Sunday, May 19, 2013Partly Cloudy 20°C
MB Toronto

Morning Brew: Lincoln Alexander lies in state, Doug Ford wants tolls, Bloor-Christie assaults news, separated lanes are safer, 3-1-1 absences, and saving churches

Posted by Chris Bateman / October 22, 2012

toronto lake ontarioFormer Ontario lieutenant governor Lincoln Alexander who died this weekend aged 90 will continue to lie in state at Queen's Park until 8pm tonight to allow mourners to pay their final respects. Alexander, Canada's first black MP and the province's 24th lieutenant governor, was born on Draper Street, close to King and Spadina. Two books of condolence are available.

Doug Ford says he's in favour of adding optional toll lanes to the Gardiner Expressway in an attempt to cover the rapidly increasing cost of maintaining the elevated road through the city. In the wake of a report that paints the crumbling highway as a danger to the public, Ford says adding toll lanes will help pay for the cost of new repairs. Would you pay to use a dedicated toll lane on the Gardiner?

Toronto police say they will make a "major announcement" in relation to the Bloor-Christie sexual assaults investigation at 10 am this morning. According to the CBC, police wouldn't confirm an arrest in the case.

In what might be the least surprising conclusion ever, a new report says cyclists are safer in separated lanes than on the street with regular motor vehicles. According to the Globe and Mail, the research from the University of British Columbia found bikers were ten times more likely to be in an accident on regular roads. Surprised?

The National Post says absenteeism at Toronto's 3-1-1 helpline is down significantly this year. According to the story, roughly 20 per cent of the service's staff were absent on any given day before new measures were put in place.

Churches in Toronto's industrial areas could be in trouble if a proposed bylaw amendment goes through. Roughly 22 per cent of Toronto's places of worship are located in buildings designed as factories and warehouses and it's feared future conflicts could arise over noise, dust and other annoyances from nearby industrial businesses.

Catering an event at the ROM is about to get a whole lot more expensive - the museum is asking companies to pay a $10,000 fee to be placed on a preferred list of suppliers. The catch? The fee doesn't guarantee any work.

GUESS THE INTERSECTION

Check out the "Geary for Mayor" poster on the side of the building. The poster refers to George Reginald Geary, the man who would successfully become leader of the city between 1910 and 1912. Can you place the streets shown here? Write your answers below.toronto guess the intersection

IN BRIEF:

Photo: "toronto misc. - 50" by sarathofkhan in the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

22 Comments

Frank / October 22, 2012 at 08:31 am
user-pic
Lansdowne and bloor, 2012.
iSkyscraper / October 22, 2012 at 08:54 am
user-pic
Man, these paywalls on the Globe and Post are making Morning Brew a lot less fun. On the other hand, it may drive more commenters to BlogTO. How's your traffic?

Speaking of, Doug Ford finally had to put his money where his mouth is and loves cars so much that he is willing to pay to keep driving on the Gardiner. Interesting. I didn't expect him to be knowledgeable about how other cities have town down their elevated freeways, or to come up with mass transit policy to compensate for no Gardiner, but I'm still a little surprised he admitted that a Tea Party-esque stance against all forms of new revenue was not sustainable.
kav / October 22, 2012 at 08:54 am
user-pic
Bay and Adelaide
JLanky / October 22, 2012 at 09:04 am
user-pic
Google Search by Image makes these a bit too easy. :P
MER1978 / October 22, 2012 at 09:21 am
user-pic
I sort of agree with the idea of new lanes for existing highways where the money is going to transit and drivers don't directly benefit from the money collected... but with the Gardiner... why would be be building new lanes and separating the waterfront even more from the rest of the city?

The Gardiner is falling apart... existing lanes should have tolls put on them so that drivers using the Gardiner are the ones paying for the huge maintenance cost.
Al / October 22, 2012 at 09:30 am
user-pic
Yonge and Alexander?
CakeBoy / October 22, 2012 at 09:32 am
user-pic
I assume Doug's referring to converting a single lane into a toll lane, and not adding additional lanes. The Gardiner simply can't expand unless they tear down CityPlace and the Jameson bend. This would essentially convert the Gardiner into a two-lane highway for people who refuse to pay tolls.

(Full disclosure, I didn't read the article because of the stupid paywall)
Zach / October 22, 2012 at 09:35 am
user-pic
South Korea has tolls on most (if not all) major highways and roadways and it has helped to keep their roads in immaculate shape. What toll fee would the Fords want?
MER1978 replying to a comment from CakeBoy / October 22, 2012 at 10:09 am
user-pic
@CakeBoy... "The Etobicoke councillor, who uses the Gardiner as part of his daily commute, said the city needs to investigate a partnership with the private sector that would see the addition of extra lanes on the busy highway. Such a move could generate money for needed repairs through tolls."
MER1978 / October 22, 2012 at 10:25 am
user-pic
They should probably replace it with a fully underground highway that is 100% paid for by tolls... then tear it down.

Once the tunnel debt is paid off every cent that isn't going in to maintenance should be put into transit.
Chris Bateman replying to a comment from kav / October 22, 2012 at 10:49 am
user-pic
@Kav: Bay and Adelaide it is. That patch of land is now occupied by the Northern Ontario Building.
Alex replying to a comment from MER1978 / October 22, 2012 at 11:27 am
user-pic
Wow, the guy uses it everyday and thinks they can build extra lanes? Does he never look out his window? I barely go by it at all but even I've noticed it's hemmed in on all sides by condos and other buildings. Extra lanes aren't an option.

Tolling some of the existing lanes might work, though it would create insane congestion in the untolled lanes, and they'd need to spend a bunch of money just to setup the tolling. I'm not sure it would be worth it in the long run, it's probably better just to toll all the lanes. Which would then create a bunch of congestion on streets that are alternates, but at least it might eventually produce a new and improved Gardiner underground or something.
CanoeDave / October 22, 2012 at 11:49 am
user-pic
Good to see that Councillor Holyday is continuing to root out the gravy in the City administration. But 10% absenteeism is still way too high and just indicates how incredibly incompetently the City was run under Miller and the years it will take to restore efficiency and accountability in the delivery of services.
MER1978 replying to a comment from Alex / October 22, 2012 at 11:49 am
user-pic
How about toll the existing lanes... build a tunnel alternative which will have tolls from the day it opens... once it does open we demolish the Gardiner and every cent raised from the tolls that isn't used to pay off the construction cost + maintenance goes in to transit.

As many in the G&M comments section have noted we need to be VERY careful not to allow the Fords/Hudak to sell off infrastructure for a one time pay out... in exchange for the many many many years of toll revenue which in the tradition of the 407 would probably amount to many many many times what the gov earned from the sell off.
Lee Zamparo / October 22, 2012 at 11:52 am
user-pic
Oh FFS. Someone needs to sit Doug Ford down and explain to him the fundamental law of highway congestion.

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2011/10/only-hope-reducing-traffic/315/
iSkyscraper / October 22, 2012 at 11:58 am
user-pic
Ah, I got it now. Thanks for the behind-the-paywall translations. Fords are not that hard to understand when you stoop to their simpleton level. Doug is fixated on Chicago and assumes that you can just stack more lanes on top of the Gardiner, a la Wacker Drive in Chicago. In his mind, this is an image of paradise:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wacker_Drive,_3_levels.jpg

Never mind that this would be a disaster for people who actually live in Toronto rather than drive through it. (More pollution, more visible blocking of the waterfront, more cars clogging off ramps and overflowing local streets). Never mind that this is technically nearly impossible given the Gardiner's poor structural state. Never mind that it would take years to actually build this monstrosity, with terrible commuting in the meantime.

How can these man-children spout such nonsense? And be elected representatives?

Yes, toll the existing highway and dedicate funds to a Boston-style Big Dig or to improving GO Transit in this corridor. But both projects would require far more than what tolls could generate -- will everyone ante up the $$$ to pull this off?
Mogura / October 22, 2012 at 12:35 pm
user-pic
Sure, a toll for maintaining the Gardiner is fine, but not for improving overall public transit.
mike in parkdale / October 22, 2012 at 03:23 pm
user-pic
as it stands - the Gardiner has some of the widest lanes I've ever seen (or maybe that's just because of the non-existent shoulders. I think that a proper HOV lane (buses, motorcycles and 3 or more people) would be the best option, granted it wont pay for repairs.
Jay / October 22, 2012 at 04:12 pm
user-pic
iSkyscraper praises every tax and fee option proposed by the left but as soon as D Ford proposes a toll it's the worst idea EVER!! Then you go on with your typical long winded spin and nonsense. Just because you write more crap on here than anyone else doesn't make you right. I think you're really Adam Vaughan. No one else could be this annoying and full of crap.
Tommy / October 22, 2012 at 04:15 pm
user-pic
It's good that the city is looking into the church-in-an-industrial-area problem. The traffic trade-off is nice (business during the week, worship on the weekend), but scaring off manufacturing and warehousing jobs is bad for the city. Maybe these religious groups need to pool their resources and buy/share a properly zoned facility.
Craig replying to a comment from Jay / October 22, 2012 at 05:19 pm
user-pic
You may wish to re-read iSkyscraper's comments: he's saying the idea of widening or adding lanes to the Gardiner is insane. If you've ever driven it, you'd know the condos are pushed up against it, there is no way to widen it. Stacking lanes, while technically possible, would cost a small fortune as you'd need to fix the Gardiner first...

It will be tolled soon, there are no other options for paying for it's repair, unless Ford finds $1 billion in gravy laying around.
Chris replying to a comment from Jay / October 22, 2012 at 05:58 pm
user-pic
Jay, do yourself a favour - take the partisan blinders off and actually read iskyscraper's comment. He was pointing out that adding a new lane to the Gardiner as a toll is not at all practical because there's no space to build it. That's not the same thing as being against a toll on the Gardiner.

Honestly, if you Fordites ever bothered to take the time to listen (or in this case read) what others are saying instead of just knee-jerk reacting to any perceived "attack" on Ford, you might discover that not everyone here is a hyper-partisan lefty socialist. Most of us are just looking for realistic solutions to dealing with the infrastructure challenges this City faces. I for one am receptive to any good idea in that regard - I don't give a crap which side it comes from.

I like that the Fords are finally waking up to reality that the magical infrastructure fairy isn't coming down from the sky to sprinkle billions of dollars to pay for infrastructure (including transit) and that we do have to finally start talking about tolls, fees or *shudder* taxes, along with any other tool at our disposal (including leaning on the private sector and lobbying higher levels of government) to get some of what we need done. Just as its not realistic to expect that taxpayers will pick up the entire freight, while the private sector gets a free ride in development fees, its also not realistic to think that the private sector will, on their own, solve our infrastructure woes for us.

I just hope the awakening isn't short-lived and that they fall right back into their old habits of promising billions in subways or other infrastructure without having any way of paying for it.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal