Saturday, May 25, 2013Partly Cloudy 13°C
News Flash

QuAIA to march in 2012 Pride parade

Posted by Derek Flack / June 29, 2012


In a move that's sure to be cause for controversy, Pride Toronto's Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) ruled that Queers Against Israeli Apartheid will be permitted to participate in this year's Pride Parade. City of Toronto funding for the parade is not contingent on the group's non-participation this year, but the presence of the group is likely to result in at least some tension this weekend. The panel has not made its reasoning public at this time, promising to do so at a later date.

--

Press Release from Pride Toronto:

Pride Toronto announced today that it has received a ruling from its arm's-length Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) that Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) will receive a permit to march in this year's Pride parade on Sunday, July 1. The decision comes as a result of a DRP hearing earlier this week on the complaint against QuAIA and the request that they not be permitted to march in this year's Pride parade.

"Pride Toronto is aware of the politically and emotionally sensitive nature of this issue for all parties involved. In line with the ruling of the Dispute Resolution Panel, and Pride Toronto's stated commitment to abide by the outcome of the process, the Board of Directors will respect the DRP's decision and will authorize a permit for QuAIA to march in this year's Pride parade," said Luka Amona, Pride Toronto Board co-chair.

Last year, Pride Toronto established a Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) process to provide an objective, transparent appeal mechanism to review and resolve complaints about participation in the Pride parade.

"Pride Toronto has taken extraordinary measures in its commitment to diversity, fairness and inclusiveness to address any concerns. We have made the Dispute Resolution Panel available to work through issues where conflicts amongst participants may arise," said Francisco Alvarez, Pride Toronto Board co-chair. "We are confident that all parties have had a fair hearing and that the complaint has received due process."

Pride Toronto is confident that the officers understood their roles and the requirement for impartiality. Appointments to the DRP were recommended by a Community Advisory Panel and approved by Pride Toronto's Board of Directors. Officers on the hearing panel were selected in accordance with a system laid out in the rules of the process in which all parties agreed to participate. All panel members serve on a volunteer basis as a service to the community.

The DRP was a key recommendation of the Community Advisory Panel (CAP) report, creating a process whereby an arms-length panel of experts in law and arbitration would make an impartial decision regarding disputes that would be binding on all parties, including Pride Toronto.

Released in time for implementation for this year's parade, the panel's decision can be downloaded here. Its reasons will follow at a later date.

Discussion

25 Comments

mario garisto / June 29, 2012 at 06:36 pm
user-pic
Congratulations.

I hope all participating parties (the complaint having arisen from a non-participant) have a great time :)
pull / June 29, 2012 at 07:25 pm
user-pic
pull their funding, i have no problem with it.
Adam / June 29, 2012 at 11:53 pm
user-pic
When this happens people supporting the parade really can't complain when others say funding should be pulled. This parade was supposed to celebrate and fight for gay rights, not push every agenda that every gay person might have. What a joke.
steve replying to a comment from pull / June 30, 2012 at 08:30 am
user-pic
Putting aside the homophobic rhetoric. What would be the grounds for pulling funding.
JC / June 30, 2012 at 09:42 am
user-pic
This is truly sad that a political group that has zero to do with actual "pride" has hijacked this celebration and tried to turn it into an attack on middle eastern politics. i don't understand why they would be allowed to march under the guise of hate. them marching has a polarizing effect on the whole community vilifying a lot of people who come to the parade to celebrate and show how proud they are. This is not about quaia vs Kulanu, this is about having a parade that is a celebration of the community's pride. there is a million other forums for quaia to send their message, Pride isnt one of them.
nicetry replying to a comment from steve / June 30, 2012 at 09:46 am
user-pic
because the parade is breaking their agreement with the city for the funding. once the agreement is broken the city has full right to yank the funding. Has nothing to do homophobia, nice try though.
Al / June 30, 2012 at 10:11 am
user-pic
Made the right decision.

Have a fun and safe time everyone!
steve replying to a comment from nicetry / June 30, 2012 at 10:38 am
user-pic
What agreement was that? I am trying to get past the rhetoric.
Jill replying to a comment from steve / June 30, 2012 at 10:40 am
user-pic
Bangs head on the wall, they keep their funding if Queers Against Israeli Apartheid does snot march. If they are allowed to march they loose their funding, not hard to understand.
AL the Pal / June 30, 2012 at 12:20 pm
user-pic
Made the wrong decision... very sad, that they would let Quaia spew their hate at this celebration of gay pride.

i don't attend anymore because this group has made me feel uncomfortable at a community event that i am part of.

however have a fun and safe time everyone who does choose to attend!

steve replying to a comment from Jill / June 30, 2012 at 01:42 pm
user-pic
Numerous searches later I cannot find were the city council specifically voted that funding is subject to QuAIA not marching. You seem to have that info, please give a link. I am not taking any sides here, just looking for clear talk.
tonyc / June 30, 2012 at 09:01 pm
user-pic
as i have said previously if a group was allowed to march that said negative things about gays i.e. "gays promote the disintegration of society as we know it" they would be condemned and rightly so as this would be hate speech." why is this group quaia allowed to march. They are promoting hate. Simple as that. Hopefully next years thinking will be the same as last years. If they march they dont get funding. simple as that.
JC / July 1, 2012 at 12:07 am
user-pic
Most people are now adjusted to & accept the fact that "gays" are a legitament group.
Why is this sub-group now going out of their way to confirm that they are nothing more than a bunch of juvenile buffoons ???
Since when do foreign politics have anything to do with preference for sexual partners ???
artem / July 1, 2012 at 01:43 am
user-pic
What a lot of Quaia critics don't realize is that Israel had a major "pinkwashing" campaign awhile back where they specifically branded themselves as being "the good guy" in the Israel-Palestine conflict specifically on the grounds that they are "more pro-lgbtq" than Palestine. There was a pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian presence at Pride parades all over the world as a result. This pissed off a lot of Palestinian queers, for whom Israel is no more "pro" than they are any other Palestinian, and that's a major reason for Quaia. I find that people who think "queers against israeli apartheid" sounds like a totally weird mashup of politics aren't aware of this, and frankly I think Quaia has done a not-so-good job of getting that aspect of their message out there.
Davis Benjamin / July 1, 2012 at 03:56 am
user-pic
As LGBT teachers, we are calling on the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan to divest from specific companies that contribute to Israeli apartheid, and for the Plan to become a responsible investor by re-investing our pension funds in Pink Triangle schools from Peterborough to Penatang:

Sign the Petition: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/otpp/
AL the Pal replying to a comment from artem / July 1, 2012 at 09:46 am
user-pic
how is it "pinkwashing" when what you speak of is fact!. Israel is more "pro-lgbtq" than anyone else in the region, find me another country in the middle east that won't jail you or worse for expressing that you are LGBTQ?. This is not pinkwashing. this is fact!...
Steve replying to a comment from steve / July 1, 2012 at 10:00 am
user-pic
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/pride-funding-in-peril-as-queers-against-israeli-apartheid-plans-to-march/article4184379/

Pride funding in peril as Queers Against Israeli Apartheid plans to march

DR replying to a comment from AL the Pal / July 1, 2012 at 12:05 pm
user-pic
Perhaps if the US and other Western countries had not installed/supported dictators in the Middle East for the last 50 years things would be different there. For example, if the US had not overthrown the DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED government of Iran in 1953, the Islamic Revolution of 1979 would likely not have happened and Iran would today be a progressive democracy. And try asking any Orthodox Jew in Israel how he feels about homosexuality and you'll find that Israel isn't quite as tolerant as you think.
steve replying to a comment from Steve / July 1, 2012 at 12:45 pm
user-pic
That was published May 18th, the article is about talk that it may be in peril. Council voted June 12th to extend funding. You have more current info that council voted with stipulation to funding was that QuAIA cannot march?

What I find most interesting here is the wish that council will pull funding. This issue of QuAIA is a fly at a banquet, Pride has always had political message, some far more controversial then a few people marching with a sign that a few find offensive. Yet it was when our current mayor got elected, giving voice to homophobic councilors, news media, giving a platform for those to crawl out from under their rocks and spew some of the most disgusting hate I have heard in a long time. No other funded organization has been questioned or threatened, only Pride. To what gain? this whole issue is motivated by homophobia.
Alice / July 1, 2012 at 03:39 pm
user-pic
The irony of QuAIA marching is that if they were to march IN the Palestinian Territories they would be stoned to death on the spot.
Maybe they should direct their energy towards promoting tolerance, acceptance and celebration of the LGBTQ community in their own land.
Al the Pal replying to a comment from DR / July 1, 2012 at 07:07 pm
user-pic
Installed dictators?? Who are you kidding? Not me.. Isreal is the only true democracy in the middle east. You talk about orthodox jews being against gay rights. I am sure they are. But look at the orthodox christrians or any orthodox religion here in north america, I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. The diffrence is that in isreal gays/lesbians have constitutional rights and freedoms like we have here in canada. Quaia should go march in the west bank for their cause.
DR replying to a comment from Al the Pal / July 2, 2012 at 01:51 am
user-pic
"Installed dictators?? Who are you kidding?"

Uh, I think you need to study your history.
DR replying to a comment from Alice / July 2, 2012 at 02:03 am
user-pic
No, they would NOT be "stoned to death on the spot" if they marched in the Palestinian Territories. What would make you think that? You're obviously making an assumption based on complete ignorance of Palestinian culture and history.

You wrote:
"Maybe they should direct their energy towards promoting tolerance, acceptance and celebration of the LGBTQ community in their own land."

The members of QuAIA are Canadian (of all backgrounds) so I'm not sure what you mean by "their own land"; their own land is Canada. If you're referring to Palestinians, the only problem is that their own land was stolen from them.
gail / July 3, 2012 at 06:02 pm
user-pic
It is irrelevant in terms of Gay Pride/Homosexual Community if the Palestinians are oppressed or not oppressed Just like is doesn’t matter if the Toronto Catholic Separate School believes there is no need for Gay Straight Alliance, acts of homophobia cannot be tolerated no matter the sob story.
The gay community if it wants to be taken seriously it cannot be seen as hypocrites meaning if you find Mayor Rob Ford homophobic and a Fascist, TCSSB as homophobic then you definitely cannot support Palestine. Because just recently the Palestinian Authority along with 56 other Islamic nations known as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation(OIC) told ’the UN's top human rights body that its 56 member states and the Palestinian Authority would ignore a scheduled UN rights panel on anti-gay violence, saying they were “disturbed" at the "attempted focus on certain persons" on the grounds of their "abnormal sexual behaviour,” which "have nothing to do with fundamental human rights."
Meaning the the Palestinian Authority succeed in getting a U.N. General Assembly panel to delete condemnation of anti-gay killings from U.N. resolution. The Palestinian Authority and the rest of the (OIC) justified this action by stating that Homosexuality is a ““Licentious behavior promoted under the concept of ‘sexual orientation’ is against the fundamental teachings of various religions including Islam,” Pakistan’s envoy said.
“From this perspective, legitimizing homosexuality and other personal sexual behaviors in the name of sexual orientation is unacceptable to the OIC,”
If the Toronto Catholic School Board or any another organization or person, country, especially Israel, believing they are victims and are suffering and was part of the above action they would definitely not be part of the Pride Parade and no question asked regardless of their sob story. Why then is Pride supporting Queers for Palestine it makes no sense which explains why the straight community is puzzled and makes us all look like fools. Are gay that easily hustled.
gail replying to a comment from DR / July 4, 2012 at 07:57 pm
user-pic
Maybe because a number of gay Palestinian men are risking their lives to cross the border into Israel, claiming they feel safer among Israelis than their own people.
According to some estimates, there are now 300 gay Palestinian men secretly living and working in Israel.
Their willingness to live there - despite the risk of being detained and deported as a security threat - is due to Palestinian attitudes towards gay men, they claim.
One 22-year-old gay man who fled from Gaza into Israel four years ago told BBC World Service's Outlook programme he was almost killed when his family found out about his sexuality.
. . .
many Palestinian gays say they would still rather live under house arrest in Israel, where homosexuality is not considered a crime, than at home.
The 22-year-old who fled his home in Gaza alleged that those who do stay in the occupied territories are often coerced into working for the Palestinian police.
He said that he himself had been stopped by police in Gaza, who had threatened to expose him as a homosexual. He alleged he was told by the police to sleep with another man in order to acquire damaging information about him.
The man alleged that after he refused, the Palestinian police had tortured him.
"They hit me. They put me in a pool of water with just my head sticking out," he claimed.

Disguised with a wig, sunglasses and a fake mustache, he offered only his first name, Ali. He said he was unwilling to reveal his last name or hometown for fear of being discovered by the Palestinian Authority.
Ali had harsh words for the environment he said homosexuals were forced into by the Palestinian Authority. “There is no freedom to speak about my homosexuality,” he said. “That’s what I’m experiencing in my Palestinian society as in the rest of the Arab world.”
According to Ali, a word for homosexuality does not even exist in the area’s native language. He said he only discovered his sexual orientation while studying in Jerusalem.
He claimed the opportunity never presented itself under Palestinian control, where he could have potentially been “subject to random arrests, torture and random killings” if he revealed his homosexuality.
Instead, Ali said he chose to live freely as a gay man in Israel rather than hide his sexual orientation. He also revealed that most of his family does not know the truth to this day.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal