Sunday, May 19, 2013Partly Cloudy 21°C
Music

CMW 08: Hawksley Workman @ the Music Hall

Posted by Steve / March 8, 2008

Hawksley Workman
For my third night of Canadian Music Week, I decided to finally find out for myself what Hawksley Workman is all about. For years, many people have told me about his amazing talents, but I've never had a chance to check him out for myself, so this year I decided to change all that.

For the most part, the rumours are true: Workman is an amazingly talented singer/multi-instrumentalist, and he's surrounded himself with a diversely talented band (the inventive violin/mandolin/guitarist was especially impressive) with which to tour his sixth album, Between the Beautifuls. You'd think that with all this incredible talent under one roof I'd have my socks rocked off, but after two and a half hours of watching these performers showing off I was surprised to find myself bored silly.

I think I was the only person in the audience that felt that way though, except for the tall guy in front of me who was clearly only there to appease his girlfriend. For most of the set Workman had the audience wrapped around his little finger hanging on his every word. I was stunned during one particularly quiet number that there was dead silence at times. If someone were to drop I pin, it definitely would've been heard.

By the end of the night, though, I felt like the sole atheist at an evangelical revival where the minister was only preaching to the converted. It seemed to me as if every other tune went on at least twice as long as it should have, with Workman and company taking every chance imaginable to show just how well they could play their instruments. Honestly, there's only so much of that sort of thing I can take, even from the best. I was often reminded of the sentiments of an old teacher of mine who also had a limited tolerance for extended improvisation: "Why do they continue to play when the music stopped so long ago?"

On the plus side, Workman is one of the better stage announcers I've ever heard; not as good as Tom Waits, mind you, but he's getting there. His between-song chatter about Canadian Tire flyers and breaking into his neighbours' homes to borrow their pianos while they were at work were quite amusing. If only I found his music as charming.

I reasoned with myself that it was because I came at it cold. If I had found any of the tunes familiar, would I have enjoyed them more? Maybe, but I doubt it. Writing this article a short twelve hours after show time, none of the melodies were stuck in my head, and I had no compunction to hunt down any of his albums to hear the tracks in their original, hopefully much shorter, forms. By the time the second encore rolled around and Workman proved beyond a doubt that not only was he a singer/drummer/guitarist/keyboard player extraordinaire but also quite talented on harmonica (of all things) I was done.

I'll be wrapping up my CMW experience tonight by taking in the Indies at the Royal York Hotel (seriously). It's the last chance ever to see Lowest of the Low as they get inducted into the Indie Hall of Fame.

Discussion

13 Comments

Charmaine / March 8, 2008 at 11:42 am
user-pic
I've never seen him live so I can't say but I can't imagine it being bad because I like his cds. Interesting.
Steve / March 8, 2008 at 12:21 pm
user-pic
You likely would've had a great time. The faithful seemed to really enjoy it. It just wasn't for me.
Carlos / March 8, 2008 at 02:18 pm
user-pic
I think it might be the venue.

The music hall is not meant for lively concerts. You are sitting down, feeling so distant from the stage, you can't move anywhere because of the seatings, all you want is some popcorn and the movie to start playing :P

i saw Beirut there, and although it was one of the best concerts last year, in another venue it would have gotten double as crazy as it got.
Carrie / March 8, 2008 at 03:19 pm
user-pic
While I'll admit that the songs went on for just a little too long towards the middle of the set, that was about as diverse a show as you're likely ever going to see. I've seen Hawksley 7-8 times now and I don't think I've heard any of his songs sung the same way twice, nor has any performance been even close to the same. You must've been in a coma not to enjoy the last half (after he changed clothes)...it was awesome.
Laura Bee / March 8, 2008 at 03:34 pm
user-pic
I was once a HUGE Hawksley Workman fan who never missed a chance to see him and who was blown away by every show. But then, he lost me. I went to his acoustic show at Massey Hall and was bored stiff. I completely understand where this review is coming from. I don't think it is the venue either because I've seen him play the Music Hall before and turn it into a very intimate environment despite the seating arrangement.
Jar / March 9, 2008 at 09:40 am
user-pic
You were not alone. I think when people pay $40 bucks and love the album they are likely to suspend their disbelief.

Hawksley has written some great songs and is a talented musician but his concerts serve to show off his talents rather than serve the songs. His vocal masturbation ruined every song for me. Someone has to tell him that. like most singers his voice sounds best when unaffected and in fact sonds quite harsh and unappealing when full throttle.

The underlying effect is watching someone who is totally disconnected from what he is singing while he moves around the stage thinking "look what I can do" !
Steve / March 9, 2008 at 10:59 am
user-pic
Jar: that pretty much sums it up. I also felt like a lot of the stuff was just filler. I would have thought that with six albums to draw from, it wouldn't be that hard filling two hours. You're right, he wasn't serving the songs.

Carrie: I saw no reason for the costume change (maybe I just didn't get it - was it an homage to Devo?), and I *was* almost comatose by then. It took so long to build up to the "rock" portion of the set that it seemed forced and contrived by the time they finally got there.
T / March 9, 2008 at 10:20 pm
user-pic
I'm as big a Hawskley Workman fan as they come but I can understand where you're coming from. I've seen him 4 times now and while I found this show enjoyable because I could reference it to all the others, I could see how a new listener would be put off or even mystified by the show. In fact, I brought a friend who had two complaints: the rock stuff was too loud and fast and that he should've turned his mike down because it was drowning out everything else. I really do love his voice and I'm amazed by his wide variety of musical abilities, but I too did find it to be particularly overwhelming at this concert. These Toronto shows seem to have been directed at long-time fans. To be fair he has a very strong and loyal fanbase in Toronto. If possible, go see him at a smaller venue or when he is just one act in a line-up of a festival or something. He seems to be forced to reel it in a bit more and let the music, rather than the theatrics (which are his trademark) come out.
Jamie / March 10, 2008 at 10:34 am
user-pic
I, too, attended this show out of curiosity and a small degree of exposure to his recordings, but I left with a true sense of hope for this guy, and for me as a potential convert.

I think what is getting lost here is that this guy has one of the most powerful, dynamic, and expressive voices in music today. I can't say I disagree with your thoughts on the showmanship, but my God, when he started singing the first song, there was an audible gasp around us and numerous "raised eyebrow nods" being exchanged amongst the people in our area. Unlike 90% of performers on the scene right now, not once did you feel that anxiety that he was going to try to hit a note that was not in his toolbox...incredible control. It is for this reason that I grant him some wiggle room on some of the other issues raised above.

There is certainly no denying his incredible musical skills on pretty much every instrument though. I had been tipped off by a session drummer that he is incredibly under-rated in that regard, and this point proved accurate. Add to that his proficiency on the guitar, piano and other more peripheral instruments, and you start to see what the buzz is about.

In retrospect, I was left with two duelling thoughts from the show. One was that this was simply a guy, with a fantastic collection of musicians around him (including his backing vocalist!) who was having a blast doing what he enjoys most, and we, as an audience, merely got to witness the mayhem. On the other hand, I fear that maybe he tried to do too much. That he was trying to hard to prove himself as opposed to express himself.

Maybe this is just the curse of someone who is blessed with so much talent? If he can refine it, we might just have a truly engaging artist to watch for years to come.

He's got my attention now, anyways.
Fraz / March 13, 2008 at 11:00 pm
user-pic
Well who died and made all of you naysayers music gods... the man is a freak of nature and his talents are surpassed by few in the industry today! Would you prefer to go to a concert and hear the entire album played note for note? If so, stay home and listen to it and let the rest of the real music fans enjoy the performance, because that's exactly what it is and what is expected!!
Steve / March 14, 2008 at 11:02 am
user-pic
Well, it's about we had some good old-fashioned hyperbolic over-reaction. Thank you, Fraz!

No one died for me to become a naysayer music god, but someone did hire me to be a music critic, and as such I have to give an honest reaction to every story I'm covering. Should I take an opinion that's contrary to yours, I don't mean it as a personal assault on you, or even on Mr. Workman, who even I acknowledge as "amazingly talented." If you want a rosy spin on everything, I'll ask Gene Shallit if he has a music critic he can recommend for you.

I don't want to hear literal note-for-note recitals, but that doesn't mean I want to see wanky, self-indulgent, unneccesarily long-winded "hey ma, look at me" performances either. It is possible to be inventive and concise in a live situation - which is what I turly look for in a concert - I just don't think Workman is going to be on my wavelength anytime soon.
Dianna / March 26, 2008 at 12:15 pm
user-pic
Everyone has their opinion...I was at the March 7 show, and it was my first. I found it to be the best live concert i have been to! I personally love when i attend a concert that is different and long. I felt that the show could have been longer. Hawksley is extremely talented, and i loved to watch him all over the stage switching instruments, listening to his fantastic voice....i could have been there all night. Many parts of the show had me & my friend in stitches. I can't wait 'till the next one!!
Allie / August 31, 2009 at 09:32 pm
user-pic
Wow... I only found this because I am currently a Workman-freak. Anyway, I can see where everyone is coming from. I want to defend the music and the artist... I want to also pull out a pillow and take a nap sometimes. In any event, this is what art is. Not every second is going to appeal to your ears, eyes, and sensibilities. Take it for what it's worth. If most of it speaks to you, then you can call yourself a fan. If not, then keep looking for that which does.

Personally, I find the shows incredibly diverse. I've seen 3. So I'm not expert - but of the 3, the first was at Massey Hall (in Toronto) - the amps cut out during "striptease" and Mr. Pro didn't bat an eye. Why? Because as I found out 8 months later in London, ON, he does the one man and a piano thing with ease, and he does it so so well. That show made me want to stay forever. I mean that. Then, heading out to Huntsville, I was thinking - okay, this is his hometown (or near it), this show is going to be one in a million. It was sort of a snore-fest. To me. But only because I don't totally get the "i'm going to riff like crazy on my guitar until your ears bleed" thing.

I'm just so glad that there are artists like this on the planet. Ones that don't bore you (most of the time), ones that are gutsy enough to be daring and hot, sexy and obnoxious, mellow and submissive, humble and countrified, a hunter and a gatherer, a key and a keyhole all at the same time. So great. So so great. So so so great.

It kills me that he's not the most famous man alive. But I get over it when I see that Jessica Simpson and David Hasselhoff are still famous.

Long live this crazy sexy beast.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal