Toronto Film Festival 2005
A Cold Shower: Douches Froides at TIFF

Douches Froides is one of the most clumsily-made films I've ever seen at the Toronto International Film Festival. Usually, when a fest film is bad, it's at least bad in an interesting way; Froides is anything but. It's so unbelievably bland that one becomes mystified upon contemplating why anyone would have made this movie in the first place. It's drab, boring, and ultimately pointless. It's an after-school special with the goofy charm taken out, and moderate nudity put in. No, on second thought, it's not even that good.
The story is such an unabashed cliche that one actually becomes embarassed for the filmmakers while watching it unspool. Mickael (Johan Libereau) is a healthy, upstanding young athlete. He has a girlfriend, Vanessa (Salome Stevenin), whom he loves, although their relationship seems to consist of little more than sneaking into various athletic facilities and having a go at each other. Mickael begins training with the new rich boy in town, Clement (Pierre Perrier), and eventually, Clement gets tossed into Mickael and Vanessa's sex life. Surprise surprise, Mickael can't handle it after the fact, and freaks out at Vanessa for being a slut. End of miserable, misbegotten story.
There are unsettling elements surrounding Mickael's judo training (he is forced to lose 7 kilograms in a matter of weeks, to qualify for his weight class), but these are not dealt with as anything more than mere plot elements, to move the story towards that moment where Mickael's opinion of Vanessa slips from madonna to whore. Otherwise, this film is not about much of anything; it's amazing just how pedestrian the overall storyline really is. The kids go to a party. The judo team capers in the shower. Mickael's parents have a fight. And so on, and so on, and so on.
Admittedly, that one crucial moment in the film - the two minutes where Mickael and Clement are wrestling one another in the abandoned gym, only to have Vanessa pulled into the mix, which ultimately leads to a provocative sequence of faceless bodies tumbling over one another before finally succumbing to fleshy lust - works better than anything on either side of it. It's restrained while still being erotic, and rather surprisingly true to the teenage experience, in ways that the rest of the film can never be. It feels so cataclysmically at odds with the ineptitude surounding it that the love scene may just as well have come out of an entirely different movie. We have seen nothing so far that indicates that first-time director Antony Cordier, who makes such elemental mistakes as eyeline direction errors and failures to maintain continuity of action, has anything like this up his sleeve. One deep breath later, the scene's gone, and we're plunged back into a film so numb that the audience climbs out of the theatre gasping for breath, as though having been smothered. Douches Froides is a cold shower, all right, in all the wrong ways. What a colossal misfire.


Discussion
3 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
I never experienced the "audience climbing out of the theatre gasping for breath, as though having been smothered"...perhaps (unlike the blogger who must have experienced this mass run-away), I was twice with a 200+ dummies who didn't understand how aweful this movie was and enjoyed its alleged dumbness till the very end with a smile and laughter in their faces. Or, more likely, this blogger uses his experience with and personal take on the movie to parade his not-so-original metaphors and solid abaility to express irony... unfortunately at the expense of facts and a real critique of the movie that he simply didn't like. That's actually the only fact you can get from his blah-blah. (Rule number one for a good review is that the audience/readers can't and shouldn't care less of what the critic's personal taste is.) Sorry, I kind of despise the generic intellectual blah pretending to be a sophisticated critique. It always happenes with these tear-for-the-sake-of-my-verbal-exhibition critiques that instead of using facts and serving the readers or the director, they serve their literary egos and ambitions. They like to bring one generic inherently neutral theme ("Michael's parents have a fight" - so, what EXACTLY is wrong with that theme, blogger??) and generalize the "badness" of the choice (without telling you really WHAT is so wrong about having that theme in a movie!) by continuing with "and so on, and so on, and so on"...you know, this conspirational "so on and so on"...like, "we" all know what I mean so I don't even have to bother to tell you. Well, guess what: "we" all don't know...could you say it next time? That would help. Both us, the dumb theater goers, and you, a...well...I guess the first-time critic. Unless you believe that "ultimately boring and pointless movies" require adequately ultimately boring and pointless critiques.
I just read this review via Google and I have to agree with Jan Stary's comment.
The author is apparently full of himself and the review is a pedantic diatribe.
I do think a reviewer has every right to express his personal opinion about a movie, but he ought to explain his position so the reader can speculate on whether he might like (or not like) the movie anyway. This review helps no one.
Thanks for your comment, Pizza Pie. You are obviously welcome to disagree with my opinion about Douches Froides, but I find that your decision to attack me personally somewhat undermines your credibility.
Critical consensus on the film remains mixed, with some strong support (particularly in Europe) and some strong detractions (particularly in North America). Cultural bias, as usual, plays a part. You might find some of the reviews of the film at Rotten Tomatoes (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/douches_froides/) more helpful in deciding whether Douches Froides is for you.