Sunday, May 27, 2012Mostly Cloudy 18°C
Theatre

Potted Potter lacks magic

Posted by Keith Bennie / February 17, 2012

Potted PotterThe challenge Dan Clarkson and Jeff Turner construct for themselves is a tall one in Potted Potter. They set out to condense all seven books of J.K Rowling's wizarding epic into a 70 minute Harry Potter summation. The pitch alone is enough to entice fans of the series to watch it all go down, hence the almost sold out run.

In practice though, the resulting stage show doesn't live up to the pitch. Instead of a narrative that in any way resembles Harry's journey, we're a party to the banter of two comedians who muggle their way through each book. While the show benefits from the charm of these two performers, the script draws attention to the set they don't have, the characterization they have forgone, and the gaps they're happy to gloss over. Instead of relying heavily on imagination, the secret to Rowling's success and theatre's lifeblood, Potted Potter is a watered down wizard variety show.

Taking the challenge literally, Dan and Jeff start with the first book and work their way through the highs and lows of the seven book saga. Jeff, the duo's straight man, is billed as the resident Potter expert — he narrates the novels and portrays the title character. Dan, the comedic better half, relies on decidedly exaggerated characterizations to bring all of the other characters to life. Just when the pair finds some traction, Dan seems to derail the action with a spontaneous Quidditch match or a lacklustre prop.

If you arrive expecting an effort to condense the material and do some sort of justice to the story, you'll be sorely disappointed. The narrative flies so fast over each book that die-hard fans will surely hunger for more detail. The best parody balances a fine line between send up and acknowledging the quality of the source material. Here, the parody seems stuck on send up.

Only so much can be accomplished in 70 minutes, yes, but instead of rising to the challenge, the script relies on jokes and gags that appeal more to those under fourteen, and that most adults will find tedious. I'm talking silly string, chocolate frogs to the face, and a moment of audience participation with a giant golden snitch that's straight out of Nickelodeon.

There are a few redeeming moments that are cleverly constructed. Dan provides a powerpoint synopsis of the third book that exposes Rowling's formulaic structure. And the duel between Voldemort and Harry works well.

The two performers are undeniably talented. Dan is a strong comedic buffoon who injects the marathon with clever quips and well-timed physical comedy. We delight in watching him. At the same time, Jeff is a noble straight man. He's able to keep the show moving amidst incredible obstacles, all the while enduring Dan's abuse. The few bright spots in the text are a testament to their chemistry.

With no real set or costumes to up the ante, the performers charm only carries the piece so far before the repetitious structure and low-lobbed gags take their toll. It may be billed as a family show, but this one feels more for the kids.

Potted Potter, written and performed by Dan Clarkson and Jeff Turner, runs at the Panasonic Theatre until March 25.

Discussion

8 Comments

Sarah Fay / February 17, 2012 at 08:49 am
user-pic
save yourself the $90.00 and watch a Very Potter Musical on youtube instead. Best HP adaptation ever.
Cyril Sneer / February 17, 2012 at 09:52 am
user-pic
I would just like someone to explain to me what the hell "Potted Potter" even means.
RD / February 17, 2012 at 10:24 am
user-pic
I saw the show last night and I loved it. If you have ever acted, you can appreciate how much work went into their performances. That's a lot of work for two people and they were fresh, in the moment and funny as heck.

BTW, Potted is a Brit term for summarizing - basically abridging.

Yes it was a fun for the whole family but then so are the books.
the lemur replying to a comment from Cyril Sneer / February 17, 2012 at 11:28 am
user-pic
Potted means preserved in a pot or other container and, by extension, shortened, condensed, simplified, summarized.
S Thomas / February 17, 2012 at 11:38 am
user-pic
I saw the show and thought it was great for kids and adults alike. This 4* review in the Toronto Star gave it a fairer airing I think, http://www.toronto.com/article/713787--potted-potter-review-mirthful-muggles
dramaturgination replying to a comment from S Thomas / February 17, 2012 at 12:48 pm
user-pic
the star's Ouzounian is a hack - he'll gush over anything from mirvish

his memorial article of whitney huston was chosen as the worst memorial on the internet by gawker: http://www.toronto.com/article/713406--ouzounian-remembering-houston
S Thomas / February 17, 2012 at 12:51 pm
user-pic
He's not alone in the gushing though is he? The Sun gave it 4 stars too... http://www.torontosun.com/2012/02/15/wiz-kids-cast-their-spell
Jamie / February 17, 2012 at 04:04 pm
user-pic
Why would diehard fans - who presumably know the story quite well already - want to hear a thorough summary?

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal