Thursday, May 23, 2013Mostly Cloudy 21°C
MB Toronto

Morning Brew: Deadly shooting on College Street, bike helmets should be mandatory, Fords finish "Waist" challenge, Humber islands, and a parking win

Posted by Chris Bateman / June 19, 2012

wards island bench torontoPolice are hunting a man they say is responsible for a deadly shooting yesterday afternoon at an ice-cream parlor on College Street. One person was killed when a lone gunman dressed as a construction worker opened fire around around 3:30pm, sending soccer fans running for cover. The incident is the latest violent attack in a year that's already seen an increased amount of gun crime.

A report from Ontario's chief coroner says bike helmets and side guards for heavy trucks should be mandatory to help reduce the number of road deaths in the province. 73% of the cyclists examined in the study were not wearing a helmet at the time of their death, but some cycling advocacy groups feel a helmet law would discourage new riders climbing into the saddle. This is a tough one. But, really, why not wear one? They don't even look particularly dorky anymore.

Well, it's all over, and Rob Ford says he could have done better in his "Cut the Waist" challenge as he weighed in at 313 lbs yesterday, down 17 lbs from his start weight. Doug Ford fared a little better - dropping 25 lbs - since the pair started the challenge in January. The mayor appeared to twist his ankle as he stepped down awkwardly from the scales.

Environmental groups are concerned that the quality of soil excavated from the Eglinton LRT project could be unsuitable for use in the Humber river mouth to create a small group of artificial islands. Toronto Water, however, says there's no reason to be believe the deep soil has been contaminated with petrol or other pollutants.

Can you imagine the sounds of Toronto's streets played by an orchestra? The squeal and glide of the streetcar, the rumble of the subway, and the swish of cars from the Gardiner could all be worked into a new piece by the Toronto Symphony Orchestra - and you can add your own suggestions.

Props to Toronto from the fun folks at the International Parking Institute! Lot C146 at Broadview and Gerrard - home to the Zhong Hua Men Archway - has won an Award of Excellence for its decorative feature.

And finally, there's a heat and humidity advisory in effect for Toronto today. The temperature is supposed to reach 34 this afternoon and it could feel like 42 with the humidity factored in. Stay cool, Toronto, stay cool.

GUESS THE INTERSECTION:

See if you can pick out where this picture was taken. Name both streets in the comments section, if you can.

morning brew guess the intersection

IN OTHER NEWS:

You can catch up on all things blogTO on the go. Download our apps for the iPhone and iPad. On Android? We've got one coming for you too.

Photo: "Last Picnic" by syncros in the blogTO Flickr Pool.

Discussion

53 Comments

mash / June 19, 2012 at 08:45 am
user-pic
"73% of the cyclists examined in the study were not wearing a helmet at the time of their death, but some cycling advocacy groups feel a helmet law would discourage new riders climbing into the saddle."

Dumbest argument ever. More to kill?

Helmets should be mandatory, especially as a new rider.
Rian / June 19, 2012 at 08:46 am
user-pic
I'm sure you meant 'why not WEAR one', right?

I've never understood why so many cyclists on the roads are not wearing helmets. It doesn't even have to be a car cutting you off, but if something were to cause you to lose balance and you hit your head, you could easily die if you hit it the wrong place. I say make it a law.
Vanessa / June 19, 2012 at 08:56 am
user-pic
"...some cycling advocacy groups feel a helmet law would discourage new riders climbing into the saddle."

Cryyyyy me a river, advocacy groups! It's new riders ESPECIALLY who should be wearing helmets.
norm / June 19, 2012 at 09:12 am
user-pic
Yeah people are shocked and running for cover but once the guy is running away you can whip your phone out and start filming. You can also chase after him at a safe distance to see where he's going, what street he turns down, what vehicle he gets into.
Chris P / June 19, 2012 at 09:17 am
user-pic
I can't believe any cycling group would be against helmets. It's as stupid as a car advocacy group being against seatbelts. I see downtown cyclists not wearing helmets and wonder about their sense of self preservation. It's just plain stupid not to wear one, especially if you're in the city. The days of thinking you look dorky should have passed along with your teenage years.
steve replying to a comment from norm / June 19, 2012 at 09:18 am
user-pic
Wouldn't it be better to address the problem before it happens? Cutting social programs in favour of increased jail time is going to make things worse.
Alex replying to a comment from norm / June 19, 2012 at 09:24 am
user-pic
The guy had a gun. I'm not chasing down anyone with a gun, they can easily turn and shoot and even if they miss you they could hit someone behind you.

Did anyone see the 24 hrs headline for that story? "Hit Mafia Related?" (paraphrasing). I didn't get to read the story, but if the mafia angle was just because it was in Little Italy, that's hilarious.
Z / June 19, 2012 at 09:24 am
user-pic
I would certainly cancel my Bixi subscription and stop riding if helmets were mandatory. I'm not carrying a helmet everywhere I go, and I'm not putting a used one on my bald head.

I bet 100% of pedestrians killed by cars were not wearing helmets at the time...
guess / June 19, 2012 at 09:29 am
user-pic
i say it is bloor and dufferin, just a guess.
Helmetless Schmidt / June 19, 2012 at 09:31 am
user-pic
The way to make cycling safer is not to force everyone to wear a helmet. What we need is proper cycling infrastructure, and for cyclists to learn how to ride safely. I wear a helmet when it's warranted, ie. in the winter when it might get slippery, on high speed rides with a group, and in races. Tootling around the city? Not so much. Go ahead haters, your turn.
AD replying to a comment from Alex / June 19, 2012 at 09:36 am
user-pic
You should have read the article then.

People who know "Little Johnny" have indicated he most likely doid have ties to organized crime and is a "well known" person in the Italian community.

Has nothing to do with the fact they happened to be in Little Italy.
mark / June 19, 2012 at 09:38 am
user-pic
You are more likely to sustain a head injury in a car - or in the bathtub!

Many reports show the best thing to improve cyclists' safety is proper infrastructure (bike lanes, signs, etc.), education of both drivers and cyclists, and increasing numbers of cyclists (ridership).

Finally, note this is not 'pro helmet' vs, 'anti helmet.' Many argue that people should wear a helmet if they want - but it should not be mandatory, as they cite research that shows mandatory helmet laws decrease ridership which decreases safety.
mark / June 19, 2012 at 09:43 am
user-pic
Here is a much longer discussion of the bike helmet issue.
http://bicyclesafe.com/helmets.html
steve replying to a comment from Z / June 19, 2012 at 09:45 am
user-pic
You would be wrong with you guess of 100%
T / June 19, 2012 at 09:53 am
user-pic
There are plenty of reasons not to wear helmuts. Not all of them necessarily good.

they're hot (and uncomfortable)
they ruin your hair (and in some cases won't fit over your hair)
they're a hassle to deal with when you're not riding
they ruin your peripheral vision.

The article throws out a lot of statistics, but IMO leaves out the most important one:

Of the cyclist that were killed and weren't wearing helmuts, how many of them would have been saved if they had been wearing helmuts?

My guess: not many
the lemur replying to a comment from mark / June 19, 2012 at 10:00 am
user-pic
So we should wait until the infrastructure and ridership is there? How long would that take? And the driver/cyclist education?

The research associating decreased ridership after helmets are made mandatory mainly comes from places where ridership was already low; legally having to wear a helmet is just one more discouraging factor on top of poor/absent bike infrastructure, lack of established cycling culture and generally crappy attitudes towards cycling.
Aaron / June 19, 2012 at 10:01 am
user-pic
We also need mandatory helmet laws for drivers and their passengers to cut down on head injuries in car accidents.
the lemur replying to a comment from T / June 19, 2012 at 10:02 am
user-pic
The stats more importantly don't seem to account for injuries with and without helmets. Saying that some accidents aren't survivable even with a helmet is like saying a seatbelt and/or airbag isn't going to save you every time in a car either: true, but not a reason to abandon using them altogether.
Alison / June 19, 2012 at 10:14 am
user-pic
Oakwood and St. Clair West?
T replying to a comment from the lemur / June 19, 2012 at 10:14 am
user-pic
Yes. And those injuries compared should be head injuries.

There's no point saying 100 people scraped their knees and 75 of them weren't wearing helmuts, so we should make helmuts mandatory.

The real question is "Do helmuts really help?". Probably a little, but enough to justify them being compulsory? not sure
W. K. Lis / June 19, 2012 at 10:16 am
user-pic
Mandatory helmets for pedestrians.
Welshgrrl / June 19, 2012 at 10:17 am
user-pic
Its helMET

Helmut = name
Helmet = head covering

Sorry, just a spelling peeve
Vic / June 19, 2012 at 10:23 am
user-pic
Davenport and Osler, looking west?
http://goo.gl/maps/t8Bb
foo / June 19, 2012 at 10:25 am
user-pic
We need better cycling infrastructure, yes.

But, you're still an idiot if you don't wear a helmet when using a bike on roads. Dedicated lanes or not.

Seriously, helmets are an impediment to new riders because it "ruins your hair"?! WTF.
Rian / June 19, 2012 at 10:30 am
user-pic
So the biggest reasons people are against mandatory helmet use is because it'll decrease ridership, leading to more accidents? Is that because the cars think they own more of the road, thus making it harder for the remaining cyclists?

So far out of the people commenting, one person didn't want to carry a helmet around everywhere when using their Bixi subscription, and another didn't want to ruin their hair/it's hot/annoying when not riding/and ruins their peripheral vision. I'm not sure about the bike helmets that you've seen, but how does it ruin your peripheral vision?

And just because it isn't as slippery in the summer as it is the winter, doesn't mean you shouldn't wear a helmet. A bump in the road can throw you off your bike regardless of the season.
McRib replying to a comment from Welshgrrl / June 19, 2012 at 10:31 am
user-pic
haha, that was bugging me too.
Martin Reis / June 19, 2012 at 10:37 am
user-pic
I think we're better off dealing with bad drivers first and designing better streets ... http://www.newschannel5.com/story/18818895/surveillance-video-shows-hit-and-run-of-cyclist
Todd / June 19, 2012 at 10:39 am
user-pic
You may be the most moral and kindhearted person on the earth but if you don't wear a helmet when riding a bike because "it doesnt look cool" then you are dumb. You can get brain damage by crashing at 5km an hour. I don't know many cool looking vegetables.
Amanda / June 19, 2012 at 10:47 am
user-pic
Dufferin and Bloor?
T replying to a comment from Todd / June 19, 2012 at 10:56 am
user-pic
Saying that riding without a helmet is stupid is not a valid argument.

Your chances of getting hit by a car increase when crossing the street. Is it fair to call people stupid for crossing the street?

I mean if you get into an accident on a bike it seems much more likely you'll just break your neck, which a helmet won't help with anyway.

My argument wasn't "it doesn't look cool" I think people look perfectly cool wearing helmets. my argument was "it's uncomfortable"
Mike replying to a comment from Amanda / June 19, 2012 at 10:57 am
user-pic
That would be my guess.
Ratpick / June 19, 2012 at 11:06 am
user-pic
I never bothered to wear a helmet until I saw a cyclist whack his CPU pretty hard at Keele and Bloor.

Your preferences may vary, and that's fine. But after seeing that crash, I'm happy to put my own head in a protective bucket out there on the mean streets.
Grant / June 19, 2012 at 11:06 am
user-pic
Nice to see the fear mongering about cycling continues. No wonder parents are afraid and drive their kids everywhere. Many cultures where cycling is a popular mode of transportation, like in Holland and Denmark have low rates of helmet use, and fewer collisions and injuries. More bikes on the streets makes it safer for bikes. In our North American culture, where obesity, and diabetes are on the rise, and childhood fitness is terrible, (http://www.thestar.com/living/health/article/1213229--toronto-schools-fall-short-on-daily-physical-activity-study-finds?bn=1) We often worry about the wrong stuff. Education and some experience goes a long way to make cycling safer. Strapping on a helmet won't prevent "accidents" that are avoidable.
i smart / June 19, 2012 at 11:08 am
user-pic
I not think wear helmet necessary because it ruin hair, it not comfortable, it hassle. Cycling infrastructure is problem, not cyclists no helmets. I ride no helmet now even though infrastructure not fix yet. It my choice. If I accident, oh well.

My friend he no ride helmet. He married 2 children. He no care about risk him. He no care about risk to family if he accident. It him choice.
Todd / June 19, 2012 at 11:15 am
user-pic
Saying helmets are uncomfortable is an easy and lame excuse. Go into dukes, urban cycle or mec and have someone help you try a bunch on.
Alex replying to a comment from Grant / June 19, 2012 at 11:19 am
user-pic
But it will help you come safely out of those avoidable accidents. Like you said, North America and Toronto specifically are not the greatest places to ride a bike. It's going to take a long time to make cycling in general safer here (either through more dedicated lanes, whatever), so why not protect your noggin in the case of an accident? I don't think helmets should be mandatory >18 though, it's too much trouble to enforce that law. I just don't understand not wearing a helmet when you're biking on dangerous roads.

FYI to all the "pedestrians should wear helmets too then" people, pedestrians move a lot slower than bicyclists and don't have to worry about hitting a bad bump in the road or swerving to avoid something. When we have an accident it is with a car and it is much more likely we got hit in the midsection, crushed, or run-over than that we got hit in the head. So a helmet isn't going to do a whole lot there. If a bicyclist has an accident most likely they are thrown from their bike and their head will hit something much harder than it.
BequiaT / June 19, 2012 at 11:22 am
user-pic
Just over 2 years ago I was riding my bike east-bound on the bike path on the north side of the Lakeshore when a car travelling westbound turned north in to my path, sending me flying off the bike and on to the hood of his car.

I sustained damage to the entire left side of my body and back, couldn't walk for a week and still require pain meds and physiotherapy for pain relief...but my head was saved by my helmet. The bike and the helmet were total write-offs, but my head was saved.

Why people won't wear helmets is beyond me.
Adam H. / June 19, 2012 at 11:43 am
user-pic
Mandatory bike helmet laws don't make cyclists safer. They've never been demonstrated to have reduced injury or fatality rates. They HAVE reduced the amount of cyclists on the road, which makes the remaining cyclists less safe.

A helmet is a good idea. A mandatory helmet law is a bad idea.
Adam H. / June 19, 2012 at 11:44 am
user-pic
Oh, and for the record, cycling advocacy groups aren't against helmets. They're against bad helmet laws. Let's keep to the facts.
the lemur replying to a comment from Grant / June 19, 2012 at 12:31 pm
user-pic
Places like Holland and Denmark have higher rates of cycling because of better bike infrastructure that is segregated from motorized traffic wherever possible. That is what causes their lower rate of helmet use, and they got that infrastructure by demanding it in response to factors such as car-driven congestion (Copenhagen) and pedestrian/cyclist safety (most cities in the Netherlands).

We probably wouldn't bother with helmets too if we had bike paths like this: http://goo.gl/maps/e0U8
steve replying to a comment from Martin Reis / June 19, 2012 at 12:34 pm
user-pic
Many motorist have posted that they plan on doing just that.
Matt S / June 19, 2012 at 02:19 pm
user-pic
I was going to add my story of how a helmet saved me in a crash, but there's enough of those on here, and the point is pretty obvious imho. The arguments against helmets on bikes are kind of like the arguments in the '70's against seatbelts...

Instead, I'll say the intersection is Pape and Langley ave, looking West down Langley.
Paul / June 19, 2012 at 02:39 pm
user-pic
A helmet saved my life. My brains would have been splattered all over the concrete otherwise. As it was I had a skull fracture. Not wearing a helmet while doing any sport, including commuting by bicycle is stupid. Your brain is the most important asset you have, statistics be damned. Anyone arguing against wearing a helmet is not using their head.
barf / June 19, 2012 at 03:16 pm
user-pic
"Adam H. / JUNE 19, 2012 AT 11:43 AM
Mandatory bike helmet laws don't make cyclists safer. They've never been demonstrated to have reduced injury or fatality rates. They HAVE reduced the amount of cyclists on the road, which makes the remaining cyclists less safe. "

This is soooooo f'ing stupid

There are half a dozen stories in this chain alone telling morons like you that a helmet saved their skulls.

Now here's where you prove that there are less cyclists on the road because of mandatory helmet laws.

We'll all wait right here.



Simon Tarses replying to a comment from Grant / June 19, 2012 at 03:52 pm
user-pic
Still believing the fear mongering bullshit about the obesity plague, Grant? I'm sorry, but it isn't true. And even if it was, that's no excuse NOT to wear a helmet.
Adam Vaughan / June 19, 2012 at 05:26 pm
user-pic
I am proposing a ban on all soccer watching in Toronto. It is just too dangerous and gets people killed. Trust me, this is for your own good Toronto.
intersection / June 19, 2012 at 08:50 pm
user-pic
Chris Bateman what intersection is it?
Adam H. replying to a comment from barf / June 20, 2012 at 12:04 am
user-pic
You mean like the proof that mark posted at 9:43? You obviously have done no research. Your opinion is worthless.
Rob / June 20, 2012 at 04:35 am
user-pic
Doug(h) lost 35 pounds.
Politics / June 20, 2012 at 01:48 pm
user-pic
Personally, I couldn't care less what our elected officials weigh or look like. They are in office to represent their constituants who should judge their effectiveness as such - how well they run the city.

I'm not necessarily saying with this comment that I like either of the Fords - in fact, I'm leaving my personal opinion about their politics completely out of this. It was admirable of them to do such a thing for the public, however I think it was a misguided media stunt which ended up getting them as much (or maybe more) bad press than good.

In summary, base you opinions of politicians based on politics.
Chris Bateman replying to a comment from intersection / June 22, 2012 at 10:28 am
user-pic
Sorry folks - tech problems on the day prevented me giving out the answer.

It's Pape and Langley looking west. Matt S has it!
4cTarJ8af / July 17, 2012 at 09:09 am
user-pic
womenhairstraighteners, http://www.womenhairstraighteners.co.uk
http://www.michaelkros-2u.com, http://www.michaelkros-2u.com
www.mulberrygoods.co.uk, http://www.mulberrygoods.co.uk
yes5ijO / July 17, 2012 at 01:10 pm
user-pic
redbottomshoes-2u, http://www.redbottomshoes-2u.com
womenhairstraighteners, http://www.womenhairstraighteners.co.uk
www.mulberrygoods.co.uk, http://www.mulberrygoods.co.uk

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal