<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments on &quot;Ford's lawyer claims errors in conflict of interest case&quot; - blogTO</title>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/feed/recentcomments/?33114</link>
<description>Comments recently made in this post on blogTO</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:45:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>mezimeen</title>
<description><![CDATA[
This just made my Thursday afternoon that much funnier, and thus that much better. Thank you crazy lawyer man.  ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385796</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385796</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:55:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ah123</title>
<description><![CDATA[
The Judge's order was not an easy read to start, but is very straight forward and thorough. It also gave one the sense that he was trying to give Ford an out but couldn't do so because of Ford's own words and conduct even at trial.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385764</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385764</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:36:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Soren</title>
<description><![CDATA[
The mayor should not be taking any money from lobbyists. When do we get to vote for one who understands what corruption is?]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385753</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385753</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:06:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>John</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Ok, let's get this by election going so we can vote this embarrassment out of office so he can get back to his real job coaching football ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385742</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385742</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:16:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>LOL</title>
<description><![CDATA[
LOL they are really grasping at straws here.
What a joke!]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385738</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385738</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:55:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AllanG</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Ford and his lawyer's definition of "error of judgement" would virtually guarantee that no one was ever punished because the very act of doing something wrong is an "error in judgement". He is arguing that no matter how egregious a conflict of interest might be, it's an "error of judgement" by definition and by law, exempt from any penalties. 

WOW. And appeal court judges are actually going to get to rule on this? This is a supposed to be a serious legal defense? Maybe Ford should get a new lawyer?]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385734</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385734</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:35:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MS</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Going to be tricky to convince the appellate judges that Ford made an mistake when he swore up and down on the stand that he did not make a mistake, was absolutely intending to do what he did, and would do it again if he had the chance.

The lawyer has to allege things like this but he has zero chance.
]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385729</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385729</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:19:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jacob</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Basically, "Ford did nothing wrong."

Par for the course. Ford has never done anything wrong, in his entire life.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385728</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2012/12/fords_lawyer_claims_errors_in_conflict_of_interest_case/#c1385728</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:17:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>