Thursday, February 23, 2012Mostly Cloudy 1°C
Toronto

The top 10 Toronto landmarks: Take two

Posted by Derek Flack / September 27, 2010

toronto landmarksYesterday we published a feature on the top 10 Toronto Landmarks. The piece, unsurprisingly, stirred up quite a bit of discussion in the comment thread, with many readers taking exception to author Rick McGinnis's choices. I don't share this sentiment - it's refreshing to see a top 10 list that eschews the obvious in favour of a true evaluation of the quality of its selections - but I do think it makes sense to do a second take of the exercise. There's just too many candidates for such a small list.

Landmarks present another difficulty for the creation of top ten lists over and above the difficulty of reducing the many possibilities down to smaller set of selections. On the one hand, they do have to be wide-known in order to live up to the term (at least in contemporary usage), but, on the other, popularity alone can't - or perhaps shouldn't - really be the sole factor under consideration. The historical significance, aesthetic merit and contemporary relevance of these places or structures must be taken into account in addition to the degree to which they're recognizable.

That's why I like yesterday's list. Sure, I wouldn't have chosen all the same landmarks, but that's what made the list thought-provoking. So, in an effort to keep the conversation alive, let me present a second set of selections, some of which take heed of reader recommendations, some of which don't. I could position this as landmarks 11-20, but I think it makes sense to run it as a counter-list to our first offering. The only proviso I'll make is that I won't repeat any of Rick's selections (so no CN Tower for this list!).

Oh, and to those who say there can't be two top 10 lists of this sort, I say that's ridiculous...there are already thousands of competing versions of these lists in the minds of Torontonians. The question is, which of these two lists will readers deem better?

Lead image by Phil Marion.

City Hall (and Old City Hall)
City Hall TorontoThe omission of this from Rick's list is probably my only real disagreement. The Viljo Revell designed City Hall is an iconic and important piece of Toronto architecture, and has been crucial to the city's branding efforts over the years. Photo by rh89.

Flatiron Building (a.k.a. Gooderham Building)
Flatiron TorontoDespite its relative lack of height - only five storeys - Toronto's Flatiron is nevertheless a gorgeous structure, with its dignified red brick facade and rear mural by Derek Michael Besant. Built in 1892, it precedes its more famous counterpart in New York, which, though taller, wasn't completed until 1902. Photo by blainekendall.com.

Princes' Gates
Princes GatesToronto seems to lack many gates of this type, which is why I suspect that the Princes' Gates (not Princess!) have become such an icon. Completed in 1927, the structure was to be called The Diamond Jubilee of Confederation Gates, but was changed to the current name when it was discovered that Edward, Prince of Wales and Price George were touring the country the year the gates were finished. Photo by Neil Ta | I am Bidong.

King's College Circle
Convocation Hall TorontoThis might a bit of a cop out, but instead of choosing University College or Convocation Hall (or even Hart House), I think it makes the most sense to label the nexus at which all of these buildings meet as the U of T landmark that makes this list. And besides, there's nothing like walking across the Circle on a brisk autumn day with the skyline in the background to make one feel like he's in a special place. Photo by wvs.

Royal York Hotel
Royal YorkThis one is a must-include for me if only because the Toronto skyline was defined by the hotel's presence from 1929 all the way to the mid seventies when the CN Tower arrived. That presence is quickly fading, but not so fast that it doesn't make the cut. Photo by dan cronin.jpg

TD Centre
TD Centre TorontoThe Mies van der Rohe-designed TD Centre was Toronto's first modern office tower complex, and paved the way for the development of our skyscraper-heavy financial district. And, for black, rectangular buildings, they remain somehow remarkably pleasing to the eye. Photo by arcticlamb.

OCADU
OCAD TorontoThe Wil Alsop designed Sharp Centre for design may not rub everyone the right way (though I suspect it's more widely liked than the ROM crystal), but it's impossible to argue that the building isn't dramatic, challenging and memorable. Photo by Scott Norsworthy.

High Park
High Park TorontoThis is the first one I have my doubts about. But, it seems strange to me to have a list of Toronto landmarks without a single bit of greenspace making the cut. So, the question becomes, why High Park over Trinity Bellwoods or even the Don Valley? Well, the Don Valley isn't really a park, and Trinity Bellwoods doesn't offer nearly as much territory to explore. Good enough? Photo by thru the night.

The SkyDome
SkyDomeYes, I'm aware that the building is now properly referred to as the Rogers Centre, but it'll always remain the SkyDome to me. And while baseball's popularity has certainly struggled in this city over the last decade or so, and the Dome is far from the technological marvel it once was, I can't help but think that Toronto would be a radically different place were it to disappear. Photo by Chewie2008~.

The Cubes (UniTri modular "space structures")
Cube Housing TorontoThis might not have made many people's lists, but there's something about these that scream Toronto to me, despite the fact that there are similar examples of this type of housing in Rotterdam. Inspired by Piet Blom's design, Ben Kutner took a parcel of land deemed unfit for development and built what's become a memorable bit of Toronto architecture. Photo by picturenarrative.

St. James Town
St. James TownNot many would put St. James Town on such a list either, but the 1960s community housing development, the site of a recent fire that's stranded residents of 200 Wellesley St., speaks volumes about the planning philosophies of a period that saw the rise of the concrete apartment structure throughout the city. Photo by Phil Marion.

Honourable mentions:

Casa Loma, the ROM, Brookfield Place atrium, Union Station, Filmores, and the Eaton Centre.

(Please disregard the map below for the time being).

Discussion

34 Comments

Alan / September 27, 2010 at 12:28 pm
user-pic
awesome photos...i wish i had taken some of these...
Alan / September 27, 2010 at 12:37 pm
user-pic
actually its the Princes' Gates, apparently there were 2 princes...
Shawn / September 27, 2010 at 12:37 pm
user-pic
I've lived all my life in Toronto and have been all over the city, but I've never heard of the Cubes...no doubt about it, its cool, but shouldn't a landmark be something people who've lived in the City know about? Especially considering how many times I've been in that area.

If I talk to friends in the States they'll know about the Rogers Centre and ACC, but if I talk to my neighbours there's not a single one who'd know about the Cubes.
adam / September 27, 2010 at 12:53 pm
user-pic
yeah, the cubes are a bit of a reach but a much better list than the one the other day.
Laura replying to a comment from Shawn / September 27, 2010 at 12:56 pm
user-pic
Actually, if you've ever taken the Richmond St. exit off the southbound DVP, it's impossible to miss these cubes, they stare you right in the face.
Langford / September 27, 2010 at 12:58 pm
user-pic
Much better list. And the cubes isn't one I would've thought to add either, but it is definitely one of the defining landmarks when you're driving into the city from Richmond. Any idea what is inside?
Daniel / September 27, 2010 at 01:04 pm
user-pic
A couple of these are more locations/neighbourhoods than they are landmarks.
Shlepster / September 27, 2010 at 01:05 pm
user-pic
Someone actually lives inside the cube.
Daniel replying to a comment from Shawn / September 27, 2010 at 01:09 pm
user-pic
I too have never seen the cubes. I google mapped it for you.
http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&;ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Toronto,+Toronto+Division,+Ontario&ll=43.654813,-79.357901&spn=0.002771,0.003535&t=h&z=18&layer=c&cbll=43.654535,-79.357496&panoid=lb-HB23QXxX_LCsPquqWDA&cbp=12,324.46,,0,-26.41
Kevo / September 27, 2010 at 01:14 pm
user-pic
I'm not a big fan of modernist architecture, but New City Hall is definitely one of my favourites. It's not ugly or dull and also doesn't look like it's stuck in 1965. Having it right beside Old City Hall also makes both buildings seem more interesting.
Greg / September 27, 2010 at 01:19 pm
user-pic
That photo of the TD building is so boss. The first big, and still the best looking of the bank towers.

I really like the atrium in the brookfield centre, but it's not a bank.
mt / September 27, 2010 at 01:21 pm
user-pic
it's a shame the skydome was ever built. i realize the weather is a big reason why they decided to build a dome but it's so isolated. look at the beautiful ball parks in america, they're wide open and surrounded by buildings. you get a real sense of being "somewhere" rather than "nowhere" like you do with the dome. sure it opens up with the retractable roof but it's not enough. you still feel isolated.
qwerty replying to a comment from Kevo / September 27, 2010 at 01:23 pm
user-pic
If you ever look at the new city hall from behind, it's pretty ugly. But the front looks good.
shannon / September 27, 2010 at 01:36 pm
user-pic
i like this list much better :D
Reggie Noble / September 27, 2010 at 01:42 pm
user-pic
The R. C. Harris Water Treatment Plant would be a good choice too.
http://www.tonybrand.ca/pictures/dscn2085.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RCHarris-cropped.JPG

Neda / September 27, 2010 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
This selection is A LOT better than your first one.
thecobra / September 27, 2010 at 02:17 pm
user-pic
Interesting choice on the cubes. I had no idea someone lived in them. To those who haven't seen them, could because you don't drive much. Anyone exiting the the DVP to Richmond would see them, or if you're coming across Eastern. I thought they were just weird billboards. Very cool.
Kevo replying to a comment from qwerty / September 27, 2010 at 02:26 pm
user-pic
Oh yeah, I totally agree, from the back it's ugly. However, I think they had to make sure it was strong on that side to resist the high winds that come off the lake and undoubtedly put a lot of strain on it.
Prince / September 27, 2010 at 02:46 pm
user-pic
St.James town is on the list! bwahahahahaha...
KingPete / September 27, 2010 at 03:25 pm
user-pic
Amazing photos for some of the items!

How have I never ever seen the cubes, and I've exited at Richmond for years? That's ridiculous! Maybe I thought they were billboards
Jacob / September 27, 2010 at 03:32 pm
user-pic
I would have replaced the cubes with 299 Queen Street West. It's far more recognised and has had a wide impact on the media landscape of this city and this country.
gtafunmuscle / September 27, 2010 at 04:16 pm
user-pic
i think the vaseline tower in the village should be one of the landmarks
John / September 27, 2010 at 04:26 pm
user-pic
Honourable mention to the Canada Life building at Queen & University.
Colin replying to a comment from mt / September 27, 2010 at 04:28 pm
user-pic
I think Skydome still carries a certain weight. When it's packed with 40,000 fans and the lid is open I don't get that sense of isolation. The sun is setting and as the evening shifts to night, the light from the CN Tower beams high above the open dome.

It's too bad the roof is closed with 10,000 people inside most of the time.
Smithermanblows / September 27, 2010 at 04:36 pm
user-pic
I liked the other list better.
David / September 27, 2010 at 05:16 pm
user-pic
well if you are going to include those ugly cube advertisement then why not include the elephant looking water treatment thing off the dvp or the massive billboard structure at yonge and dundas. better yet why not include the the telephone poll outside my store covered in flyers.
bobobob / September 27, 2010 at 06:23 pm
user-pic
Surpring lack of AGO, Bata Shoe Museum, Ontario Place, and Union Station.

@mt

The Skydome was one of the biggest and most important movements in sports arena in North America... why is it such a shame that it was built?
iwdrut / September 27, 2010 at 06:28 pm
user-pic
'The cubes' (??) before the AGO? interesting.
W. K. Lis / September 27, 2010 at 06:54 pm
user-pic
Hey! You forgot my home as well as your home! At least a honourable mention.
jamesmallon / September 27, 2010 at 10:05 pm
user-pic
Thank BlogTO for omitting the 'ROM Crystal' from both lists. It's not a crystal, because the engineers had to tell the architect it could not be built that way, it's a lousy exhibition space, they stole airspace from the city over the sidewalks, it's a waste of limited pubic funds, and it makes me feel like I;m in the interrogation room in 'Brazil' - even outside. Did I mention that it is UGLY?
bob loblaw / September 28, 2010 at 12:32 am
user-pic
Each cube (there are three) is its own apartment. the interiors are pretty crazy with their angled walls (similar to the inside of the ROM's Crystal). one of the cubes is home to a small interior design firm.
mikeb / September 28, 2010 at 10:01 am
user-pic
Wow, three from U of T on a list of the top 20 landmarks. Unless they've attended, U of T, most people barely notice the Robarts Library?

I suppose it all depends on your definition of landmarks, but I'd put Casa Loma and the ROM on the list. Possibly the Cinesphere at Ontario Place. The first two are the Toronto buildings that visitors always want to see. Both are well loved by locals--or hated given the ROM/Borg redesign. I'd certainly put them ahead of about a third of the structures on these two lists. St Jamestown, the Ashbridge's Bay Pumping Station, the cubes at the DVP and those condos at the Humber really don't even merit being included with the others.
jaime / September 28, 2010 at 03:01 pm
user-pic
I really liked this list. I love the flatiron building. It is such a pleasure to drive down Front street before it splits and approach the old building with all the newer modern buildings in the background. It is definitely one of my favourite views of the city.
I also liked the mention of the cubes. It wouldn't have occurred to me if I was making the list, but at the same time it is definitely a landmark for me. And it's interesting, because it made me realize how many landmarks I take for granted to be there. I'm sure there are so many buildings and places around the city that define Toronto for me and maybe wouldn't know it until someone took them away. Like the Sam The Record Man sign.
Damon / September 28, 2010 at 11:08 pm
user-pic
The Food Building!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal