<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>blogTO Recent Comments: Should the Toronto Archives be on Flickr Commons?</title>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/feed/recentcomments/?8456</link>
<description>Comments recently made in this post on blogTO</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:41:14 PST</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Sameer Vasta</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Glad the link got you exploring David!]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c255136</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c255136</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:50:39 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>David E</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Thank you for the link to the archives.  I've had a wonderful time looking at many fine quality photos of
localations, events  and buildings.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c255117</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c255117</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:12:24 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sameer Vasta</title>
<description><![CDATA[
That's a great question about Open Standards, particularly since much talk around the web these days has been centered on Data Portability and open formats.

http://www.dataportability.org/

I have peeked around the Microformats standards to see if any would apply, but I'll have to admit that my technical know-how may have limited me, because I don't see anything that may apply.  Perhaps someone needs to talk to the Microformats people to see how this kind of photo sharing can be incorporated?

http://microformats.org/]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c255063</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c255063</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:22:52 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Disparishun</title>
<description><![CDATA[
The general idea is a great one.  If there were someone coordinating volunteers to get the encoding done, I would gladly volunteer.

As to Flickr, Wikimedia Commons, and so forth: I guess best would be if there were some platform-neutral way of publishing all of the photos in such a format that services like Flickr and Wikimedia Commons could easily subscribe to and import them.  Is there an open standard for this kind of thing?]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254994</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254994</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:22:16 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sameer Vasta</title>
<description><![CDATA[
You're right Alden, there is already a wealth of information that is available online: the problem is that the UI is pretty horrible and it requires familiarity with the system in order to find what you're looking for.  With Flickr, however, serendipity is increased, as people would be able to find archival photos in a variety of different ways.

Maybe the first step is to fix up the current Archives online UI?  Hey, wait, I do that for a living -- I should give them a call.  =)

The second thing, of course, is the fact that very few people in the city are aware of the fact that the Archives even exist.  They definitely need some serious PR to get the word out -- a bit like the PR that the LoC got when they partnered with Flickr!]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254920</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254920</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:02:56 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rick</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I'd love to see the archives online.  It would really help my On This Spot column. 
(=]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254916</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254916</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:33:21 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AldenC</title>
<description><![CDATA[
The city archives' online collection isn't so bad once you get the hang of their filing and searches system.  If anything they should make their online resources more user friendly.  It took me a while before I got the hang of it.  There's lots already online to get yourself lost for hours through there site.  You just have to learn how to use their search engine.  If what you are looking for has not been digitized yet you can always go to the archives and view it for free.

Ideally yes we would want everything digitized but everything has a price and it looks like the city can't afford it right now. Sucks but for the mean time we can do with what we got...]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254911</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254911</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:32:11 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gregg</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Yes, the Archives.  Thanks for reminding me, now I'm ready to head up to the Casa Loma area to check it out again.  The free admission and research facilities are not bad I must say.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254898</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254898</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:25:52 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sameer Vasta</title>
<description><![CDATA[
To be honest <b>Danielle</b>, if it weren't for the excellent "On This Spot" posts on blogTO, I would have no idea about the gems that are hidden in the Archives.  They definitely need more exposure!

<b>Mark</b>, that's how I originally conceived the process, but realized that it would require significant human resources to curate the digital crowdsourced collection (depending on the level of engagement of users, of course) and it doesn't look like the City is ready to devote the kind of money that would be necessary for that kind of human resource need.

All that ties directly into what <b>Bart</b> was saying: digitization is going to require money and time, two things the City doesn't seem to want to devote to something like the Archives.  Is there some way the Toronto online community can make this easier (both financially and resource-wise) for the City?

Anyone have any ideas on what we can do to persuade the City that this is a good idea, and that we're willing to help?]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254887</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254887</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:40:03 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>bart</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Every archive should be following LoC's lead! I don't think the pitfalls of crowdsourcing metadata is an issue at all. the photos that LoC posts on flickr all have links to LoC's own digital archive where you can find the proper metadata + do searches based on that metadata. what flickr does is extend that collection to a larger community of users thereby utilizing the digital collection even more which is the whole point of making it's collection available digitally. so what if the photos just as findable than any other photos on flickr? they'll still be seen by far more people than if they weren't on flickr at all.

as for the toronto archives, digitizing a collection and cataloging it properly requires a bit of funding and a lot of initiative. from my experience, libraries and archives are still predominantly filled with people just shy of retirement so it might take a bit of time before any major digitization happens.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254879</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254879</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:05:39 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mark Dowling</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Perhaps it could be curated (i.e. professionally moderated) so all changes would be reviewed by a Toronto Archivist before being committed to the piece concerned.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254874</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254874</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:40:00 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Danielle</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I was so impressed with the vast array of STUFF there, at Doors Open this past year. I think it could really be fascinating if we had better access to that stuff!
]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254873</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2008/01/should_the_toronto_archives_be_on_flickr_commons/#c254873</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:30:59 PST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>