<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>blogTO Recent Comments: There Must be 50 Ways to Kill Your Lover</title>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/feed/recentcomments/?10168</link>
<description>Comments recently made in this post on blogTO</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:10:50 PST</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Lisa Bradburn</title>
<description><![CDATA[
This statement is found on the Edward Day Gallery site referencing the coalition:
The Appropriation Art Coalition, a coalition of art professionals across Canada oppose Bill C-61, advocating that if the new legislation is passed, it will make it "illegal to access existing material, modify it, comment on it and/or publicly display it.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c295835</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c295835</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:22:17 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harold Ortiz</title>
<description><![CDATA[
hi Lisa, very cool meeting you @ Edward Day's... I was thinking on writing a rant re. Bill C-61 or start a facebook group. if it's not too late... will keep you posted.

 here's a link from the days I used to write for art's sake/
 
http://www.dianefarrisgallery.com/artist/xiong/press/redlands.htm]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c294089</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c294089</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:38:25 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brett</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Please check out the Edward Day Gallery website for the full press release :(http://www.edwarddaygallery.com/exhibitions.htm)

BoingBoing has a great article on the show that you could possibly reference :(http://www.boingboing.net/2008/07/06/toronto-gallery-hang.html)

There is no 'Appropos Group' or 'coalition', not sure where you got that information from. There are also press releases available at the gallery.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c293497</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c293497</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:13:57 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>lou</title>
<description><![CDATA[
The bill is a result of applying analog thinking to a digital medium. What it really does is erode the concept of a public commons owned (and maintained) by all Canadians, not corporations.

Balancing the need for a public commons against the needs of balance sheets can be accomplished in other ways.

Barney doesn't need to die.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c293039</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c293039</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:58:20 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lisa Bradburn</title>
<description><![CDATA[
All of the artists represented at the show are being impacted by the law and stand opposed to C-61 collectively through The Appropos Group. According to the bio, John Oswald had his music and performances of Michael Jackson shut down by the recording industry representing Jackson.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c293014</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c293014</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:30:01 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Greg J. Smith</title>
<description><![CDATA[
I don't really understand this show. Okay, it is obviously about sampling pop culture/mass media.. but is it in response to C-61 or is whoever curating it just framing it that way? I can't really read the intent of the show through the rhetoric. Regardless, the images look nice. I wonder what John Oswald's contribution is..]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c292991</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c292991</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:46:14 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jerrold</title>
<description><![CDATA[
Thanks, Nate. Fixed.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c292922</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c292922</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:05:44 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>nate</title>
<description><![CDATA[
whet. gouging.]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c292920</link>
<guid>http://www.blogto.com/arts/2008/07/there_must_be_50_ways_to_kill_your_lover/#c292920</guid>
<category>Toronto, Arts</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:59:16 PDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>