Wednesday, October 26, 2016Clear 2°C

That time the supersonic Concorde visited Toronto

Posted by Chris Bateman / May 10, 2014

Concorde Toronto planeI've always loved Concorde. I had a poster of the jet with its paper-thin wings plastered above my bed when I was five years old, and I was obsessed with trying to catch a glimpse of its swan-like body in flight from the window of my parents' car (I grew up near Heathrow Airport in London, so it actually happened once or twice.)

Although Concorde never visited Toronto as regularly as it did London, New York or Paris, in 1979, the city provided the backdrop for the first public air show appearance by the billion dollar Anglo-French aviation project. For nine tantalizing minutes one late-summer afternoon, the entire city tried to catch a glimpse of the machine that made supersonic passenger travel a reality.

concorde heathrowConcorde first came to Toronto and the CNE three years after the plane first entered commercial service. It was the first time one of the jets, the product of a joint venture between the British and French governments several decades and billions of dollars in the making, had put on a display outside of a trade show.

The first Concorde prototype, number 001, first flew in southern France on March 2, 1969. Eager onlookers crowded rooftops and lined the air strip in Toulouse as the impossibly delicate looking delta-winged plane accelerated into the air, producing a deafening roar from its four Olympus engines. BBC television in the United Kingdom covered the event live.

The iconic plane was developed in response to the planned Boeing 2707, a supersonic jetliner being cultivated in America. More than 100 Concordes were ordered by the major carriers of the day, including Pan Am, BOAC, American Airlines, Qantas, and Air Canada, which requested four. During development, the price of oil began to steadily climb, and the low-capacity jet with its propensity to guzzle fuel began to look like a less attractive investment.

One-by-one, the airlines cancelled their orders, until only British Airways and Air France remained. Air Canada officially backed out in June 1972. In the end, just 20 Concordes were built, including six prototypes. The 14 that remained were split evenly between the two airlines. Each one cost the equivalent of $222 million Canadian (2014,) twice as much as other airliners that could seat more people.

The Boeing 2707, Concorde's main rival, was cancelled in 1972 without a working prototype.

concorde air showEven by today's standards, Concorde was unbelievably fast. Over the open ocean, where it was permitted to accelerate to full speed, the plane could reach 2,140 km/h, more than twice the speed of sound. Modern airliners travel at less than half that. A trip from New York's John F. Kennedy to London Heathrow took about 3.5 hours.

In 1979, the British Airways liveried Concorde that visited Toronto became an instant local sensation. Thousands of Metro residents crowded Malton airport to catch a glimpse of the plane, packing out the parking lot and jamming local streets. Police ticketed abandoned cars on the side of the highway and urged motorists circling the field ahead of take-off to go home lest they delay actual passengers.

"Every parking space was taken. There were people and cars everywhere," British Airways' John Dawe told the Star. Only about 600 people were able to file through the cabin before the plane was scheduled to depart for its CNE appearance.

For nine minutes, Concorde, with its distinctive nose pointed downward, made four slow passes along the lake shore. At the controls, Capt. Brian Walpole put the plane through several banks and turns to show off its agility and slender profile. "It's one hell of a plane," said John Davidson, who was watching from the bleachers at the Ex. "Now I just wish I could afford to fly on it some day."

Back at Malton, the plane was re-fuelled and stocked ahead of the first supersonic flight from Toronto to London. One of 100 one-way tickets $1,069, about $3,400 in 2014 money.

Concorde became a regular fixture at the CNE air show, appearing every year from 1979 to 1987. In 1981, legendary Toronto Star photographer Boris Spremo was on board as it made its traditional flypast. Unfortunately, the extreme forces produced by a tight banked turn floated the camera from his hands at the crucial moment. "It's one of the few occasions our prize-winning photographer came back without the picture," wrote columnist Frank Jones.

In 1982, the newspaper offered a pair of supersonic London-New York tickets to the person who could snap the best picture of Concorde with the city in the background. The photo would be used by British Airways to promote a proposed regular supersonic operation between Toronto and London, a prospect that unnerved homeowners near the airport but didn't become a real threat until eight years later.

"They [Pearson] don't give a damn about the people who live here," said Deborah Boots, vice-president of the local Council of Concerned Residents, in 1990. "This is a bloody noisy aircraft and there will be some concern about that," Chern Heed, the airport's general manager, told the Star.

toronto concorde advertA regular scheduled service never fully materialized, however. At its peak, Concorde charter flights were operated out of Toronto once a week by luxury Canadian tour agents Blyth & Co. and later Nordic Tours. It took about 4.5 hours to make the trip to London, less with a tailwind. On several occasions, Toronto's airport was the start and finish for sight-seeing tours over the Arctic Circle.

Even flying on Concorde out of New York, a regular hub, was prohibitively expensive. The plane had only 100 seats, all of which were first class. Although there was no in-flight entertainment and no telephone, passengers were kept busy with champagne, caviar, pat├ę de fois gras, and filet steak served on real ceramic plates with metal cutlery.

Inside the narrow curved cabin, there were just 25 rows with two seats on either side of a central aisle. A "Machmeter" on the wall near the cockpit displayed the ground speed relative to the speed of sound. It read "M 2.02" - Mach 2.02 - as the cabin, so noisy from the sound of the afterburners that cockpit announcements were drowned out, reached its cruising speed.

It was the sound of the engines and fears over emissions that led many cities to balk at the prospect of regular visits. With the engines running at full power, Concorde made an ear-splitting din during take-off. There were also concerns that allowing the plane to break the sound barrier over land would shatter windows on the ground.

Despite the rising cost of fuel and limited service options, Concorde appeared to remain a profitable enterprise for British Airways and Air France. Fewer flying hours meant the plane aged slower and in the mid-1990s, both airlines expected to continue flying beyond 2010.

The catastrophic crash outside Paris in 2000 and industry turbulence following 9/11 finally put the kibosh on the plane. The dream of routine supersonic flight ended in smoke and ashes a little over 30 years after it began.

"The Concorde was special," said British MP Tony Benn, the country's minister of technology during development of the jet. "The quality of the work, the minds, the skill, the talent, the commitment that went into it, that's what really matters."

"It's the most brilliant example of far-sighted designers [who] thought ahead and kept a lead for half a century," he said.

English journalist Sir David Frost, a regular Concorde passenger famous for his series of interviews with U.S. president Richard Nixon that formed the basis for the movie Frost/Nixon, thought highly of the plane's aesthetics.

"There's the view of New York from the Triborough Bridge, there's the Sydney Opera House, and then there's Concorde," he said. "Arguably the three most beautiful man-made sights in the world."

Chris Bateman is a staff writer at blogTO. Follow him on Twitter at @chrisbateman.

Images: E. Gammie, P.B.Toman/Creative Commons, Russell Sutherland/blogTO Flickr pool.



Sean / May 10, 2014 at 07:42 am
Good story & details too. Never saw the plane.

A shame technology is now lagging behind.
bernie Q / May 10, 2014 at 09:44 am
Probably one of man's coolest inventions. when the concorde took off you could hear it through the soundproof glass in the airport. So sad that supersonic travel wasn't given the opportunity to evolve...
Marnie / May 10, 2014 at 09:53 am
You know, maybe Porter Airlines´╗┐ should invest in bringing these back for the island airport. ;-) Seriously though, always loved the magic and allure of the Concorde growing up and hoped that one day I might be lucky enough to take a trip on one. Alas, didn't happen but I still marvel. #aviationgeekoutmoment
Holy Thundering Jesus / May 10, 2014 at 01:26 pm
it's amazing people were allowed to stand on the lawn of the airport runway
Eric / May 10, 2014 at 05:30 pm
Great article. I was in Heathrow last month and the plane taxied by an old Concorde, that was just sitting by the terminal:

I think I remember seeing the Concorde at the air show in the 80s too. It's weird that supersonic flight has been almost forgotten for passenger flights.
Anthony O'Neill / May 10, 2014 at 07:40 pm
I remember this. We lived in Scarborough and it flew over our house. We were standing in the back yard and we saw it's distinctive silhouette. Big thrills for a young lad
BH / May 10, 2014 at 08:30 pm
Man, I remember seeing the Concorde at the air show. Beautiful passenger jet, I just wish I'd had the chance to try it before it was gone.
kstop / May 11, 2014 at 07:10 am
The Concorde's main rival (if passenger aircraft can have rivals) would actually have been the Tupolev Tu-144, which flew first but had a much shorter operational life.
David Morgan / November 14, 2014 at 09:58 pm
I saw Concorde on test flights flying over South Wales from Bristol in 1969 when I was 16. I looked up and thought what is that? I said to myself I want go on that thing. Didn’t know what a bucket list was in those days but by God it was #1 on it. I crossed it off after I got married in 1986 LHR - JFK. In 1990 I did a weekend in the UK for a wedding and flew her again this time JFK - LHR. The second time was still pre 9/11 so I asked the Captain (during the usual visit to the flight deck) if I could come up for landing. He said ask the co-pilot as he's landing us so it's his call. The co-pilot looked a bit shocked and the Captain said "if you ever want to sit in my seat you have to make decisions and Mr. Morgan has asked if he can join us for landing so.... ? The co-pilot said "well I guess so" and the Captain said "well that's sorted I'll have our chief steward bring you back just before we reach the Irish coast". So I was in the cockpit of Speedbird 002 for landing in June 1990. I will never forget the rush of the takeoffs, the purple horizon and really seeing the curve in the world and the rush of being pushed back in my seat again after the afterburners being switched on again after clearing land to go through the sound barrier. In 1986 I sat next to David Frost who slept for most of the 3½ hours the flight took which now takes 8 hours.
Wayne McKay / January 4, 2015 at 11:02 am
The Concorde was a political football, it out flew the Blackbird SR71. So ... sadly, it was destined to leave the skies just as the Avro Arrow did. It is sad when technology is stifled, because a country's military can't control it.

Just my opinion, I have really enjoyed reading this blog

All the best to all
this bug eats memories lyrics / January 31, 2015 at 01:53 am
Greg, rereading that above line I don’t mean it harshly—more tongue in cheek. Sorry if it came across more severely. A
Penn / January 31, 2015 at 06:29 am
As long as cities allow suburban sprawl to reach where airports are, we'll never be able to have anything like the Concorde (or to put it another way: 'This is why we can't have nice things.')

Also, if we'd not let suburban sprawl reach the heights that it did in Toronto, we would have land enough for a second airport that could accommodate airliners like the Concorde and the Tupolev Tu-144 without worrying about noise problems.
Norman Barry / September 10, 2015 at 03:05 am
First commercial service between Toronto and London was launched on August. 31, 1980. (Capt. Brian Walpole made the low-level swoop to the delight of onlookers.) I believe you are referring to this flight when you mention the one in 1979.

On Nov. 2, 1985, a second "first flight" Toronto-London crops up, suggesting that the 1980 inaugurated commercial route was a flop. Does anyone know what irregularities occurred or why commercial service, as originally initiated, did not pan out? Also, it looks like the second attempt enjoyed about as much success as the first.
Other Cities: Montreal