Bryan Colangelo Waltzes Into Toronto

GM.gif
Mr. Colangelo, welcome!

Before we examine the relative value of adding the reigning executive of the year in the NBA to a franchise that has employed - arguably - the worst trio of GM's in the history of sport; let us examine two fundamental truths.

1. After today's introduction three of the four most visible executives at MLSE are visibly metro-sexual. Richard Peddie, Larry Tannenbaum and the newly minted Colangelo. This begs the question: do the three of them ever get together and go out for a drink with John Ferguson Jr.? Right now I'm picturing the three of them ordering dirty martini's at the Windsor Arms while Ferguson Jr. looks around with a frown on his face and finally says to the waiter: "do you have any Labatt 50?" What about if Ferguson showed up at the Air Canada Centre on Monday morning and brought everybody double double's from Tim Horton's? Would the other three start sending BlackBerry pins around the office lamenting the fact they weren't drinking Starbucks? This needs to be a reality show.

2. Bryan Colangelo LOOKS like an executive. Sounds superficial doesn't it? Frankly, I don't care. John Ferguson Jr. looks tough and thorough; J.P. Ricciardi looks like he could rattle off a 2:40 marathon at will; Rob Babcock... Rob Babcock looked like a guy in an elevator who ripped one two seconds before the door opened and a pack of people walked in. One of these general managers is not currently employed. If Ferguson or Riccciardi was the GM when Vince Carter was playing like a poor man's version of Doug Christie, I'd like to think they would have done the honorable thing. Namely, make Vince part of the Raptors Dance Pack and force him to sit for the duration of his maximum contract.

Now - Why is this a terrific move? If you were a GM you could not possibly ask for a better situation. This is the business equivalent of Barry Bonds taking batting practice after Eric Hinske.

Cap space? Check. Budding Superstar? Check. (We'll debate whether that's Charlie Villanueva or Chris Bosh at another time.) Complete autonomy over basketball decisions. Check. (Though, it is entertaining to read columnists effectively compare Richard Peddie to Ricky Gervais' character in "The Office".) Good young coach? Check. Special advisor who's a pal of your Dad and looks a little bit like James Earl Jones? Check. (Thank you, Wayne Embry.)

Of course, there are landmines:

Everybody and their brother thinks it is imperative that we overpay for Mike James this off-season. First of all, you should never overpay for anybody in a sport with a salary cap. It will always end badly; this is a mathematical and primary certainty. As of right now, the only difference between Mike James, Stephon Marbury, Steve Francis and Baron Davis is that Mike James isn't grossly overpaid. James is a shooting guard trapped in a point guard's body. He wouldn't pull down more than 20 minutes for Detroit, San Antonio or Dallas, and he should never be paid more than 5 million dollars a year under any circumstances whatsoever.

Hopefully, part of the advantage that is born from Bryan Colangelo being given unprecedented power within the MLSE hierarchy is that he wont feel the pressure to save face. If Mike James wants to make 8 million jacking 23 shots a night for the Atlanta Hawks, god bless him. Let's hope it doesn't happen in T.O.

Most importantly, the financial landscape of the NBA isn't overly complicated. With the salary cap, there is a limited amount of financial maneuverability available to each and every team. If this were an economics chart the demand for cash from the players would far outweigh the supply of cash from the owners. So the onus falls on the general manager to be fiscally responsible. If you are patient, prudent and resourceful you can assemble a competitive basketball team. These are the only factors.

Geography is not a factor. Luck is not a factor.

Cash is a factor.

Which is why anybody who thinks that Chris Bosh will leave 16 million dollars on the table and gamble on whatever team happens to have salary cap space is certifiably insane. Bosh is here to stay. So is Charlie Villanueva.

Now go ahead Mr. Colangelo; assemble your team.

SA

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

Ain't no debate. Right now CV has two of the six tools. That doesn't make you a star, it makes you Steve Kerr with a lil rebounding. He certainly may turn out to be a potential star (on another team - he needs to play the four), but Bosh is unquestionably the superstar here.

Posted by: Greg at March 1, 2006 11:23 AM

Trade him! Super idea. Maybe we can ship him to Detroit so he can play with Chauncey Billups.

Bosh is unquestionably better; unfortunately he's recently been doing his best impersonation of Chris Webber in crunch time. Villanueva, on the other hand, seems to have a sense for the big shot.

Personally, I think they'll both mature together. But like I said in November, Charlie Villanueva will be the crunch time man. SA

Posted by: SA at March 1, 2006 12:14 PM

Its the only idea, really. This team lacks two major things. A legit centre and the pieces required to get one. Bosh needs the protection and luxury of a big man in the lane. Nene (knees), Mohammed (not worth it) and the Gorilla (sucks) will not help us except to eat up all of the cap space. I actually love CV and think he's the second best player from his rookie class, but he's a born 4. As long as Bosh is here, he needs to move on. CV ought to be enough (talent wise, not cap wise) to land Magloire.

Posted by: Greg at March 1, 2006 6:34 PM

The team does lack two things: a point guard, and somebody to shoot the ball in crunch time.

Wonderful set at the end of OT last night. Mike James jacks a 26 footer without passing; Bosh dribbles off his foot; Peterson fires up his second brick at the buzzer in three games.

All that was missing was Vince Carter yelling at Dee Brown and then starting to cry.

I suppose the only bright spot was Charlie Villanueva posting 25 & 11. From the 3.

Greg - Do you think you could hyperlink to some of your articles on the Raptors so I could dissect those too?

Posted by: SA at March 2, 2006 12:40 PM

Now I remember why I stopped coming to this site. You guys are so goddamn sensitive. At least you didn't cry and send me stalking emails for a month like Tanja. Good luck dude. You've got the perfect thickness of skin for journalism.

(And while CV did have 25 & 11 he got TORCHED on D, which is why we lost to one of the few teams worse than us. Why? Because he is too slow and lacks the footwork to guard 3s. Then again, maybe you know better. You are after all a professional sportswriter.)

Posted by: Greg at March 4, 2006 12:48 AM

Greg - Please don't go. Frankly, I don't care if you accuse me of molesting the elderly.

I had just noticed that you frequently commented on things that I've written; which is lovely. And I suppose I just deduced that, based on the tone of your "comments" that you could handle a good natured rib.

If you left and started having to read about Vancouver, Montreal or Buffalo, it would drive me to drink. My apologies.

Posted by: SA at March 4, 2006 4:54 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Bryan Colangelo Waltzes Into Toronto' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.