Tuesday, February 14, 2012Cloudy -1°C
News Flash

G20 protestor suing Toronto police for $1.6 million

Posted by Robyn Urback / September 8, 2010


Remember that summit thing that everyone was talking about a couple months ago? Well one woman hasn't forgotten, and she's asking for $1.6 million.

Natalie Gray, 20, is suing Toronto Police for allegedly being shot with two rubber bullets while peacefully protesting at the temporary Eastern Ave. detention centre during the G20 summit weekend. Gray, who is from Montreal, was charged with obstructing a peace officer, but the charge was withdrawn last month.

According to the Toronto Sun, Gray is seeking $275,000 for assault and battery, $100,000 for unlawful arrest and detention, $25,000 for "the violation of her right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure," $200,000 for "malicious prosecution, or alternatively, negligent investigation," $50,000 for out-of-pocket expenses (that must have been one pricey bus pass) and $1,000,000 in punitive damages "as a result of the outrageous abuse of power and high-handed treatment of the plaintiff by the defendants."

An alleged attack on peaceful protesters shouldn't be overlooked. But $1.6 million? Of course, a larger-than-life sense of entitlement is totally priceless.

Discussion

25 Comments

RG / September 8, 2010 at 02:50 pm
user-pic
"a larger-than-life sense of entitlement" -- so blogTO supports fascism then. How else other than lawsuits will justice be served? Certainly not from within the system.
Jeff / September 8, 2010 at 03:30 pm
user-pic
The sum is greater than 1.2 million
Math / September 8, 2010 at 03:37 pm
user-pic
$1,550,000 to be correct.

Her lawyer must be taking about two-thirds of that, in the name of Xenu.
Brian / September 8, 2010 at 04:42 pm
user-pic
For those interested in the details of this story, an archive of information is available at http://www.anothervoice.ca/G20Toronto.html.
Amanda / September 8, 2010 at 04:49 pm
user-pic
The Toronto Sun article quotes the correct amount of $1.6M. I think it was just a simple editing error in BlogTO.

In any case, I fear this poor girl is spending more to pay her lawyer than she'll ever get from this lawsuit.
James / September 8, 2010 at 05:10 pm
user-pic
It is standard practice in civil lawsuits to sue for much more than the actual damages. The lawyer is paid a percentage of the actual award... obviously much less.
Picard102 / September 8, 2010 at 05:29 pm
user-pic
Hope the court fines her for wasting everyones time.
Derek Flack replying to a comment from Amanda / September 8, 2010 at 06:06 pm
user-pic
The amount has been corrected. Thanks for the note.
Hmm replying to a comment from James / September 8, 2010 at 06:39 pm
user-pic
Ah yes, even parasites need their due. Is any profession so grossly overpaid for the amount of actual work done?

The amount is still ridiculous. I'll take a dozen rubber bullets for over a million bucks. Beats working (rather than protesting) for a living.
shannon / September 8, 2010 at 07:16 pm
user-pic
with all these lawsuits coming against the city how many will be settled out the court room?
Censor / September 8, 2010 at 07:47 pm
user-pic
I love how you guys keep deleting any comments with the $cientology name in it.

Yes, one of her lawyers defended $cientology.
belvedere / September 8, 2010 at 08:44 pm
user-pic
uh maybe they were silver bullets and they're still lodged in her face. guess the police thought she was a vampire.
bryant / September 9, 2010 at 10:25 am
user-pic
you have just lost a reader by your inability to publish the post i left here last night critical of your author's flippant parting shot at a victim of police violence, who is taking the appropriate channels to find a voice and be compensated for the inappropriate acts of the state.

grow up BlogTo.
KL / September 9, 2010 at 11:23 am
user-pic
Just another entitled little brat that doesn't want to work for a living. Go back to your little podunk town and stop trying to sue mine.
Jerry Cassel / September 9, 2010 at 12:02 pm
user-pic
The cops will still pay it with a smile. They don't care. Oops, sorry lady. Here.

Maybe they'll notice after 1000 of these lawsuits when they can't get a new watercannon.
agentsmith / September 9, 2010 at 01:01 pm
user-pic
This is the same chick who says that while she was in jail, one of the cops made a comment about "banging" her... which she's of course claiming was a threat of rape. By that rationale, if I tell someone I like their car, it's the same as threatening to steal it.

Sounds like what she's really suing for is attention.
KL replying to a comment from agentsmith / September 9, 2010 at 01:53 pm
user-pic
Did the multiple interviews she gave before and after the G20 give it away?

This case is going to get tossed out so quickly it might break the sound barrier.
G20isNOTgoingAWAY / September 9, 2010 at 09:12 pm
user-pic
She will EASILY win her case, as will the others. And there are more lawsuits to come. I support every single one. If you dont, you dont belong in Canada. You truly do not deserve the democracy this country is built upon.
Mike / September 9, 2010 at 09:49 pm
user-pic
My favourite part is that she claims she got shot in the sternum while running away from police. Pretty amazing to hit someone in the dead center of their chest from behind, but I guess the facist police use magic bullets as well.

For those taking shots at blogTO maybe it's time you grew up a little bit yourself and realized all these "independent journalists" AKA nobodys with blogs are just doing this for attention. I spend a large portion each day reading the news as part of my job and I am absolutely sick of all the ignorance I see from g20 protest idiots and their supporters. I know it's hard when you've got an IQ of 6, but please read this and show it to all your brain dead friends.

1.Go to google
2.Search for "charter of rights and freedoms"
3.Read #1.
4.Go get a dictionary
5.look up "reasonable" and "limits"
6.shut up and get a job
G20isNOTgoingAWAY replying to a comment from Mike / September 9, 2010 at 10:16 pm
user-pic
Hey, if you dont want to have rights, so be it...
asd replying to a comment from Mike / September 10, 2010 at 05:13 pm
user-pic
because there can only be police behind you
M. Btok / September 10, 2010 at 11:54 pm
user-pic
Sounds to me like blogTO, is taking the side of the establishment as they believe that is the popular side!

However, they are not givig any presidence, to this woman's Rights uner the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms!

Are you saying blogTO, this lady has no rights?
I also see that you have taken it upon your blog to decide what the amounts her lawsuits should be, where you there to witness what "assult and battery", she suffered?

Did you stop to consider possibly her lawyer suggested the amounts?
Do you know more about the law than her lawyer? Have you passed the barr!

TOblog has tried Natalie Gray and found her not worthy of compensation for he denial of her rights?

In other words you are against, Canadian citizens having rights? It's a good thing you don't depend on sales traffic for your blog!

I for one would reccomend everyone ignore your narrow minded publication!

Do you consider yourself an Elitist?
Ryan L. replying to a comment from asd / September 11, 2010 at 09:15 am
user-pic
If there were police in front of you and you are in motion, you're hardly 'running away' now are you?
Ryan L. / September 11, 2010 at 09:22 am
user-pic
Speaking of which, this is my big G20 pet peeve. This woman is clearly exaggerating her story because she thinks it will make a difference. She doesn't realize that <b>she doesn't have to</b>. The police messed up, plain and simple. She got shot in the chest with rubber bullets at a time when they probably shouldn't have been used. The police were wrong.

But instead she chooses to exaggerate and possible outright lie (running away? really?). She takes a pure example of excessive force and taints it. And you know what? The courts don't really like being lied to. Her exaggerating and lies will be used against her and all the other people who were arrested unlawfully that weekend.

I repeat: <b>Please stop exaggerating your stories. Stop lying. You don't. Have. To. You only make yourself look bad and the rest of the supporters look bad by proxy. Stop it.</b>
Kevin replying to a comment from Ryan L. / September 11, 2010 at 09:39 am
user-pic
The thing is that the way they had it set up down there often running from one meant you were running towards another, so yea you could be shot in the sternum.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: VancouverMontreal