronto screens again and again, each year's programme is set the task of finding a flick that out-ickies last year's most upsetting feature film. When 2007's closing show, Inside, proved to be one of the most gruesome films ever shown at the Toronto International Film Festival, finding a topper for 2008 was always going to be a challenge.

Martyrs has been brought in to fit the bill, a neo-horror picture so extreme, Midnight programmer Colin Geddes described it as "a suckerpunch." And if you can suckerpunch that guy, you've certainly earned a place in the program. After disappointing with Deadgirl and The Burrowers but hitting the nail on the head with Acolytes, how did Martyrs fare?

There's been a collision coming between the French horror new wave (expertly exemplified at last year's Midnight Madness with Frontiere(s) and Inside) and American torture porn (think Hostel or The Passion of the Christ). Torture porn is an exercise in gratuitous gruesomeness, the brutalization of human bodies and souls for the pleasure of the audience. The French horror new wave, meanwhile, has spent the last few years building momentum by turning all the old horror/slasher tropes we grew up with on their ear via almost blindingly cathartic shock cinema. I have a growing respect for the latter - who knew the French were so fucked up? - and little more than lazy contempt for the former. Their inevitable collision finally occurs in Martyrs.

This film's first act is an effective primal scream of vengeance picture fury, as a teenage girl named Lucie escapes from an urban dungeon where unseen captors have been abusing her, only to return 15 years later and slaughter the family responsible for the crime. It's rat-a-tat cinema, blood-soaked as hell. Lucie's murderous rampage also introduces the freakiest jump-out-of-the-shadows monster since that Japanese kid spider-walked in Ju-On, five years ago.

Lucie's best friend and guardian angel, Anna, arrives at the scene of the crime to try to sort out the mess - Lucie is unabashedly psychotic, gibbering and crying and beating her own head against the wall - but as some clues to the motivation of Lucie's original imprisonment are revealed, Martyrs flips over and becomes torture porn through and through. Any hope that the flick would redeem its excesses vanishes as the audience is put through an entirely gratuitous 20 or 25 minute sequence of Anna being brutalized past the point of being recognizable as a human body. When she resembles nothing so much as a BodyWorks exhibit, and a weird, quasi-metaphysical "answer" is provided as to the machinery of the plot as a whole, the film sputters and dies.

There will always be something useful in cinematic horror, the film world's amped-up psychodrama which lets the audience confront, and hopefully purge, its deepest and least-accessible neuroses. Torture porn, on the other hand, is little more than an exercise in human cruelty dressed up in a game of one-upsmanship of "who can come up with the grossest gag." Martyrs falls shamefully into the T.P. camp, a mean-spirited, wholly unlikeable plane crash of a movie whose only lingering aftertaste is shame.

Had enough Midnight yet? Thursday night brings Eden Log, a Heavy Metal-inspired (the magazine, not the music) science fiction flick from France, followed on Friday night by Sexykiller, a killer comedy (pun intended). The 2008 show closes on Saturday night with Chocolate, which puts the Muay Thai firmly back where it belongs: on the screens of Midnight Madness in Toronto.

Discussion

11 Comments

Munzz / September 11, 2008 at 09:30 am
user-pic
I was there last night. It was the most disturbing film Ive ever seen. The girl in front of us threw up and left lol I dont think I've ever heard of anyone throwing up because of a film. as Colin Geddes said "can I see a musical now?"

I thought film held itself up pretty well.
Adam / September 11, 2008 at 10:52 am
user-pic
Wow, the comment above is enough alone to make me want to see this one. I smell a challenge :)
Kate / September 11, 2008 at 11:28 am
user-pic
Meh.
It was like there were two different films: one a Euro-take on J horror, which was pretty interesting if not a bit overdone and another in which a girl gets beaten up and made into a cenobite for no real explainable reason. I think it may have been oversold to me but not the high-tension cataclysmic ride I was hoping for. Possibly redeemable if there was something a bit more thoughtful going on ? L'interieur style but in this film, I couldn't find it.
Munzz / September 11, 2008 at 11:35 am
user-pic
"no real explainable reason."

did you really pay attention to the plot? because the reason was explained pretty clearly towards the end.
Jerrold / September 11, 2008 at 11:42 am
user-pic
To me, someone vomiting from watching a film is reason not to go :P
Kate / September 11, 2008 at 11:58 am
user-pic
Munzz - I did maybe instead of explainable I should have used convincing. I didn't buy the reasons given by the evil gran charcter and didn't think they were explored enough to warrant the time spent.
Kate / September 11, 2008 at 12:02 pm
user-pic
Munzz - I did pay attention, maybe instead of explainable I should have used convincing. I didn't buy the reasons given by the evil gran character and didn't think they were explored or explained enough to warrant the last half hour. It just didn't hold my interest. Glad you enjoyed though. I'm looking forward to the remaining 3. the line-up this year has been pretty strong and pleasantly diverse.
Kate / September 11, 2008 at 12:03 pm
user-pic
umm weird half double post - sorry about that
e / September 11, 2008 at 03:25 pm
user-pic
To me, the 20 or so minute beating scene wasn't so much torture porn. It wasn't really done in a way to thrill the audience, more so than to numb them.

Initially, you have that bit of shock/horror at the situation, you have a good idea of where it's going to go, and the beatings evoke a few gasps here and there. But then eventually, for me at least - you get desensitized to them. They no longer become shocking or horrific.

For me, this also came at about the same point that Anne started to accept it - you can see the change in her character. From fighting what is happening, to accepting it.

It sort of puts you into the same head space that they are putting the character through to some extent. Initially, I was almost bored by it by about halfway through, but as the movie wrapped up, then reflecting back on the movie after - I think it played out pretty well and thought it was well executed.

(going to try avoid spoilers ...)

To me, this is further reinforced once they put her into the rig and start to hrmm, put the knife into her. Instead of her screaming in agony - which would have been more shocking and difficult to watch, but not as powerful. She simply lets out a gasp - and it almost didn't even seem to be a gasp of pain. Then, seeing what the end result of that scene was, and the disconnect in her eyes, and almost the weird combination of serenity and horror.

Either way, I thought the movie was very effective at what it was doing, and it has left me mulling over it / thinking about it all day. It has me thinking between the lines of just the physical violence on the screen. It made me think, and has caused quite a bit of discussion between me and my friends and other people that have seen it - any movie that can do that, is worth seeing at least once IMO.
Munzz / September 11, 2008 at 03:39 pm
user-pic
in reply to the post above:

What you said about the last part of the films is actually what, in my opinion, makes the film great. It did not copy all the other horror films and over-use the element of shock in every single second of the film. Rather, it delved deeper into the philosophy of suffering and pain and essentially life itself. It gave us something to think about which is more than what we could have asked for.

To me that is not boring. The film kept a great balance between shocking its audience and making them think. that is called a good film.
e / September 11, 2008 at 04:55 pm
user-pic
I think I'm miss-using the term bored again, and really should be more desensitized, as I'm not meaning to used "bored" in a bad way. The overall impact of the film was very strong, and it really did get me thinking.

The beating scene was very intense, yet for the most part - it kept the same level of intensity. The repetitive nature of it, without it escalating for so long is what 'numbs' you to it. Instead of having a series of increasingly horrific ways to torture her, it kept the same tone for the most part.

However, what did change was her reaction to the beatings - and that is what really gave it impact. I think we are sort of arguing for the same point on this one, I just think I didn't express myself clearly above.

Then, when they did escalate things - it was done with a purpose, and with a twist. I was expecting them to do to her, what they did to the girl that she had initially found. I almost groaned for a second thinking "that would be so cheesy", yet the direction that they ended up taking it really impressed me.

Anne, was not "seeing" things - no dead girls, no cockroaches on the walls - so instead of binding her in the helmet to prevent her from seeing anything as they did with the previous girl, they took her one level further.

Like I said, "bored" is the wrong term - as the over all impact was a very effective one, and one that has had me thinking about the movie all day - both in terms of the physical brutality of it, but also 'reading between the frames' and something to think about and chew on.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal