<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>blogTO Recent Comments: Morning Brew: January 13, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/feed/recentcomments/?11947</link>
<description>Comments recently made in this post on blogTO</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:35:36 PST</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Diane</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Off Road Action, the media did today report that 13 of the 16 employees being charged were not even at work at the time.

That the OPP would knowingly charge these people anyway is a clear abuse of their power.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c377532</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c377532</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:30:42 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Off Road Action</title>
<description><![CDATA[
"Three young men died in a car crash last July after leaving a Muskoka golf club, and now 16 staff members, including managers and executives, of that club were charged with serving the victims too much booze. The accused will have to prove there was no negligence in order to not be found guilty, but I'm thinking that when you serve three young men 31 drinks in just a couple of hours - and then let them drive away - you are more likely to become a shining example of negligence, not the other way around."

Three young men drank to much, than got in their father's car, then drove that car and something terrible happened. When do people start taking responsbility for their own actions. The servers didn't make them drink, the owner didn't tell them to drive home, the bartender didn't give them beer cans before coming into the bar."

What is not being told to the media or by the media is that the driver was not dinking, the corner is a well known hazard that is usually taken at 40km instead of 120km/h and why the kitchen manager is being charged when he had no clue about what customers are drinking how much. He is in charge of running the kitchen, not keeping an eye on how much customers are drinking. 

This is all about some rich Toronto parents not wanting their children to accept responsibilty...typical! People need to start taking responsibilty for their actions and the actions of their children. 

]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c377026</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c377026</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:08:29 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parkdalian</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Thanks again for resorting to name calling Jack. And don't forget to re-read "badboys" comment about you. I think he says everything that's needed. 
Regards,




]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376752</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376752</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:39:29 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>jack</title>
<description><![CDATA[
now you know why you are called an idiot]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376699</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376699</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:29:52 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parkdalian</title>
<description><![CDATA[
You blame me for the mix-up? Really?

Just thought i'd point out that beside our names on here, you know, beside the date and time of our comments.. there reads "replying to a comment from". 

But i won't hold that against you. We all make mistakes.

]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376265</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376265</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:06:44 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr. Negative</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Ok I'm going on like a babbling idiot but you posted right after me and didn't shed a skylight onto whom you were respond too... so thought it was for me. You didn't say me nor jack. I hold you personally responsible for this mix up.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376255</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376255</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:55:27 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parkdalian</title>
<description><![CDATA[
*sigh... Mr. negativity, please read to whom i'm responding to when writing on here please. I was responding to Jack.

And in regards to the skylight, i never said it was the be-all-end-all of city initiatives. Of course it's not high end infrastruture, it's simply a "different" and fun addition to our otherwise sometimes bleek architectural urban landscape(*I dont want to sound too negative now..haha) 

On another topic, one other ThinkToronto proposal was the illuminated crystal-like TTC entrances! Wow.. what is it with me with the underground and lights today!(haha) 




]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376236</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376236</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:44:19 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr Negative</title>
<description><![CDATA[
No I'm not all for the PATH!! The only times I ever used it was when we was young we'd get drunk with know where to go like some kids do, and we'd go down into the path at night and walk about and stumble around.

Its one thing to come up with an idea it's another how actual feasible it is. I agree with Jack in that is the lighting in the underground really the biggest thing on our plate for improving Toronto? Its sort of a Neato idea... maybe cool in a designey way but really you'll be in the underground stare up at the skylight then move on, thats not really any improvement or innovative.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376226</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376226</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:28:23 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ryan L.</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I think the PATH system needs a BIA specifically for the underground retailers.

- Consistant and CLEAR wayfinding signage located at regular intervals.

- Garbage Cans and Benches at regular intervals.  These don't have to be the same style, as each underground mall might prefer something that matches their decor, but in the event multiple malls are okay with the same design, they could save money on larger bulk orders (same goes for other 'furniture')

- Lets be honest, the Eaton Centre is going to be a major destination for most people.  Directional arrows in regular locations indicating how to get there (and other major landmarks, such as City Hall) would be better than the current system (Only adjacent buildings are indicated on signage)

- Major Hubs, such as Dundas Square or Union Station should also have adequete signage showing the directions to all of these places.

- More visible surface access.  Most people are surprised to find out of underground malls.  Skylights would do this very well, but there are also other means.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376223</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376223</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:19:37 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parkdalian</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Oh WOW.. now your all FOR the PATH?!! Well..... this discussion should have ended many posts ago shouldn't it have?!(geez)

Good night folks! Pleasure discussing these topics(*my bad, not debating)




]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376220</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376220</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:14:41 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr Negative</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Of course I expect debate, comments etc thats how it all works lets try a sample of how it could go, 

"we could see that skylights could either create jobs for people(maybe those BUMS you speak of?) or better yet, have a de-frost device installed in them to keep them clear of snow and ice."

Create jobs, these skylights aren't gonna create any jobs, it will create a contract for a company to install and maintain them. You wanna create jobs, buy an automobile and save a few GM or FORD jobs, plus oil and gas industry jobs. You should drive and not use the PATH if you want to go the employment angle. ALSO PEOPLE it really depends on how much of the underground is exposed to street level that skylights could go in, alot of it exists right under office towers and private property, then is exposed to the sidewalk crosses the street then back under a tower. It may just be a few of them here and there...]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376219</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376219</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:13:46 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parkdalian</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Thanks Negativity, duely noted(*that you have no idea what the difference is between posting a though or opinion on a blog to debating an opinion on a blog) Way to contradict yourself. 
I'm also not here to debate or put anyone down, let's be clear on that. I'm simply stating my opinion as to why your opinions don't necessarily "stick" with me(*if that's ok) You should expect a little debate when posting a comment on a world-wide blog by the way. With all due respect.
  ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376210</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376210</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:00:54 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>jack</title>
<description><![CDATA[
if you call this innovation, you really need to go see the world.. I am all for the PATH, just not the sky lights

As for what they have in hk and japan.. you should go see it for yourself..]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376208</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376208</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:55:22 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr. Constant Negativity</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Thanks Parkdalian glad you like in a sarcastic way. 

Just so you're aware I'm not here to debate just to share my thoughts, points and brainstorm with the rest of you, I put it out there and see if it sticks, not here to argue with you about why you're terribly wrong.
]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376139</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c376139</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:27:17 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parkdalian</title>
<description><![CDATA[
My appologize Jack, for misinterpreting your disgust for the PATH. I should have read between the lines that you really do have something(*something!) positive to say about the PATH.
Also, where did i say we should be like Japan or HK? Can we not design or innovate ourselves? And when did I say the PATH doesn't have it's flaws??(*ie. signage) Sounds like someone else was jumping the gun on what others are thinking. It goes both ways on email unfortunately. Except, i don't resort to name calling.

ANd to Mr. Negativity, great response! Way to debate an issue!!! ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375934</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375934</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:09:07 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>badbhoy</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Jeez, take it easy.  Just because you haven't been able to construct a rational argument why you don't like PATH doesn't mean you have to start attacking people.

You didn't specifically say that it serves no purpose, but you did say things like "it leads nowhere", "the stores are boring" and "what good is this".

And your response to fact that PATHconnects to the Eaton Centre is that most stores in malls in Canada are boring as well?  What are you looking for?  Waterslides?  Do they have that in Japan and Hong Kong?]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375779</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375779</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:46:48 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr. Constant Negativity</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Skylights on the side walks, rooftop gardens, people walking underground... CRAZY WORLD I tell you. Craaaazzzy World.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375756</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375756</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:30:31 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>jack</title>
<description><![CDATA[
hey idiot, don't twist my words.. where did I say the PATH has NO purpose.. learn how to read before commenting, asshole... if the skylights idea was that good.. people in Hong Kong and Japan would have adopted that..and if the PATH was really that great, we wouldn't be even having this conversation...]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375753</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375753</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:27:29 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parkdalian</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Maybe Jack and Mr. Constant Negativity should merge as one and create a MEGA-negativity group(*if you run, there might be room in Facebook!) 
First off, stores "everywhere" are sometimes boring(*deal with it) And to suggest that the PATH has no purpose, is incredibly ignorant and ridiculous(*no disrespect) As i mentioned in another article post, maybe if we were more "positive-minded" we could see that skylights could either create jobs for people(maybe those BUMS you speak of?) or better yet, have a de-frost device installed in them to keep them clear of snow and ice. 
And lastly, what does the stores not attractive have anything to do with this ThinkToronto idea of a skylight??
]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375742</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375742</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:11:35 PST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mr. Constant Negativity</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Ok seeing as how everyone's so keen on paying 5 cents for a useless plastic bag, you all understand things cost money right? There should be a toll for using the PATH 5 cents to enter and 5 cents to exit UNLESS you have a valid receipt from one of the stores proving that you purchased something while down there. Improvements and maintenance cost money, you ain't gonna be using the PATH to stay warm and get light for no reason, if it's worth it pay the toll or walk outside!]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375739</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/city/2009/01/morning_brew_january_13_2009/#c375739</guid>
<category>Toronto, City</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:08:18 PST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>