Google Maps - Pedestrian Version

I am stupidly excited about this. Whee!!

Very cool. So I guess the main difference is that it will give you directions up one-way streets, consider alleyways and pedestrian only areas. It's pretty much a 'direct' route as opposed to obeying the rules of the road.

About time they realized that in an urban setting, most of us do not drive.

As an avid "walker" I find this quite useful!!! Good idea. Although walking times can vary...it's nice that they'd use side streets aswell. Taking side streets is sometimes faster than walking on a crowded main street.

People do realize that you can drag the route and choose it yourself, right? also with the "driving" Google Maps.

Yes, you can drag to create custom routes. I played around with the one linked above, and it reminded me of the classic Devil's Staircase.

Very cool!

Needs some work.It directs you around parks instead of walking across them.

I walk a lot, and played around a bit with this beta. Pretty accurate for me. Very nice.

Would be nice to have some way to adjust the time estimate to suit different individuals... I walk much faster than most ppl I know, to the point that most days I find myself yelled at at least once for it.

at 6'2" I definitely walk faster too. Maybe they need to factor in height as well as a "will you be window shopping button".

Super cool. Just yesterday I was Google-mapping some directions and thinking about how car-centric it was.

OK, it takes 7 minutes by car, but how long is the walk? And do I have to make all those stupid turns? Etc.

my initial reaction is Yippie... now to see how it translates for me...

Thanks for the measure theory flashback, Jerrold.

Now they just need one that somehow combines public transit and walking, and maybe one that you could use for biking that would indicate bike paths, roads with bike lanes etc.

very good.
I walk everyday to work from Bay/Boor to Bay/King and it takes me about 30 min and it says here its 37 min. I can live with that.

Related:

Why isn't Toronto in the Google Transit list?

Jerrold, here is your answer.

It doesn't treat parks as pedestrian pathways. It'll follow a path into a park, but it won't cross the grass where the path ends or turns in a different direction.

Not sure why you need Google to calculate a customized walking speed for you -- seems needlessly complex. If you walk faster than normal, just say, "Ok, Google says 39 min for the 'average person', so it'll be LESS than 39 min for me."

"It doesn't treat parks as pedestrian pathways. It'll follow a path into a park, but it won't cross the grass where the path ends or turns in a different direction."

The problem here, of course, is that the mapping data simply isn't available. All of the information google has available is oriented towards vehicles, and I doubt anyone's really ever given any serious thought to computerized mapping data that indicates, "yes, it is possible to pass through this big area labelled 'High Park.'" There just isn't (or at least, wasn't) the demand for it, so who would bother to plot the data?

I'd expect its something that you'll see change, albeit slowly.. these things take time. Kudos to google for making the effort to introduce the feature!

I walk to work every day. It takes me ~20 minutes. Google tells me it should take 34. I am awesome.

I don't get the hype. I think it's pretty useless. When choosing to walk somewhere, I'd rather pick a route myself. And it's very easy to estimate distance and therefore time that it would take me. Really, just typing all that info into Google would take longer and result in an inferior route that you have to tweak manually.

But then, I don't see much point in those driving direction thingies either.

"I don't get the hype. I think it's pretty useless. When choosing to walk somewhere, I'd rather pick a route myself."

I use google maps when I DON'T know where I'm going. The point of getting directions is because you can't choose your own route.

It would be nice if Google corrected the locations of the subway stations - Warden is at Danforth and Warden, not St. Clair and Warden, Wilson station is at Keele, not at the Allen.

Neat feature, but like a lot of Google's mapping, needs some work.