Saturday, May 18, 2013Mostly Cloudy 13°C
MB Toronto

Morning Brew: Rob Ford's conflict trial wraps up, a bevy of Magders, couriers protest TRL book launch, more muscle for Ford Fest, and a Toronto quiz for Hollywood

Posted by Chris Bateman / September 7, 2012

toronto laneway flowersThe Ford trial or, to use its Twitter hashtag, #fordcourt is officially over a full day ahead of schedule. Contrary to what many expected, the mayor was present before the judge yesterday morning to hear lawyer Clayton Ruby make his final arguments to Justice Charles Hackland.

Ruby argued that Ford deliberately broke provincial conflict-of-interest rules to avoid repaying $3,150 in charitable donations made to his football foundation, referencing nine other times in the seasoned politician's career when he had correctly abstained. Ford's lawyer, Alan Lenczner, said the mayor had made an honest mistake and questioned council's authority to make the mayor pay in the first place. A verdict is due in a few weeks.

Turns out there are actually three Paul Magders of note in Toronto. There's Paul Magder the furrier who fought to stay open on Sundays; Paul Magder, the son of said furrier, and Paul Magder the plaintiff in the Rob Ford conflict of interest trial. Let's not forget, of course, the outlaw Robert Ford who killed Jesse James and Robert Ford the poet, diplomat and Companion of the Order of Canada.

A group of bike couriers gathered outside the launch of former Attorney-General Michael Bryant's book 28 Seconds: A True Story of Addiction, Tragedy and Hope at the Toronto Reference Library yesterday in protest at the tone of the book. Courier Darcy Allan Sheppard died on Bloor Street West after an incident involving the politician, a story which forms the basis of the work.

Looks like this year's Ford Fest is going to be a whopper. The Star reports the mayor's mother, Diane Ford, has hired private security to keep the peace at the annual backyard shindig of council's famous brothers. No-one seems to know exactly how many people will show up, but indications are more than 4,000 Torontonians will grab a hot dog at the public event.

Finally, what's your Toronto IQ? The U.S.-based Hollywood Reporter, a top show-business magazine (so I'm told), has a special quiz on its webpage for cinema fans heading to TIFF. According to the Globe and Mail, the test (only available with a subscription) includes the classic "what's a toque" and a question about double-doubles. Because nothing says Canada to the world like a giant coffee corporation.

IN OTHER NEWS:

Image: "Flowers on Orphanage Mews" by jer1961 in the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

17 Comments

fappy / September 7, 2012 at 08:24 am
user-pic
The judge in the #FordCourt case has the clearest choice of any time in front of him. Heh.
Picard102 / September 7, 2012 at 08:39 am
user-pic
Cue the Allan apologists in 3..2..
Mike / September 7, 2012 at 09:20 am
user-pic
Ya know, the longer that this goes on, the more obvious it is that the Ford case isn't so much about the actual conflict of interest, but his general gross incompetence on the job.

Let's face it: If this were occurring right now with a politician with some level of acumen and awareness, it would likely be a non-issue and quickly resolved, but because of Ford's stubbornness and inability/unwillingness to do things by the book, it's become a spectacle putting his lack of refinement and ineptness on display.

I almost feel bad for the guy, but then I remember that he's my mayor and this city can't afford to have somebody this far in over his head representing it.
wtfskies / September 7, 2012 at 09:29 am
user-pic
you really shouldn't start a sentence with "because"...
EricM replying to a comment from Mike / September 7, 2012 at 09:30 am
user-pic
Well said.
Thecluelessmayor / September 7, 2012 at 09:39 am
user-pic
4:20 PM The judge says he does think the money influenced Ford’s approach to the matter. “I think your client made that part of it crystal clear,” he says. Lenczner finishes and sits down. Now Ruby will respond. He says he’ll do so briefly.

So when the ford nation cries that the money is a small amount and this is a waste of time. Clearly the judge disagrees with you. I was pretty sure that Ford was going to get off, but the judges statements at the end of the day, has made it clear that anything can still happen.
Alex / September 7, 2012 at 09:48 am
user-pic
Really bike couriers? Leave the guy alone. I remember when that happened and everyone was blaming Mr.Bryant, but if I was in his situation I probably would have panicked and done the same thing. A drugged up nutjob attacks you and your partner, obviously your first instinct is to run away. If Sheppard had just not held on to the car for some weird reason he would have been fine. It was a terrible accident, but the bike courier is far from blameless in it.
the lemur replying to a comment from wtfskies / September 7, 2012 at 09:55 am
user-pic
And you really shouldn't start a sentence in lower case and end it with an ellipsis for no reason.
the lemur replying to a comment from Alex / September 7, 2012 at 09:58 am
user-pic
If someone's clinging to your car, would your first instinct really be to 'run away' by driving, specifically by going over to the wrong side of the road and knocking the guy into several stationary objects? In the real world, I mean, not in the guy-clinging-to-hood movie scenario we're all familiar with.
Alex replying to a comment from the lemur / September 7, 2012 at 10:14 am
user-pic
Like I said, I would panic. If my husband (in Bryant's case his wife) was in the other seat and couldn't get out of the car because the guy was standing on his side next to the door then I would probably try to drive away, because I would assume he wouldn't be able to catch us (ditto if the guy was on my side and I couldn't get out to get away). Once I realized the guy was clinging on to the car I would definitely panic and have no idea what to do, so I can't predict what I would do in that situation, but I would probably do everything I could to get this crazy enraged person away from my husband and myself. If you thought the life of someone you care about, or your own life, was in danger and this nutjob was within arms reach of you/him/her, do you really think you would start thinking rationally? Even now, from the safety of a computer and lots of time to think over the scenario, I have no idea what Bryant should have done, or could have done, that would have ended up with no one being hurt. Everyone(particularly the bike couriers) is ignoring the obvious fact that the only person that could have stopped anyone from being hurt was Sheppard, because he could have not gone nuts and attacked them, and then inexplicably clung onto their car.
This sort of stuff is what happens when you let your anger take over your senses, and hopefully out of something this terrible some good can come by teaching people not to lose control over small altercations.
BitMedler / September 7, 2012 at 10:41 am
user-pic
If you only listen to Michael Bryant's side of the story, Al certainly seems to blame. However, one look at this footage and you might question why you rammed the bike at a stand still in front of you before you question why the guy on the bike was so mad.

http://youtu.be/RFISP_PrhFo

No one is guilt free, but certain;y the person who took another's life with wantant disregard for not only that life but those in your car and on the side walk - Bryant did 100 km/h on the wrong side of the street, bouncing Al off of poles, tree's and finally the mail box.

This is to say nothing of the fact that Bryant wasn't breathalized simply because he claimed to have not drank and given the opportunity to freshen up before he let loose two separate PR firms to get out "the right story" and diminish any credibility the victim my have had.

Let's hope this never happens to you or someone you care about.

No matter your position, all victims have families and friends - regardless of their job or station in life - and maybe your soul would be best served to remember that.
BitMedler / September 7, 2012 at 10:50 am
user-pic
Forgot to include witness interviews pre-PR firm.

http://youtu.be/o8UKQW225gI
Ratpick replying to a comment from Alex / September 7, 2012 at 10:52 am
user-pic
Don't leave out the critical detail that Bryant and his wife were in a convertible with the top down, and therefore vastly more vulnerable. You can't put the window up and lock the door in a convertible.
Picard102 replying to a comment from BitMedler / September 7, 2012 at 11:17 am
user-pic
Interesting how being mad is an acceptable excuse for Allan to assault someone, but trying to escape that assault isn't justifiable. Bryant should have just let him beat him and his wife.

Having a family isn't a viable reason to escape the responsibilities of getting yourself killed.
Alex replying to a comment from BitMedler / September 7, 2012 at 11:39 am
user-pic
Bryant shouldn't have rammed the guys bike, but they're both adults and saying "he started it" isn't an excuse for assaulting someone either. Sheppard should have recorded Bryant's license plate and called the police. He should not have attacked the man and his wife.

Like I said, this was a tragedy and everyone is a victim in it. Bryant has to live with having killed someone for the rest of his life, and I doubt that it being in self defence gives him much comfort. Sheppard lost his life. I just think the actions of the bike couriers to go after Bryant after all this has happened is just shameless. The guys been through enough, so leave him alone. If there is anything they should have learned from all this it's to let things go and not get so angry.
jen replying to a comment from Alex / September 7, 2012 at 04:22 pm
user-pic
Somehow I don't think Bryant really cares that a life was lost. He's still a smug arrogant tool as far as I can see, and now he stands to profit off the whole incident with his stupid book. He doesn't admit to any wrong-doing at all, even though he quite clearly rear-ended the cyclist and drove off. He should have been slapped with a leaving the scene of an accident charge.
BitMedler replying to a comment from Alex / September 11, 2012 at 12:45 pm
user-pic
Seriously? "He started it" is how you read that? Do you understand that there is a thing called vehicular homicide? Do you understand that using a 2000lb hunk of steal with 100+ horsepower pushing a soft tissued human is assault with a deadly weapon?

I generally try to avoid feeding the trolls - which are rife when Al's name pops up - but I do have to insist you remove your head from your ass. I'm not asking that you accept the decisions Al made. In fact, I may not agree with them myself. However, I'm sure that if your mother/sister/brother/friend/hell any human was rammed by a car while riding a bicycle you'd be a little less forgiving of someone with enough maturity and education - and understanding of the legal system - to make a clear decision or at the very least, avoid killing someone. There are many other bad decisions Bryant could have made without killing anyone. And in fact, if he were anyone else most people would be wondering how - given he was driving 100 km/h on the wrong side of a busy street with his driver side tires rubbing the curb - more people weren't killed.

I hope for all of you you never have to find yourself defending your dead friend endlessly in a local news comments section. Have some fucking respect!

The poor guy who has to live with killing someone has decided to turn a profit from it. Poor guy.

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal