Wednesday, May 22, 2013Mostly Cloudy 18°C
MB Toronto

Morning Brew: Ford calls for resignation of TCHC members, McGuinty refuses Toronto's request for financial aid, police recover $150,000 worth of vacuum cleaners, it's gonna be a cold spring, and the Leafs have a quiet deadline day

Posted by Brianne Hogan / March 1, 2011

Toronto HarbourWell, the report was scathing all right. Mayor Rob Ford called for the resignation of members of the Toronto Community Housing Corp. board on Monday, hours after the city's auditor-general, Jeffrey Griffiths, blasted the housing agency for wasting millions in untendered contracts and lavish employee expenses, including: a $40,000 Christmas staff dinner, $1,000 for Holt Renfrew chocolates, $5,000 given to one staffer without documentation of how it was spent; $800 for massages at a staff picnic. The TCHC is one of North America's largest landlords, housing about 164,000 tenants in a $6 billion housing portfolio.

The Ontario government has shot down Rob Ford's request for $350-million in financial aid for Toronto. Premier Dalton McGuinty said Monday the province is running a record deficit, forecast to hit $18.7-billion this fiscal year, after borrowing money to help stimulate the economy and bail out the auto sector during the recent global recession. So Toronto will have to "chart [its] own course."

Here's something to warm you up.The Riverdale community is rallying behind a loved corner store that's been frequently targeted by thieves. Since taking over the convenience store on Logan Avenue two and a half years ago, Paul and Juliet Kim have suffered four robberies, each one more brutal than the last. The most recent one landed Mr. Kim in the hospital with multiple stab wounds. He was released Monday to find a sign taped to the store door: "You are kind and valuable members of the community and our thoughts are with you at this difficult time. We wish Paul a speedy recovery -- The Withrow/Riverdale Community." It was signed by hundreds of locals, who also raised $900 for the Kims.

Maybe someone had a severe case of OCD. Or maybe they were for a very large, dirty house. Whatever the case may be, police recovered $150,000 worth of vacuum cleaners in a stolen transport trailer. Police have charged 4 people with the incident.

IN BRIEF:

Photo by Bruvyman in the blogTO Flickr pool.

Discussion

35 Comments

teh-borg / March 1, 2011 at 08:54 am
user-pic
I love to slather gravy down under.
gravyfeelsgood replying to a comment from teh-borg / March 1, 2011 at 08:59 am
user-pic
i love bathing in gravy, especially if its beef gravy.
Sean / March 1, 2011 at 09:10 am
user-pic
It is really nice to see how the Riverdale community has responded to the Kims.
Rena / March 1, 2011 at 09:27 am
user-pic
The vacuum cleaners thing sounds like something out of Trailer Park Boys.
Just Sayin replying to a comment from Rena / March 1, 2011 at 09:31 am
user-pic
I would let Julian touch it.
Mark Dowling / March 1, 2011 at 10:07 am
user-pic
Rob Ford just embarrassed the city by looking for a $350m handout when he campaigned on the city having no revenue problem. I want him to resign on the same day as the TCHC board.
Marlon replying to a comment from Mark Dowling / March 1, 2011 at 10:21 am
user-pic
agreed!
ROB / March 1, 2011 at 10:31 am
user-pic
A colder than normal spring sucks. Watch those heating bills!
Adam replying to a comment from Mark Dowling / March 1, 2011 at 10:54 am
user-pic
Absolutely! Well said, sir.
Ryan L. replying to a comment from Mark Dowling / March 1, 2011 at 11:13 am
user-pic
And not surprising that after years of false accusations and unwarranted criticism, the Ontario government isn't willing to hand money over to Ford.
John / March 1, 2011 at 12:09 pm
user-pic
Well, why doesn't the city sell off those vacuum cleaners? $150,000 isn't much, but it doesn't hurt.
Sean replying to a comment from John / March 1, 2011 at 12:41 pm
user-pic
Well, for one, there is no indication that it is the city's property to sell.
David Toronto replying to a comment from Mark Dowling / March 1, 2011 at 01:05 pm
user-pic
I agree with you, Mark. I also believe that
we should hold him to the same standard of
performance as he is trying with the TCHC.

Unfortunately, the board is appointed and
he is elected. Maybe it time for a non-
confidence plebiscite about the mayor or
some other recall device.

Everything Ford has done, so far, is
contradictory and slavishly cleaving to his
platform which is unworkable.

How people voted for him is beyond me.

You should hear how strongly he is being
defended at CFRB. That station has been
torpedoing its own credibility for a long time.
Xavier replying to a comment from Mark Dowling / March 1, 2011 at 01:06 pm
user-pic
Yay!
Boo Democracy!
Hmmm / March 1, 2011 at 02:16 pm
user-pic
TCHC is corrupt as anything with lavish gifts and parties on the taxpayer's dime along with sweetheart deals and all everyone here can do is complain about Ford asking for money for the city--legally, I might add.

Nothing wrong with hating Ford but man, some people never give it a rest.
Lol replying to a comment from Xavier / March 1, 2011 at 02:58 pm
user-pic
even xavier has nothing to say on this one... just a big red face. xavier, yeah boo democracy but please weigh in. should ford be asking the province for money? and if so how did you feel when miller was doing it?
Mike W / March 1, 2011 at 03:48 pm
user-pic
Wow, serious misspending and abuse of finances and people still care more about Ford requesting financial aid?

Would you rather he didn't ask and just raise property taxes?

I was hoping the TCHC will get nailed to the wall but with people talking more about every little thing Ford does I'm being increasingly disappointed with what's getting more attention.
Adam replying to a comment from Mike W / March 1, 2011 at 03:53 pm
user-pic
I would first of all rather he never touched the car tax, seeing how $65/year is pennies to anyone who can afford a car, yet millions in lost city revenue.

And secondly yes, I would pay yet another increase in property taxes before having the city go crying to daddy for help.

But hey, that's just me...
KL replying to a comment from Mike W / March 1, 2011 at 03:57 pm
user-pic
Wheels are being greased across the city. Ford's in no position to act like he's above it less than a week after announcing $3M earmarked towards consultants, while sticking his hat out.

I agree with him. I'd like the heads of TCHC to resign... Followed by Ford.

Mike W replying to a comment from Adam / March 1, 2011 at 04:07 pm
user-pic
Well let's just increase property taxes then? It'll be "pennies" for anyone who can afford <i>a house</i>, and you seem to be down with the idea.

I didn't know there was a macho aspect to municipal politics.

Do you yell "pussy" when people say the TTC should receive more provincial funding or talk about Transit City?
McD / March 1, 2011 at 04:32 pm
user-pic
Get a grip people the "culture of entitlement" became an infectious desease at City Hall in the Miller years and there are going to be more ugly revelations. Any political leadership that hands out a "jobs for life' clause to his political allies like it's candy just invites mismanagement and abuse of the public trust. Miller deserves to wear the TCHC mess like a dirty shirt as does Councillor Paula Fletcher who was his appointee to the TCHC Board.
Adam replying to a comment from Mike W / March 1, 2011 at 04:36 pm
user-pic
OK first of all, let's get one thing clear. Having a place to live is essential - having a car is not. That said, you don't HAVE to own, you can rent, in which case you won't pay property tax. But, you are then paying into something you will never see again. For many people who have chosen to purchase a home for that very reason (it's an investment), I'm sure a small increase in property taxes, say $100 per year (less than $10 more per month) would be do-able for them. Even though many of them are just getting by as it is.

So really your comparison doesn't work. And, are you saying that you think the abolishing of the car tax was a good thing? I own a car because I'm fortunate enough to be able to afford it and even I think that the tax should have stayed put.

Also - transit city would have been brilliant and would have reduced the need for people in the suburbs to have a car to get to their downtown jobs, so I'm in full support of it and always was. So no, I don't yell pussy (of course I would never put it that way in the first place)...
steve replying to a comment from McD / March 1, 2011 at 05:33 pm
user-pic
The problems at TCHC are decades old, they were inherited from the province.
The 'jobs for life' firstly came from Mel Lastman
And what 'entitlements' are you talking about, I here this phrase yet little to support it.
John replying to a comment from Sean / March 1, 2011 at 05:48 pm
user-pic
Dude, seriously? It was a joke...
Rob Ford replying to a comment from Mark Dowling / March 1, 2011 at 06:10 pm
user-pic
Imagine what I would have done with my fire-breathing fists.
Rob Ford replying to a comment from Adam / March 1, 2011 at 06:12 pm
user-pic
Vintage balderdash.
Rob Ford replying to a comment from Adam / March 1, 2011 at 06:14 pm
user-pic
They picked a fight with a warlock.
Kevo / March 1, 2011 at 07:26 pm
user-pic
All the Ford supporters are silly.

I don't get why people are so set against any kind of tax increase around Toronto. I was in Burlington at my parents house recently and the newspaper reported that city council was making the tax hike a minimum of 2.5% (up to 3.5%) and that Halton had already approved a 1.4% tax hike. That's considering we've always had to pay for pools, rinks, day camps, etc., while the garbage is contracted out, snow removal is both contracted out (mainly to local farmers) and done in house by the city, and road maintenance is contracted out (with work that takes 2-4 days instead of 1). That hike is an extra $15 per $100k of house - that's not that much in the end considering how much money it infuses the coffers with. It's the same story in Waterloo where I also live part of the year for school (plus they have water increases).

I guess it always takes an experiment for people to figure out a millionaire who just yells at people and got where he was because of daddy is a bad choice for mayor.
Rob / March 1, 2011 at 07:53 pm
user-pic
So TCHC has 1400 employees in Toronto and spends $40,000 on a christmas party... That a Grand amount of under $30 per person! Wow big spenders.. You try to face what most of these employees deal with each day, many of the tennants have mental or health issues, language barriers and some properties are over run with criminal activity and this is what they deal with every day they go to work. Do you not think that a Christmas party to say Thank You is that least that they could do? And for the company picnic I guess you want them to just sit on the grass in a public park and eat baloney sandwhiches and tap water, no way should they be rewarded by spending $800 (or about 50cents per employee) for a massage booth.

Yes Public housing needs more money but if the employees feel burnt out, stressed and under appreciated do you think they will care more about that hoarder that someone tells them about? Treat your employees well and they will do a better job for you.
Marc replying to a comment from Kevo / March 2, 2011 at 01:22 am
user-pic
They're all the same. However, at this point remember that anyone who is new to the mayoral role is simply a relief. We've had the previous people for too long now. Nobody should ever treat this as an Obama-style thing (which was proven to be rubbish and going nowhere), especially with the way politics and the world is today.
Mike W replying to a comment from Adam / March 2, 2011 at 10:24 am
user-pic
So Miller asking for provincial funding for Transit City is okay but Ford asking for money (somehow different than when Miller asked for more provincial funding outside Transit City) is an embarrassment?

I never equated a house to a car actually but making up budget shortfall by taxing some people (who can afford it) as opposed to all people (who can also afford it), just because they own a car.

Yes I think abolishing the PVT was a good thing. It was not allocated for road infrastructure or earmarked for public transit or even environmental reasons. Why tax car owners specifically because Toronto has a general budget shortfall?
Not all car owners are wealthy, some need it because transit isn't sufficient for their lives. Believe or not transit city isn't the saviour that's going to obsolete cars. The suburbs are beyond the proposed lines.
I even remember the first adverts for TC and thinking none of these are gonna help anyone I know.

You wouldn't put it that way, you put it as "having the city go crying to daddy for help". I'm curious, did you having these sentiments when Miller did the same thing?
Adam replying to a comment from Mike W / March 2, 2011 at 10:34 am
user-pic
You make some good points, but at the end of the day I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

As for Miller asking for money from the province, yes I felt the exact same way then. I didn't advocate most of his actions, truthfully. That said, I did feel that he at least understood the needs of the city as a whole (not just the suburbs, or vice-versa) and had some sort of balance in that regard.
Mike W replying to a comment from Adam / March 2, 2011 at 11:08 am
user-pic
I guess you're right about agreeing to disagree, I felt the opposite about Miller. Caving to the civil strike was the last straw, but while I supported Miller at first, I felt he pandered to the down/midtown crowd and tree-huggers.
Sean / March 2, 2011 at 06:09 pm
user-pic
Rob Ford vows to campaign against Liberals if province won’t boost funds: http://bit.ly/dM4hgO
FORDNATION replying to a comment from Sean / March 2, 2011 at 06:31 pm
user-pic
What are you gonna do when Ford Nation runs wild all over you. HAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

Add a Comment

Other Cities: Montreal