Toronto not taking the LEED?

Toronto LEEDGreen buildings and LEED certification are virtually synonymous in North America. But green buildings and Toronto are not. The city is failing to embrace the "green revolution" in building design, which takes into account sustainability criteria such as energy efficiency, materials, indoor environmental quality, and water use.

According to the CaGBC's data (the LEED authority in Canada), Toronto only has 8 certified buildings, which puts us well behind smaller cities like Vancouver (15 buildings) and Calgary (11 buildings).

An article published on Treehugger.com last month, entitled "Building a Green Toronto: A Tale of Woe", highlights the frustration felt by proponents of green projects in Toronto, who feel the City isn't doing enough. The City is actually holding back such projects, and a lack of coordination between departments means that Toronto is a long way from fast-tracking green development.

The City does have a Green Development Standard, a list a lofty best practices. But it's unclear if the document is anything more than a feel-good document full of things that would be great if there was any sort of implementation plan. In one of the reports on its own website, the City claims, "At this point, Toronto does not have the authority to require developers to meet the green development standard."

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is the only recognized certification for buildings that have green design features. There are 3 grades or levels: Gold, Silver, and Bronze and certain criteria are required and verified for each designation to be given. This image gallery shows some innovative design examples of what can be done in a variety of categories to improve building design.

Buildings in Toronto that are LEED certified include:
HOK Canada Urbana Architects Office (505-720 King Street West) (pictured above)
Radiance @ MintoGardens (Yonge & Sheppard)
Herman Miller Canada National Design Centre (462 Wellington Street, West)
Metro Label Printing Facility (999 Progress Ave)
TEDCO/Canpar Distribution Facility (205 New Toronto Street, Etobicoke)
Thomas L. Wells Public School (69 Nightstar Road)
M5V Presentation Centre (363 King St. W)
Minto Roehampton (150 Roehampton Avenue)


View Larger Map

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

I worked at 720 King for a while. It didn't seem to be any different from a regular office building. Is it just the one office that has LEED?

Posted by: Ben at May 28, 2008 8:35 AM

It would be the whole building. I took a look around and didn't notice much either, but there could be some interesting details that just aren't very obvious. Weird how they don't have any info about it inside on the main floor..

You didn't notice any difference in the bathrooms/lighting/ etc?

Posted by: Greg Davis [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 28, 2008 9:34 AM

What about Mountain Equipment Co-op? It's a very
environmentally responsible building. I wonder why
it's not considered a green building.

Posted by: David Toronto at May 28, 2008 9:39 AM

@David Toronto

My guess: Either MEC doesn't qualify because it doesn't meet the required critera, or they haven't applied for LEED certification.

Posted by: Jerrold at May 28, 2008 9:46 AM

@David sounds about right. MEC building has some nice features inside but they probably took the building over just renovated, doubt it was built with LEED in mind.

Posted by: Greg Davis [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 28, 2008 10:03 AM

Really interesting post, Greg. Any idea how those 8 buildings end up ranking? (i.e., Gold, Silver, or Bronze?)

Posted by: andrea. at May 28, 2008 10:06 AM

@Greg Davis
I believe that MEC was a purpose-built building. What was there before was completely demolished and MEC started from scratch.
Does that mean MEC falls outside the criteria?

Posted by: David Toronto at May 28, 2008 10:08 AM

Does LEED certification require the building owner to give the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design group a bunch of money to process the application?

There in might be your answer why there are not more buildings certified.

Posted by: Ryan L. at May 28, 2008 10:40 AM

@Ryan L.

Perhaps the cost is a deterrent. It would be great to have see cost benefit reports from these 8 buildings that have the certification.

Posted by: Jerrold at May 28, 2008 10:45 AM

There's actually a fourth level of LEED certification, Platinum. You do have to register with the Canadian Green Building Council and there is a fee, which is calculated based on the size of the building. A new LEED section, LEED for Homes is supposed to be introduced in Canada soon.

Posted by: Mark at May 28, 2008 10:46 AM

Andrea that info is available on the CaGBC website I just didn't include that detail..

Posted by: Greg Davis [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 28, 2008 10:51 AM

re Greg: I don't know. It just seemed like a normal building.

The ward 20 newletter from a few months ago had a long list of buildings that were seeking zoning approval and so forth. One was a LEED platinum certified building to be constructed on the empty parking lot on Queen West, just West of University. See page 8:
http://www.adamvaughan.ca/AV-newsletter/newsletters/Vaughan-E_Newsletter%20-%202007%2002%2001.pdf

Posted by: Ben at May 28, 2008 11:23 AM

We'll soon have another in Toronto - Artscape's Green Arts Barns will be the first heritage building redevelopment project in Canada with LEED Canada Certification.
LEED features at the Barns include: geo-thermal heating; ventilation and air conditioning system; a storm water harvesting and reuse system for all non-potable water use (i.e. greenhouse, landscaping, toilets); and energy efficient lighting and appliances and water conserving plumbing fixtures. Through careful waste management, 75% of all construction waste is being diverted from landfill ? almost unheard of in the construction industry. In addition, 30% percent of the building materials used are extracted and manufactured locally. On the sustainability front, the Barns will feature a year-round temperate greenhouse, sheltered garden, outdoor bake oven and compost demonstration site run by The Stop Community Food Centre. The Stop will also host weekly farmer?s markets on the site and education programs for children around food and sustainability.
www.torontoartscape.on.ca/barns

Posted by: Sue [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 28, 2008 12:13 PM

Coming soon... Artscape's Green Arts Barns will be the first heritage building redevelopment project in Canada with LEED Canada Certification. Artscape is transforming the Wychwood TTC Streetcar Repair Barns into a 60,000 square foot community hub and environmental centre located in Toronto?s St. Clair and Bathurst neighbourhood
LEED features at the Barns include: geo-thermal heating; ventilation and air conditioning system; a storm water harvesting and reuse system for all non-potable water use (i.e. greenhouse, landscaping, toilets); and energy efficient lighting and appliances and water conserving plumbing fixtures.
Through careful waste management, 75% of all construction waste is being diverted from landfill ? almost unheard of in the construction indiustry. In addition, 30% percent of the building materials used are extracted and manufactured locally.
On the sustainability front, the Barns will feature a year-round temperate greenhouse, sheltered garden, outdoor bake oven and compost demonstration site run by The Stop Community Food Centre. The Stop will also host weekly farmer?s markets on the site and education programs for children around food and sustainability.

www.torontoartscape.on.ca/barns

Posted by: Sue [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 28, 2008 12:16 PM

We?ll have another one soon ? Artscape?s Green Arts Barns. The Barns will be the first heritage building redevelopment project in Canada with a LEED Canada Certification LEED features at the Barns include: geo-thermal heating; ventilation and air conditioning system; a storm water harvesting and reuse system for all non-potable water use (i.e. greenhouse, landscaping, toilets); and energy efficient lighting and appliances and water conserving plumbing fixtures.
Through careful waste management, 75% of all construction waste is being diverted from landfill ? almost unheard of in the construction indiustry. In addition, 30% percent of the building materials used are extracted and manufactured locally.
On the sustainability front, the Barns will feature a year-round temperate greenhouse, sheltered garden, outdoor bake oven and compost demonstration site run by The Stop Community Food Centre. The Stop will also host weekly farmer?s markets on the site and education programs for children around food and sustainability.
www.torontoartscape.on.ca/barns

Posted by: Sue [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 28, 2008 12:26 PM

why do good things always cost so much?

Posted by: jack at May 28, 2008 12:47 PM

Canada boasts itself of being a "green" country, but there is so much more that our governemnt(s) could do than just talk!

Posted by: eric at May 28, 2008 12:58 PM

If good things didn't cost so much then someone wouldn't be able to buy themselves a 4th bigscreen TV

Posted by: Ryan L. at May 28, 2008 12:58 PM

It's not that good things cost so much, it's that we've become accustomed to building things on the cheap (which often costs us more in the long run).

Posted by: Ratpick at May 28, 2008 1:55 PM

It is not entirely fair to compare the number of LEED certified projects in Vancouver to Toronto, since LEED came into development in on the west coast before becoming a national program. In fact, if you look at the number of projects that are registered with the CaGBC, the number in Toronto exceeds that in Vancouver or Calgary (89 compared to 79 or 51). Toronto is well on its way to catching up and even exceeding Vancouver in terms of numbers of LEED certified buildings. Many projects under construction are already aiming for LEED certification. Consider the three large office towers currently under construction downtown. Telus Tower is aiming for LEED Silver, RBC Centre is aiming for LEED Gold, and Bay Adelaice Centre recently increased their aim from Silver to Gold.

@David: the MEC building was designed and built before LEED ever came out here. It is entirely possible that it could qualify for LEED certification, however, the process of LEED certification involves quite a bit of paperwork (materials tracking, waste diversion, recyced content, etc.)

@Jerrold
There is actually an excellent example of the additional cost of making a building LEED. Vaughan Fire Station No. 7-9 & York Region EMS Paramedic Response Station was built based on the same design as another station in Vaughan, except this time they made modifications to the design to make it LEED Gold. The building has 35% energy savings and 52% water savings compared to its non-green counterpart, and an incremental cost of between 3 and 5%.

Posted by: alex at May 28, 2008 2:03 PM

Great comment Alex.

Toronto is the biggest city in the country so it has to deal with the biggest expectations. Its "Green Development Standard" is still pretty flawed/useless IMO.

Posted by: Greg Davis [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 28, 2008 2:16 PM

I've looked into LEED here in the States, and it's a mixed bag. On the one hand, it has serious, serious flaws. Think of it as being similar to Canada's points scheme for immigration: You get points for having lots of money, but the same points for speaking French. Are those traits really equivalent in terms of predicting immigration success? Same thing with LEED - is spending millions on solar panels really equivalent to buying a $200 bike rack? Or informing tenants of their energy use? You get the same points for each. And registering for LEED means spending tens of thousands of dollars on filing fees, extra paperwork, hiring staff to track whether that plywood traveled more than 500 miles, etc. For these reasons of costs and distortion there are some well-intentioned institutions like Princeton University that are building buildings that are very green but will not be LEED. You could, if you were extremely generous, make an argument on this basis for Toronto's lack of LEED. "We're green, we just didn't bother to register."

However, LEED is the only brand name out there, so we're kind of stuck with it as a measuring stick. Private developers need to make money by definition to pay back their bank loans and generally do not build LEED unless there is something in it for them - payback on energy savings, or a corporate tenant who insists on it for PR, or city incentives.

Toronto has weak incentives and is filled with cash-poor companies, so there is no great momentum for LEED, or at least there won't be until the banks decide to do it (but if they were that concerned about image over dollars, why are they moving offices to the burbs?)

Public institutions have led the way in the US, but good luck finding a rich university or museum in Toronto (As one example, MoMA's last expansion cost $850m).

Toronto's construction market is driven by condos, so unless someone introduces a requirement for condos (which will essentially be a tax and therefore very risky), don't expect to see too many LEED buildings anytime soon.

Posted by: uSkyscraper at May 28, 2008 2:47 PM

basically, toronto sucks. its architecture is developer derivative. the bottom line rules in this city.

but at least we have our kitschy ROM and our fantastic museum station. WHOOO plastic column covers! who the fuck needs LEED when you can architecturally-rape a subway station?

Posted by: LEE ROY BROWN at May 28, 2008 4:33 PM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

Email This Entry

Email 'Toronto not taking the LEED?' to: Message (optional):
Your email address:

Please type the verification code displayed in the image:

By forwarding this entry to a friend, we do not opt you or your friend into
receiving any additional mailings from blogTO. We hate spam too.
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.