Sunday, May 27, 2012Mostly Cloudy 17°C
Toronto Film Festival 2005

Battle in Heaven at TIFF

Posted by Matt / September 11, 2005

29.jpg

Here's a film that is the sort of thing that will scare newbie festival audiences away from the Toronto International Film Festival for the rest of their natural lives. It's a foreign art film that will (somewhat unfairly) remind viewers who are not used to this sort of thing of every single joke and cliche they have ever heard about foreign art films. It's very long, very slow, quite impenetrable, minimal on plot, difficult to follow, and filled to the brim with extremely graphic sex, which is then so utterly deconstructed by the filmmakers that it can't even be seen as erotic or enjoyable. Battle in Heaven is the kind of art film that The Simpsons warns you away from.

The story concerns Marcos (Marcos Hernández), a deplorable sad sack Mexican driver who can't even muster up the cheer to crack a smile while he is being fellated by his nubile, 20-year-old charge. She is Ana (Anapola Mushkadiz), the bored daughter of a general who, with her friends, has created an upscale whorehouse which they call "the boutique," out of nothing more than seeming apathy for their mundane lives. Ana takes Marcos to the boutique early in the picture, where he refuses the ministrations of a Mexican beauty, preferring instead to spend time with Ana. He is sexually obsessed with her, and confides in Ana that he and his wife have kidnapped a baby who has since died. She advises repentance.

If I'm making any of this sound lurid or titillating, let me assure you that it is not. In a film like this, I often wonder if the script can be more than a dozen pages in length, as very little actually happens in Battle in Heaven. The things that do happen are milked for the extremes of running time. There are minute-plus shots of characters walking across great distances of space; there is an extended sequence of Marcos masturbating to a football game on television. When Marcos and Ana finally consummate (noticeably, he begins to become more passionately involved in the sex, but is warned away by Ana, who prefers him to lie absolutely still beneath her while she services him), the camera leaves the bedroom and tracks 360 degrees around the Mexico City skyline for a full three minutes, before returning to Marcos and Ana's bed. Battle in Heaven is graphic in its depiction of sex; Ana dismounts from Marcos and director Carlos Reygadas holds on a two-shot of their genitals, his erection fading, her vagina pristine. These are the sorts of aggressive, transgressive chances that art cinema can take, but without a great deal of experience with films like this, it would be difficult for any audience to know what to make of it.

I cannot deny that I found Battle in Heaven frequently intriguing, though deplorable, if only because the principal character is so unanimously loathsome and worthless. Visually, it is one of the ugliest pictures I have seen in a long time. Only a sequence atop the mountains above Mexico City has any pictorial beauty; everything else is mundane, brutal, and uninspired. The film's use of graphic sex is interesting from a formal perspective but does not seem to be in service of the story that the film is telling.

I have to admire the trick that the festival programmers pulled, however, to get bums in the seats; they published a big, beautiful photograph of Ana's breasts in the festival guide, and thus guaranteed their audience. Battle in Heaven sold out long before regular tickets even went on sale; sadly, the majority of the people who came to see it will doubtlessly walk away mystified by what they were meant to interpret from the film, which is neither erotic nor entertaining. It's art, all right... although what it is in service of remains a mystery.

Discussion

5 Comments

Yan / September 11, 2005 at 09:57 am
user-pic
Define "deconstructed."
Ariel / September 14, 2005 at 11:47 am
user-pic
You must have seen a different Battle In Heavan than I saw - or you are completely lost when it comes to movies. This was the slowest, most pretentious piece of crap I have seen since Eros at last year's festival. Matt, you should be barred from writing about movies on this Blog and will speak to Tim about having you fired.
Ariel / September 14, 2005 at 12:54 pm
user-pic
Disregard my last posting. I didn't read your review carefully and just saw that you wrote "I cannot deny that I found Battle in Heaven frequently intriguing" which caused a knee-jerk reaction. My deepest apologies.
Chris / September 14, 2005 at 01:00 pm
user-pic
To Yan:<p>In this context, 'deconstruction' is the practice of using the devices which make up a film --ie, voiceover, addressing the camera, dialogue, visual style, etc-- to divert the audience's focus away from the story to the way in which that story is being constructed. Plot & character become tools, as opposed to ends in themselves, in service of a political or ironic analysis.<p>To Ariel:<p>Just because you disagree with the writer doesn't give you the right to insult him. You are welcome to use the dubious powers of the internet to blog a reasonable response to his review.
Moilanen / October 2, 2005 at 01:56 pm
user-pic
Slow? Yes. Pretentious? No.

Judging by his/her comment above, Ariel should feel at home with the tunnelvisioned reactionaries who have opposed challenging cinema throughout history, from the days of Bunuel all the way to the likes of Haneke, Noe, and now Reygadas.

In contrast, Diana Sanchez' comments in the festival guide were spot-on: www.e.bell.ca/filmfest/2005/films_description.asp?id=29

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal