TIFF Review: The Man from London

Although it's too early to call a masterpiece, Bela Tarr's The Man from London is the Hungarian master's leanest, most realized and plot-driven film to date. This monochromatic genre film -- that is at once obedient to the rules but also manages to be anti-genre -- is still monumentally dense and challenging.
The opening scene is astonishing in its pure bravado, an orchestration of movement and space so complex, it rivals that of any ever wrought by the Russian "sculptor of time" Andrei Tarkovsky. In it, our hero Maloin, a burly laconic railway worker, becomes a witness to a heist and a murder. Yet what Tarr does with this conventional plot setup is remarkable: in a single unending shot, the mise-en-scene somehow morphs into a point-of-view, then to an over-the-shoulder, and back out to a master shot again. Lasting what seems like an eternity, the camera swings back and forth, and glides without boundaries -- at times, I swear it goes through walls. Anyone with a vested interest in the mechanics of filmmaking may likely ponder: how the hell is he pulling this off?
Maloin is the classic existential hero, a Camusian loner drifting through the tides of his own fatalism. The constant bickering with his unloving wife has kept him numb and miserable, while his depressed teenage daughter works a demeaning job mopping floors in a tight mini-skirt. But when Maloin finds a suitcase full of money from the crime scene, the ethical schism that tears through his humdrum existence leads him to a tragic but inevitable fate.
The cathartic conclusion, despite not being as elaborate and showy as the opening, holds tremendous power. What seemed impenetrable at first becomes clear -- and simple really -- not with wordy expositions, but somehow through the logical way the events fit together. I was reminded of those final scenes in a Robert Bresson film, particularly Pickpocket and L'Argent, in which spiritual redemption and tragedy run side by side.
The images of Tarr are some of the most long-lasting imprints in recent memory. They haunt and linger like few others, only to surface with greater impact upon hindsight and reflection. I've been an admirer of Tarr since I saw his 7 1/2 hour masterpiece Satantango, and that admiration deepened and cemented with Werckmeister Harmonies. I believe that amongst the great virtuosos of contemporary world cinema, he may truly be the worthy successor to Tarkovsky; a bona fide master of austere cinema with his own maturely defined grammar.
---
Remaining screentimes:
Saturday September 8 12:45PM @ SCOTIABANK THEATRE
Friday September 14 8:30PM @ VARSITY
(Photo: Scene from The Man from London)
Comments (5)
Did we see the same movie? I think you might have been reading too much into it or were too acquainted with the press release synopsis. The camera work was amazing, I'll give you that, but what good is it when all it's doing is hanging on the most boring subject matter I've seen at the Festival in years. After I endured three, five minute takes of people eating soup, I got up and left. Is this considered 'challenging', because it's impolite to call it boring and we're all polite Canadians?
And why was Tilda Swinton in it, only to have her dialogue dubbed over? If she couldn't speak the language, or learn it, it's just a gimmick. This film didn't work.
I totally agree with you, wb. I was completely bored with this film. I understand what the director was trying to do by stretching out time but there was nothing that held my interest. The plot was paperthin. Sure, the opening continuous shot technique was impressive, but, technique does not a movie make. I stuck it out till the end but there was no payoff, nothing except more vacant looks that conveyed nothing to me.
The first time I went out of my way to vote for a film in order to give it a 1. And I'm Hungarian and wanted to support the "home team".
I was impressed by the movie. It's definitely not for everyone, but it's a very detailed analysis of the main character in the movie. It's a very difficult movie to watch and very bleak (not very bright).
Boy do you guys have short attention spans. Time to microwave some popcorn and watch MTV for 2 hours.
As as been noted elsewhere, there are those who regard Bela Tarr as either a visionary genius or a crashing bore. I belong firmly in the former camp. This is a pure work of art in which images and moods are painted with light. But there are many who are bored with this, and other Tarr films. One of the reasons is what Nenad says: those brought up on an MTV visual/aural view of the world struggle with his films, and label them 'boring'. It is about attention span. Sure, Tarr's films demand the viewer be engaged and doesn't present it all on a plate, like a Big Mac. Tarr is the 'slow cooking' of the movie world: if you want a Big Mac, go to McDonalds, if you want a proper, decent, film, go see this.














RSS