Toronto Club District
Sold! 140 year old house on Peter St. in the Club District
122-124 Peter Street has been vacant for over a year now. Outside the cracking grey building with white trim is a yard of overgrown weeds and a "for sale" sign.
Donald Woods has owned the house his entire life. In fact, Woods is the third generation in his family to take possession of the building, but this isn't the story of some greedy offspring seeing dollar signs in his inheritance. Woods is not a young man and he's held onto that property for quite a long time, but his years of running the building as a rooming house are behind him. The place has become more work than his deteriorating health can handle and as a result, for the first time since the late 1800's, one of the few houses left on Peter is looking for new owners.
It's another sign of change in the area, but this time the change isn't about noise or club kids or sky-high rent. It's simply a case of moving on.
Of course, the Woods' weren't the first family in the building. 122-124 Peter Street was built in 1871, a year that saw the birth of Emily Carr as well as the adoption of British Columbia into Confederation. France surrendered to Germany, ending the Franco-Prussian War and as a result, a young war correspondent for the Irish Times immigrated to Canada. Upon arriving in Toronto Nicholas Flood Davin moved into 122 Peter Street and began writing for the Globe (later to become the Globe & Mail).
While in Toronto Davin was commissioned by then Prime Minister, John A. MacDonald to write the Davin Report - or as it was known at the time: the Report on Industrial Schools for Indians and Half-Breeds. This document outlined the need for residential schools in Canada, an act that devastated native families and still hangs today as one of the darkest elements in Canadian history.
To be fair, Nicholas Flood Davin did not invent residential schools, but his report did bring public funding and support from the government. From the 1890's all the way up to - shockingly - the 1970's native children were forcibly removed from their families and made to live at these "schools" where they were sexually and physically assaulted and systematically forbidden from speaking indigenous languages or practicing indigenous faiths. It has been widely reported that the schools were plagued with poor sanitation and as a result tuberculosis was rampant and mortality rates were disastrously high.
Now, it's unfair to place such horrors specifically on the shoulders of Davin alone. After all, residential schools had been around since the 1840's, but his report remains a cornerstone of legitimizing them at the time. Fortunately for Davin, he went on to much nobler accomplishments later on in his career. He found his true calling when he moved west in 1882, started a newspaper - the Regina Leader - and entered politics holding a seat as a Conservative MP.
It was right around that time of Davin's move west that Woods' grandfather - William Mackenzie - first bought the property; thus ushering in 120 years of possession. Woods himself lives elsewhere, renting the building out, but for the past year it has sat vacant and for sale - that is until recently.
Andrea Kraus, vice president of Lennard Commercial Realty - the agency representing the building, says the house has been sold. But it won't be families moving in, or even businesses. It's no surprise of course that the land is worth far more than the building sitting on it and as a result Woods' family legacy doesn't stand much of a chance. Prime real estate a block south of Queen West is hard to come by, so once the new owners take possession 122-124 Peter Street will most likely be very quickly reduced to rubble.


Discussion
24 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Also (in the event that it CAN be demolished) what the hell is it with companies tearing these gorgeous buildings down? Like, I've seen hundreds of buildings redesigned to accommodate the original building? I'm over all this glass.
Glass provides a nice counterpoint to all that solidity, a break. A good glass tower can be really remarkable amidst a lot of solid surfaces. But when everything is made of glass it just feels cheap.
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontomayoralrace/article/837689--mayoral-candidate-proposes-fast-tracking-good-building-designs
If it can be saved, fine. If not, make good use of the land.
Second, we need density. We need it in order to reduce the burning of fossil fuels. We need cities where you can walk to work, the grocery store, bank, entertainment, etc. And you get this by increased density. Now let me guess, of all the people saying the house should stay as is, I bet over 50% of you are evironmentally aware. Am I right?
Arghhhhh!
And yes, I agree, the house is beautiful. But beauty ain't everything! I think property rights are more important. I think the environment is far more important.
Blah blah blah! Fancy words...but you make no sense. You sound like an academic!
We are born with rights in this country which follow us out of the womb! That is what has made this country great (despite people like you.)
Those that own a home should be able to do with it what they want (subject to zoning of course.) Who the hell is anyone to say to another that they like your house so much that you can't tear it down. That is so freakin' bizarre! What's next, I have to keep wearing certain vintage clothing because someone else likes looking at it! It is the same damn thing!
I live in a neighbourhood where many poeple think like you. Your house can't be modern looking; it has to fit in with the neighbourhood. It is no damn different than telling people that you can't wear this particular color shirt becuase no one here likes it and no one here wears that color. Same thing!
And now you accuse developers of cheap construction and the like! Quick and easy profit you say? So you think development is a quick and easy way to make money? Developers are building the friggin homes that we all live in. They are doing a great service to society! (If you think that having a roof over your head is important that is!)
I wonder how much a house would cost or rent for if we were not allowed to build density in Toronto? I'm guessing (just a guess here) that you would not be able to afford a place to live and you'd be homeless! Ahh..but I'd also bet that you'd say everyone has a "right" to a home! And at the same time though, you won't let developers build anything!
have a good read. I appreciate you for sharing!