<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>blogTO Recent Comments: Sexy Girls and Sexy Lingerie Go Well Together</title>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/feed/recentcomments/?13821</link>
<description>Comments recently made in this post on blogTO</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:58:27 PST</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>sexy lingerie</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I like the girls with lingerie, now a days lingerie wear become fashion, but i agree 100%. not many things are more laughable than a fat woman describing herself as 'voluptuous]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c703832</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c703832</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:14:32 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kevin</title>
<description><![CDATA[
People need to understand a little more about anatomy in that Fat vs. Muscle, and the ratio of measurements that the body composition reveals are what determine the overall body shape.

On top of that is "how you carry it" meaning, usually, you know how to move and express yourself through movement. Our culture is far too ignorant about the basic ingredients of beauty because there is not much opportunity to sell those ideas. But keeping women hungry and ignorant is not sexy, it's sexist.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c703604</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c703604</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:06:47 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ppsed</title>
<description><![CDATA[
i dont know how some of you say that bigger girls that have some fat on them aren't sexy, all they are are thicker versions of the skinny ones!

and note: big does not mean unhealthy! i used to be big and i was way more fit and healthier than I am now!]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c648028</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c648028</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 22:54:45 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>B.</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Let's see. 
In the first paragraph, you applaud designers for having models who are "outside the norm", which means you misinterpreted the first part of the article. 
I believe Brinony was implying that lingerie shows (like this, or Victoria's Secret, for example) are a nice change from seeing non-lingerie high fashion shows, where the models are generally super thin. So whether they had more or less cellulite/etc than Victoria's Secret models/"typical lingerie models", too, is both a subjective view and something most of us will never know.

Also, to compare these women to super extra thin models and have that somehow mean that they're outside the norm is really dumb.
These women are beautiful model-y ladies. 
(Related aside: I never get how if someone is thin but flat, that means they're skinny, but two giant half-moons on an angular frame is apparently "curvy". Trickery!)

Also dumb is your "externally sexy" comment, not only because it's just dumb but because that is an opinion and not a statement of facts. ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c636073</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c636073</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:58:28 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>bounce</title>
<description><![CDATA[
all the women pictured, can lounge in their undies on my couch any day of the week... ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635920</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635920</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:11:36 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ken</title>
<description><![CDATA[
"not many things are more laughable than a fat woman describing herself as 'voluptuous'"

A misogynist on the internet might be one of them though. 

]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635732</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635732</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:22:05 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>t</title>
<description><![CDATA[
simuls - i agree 100%.  not many things are more laughable than a fat woman describing herself as 'voluptuous'.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635681</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635681</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:27:09 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>simuls</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I actually looked at the photos before reading the article and the first thing that popped into my head was "these women are super attractive, but not your typical lingerie models, what's up?" So it was interesting to back track and see that it was intentional on the lingerie maker's part. Good for them!

Here's where I might get in trouble with Catherine. The above models ARE truly curvaceous and voluptuous, but there's a difference between that and fat. I seriously wish fat women would stop using those words to describe themselves. It's disingenuous and only used to make them feel better about being unhealthy. There's simply no such thing as a healthy or externally sexy person who is 15 or more pounds overweight (that goes for men too). And this isn't about "body types" - again that's just an excuse.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635645</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635645</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:16:50 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>conscious</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Indeed the opener of the article does not make any sense when you look at the women in these photos... holy *@!#, look at the women in these photos!]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635640</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635640</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:54:11 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ddt</title>
<description><![CDATA[
what's so offensive about playful discourse and healthy sexuality?...plus the author's right,lol]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635520</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635520</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:08:39 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Catherine Kustanczy</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I agree with Marc -these women aren't really that far from "skinny minny" -though the opening paragraph leaves so much to be desired, it's hard to know where to start. Perhaps best not to.

However, if you really want proof of "le thin" here, all you have to do is look at the lines featured: Simone Perele, Passionata, LeJaby, etc, do NOT make sizes that reflect or accommodate the bodies of truly curvaceous women. Passionata and Chantelle do, but some of the pieces are hard to find- and if you do, they're not the pretty things that come in smaller sizes. So again, there's a limitation on how fabulous your underthings can be if you have a certain type of body. 

While the lines Briony wrote of are gorgeous, again, keep in mind they aren't made for voluptuous women. I've frequently wished LeJaby's stuff came in the more so-called "unusual" sizes manufacturers like Freya and Gossard specialize in. 

For those of us who know our lingerie, the proof's in the labels when it comes to skinny minnies. ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635516</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635516</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:58:56 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>piccola</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Seriously, these women have perfect bodies - I don't see any of the jiggle or cellulite mentioned, and I got a much closer look than these photos provide.

@jamesmallon: Are you saying these ladies have less-than-ideal bodies? If so - dude, you are PICKY. There's no denying that lots of people in North America are overweight or obese, but I don't see how that's relevant here.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635515</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635515</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:58:10 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wolfmanharv</title>
<description><![CDATA[
The opening of this article was so offensive to me that I did not continue reading it.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635498</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635498</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:28:17 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>jamesmallon</title>
<description><![CDATA[
'Supermodels' are far too skinny, and although all of these women would look quite fine in full dress on the street, perhaps not to my taste in lingerie.  Anything on display should be an ideal form.  We N. Americans have let both our own physiques, and what we are used to seeing, stray too far from an ideal.

There are a lot of people who will be offended by that comment; however, of the 2/3 overweight or obese N. Americans, few have health concerns that caused that - rather than the other way around.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635496</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635496</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:22:39 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ddt</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Now this kicks ass....]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635469</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635469</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:02:24 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marc Lostracco</title>
<description><![CDATA[
THESE women are what you consider an alternative to "skinny minny" models, with "jiggling, stretchmarks, cellulite" and "boobs and bums"?!  Wow.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635444</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635444</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:21:44 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kenny</title>
<description><![CDATA[
:)]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635431</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/fashion_style/2009/07/sexy_girls_and_sexy_lingerie_go_well_together/#c635431</guid>
<category>Toronto, Fashion & Style</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:46:23 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>