Eat & Drink
The Battle for Ici Bistro and Why Joe Pantalone Dug His Own Grave in His Quest to Be Mayor
When chef Jean Pierre Challet applied for a liquor licence for his new restaurant Ici Bistro, he dreamed of a place where locals could meet over brioche. Little did he know he would instead bring the community together over a political battle that still lies smouldering.
After working for years in some of Toronto's most respected restaurants (The Fifth, Le Select Bistro, Windsor Arms Hotel, Auberge du Pommier) Challet turned his attention to opening a small bistro on the corner of Harbord and Manning. He was confident he had chosen the right location.
"Each time something opens in this neighbourhood people hope for a little bistro; something casual, a little bit creative. But instead it is always just another fast food restaurant. I think that we really have the right formula," said Challet.
The space he chose was small and bright, but had a dark past. In 1999, when arcade games littered the floor, an 18-year-old student was stabbed to death by a 15-year-old boy. This made local schools and business associations fearful of a repeated situation when Challet first applied for his liquor licence in 2009.
Fearing the worst, both principals of Harbord Collegiate and Clinton Street School wrote letters of opposition to the Alcohol Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO). The Palmerston Area Residents Association (PARA) added their voice to those opposing the licence.
Then, Deputy Mayor and city councillor Joe Pantalone of Ward 19 (Trinity-Spadina) joined the crusade against Ici. He would turn out to be their biggest, most challenging enemy.
Though Pantalone never visited Ici, despite numerous invitations from Challet and his partners, he was quick to put his political weight against the licence. In an interview with the Toronto Star, Pantalone said he was convinced that the bistro would only spell trouble for the neighbourhood in the future. "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," he said.
Challet would not be defeated. He found an ally in Sam James, owner of nearby Sam James Coffee Bar, who carried his croissants and his message. He attended community meetings and invited countless people into his small bistro.
"He kept an open door," said James. "He would walk people through there, show them what he was doing, what his plans were." These plans were to open a small, quality focused, fair priced establishment focused on bringing the community together.
He agreed to fifteen stipulations made by the PARA; some of these include specific business hours, no TV screens, teenagers are not allowed without guardians, smoking is allowed on Harbord Street but not on Manning, and more.
One by one his opponents became his allys.
"It created a new buzz;" said Challet, "there were neighbours who had lived a few doors from each other who had never met and suddenly they met here, they met at Sam [James Coffee Bar] for coffee. The neighbourhood came together."
When Ici finally won their license after a hearing with the AGCO, Pantalone called it "the beauty of democracy." Since then, Pantalone's secretary has approached the PARA to set up a meeting with Challet and his partners, which they have refused. As Ici finalizes licenses, construction and prepares to hire staff Challet has not warmed to the politician that "robbed" him of 6 months revenue.
"What he did here is unacceptable," said Challet. "And now we want him to be mayor? We should ask him to quit! He never supports the neighbourhood."
Sam James agrees.
"As a mayoral candidate he has left a negative impression on a lot of people as far his support of small business and community. It is something you do not expect from a politician of that tenure," said James. "But to each their own, everyone is welcome to dig their own grave."


Discussion
46 Comments
Sort By Oldest First / Newest First
Subscribe
Yeah, teenagers are going to want to go hang out in a BISTRO.
They're going to go in there and sit at tables and order snow crab bisque.
PARA and Pantalone need to go fu*k themselves.
I can't wait for Pantalone to come up my street campaigning to his safe little old Portugeuse man with cigarette demographic. I'm gonna film his answers to my ICI questions.
What were they thinking?
And I'm so hyped for this new bistro!
<br><br>
ps: I think pretty much everyone in the neighbourhood has a little crush on Mr. Sam James...
I knew I wouldn't be voting for Pantalone after several emails from him that were utter gibberish - I mean completely unintelligible - in response to basic foundational questions about his contribution to council. Hopefully his greatest contribution might be yet to come...being rightfully ousted.
The story as it is told here is one of the tenacious sticktoitiveness of entrepreneurship in overcoming political and NIMBY obstructionism, without any views from the mouths of the people who actually opposed the liquor license. If it is the case that Challet and James won people over with a concerted charm offensive, it would have been nice to hear about it from some of those people.
Keep in mind, this isn't about a rowdy nightclub trying to open up in a quiet residential area, it's a little bistro... so in this case a liquor license means serving wine to diners, not Jager shots to frat boys. I fail to see how the opposition had any justification in the first place.
"If we give Ici a liquor license then we're going to have to give one to anybody who comes to that strip wanting a liquor license. And that could mean a jager-shots-to-frat-boys bar, so let's not give anyone a liquor license based on that hypothetical situation, even though each liquor application is evaluated individually and independently of any other licenses already in play in a neighbourhood."
This election's ICI Bistro is last election's Olive & Lemon.
The old City of Toronto, pre-amalgamation had on its books, a kind of right of first refusal to new liquor licenses within a certain distance from any public school.
The original intention may be rooted in a Toronto The Good that was Puritan in its thinking.
Fast forward to today, and though it took six months for mutual understanding to develop, it could have been much quicker.
And that's one among many reasons Why I want to be on City Council in Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina.
HiMY SYeD ~ Toronto City Council Candidate ~ http://ward19.ca
p.s. Tobogganing on Sundays is still a no-no, and technically illegal. One battle at a time though. The City has many grandfathers.
on College St. as on Ossington and slowed new business interest to a crawl on College St. sure there are l GREAT places on College but what Pantalone did not realize is that maybe 20 residents most with too much time on their hands who do not support College or Ossington with their business were upset with College St. & Ossington but Thousands loved them and still do and MANY live in his Riding. Dont get me started on the PARA people i went to one meeting and was shocked at the ignorance and NIMBY
attitude of most of the people there.
In short, it was Joe Pantalone alone who remained the key opponent of the license by the time of the license hearing. This was despite the emails of support written to Pantalone by several Ici neighbours. Even the lawyer appointed by the City to oppose the license basically admitted at the hearing that the City had no case and that there was no evidence of widespread community opposition.
Pantalone called this "the beauty of democracy," but he used his bully pulpit and City power to impose his own will, while refusing to even meet with his constituents, who overwhelmingly supported this new business in their neighbourhood.
While the fate of one little bistro is not likely to affect the lives of most Torontonians, voters should consider Pantalone's behavior during this episode, and ask whether his dictatorial style has any place in the mayor's chair.
Yes, Joe Pantalone has a responsibilty to gather his own information and to lead his residents, and he may have missed the moment when the wind changed on this issue. However, the close link between ratepayers' groups and the local councillor is the kind of relationship that many would complain about if it were between a councillor and a developer, but one that we seem to overlook.
My god this is worth a blog???
Speak for yourself, this neighbour DOESNT have a crush on the coffee bar or its owner. There is a better coffee place just near the park, a real organically established place with a real not"faux" vibe.
Lets figure this out-- hmmm he has been open at this spot for months now. Could he be looking for some free advertising by fooling some guy who needs a topic for his blog?
I go by his place several times a day and 5 out of 7 days it is empty/not open. I realize it is not the prime time for restaurants, but heh when you open where the rents are MUCH MUCH less than either Bloor or College (both less than 5 mins away) I guess you want free advertising
Think people
Your slamming of Joe is below the belt. Let me guess, you have another beef with him and are using this venue to vent, like it seems lots are (you Ossington people) Sorry Joe doesnt rule the Alcohol and Gaming Commission, it is a PROVINCIAL body-- please learn the details
What is your criteria for someone establishing an "organic" business? Cut the bullshit buzz words. And what is fake about Sam's shop? He is quite possibly the most legit barista in the city, and the only vibes coming out of the shop are good ones, along with great coffee and espresso. If I were you, I'd double check before posting something inflammatory about a shop that you obviously know nothing about. In the end it will be alright - your lack of taste is demonstrated by saying that the Linux Cafe has better coffee.
On the topic of ICI - Anyone getting into business of ANY kind in this city knows to expect delays, bureaucracy and an inordinate amount of red tape from our local government. Their track record on this stuff isn't good, and I suppose unless you're a small business owner (especially restauranteurs) you would have no idea of how frustrating it can be. But aside from all that, I'm sure ICI knew there was potential for delays like this, and the added weight of a past killing in the space can't help, but again we can't help but feel for the families affected by this. Contrastingly though, these new businesses are breathing new life into a street that's often been neglected, and from what I've seen in the neighborhood there's been nothing but improvement. Moving forward isn't always a bad thing, and it's sad that someone like Pantalone is too reactionary to even make a visit to ICI to see what they were trying to do. A city councillor OWES his constituents this much, and if you disagree with that then you are a complete idiot. - Looking directly at you Carol.
Joe's concern about the Ici application was two-fold, as I understood it. Obviously, a bistro is different than a video game place that appeals to a young crowd. However, once one place gets a licence, it makes it more likely that other, nearby places will get licences too. Even places that appeal to a young crowd of the type that was ruled against the public interest before. Now, the place across the street (kitty-corner to the high school) which caters to a young crowd will apply. This corner has not previously had liquor licences. Second, if Ici goes under, the licence can follow the sale of the business. Three times the AGCO ruled that it was against the public interest for youth-oriented establishments, directly across from the high school, to have a liquor licence. Joe's concern was that Ici's application might do indirectly what the other earlier applications had tried to do that directly.
So much for the total absence of context in this bush-league article. How people can make meaningful comments about Joe Pantalone's motives and vision on this issue is beyond me, unless they know something about the underlying issues. Meanwhile, I live right down the street from Ici, and I was not aware of any outreach.
Joe Pantalone has stood up for the neighbourhood, and actually has a vision for the neighbourhood which he has consistently maintained in the 19 years I have lived here. We'll see how long Ici lasts.
before he would even speak to him my friend is a resident who actually lives close to Mr. Pantalone
none of the residents who opposed the patio had to register as Lobbyists and the AGCO found
in favour of the patio and called Mr. Pantalone's actions Irresponsible considering all the patios close by and the fact that he approved of the patio in the first place. My friend is one of the best operators on College St. and is respected in the community and works very hard 7 days a week for the last 14 years on College St. He might even be not too happy with me for writing this as he still has a good relationship with Mr. Pantalone but was shocked that Mr Pantalone took the stance he did.
Once again, another post not addressing the issuing a license to an establishment on that corner. Another post giving us some one sided tale of some other issue. Do you honestly think anyone would take your story on face value given College Street "bars/restaurants" are well known to be money laundering vehicles that routinely turn over every year or two? Who knows what your friends story is--do you think we should judge Pantalone badly because of your friends situation? really get a grip-- stick to the posted issue.
Read Reid's post-- maybe you will get the drift
peace out
Read Monday janes post if you truly want buzz words-- wow organic a buzz word?? RTM if you really care to understand the issue RTM-- read Reids post--
I feel equally for the people who've been directly affected in the past by irresponsible business owners, self righteous do-gooders, and just sheer circumstance - but I don't fully understand condemning businesses on the street because of the past, nor do I think that it's reasonable to expect your neighborhood will remain a sleepy hollow in the middle of a major metropolitan centre. But whatever, none of this will change your mind at all, I'm personally glad that ICI got their license and I plan on at least trying what they have to offer like I would any new business on the street. Your insinuation that ICI will "heh, be gone in a year or so..." is the kind of vile thing said by lonely, sad people who annoy all the neighborhood business' captive audiences (read: employees and owners) with their proselyzations.
as for business turning over and money laundering my friend as i stated has had his place on College St. for 14 years and its busier than ever and I did work there for 2 years, so i am aware of all sides of his story as i was there and still go there.
The Stabbing was in 1999 not " A few years ago" i don't buy drugs from cafes so i would not know of a cafe owner selling drugs. Adult eyes- as in the adults that own ICI as well as customers and the new shops where Sam James is which used to be home to a very old man that lived in one of the papered up stores but was recently moved to a care facility. The only business' that were there are the two convienance stores and laundramat & a bike repair. The convienance store's have been robbed many times in recent years at night once just 10 minutes after i was just there, and Events cafe which is not an Adult place. The Only places i have seen Turn over every few years were ones that were not thought out and did not fit in the area, as well if they were money laundering they would not go out of business quickly. This is BLOGTO and this is a Toronto Story not "Free Advertising" like JP needs it anyway being one of the most accomplished Chefs in the
City.
He's done damage on Harbord, and certainly on Ossington. He comes up with some total BS as to why and and goes mercilessly to town on small business owners who in many cases invest all they have to make a dream come true.
His thrust is to not allow momentum on a street to delevelop to apoint where it threatens College street west. So streets in close proximity are under his fire. I use the present tense here as, though he no longer has a seat in council, he still may have some kind of influence there given he worked behind the scenes for 30 years. Plenty of prep time to go into consulting and work a system that he knows so well... With Ford in, we'll see what happens...
Pantalone, while in power, was bought and sold over and over. He did the bidding of his cropnies and will continue this in his "consulting" position.
The city needs to take responsibility for the actions of politicians like him.
He's done damage on Harbord, and certainly on Ossington. He comes up with some total BS as to why and and goes mercilessly to town on small business owners who in many cases invest all they have to make a dream come true.
His thrust is to not allow momentum on a street to delevelop to apoint where it threatens College street west. So streets in close proximity are under his fire. I use the present tense here as, though he no longer has a seat in council, he still may have some kind of influence there given he worked behind the scenes for 30 years. Plenty of prep time to go into consulting and work a system that he knows so well... With Ford in, we'll see what happens...
Pantalone, while in power, was bought and sold over and over. He did the bidding of his cropnies and will continue this in his "consulting" position.
The city needs to take responsibility for the actions of politicians like him.